Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
INT RO DU CT I O N
P r o b le m d e fi n it io n a n d w o r k mo ti va t io n :
In PV systems, the direct energy storage systems (ESSs), such
as Lead Acid Batteries (most mature technology) play a vital
role in such systems. To Keep and extend the life time of such
storage elements, charging process is considered one of the
most important factors that affect the life time of those
batteries.The charging process includes two issues, the 1st
issue subjects to the different charging modes of Lead Acid
Batteries for PV applications as in [1], and the 2nd issue
concentrates on the charging current quality for ripples
contents, which plays a vital role for life time and aging for
such batteries.
Hence, this research aims to reduce the current ripples of the
charging converters. These converters usually used with PV
systems may be buck, boost, or buck-boost converters that are
characterized by plenty of ripples content that affect seriously
the life time of chemically storage devices, such as lead acid
batteries.
Here, in this work an interleaved topology of buck DC/DC
converter for PV charging system is proposedto achieve an
efficient charging process, while minimizing the ripple
contents in the charging current.
II. PV SYSTEM
ID
Iph
I pv I ph I 0 [exp (
Q.Vpv
) 1]
A.k .T
(1)
) 1]
pv
N s . A.k .T
10
9
8
T=25 oC
T=35 oC
6
T=45 oC
T=55 oC
5
4
3
2
1
0
10
20
30
PV voltage (V)
40
50
60
(a)
9
G=1000W/m2
G=900W/m2
G=800W/m2
G=700W/m2
6
G=600W/m2
G=500W/m2
G=400W/m2
G=300W/m2
G=200W/m2
G=100W/m2
Vpv
PV Current (A)
I.
Ipv
PV Current (A)
10
15
20
25
PV Voltage (V)
30
35
40
45
(b)
IJER@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 687
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
The maximum power point tracker searches for the MPP
through the adopted modified P&O algorithm shown in figure
(3).
S1
L1
Cout
D1
S2
- Battery +
L2
Cin
D2
D1
S1
PV1
(a)
L1
Cout
S2
Cin2
(b)
dP=Ppv(k)-Ppv(k-1)
dI= Ipv(k)-Ipv(K-1)
Yes
dP>0
Yes
Yes
NO
dI>0
dI>0
D(k)= D(k-1) +
dD
D(k) = D(k-1) dD
D(k) = d(k-1) dD
D(k)= d(k-1) +
dD
(3)
dI = Ipv(k) Ipv(k1)(4)
The output variable isdD, which is given by:
dD = D(k) - D(k-1)
(5)
L2
PV2
Calculate Ppv =
Ipv*Vpv
NO
- Battery +
D2
NO
D1
Cin1
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 688
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
Vin
C in
D, Fsw
THE
PROPOSED
C out
Vout
300 W
37.6 V
7.976 A
24 V
10 KHZ
30 %
10 mV
3
Where:
Vin(Max): Maximum input Voltage.
Vout: Output Voltage.
: Efficiency of the converter.
*D
(7)
(8)
The higher the inductor value, the higher is the max
Output current because of the reduced ripple current as
(9)
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
(14)
Page 689
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
15
10
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
1.2
(
1
6
)
(
1
7
)
Diode Selection:
(18)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
1
0.9
0.8
Of
[9]
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.044
IJER@2016
10
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.044
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 690
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
Figure 10: The three Phases currents against the total output
current.
15
10
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
(a)
(a)
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
(b)
(b)
Figure 11: (a) Simulated battery terminal voltage and
(b): The State of charge (SOC) during charging
process for two batteries of12V each.
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.044
0.044
0.0441
0.0441
0.0442
0.0442
time in sec.
0.0443
0.0444
0.0444
0.0444
0.0445
(c)
Figure 9: (a)Output current from 3-ph interleaved Buck
converter, (b) carrier signals (120o shift), and (c) gating signals
(120o shift)
IJER@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 691
Figure 14: output current for the Conventional Buck with the
designed parameters.
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
(a)
IJER@2016
i Khaled N. Faris, Hala S. Khalil, and Mohsen T. ELHagry: Fuzzy Logic Controller for Fusing Different charging Modes
in PV Systems, 3rd International Conference on new Paradigms in
Electronics and Information Technology (PEIT015), 15-19
November, 2015, Luxor, Egypt.
ii - Atef . M. Mansour, Khaled .N. Faris, Essam El-Din
AboulZahab: Smart Energy Management controller for a Micro
Grid, International Journal of Engineering Research, IJER, Volume
No.4, Issue No.8, pp : 456-464 01 August 2015.
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 692
IJER@2016
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 August 2016
vii-Jens Ejury: Buck Converter Design, Infineon
Technologies North America (IFNA) Corp.Design Notes DN 2013-01,
V1.0, 2013.
viii - S. Mouhadjer, A. Chermitti, and A. Neaibia:
Comprehensive and field study to design a buck converter for
photovoltaic systems, Revue des Energies Renouvelables Vol. 15 N2
(2012) 321 330.
ix Donald Schelle and Jorge Castorena: BuckConverter Design Demystified, Power Electronics Technology, 2006,
www. Powerelectronics.com.
x- Brigitte Hauke:, basic calculation of Buck converters
power stage, application report, TEXSAS Instruments SLVA477BDecember 2011-Revised August 2015.
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s8/810
Page 693