You are on page 1of 2

References

Bentley, E. (2007). Teaching constructivist science K-8. USA: Corwin Press.


Gutierez, S. (2014). Integrating socio-scientific issues to enhance the bioethical
decision-making skills of high school students. Retrieved on January 2016 from
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p142
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content
knowledge
gains
associated
with
socioscientific
issues-based
instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017-1043.
Kolst, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science
dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291
310.
Kortland, K. (1996). An STS case study about students decision making on the waste
issue. Science Education, 80, 673689.
Kuhn, D. (1993a). Connecting scientific and informal reasoning. Merrill-Palmer
Quarterly, 39, 74-103.
Kuhn, D. (1993b). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific
thinking. Science Education, 77, 319337.
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal
reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels.
Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical
review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1024.
Shaw, V. F. (1996). The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking and
Performing, 2, 51-80.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in
socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371-391
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice.
Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A
research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science
Education,
89: 357 377
37

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students knowledge and argumentation skills
through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
39, 3562.

38

You might also like