You are on page 1of 65

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

REPORT
OF
THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SN.

Title

Page No.

Introduction

Design Approach and Methodology

Analysis

Analysis Outputs

10

Design of Members

17

Annex

51

Architectural Design Form

52

Structural Design Form

56

1.0

Introduction
1.1
Background
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of the residential building. The
analysis and design has been based on the prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the
National Building code of Nepal and the IS code at places. This report consists of the design
procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design
output.
1.2
1.2.1

1.2.2

1.2.3

1.3

Salient Features
Project Information
Client
Building Type
Location
Plinth Area

:
:
:
:

Building Features
Type of Structure
:
Storey
:
:
Storey Height
Total Height
:
Site Condition
Soil Type
Seismic Zone Factor
Net safe bearing capacity

Mrs. .
Residential
.
1040.86 Sq. ft.

RCC Framed Structure


Three Storey with basement
94
31 Feet (From Plinth level)
: Medium Soil (for seismic consideration as per IS 456)
: 0.36
: 120 KN/m2(Assumed)

Geometry of the Building

Building is analyzed in rectangular-shaped block having floor height of 9-4, length is


12.409m and breadth is 12.720 m.

Column Base Identification

D G

E
1
6'"

'14

'

5"

13

2
12'-3"

9"

7'-

14'-3"

13'-9"

F
5'

12'-9"

4 B

Grid Number according to structure modeling.

2.0 Design Approach and Methodology


2.1
General
The structure is analyzed with Finite Element Method (FEM). Beams and columns are
modeled as frame (line) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of
elasticity and poissons ratio for the materials used are taken accordingly. The section
properties used are based on preliminary section sizing with consideration for deflection,
minimum sizing specified and serviceability. Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried
out using FEM based latest software.
Seismic Coefficient Method is used and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution
generated with IS1893:2002 based.
The design horizontal seismic coefficient,
Ah = Z*I*(Sa/g) / (2R) (Cl. 6.4.2, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002)
Where,
Z
I
R
Sa/g

= Zone factor (0.36)


= Importance factor(1)
= Response reduction factor (5)
= average response acceleration coefficient

Design Seismic Base Shear


The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (V B) along any principal direction is
determined by the following expression
VB = Ah*W (Cl. 7.5.3)
Where, Ah = The design horizontal seismic coefficient as above
W = Seismic weight of the building

Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.


2.2

Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software)

The analysis for the structural system was carried out using ETABS 2015 Version 15.0.0
build 1221 Integrated Building Design Software, is a product of Computers and Structures.
Inc. It is a FEM based software having facility of RC Design based on IS- 456:2000.
2.3

Structural Performance

Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and
stiffness relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of
forces are duly evaluated. Basically short- term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and
lateral deflection due to seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term
defection of beam elements under sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are
also taken into account.
2.4
Deformation under Vertical Loads.
Maximum vertical deflection in all beam and slab elements that resulted under vertical load
of combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for critical elements and
maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term
deflection due to shrinkage and creep due to sustained loads are also maintained within
permissible limits for all the elements.

3.0 Analysis
3.1

Loading details / Types of Loads.

A. Dead Load: The Dead load comprises the loads due to the materials used in the
construction and parts or components in a building. It consists of the loads due to structural
elements like beam, column, wall, slab, staircase, etc; finishes applied in the building and
some permanent structures like water tanks etc.
B. Imposed Load: The imposed load comprises the loads due to the physical contribution of
people and the loads due to the nature of occupancy, the furniture and other equipments
which are a part of the character of the occupancy. The imposed loads on the structural
system are based on the codal provisions as specified in IS 875(part2)-1987.
C. Earthquake load: The Earthquake load is the horizontal /lateral load induced by the
ground motion due to earthquakes. The design lateral load / force is considered in two
orthogonal horizontal directions of the structures. The earthquake induced lateral loads on the
structural system are based on the codal provisions as specified in IS1893:2002
3.2

Material Specification

Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands, reinforced cement concrete


(RCC) is used as the major structural material, the selected material also confirms the
availability and ease in construction. The concrete grade used is M20 as per Indian Standard
Specification. This material provides minimum grade of structural concrete and favorable for
easy production and quality control as well. Fe500 is provided as longitudinal and Fe415 is
provided as shear reinforcing in Beams, Columns, foundations, and slabs wherever RCC is
used.
Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Structural Components:
Concrete
Grade: M20
Characteristic Compressive strength: 20 N/mm2
Unit weight: 25 KN/m3
Youngs modulus of elasticity (E) = 5000 fck N/mm2 22360680 KN/m2 (for M20)
Steel Reinforcement (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)
Grade: Fe 500
Yield stress: 500 N/mm2

Non-Structural Components:
Brick Wall
Unit weight: 19 KN/m3
NOTE: During this design, brick is not considered as structural component and hence its strength is
not considered.

Finishing
Plaster
Unit Weight: 20.4 KN/m3
Floor Finish:
Specification:
Intensity:
Specification:
Intensity:

50mm thick screed + punning on floor


1 KN/m2
50mm thick marble on the floor
1.335 KN/m2
2
NOTE: During this design, a value of 1.5KN/m is considered as floor finish load.
3.3 Loading on Structural Model
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural model:
The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed
over length are imposed on line element whenever possible.
Where such loading is not applicable, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the model near the real case as far as possible.
For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the
requirements of IS1893:2002.
3.4 Load Cases
The following load cases were used for loading during the analysis:
Dead :
Self Weight of the building structural components
Finish :
Weight of the finishing of the slabs and staircases (including steps)
Wall :
Wall loads (including plaster)
Live :
Live load in the building area elements

Primary Load Cases


NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

NAME
EQX
EQZ
DEAD
WALL
STAIR
LIVE
FLOOR FINISHING
PARTITION WALL

TYPE
Seismic
Seismic
Dead
Dead
Dead
Live
Dead
Dead

3.5 Load Combination


The load combinations are based on IS456. The following load combinations are specified by
IS 456.
1) 1.5(TDL+IL)
2) 1.2(TDL+IL EQL)
3) 1.5(TDL EQL)
4) 0.9TDL 1.5EQL
Assumptions
The following assumptions are taken into consideration in the seismic resistant analysis and
design of structures:
Adequate supervision and quality systems are provided during execution of the works.
Construction is carried out by personnel having the appropriate skill and experience.
Construction materials and products confirm to the pertinent codes and specifications.
The structure is adequately maintained.
The structure is used in accordance with the design brief.
An earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with maximum flood, wind,
waves or tides.
Resonance as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitation will not occur, as the
small duration of earthquake is not enough to build up resonance amplitudes.
Subsoil does not considerably settle or slide due to earthquake at the site of structure.

3.6

Load Calculations
3.6.1 Dead Load
Floor Height
Beam Depth
Description

SN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Wall Plaster
Wall Plaster
Full Brick Wall
Full Brick Wall
Full Brick Wall
Full Brick Wall
Half Brick Wall
Half Brick Wall
Half Brick Wall
Parapet Wall

2.8448
0.3556
Width(m)

0.025
0.025
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.115
0.115
0.115
0.115

Wall Load Calculation


9' - 4"
1' - 2"
Wall
Height
(m)

2.49
0.90
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
2.49
0.90

Unit
Weight
(KN/m3)

Load
(KN/m)

20.4
20.4
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

1.3
0.5
10.9
10.9
10.9
10.9
5.4
5.4
5.4
2.0

Load
(KN/m)
With
Plaster

% of
opening

Final
Load

12.1
12.1
12.1
12.1
6.7
6.7
6.7
2.4

0
20
30
50
0
15
25
0

12.1
9.7
8.5
6.1
6.7
5.7
5.0
2.4

Note: Calculation of staircase load is shown in Design sheets

Live Load
LIVE LOAD
UDL (KN/M2)
Rooms and kitchen
2.0
Toilet and bathroom
2.0
Corridor, passage, staircase
3.0
Balconies
3.0
Terrace
1.5
3.6.2 Seismic Load
The seismic lateral load is calculated using the IS 1893:2002. The base shear
is applied with the coefficient as calculated hereunder:

Site Sub-soil category Type II(Medium)


Time Period Tx=0.09H/Sqrt(dx) 0.218 sec
Time Period Tz=0.09H/Sqrt(dz) 0.215 sec
Seismic Zoning Factor 0.36
Importance Factor 1.0
Response Reduction Factor 5.0
Sa/g 2.5
Ah .09

3.6.3

Data Used in Analysis in FEM Software

IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation


This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern
eqx and eqy according to IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period

Period Calculation Method = User Specified


User Period
User Period
Factors and Coefficients

Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2]


Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7]

Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6]


Site Type [IS Table 1] = II
Seismic Response

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, Sa /g


[IS 6.4.5]
Equivalent Lateral Forces

Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2]


Calculated Base Shear

Direction

Period
Used
(sec)

W
(kN)

Vb
(kN)

Direction

Period
Used
(sec)

W
(kN)

Vb
(kN)

0.218

1544.5771

139.0119

0.215

1544.5771

139.0119

X + Ecc. Y

0.218

1544.5771

139.0119

Y + Ecc. X

0.215

1544.5771

139.0119

X - Ecc. Y

0.218

1544.5771

139.0119

Y - Ecc. X

0.215

1544.5771

139.0119

Applied Story Forces

Story

Elevation

X-Dir

Y-Dir

Story

Elevation

X-Dir

Story4

kN

kN

11.3792

81.2689

Story3
Story2

8.5344
5.6896

Story1
Base

Y-Dir

kN

kN

Story4

11.3792

81.2689

57.7431

Story3

8.5344

57.7431

Story2

5.6896

2.8448

Story1

2.8448

Base

Wall Load in Model:

4.0

ANALYSIS OUTPUTS
Results from Structural models and analysis

10

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement


Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates


Story Response Values
Story

Elevation Location
m

X-Dir

Y-Dir

mm

mm

Story4

11.3792

Top

15.2

13.3

Story3

8.5344

Top

10.4

8.9

Story2

5.6896

Top

4.9

3.9

Story1

2.8448

Top

Base

Top

11

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts Along X


Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates


Story Response Values
Story

Elevation Location

X-Dir

Y-Dir

m
Story4

11.3792

Top

0.000977

0.000243

Story3

8.5344

Top

0.00123

0.000372

Story2

5.6896

Top

0.001053

0.000337

Story1

2.8448

Top

Base

Top

12

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts Along Y


Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates


Story Response Values
Story

Elevation Location

X-Dir

Y-Dir
0.000998

m
Story4

11.3792

Top

0.000031

Story3

8.5344

Top

0.000173

0.00109

Story2

5.6896

Top

0.000153

0.000882

Story1

2.8448

Top

Base

Top

13

Axial Force Diagram (for Envelop)

14

Shear Force Diagram (For Envelop)

15

Bending Moment Diagram (for envelop)

16

5.0

Design of Members
Design of Beams and Columns
The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to
be notified that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the
adjustments have been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through the
software based on IS456: 2000 has been presented hereunder.
Design of Foundation
Modeling, analysis and design is carried out using the software. However, design of
the individual elements is carried out manually. Results of the design output of beams and
columns given by the software are directly used but the design of slab, staircase and
foundation is checked manually. The sample calculation of the individual elements is
presented below.

Design of Slab and Staircase


A sample design of the critical slab is carried out in Excel. Similarly, the Sample
design of Staircase with calculation of loading of staircase is also carried out in Excel. Both
the calculations are shown here under.

17

Column Reinforcement Summary


SN

Column
Name

A1

A2

B2

B3

C1

C2

D2

D3

E3

AR
886
1674
1453
1263

Reinforcement
Bars
4-16 + 4-20
4-16 + 4-20
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

AP
2061
2061
1608
1257

Dia./Leg

Side

Mid

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

743
1312
934
808

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
8-12

1608
1608
1257
905

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

743
743
816
788

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
8-12

1608
1608
1257
905

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

993
1287

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

743
1690
1544
1196

4-16 + 4-20
4-16 + 4-20
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

2061
2061
1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

743
1256
983
831

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
8-12

1608
1608
1257
905

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

743
866
825
743

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
8-12

1608
1608
1257
905

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

876
1129

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

849
773

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

Column
Floor
Size
BM
GF
12" X 12"
1F
2F

12" X 12"

12" X 12"

12" X 12"

12" X 12"

Lateral Ties

18

Column Reinforcement Summary


SN

1
10

11

12

13

14

15

Column
Name
A1
F1

F2

F4

G1

G2

G4

AR
742
1508
1383
810

Reinforcement
Bars
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
8-12

AP
1608
1608
1608
905

Dia./Leg

Side

Mid

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

742
885
1196
1135

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
8-12

1608
1608
1257
905

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

742
767
901

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

849
1544
1255
1199

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1608
1257
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

12" X 12"

BM
GF
1F
2F

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

742
1327
1248
1305

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16

1608
1608
1608
1608

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

BM
GF
1F
2F

742
916
1163

4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-16
4-16 + 4-12

1608
1608
1257

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

8/4L

4" c/c

6" c/c

Column
Floor
Size
BM
GF
12" X 12"
1F
2F

12" X 12"

12" X 12"

12" X 12"

Lateral Ties

19

ETABS 2015 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level

Element

Section ID

Combo ID

Station Loc

Length (mm)

LLRF

Story2

C17

Column

Max

2844.8

0.795

Section Properties
b (mm)

h (mm)

dc (mm)

Cover (Torsion) (mm)

304.8

304.8

61

35

Material Properties
Ec (MPa)

fck (MPa)

Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless)

fy (MPa)

fys (MPa)

22360.68

20

500

500

Design Code Parameters


C

1.5

1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu
kN

Design Mu2
kN-m

Design Mu3
kN-m

Minimum M2
kN-m

Minimum M3
kN-m

Rebar Area
mm

Rebar %
%

431.0028

42.9432

38.5502

8.6201

8.6201

1690

1.82

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor
Unitless

Length
mm

Initial Moment
kN-m

Additional Moment
kN-m

Minimum Moment
kN-m

Major Bend(M3)

0.663896

2489.2

15.4201

8.6201

Minor Bend(M2)

0.698684

2489.2

17.1773

8.6201

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vp
kN

Rebar Asv /s
mm/m

29.7237

36.02

337.85

29.7237

40.9871

337.85

Shear Vu
kN

Shear Vc
kN

Shear Vs
kN

Major, Vu2

25.3967

72.162

Minor, Vu3

40.9871

72.162

20

Joint Shear Check/Design


Joint Shear
Force
kN

Shear
VTop
kN

Shear
Vu,Tot
kN

Shear
Vc
kN

Joint
Area
cm

Shear
Ratio
Unitless

Major Shear, Vu2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Minor Shear, Vu3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio

Minor Ratio

N/A

N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)


Ag
cm

Asc
cm

Puz
kN

Pb
kN

Pu
kN

k
Unitless

929

16.9

1469.809

280.4565

431.0028

0.873422

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider
Ma

Length
Factor

Section
Depth (mm)

KL/Depth
Ratio

KL/Depth
Limit

KL/Depth
Exceeded

Ma
Moment (kN-m)

Major Bending (M3 )

Yes

0.875

304.8

5.422

12

No

Minor Bending (M2 )

Yes

0.875

304.8

5.706

12

No

21

BEAM DETAILS
FLOOR

Grids

REINFORCEMENT

Basement Ties

All

Ground Tie

All

First

Second

Second

All

All

All

no.
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Top
no.
12
12
12
16
2
16
16
2
16
2
16
16
2
12
3
12
12
3
12
1
12
12
1

12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12

no.
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

bottom

no.
12
12
12
16
1
16
16
1
16
1
16
16
1
16
16
16
12
12
12

12
12
12
12

area total
Top
Bottom
339.3
339.3
339.3
339.3
339.3
339.3
628.3
515.2
402.1
402.1
628.3
515.2
628.3
515.2
402.1
402.1
628.3
515.2
565.5
402.1
226.2
402.1
565.5
402.1
339.3
226.2
226.2
226.2
339.3
226.2

Stirrups

end ties
8@
120 mm
c/c
8@
120 mm
c/c
8@
100 mm
c/c
8@
100 mm
c/c
8@
100 mm
c/c

mid ties
8@
150 mm
c/c
8@
150 mm
c/c
8@
150 mm
c/c
8@
150 mm
c/c
8@
150 mm
c/c

portion of
beam
Left end
Mid
Right end
Left end
Mid
Right end
Left end
Mid
Right end
Left end
Mid
Right end
Left end
Mid
Right end

22

ETABS 2015 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level

Element

Section ID

Combo ID

Station Loc

Length (mm)

LLRF

Story2

B21

Beam

Max

4364.4

4368.8

Section Properties
b (mm)

h (mm)

bf (mm)

ds (mm)

dct (mm)

dcb (mm)

228.6

355.6

228.6

25

25

Material Properties
Ec (MPa)

fck (MPa)

Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless)

fy (MPa)

fys (MPa)

22360.68

20

500

500

Design Code Parameters


C

1.5

1.15

Factored Forces and Moments


Factored
Mu3
kN-m

Factored
Tu
kN-m

Factored
Vu2
kN

Factored
Pu
kN

-4.3736

3.9456

79.2097

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt


Factored
Moment
kN-m

Factored
Mt
kN-m

Positive
Moment
kN-m

Negative
Moment
kN-m

-4.3736

5.9312

1.5576

-72.9069

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu


-Moment
+Moment
Minimum
Design
Design
Rebar
Rebar
Rebar
-Moment
+Moment
mm
mm
mm
kN-m
kN-m
Top

(+2 Axis)

Bottom (-2 Axis)

-72.9069
1.5576

Required
Rebar
mm

620

620

174

174

11

50

174

23

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu


Shear Ve
kN

Shear Vc
kN

Shear Vs
kN

Shear Vp
kN

Rebar Asv /s
mm/m

115.3218

43.6058

99.3315

36.1121

832.59

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2


Tu
kN-m

Vu
kN

Core b1
mm

Core d1
mm

Rebar Asvt /s
mm/m

3.9456

79.2097

198.6

325.6

529.9

24

Diagram Showing Reinforcement output From Etabs

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

Design of Sloped Square footing


Ref

Step

Calculations

1.0 Initial Input data


Unfactored Axial load of Column:
Column Width:
Column Depth:
Concrete Grade:
Steel Grade:
Soil Bearing Capacity:

Output
518.94
304.800
304.800
20.000
500.000
120

kN
mm
mm
N/mm2
N/mm2
kN/m2

518.940
10.000
570.834
2.181
2.210

kN

2.0 Size of the Footing


Net Weight
Assumed footing weight % ,
Gross Footing weight,
Footing width
Adopted width/length
IS 456
Cl.34.2.2

Providing a square ledge

609.570 mm
around the coulmns.

3.0 Ultimate loads from column


Factored load:
Upward pressure:

SP 16

kN
m
m

4.0 Depth from moment consideration


Taking moment about face of the column
For a conservative estimate of (d)
Mxx= P/8L*(B-d)2
B:
b:
Mxx:
Breadth Resisting Moment:
For Fe 415, Mu=0.138fckbd2

Size of Footing
Length: 7 '- 3.0'' ft
Breadth: 7 '- 3.0'' ft.
2.00

ft

778.410 kN
2
0.159 N/mm

2210.366
304.800
1.598E+08 N/mm2
609.570 mm

For Fe 500, Mu=0.133fckbd2

d:
Provided effective depth at column face
Provide depth at edge of footing
Provided cover for steel

313.977
300.000
250.000
50.000

mm
mm
mm
mm

5.0 Check depth from one way shear


IS 456
Take section at effective depth from the face of the column
Cl 34.2.4.1 a
minimum dimension of column
304.800
Distance of section from edge of
footing equals to( Along minimum
dimension of column:
652.783 mm
o
Breadth of column face at this section with 45 diagonal
b1
904.800 mm
V1
161.994 kN
effective depth of section d1
284.171 mm

36

Design of Sloped Square footing


Ref

Step

Calculations

Output

IS 456

c(required)

2
0.630 N/mm

For Grade 20 with nominal steel


Concrete design shear strength

2.800 N/mm2

Cl 34.2.4.1 b
From IS 456
Table 20

Safe in one way shear

6.0 Check for Two way shear


Section at d/2 from face of column
IS 456
Cl 34.2.4.1(b)

d/2:
Distance of section from edge of footing:
b2:
d2
V2

p:
IS 456
Cl 31.6.3.2

150.000
802.783
604.800
292.022
720132.1

mm
mm
mm
mm
N

2
1.019 N/mm

Shear Capacity of concrete


c=0.25fck

2
1.118 N/mm

Safe in Two way shear

7.0 Area of steel required


For a economical solution is to take moments of the pressures
inside the diagonals
Mx=P/24LB(2L+a)(B-b)
Mx:
M/(fck b d2)

From Table

113.91 kN-m
0.104 mm2

Lever Arm factor


As=Mu/0.87fydLa

0.86

Area of steel required:

1015.0 mm2

Assume bar dia meter


#of bars
Area of total bars

12.0 mm
11.0 nos.
2
1244.1 mm

8.0 Distribution of steel-Check for Spacing


Distribute total steel uniformly as per IS.
Provide cover to effective depth of
Hence, Spacing
spacing less than 300

50.000 mm
211.037 mm

no. bars sufficient


2
Steel provided 1244.07 mm

50 mm side cover
Spacing = 211.04

spacing less than 3d

9.0 Check for development Length


Required Ld:
684.000 mm
Available Length:
800.398 mm
sufficient development length

37

Design of Sloped Square footing


Ref

Step

Calculations

10.0 Overall Dimension of the footing


L=B=
at edge of footing to
at face of column

Output
2210.366 mm
300.000 mm
350.000 mm

depth of footing at the edge


300.00 mm
depth of footing at the face
of column
350.00 mm

Modifying Area of steel on full breadth and mean depth


Mean depth considering the whole width:
281.894 mm

SP 16 Table 1

M/bd2:
p:
As:
Assume bar diameter:
# of bars
Provided Area of total bars
Hence, Spacing is

0.649
0.156 %
972.020 mm2
12.0
11.0
1244.1
211.037

mm
nos.
mm2
mm

no. bars sufficient

Spacing = 8.31

inch

38

A1
A2
B2
B3
C1
C2
D2
D3
E4
F1
F2
F4
G1
G2
G4

Soil Bearing Capacity


Footing Type

120 KN/m2
Isolated Square

Foundation wt.

10%

Load Combination

DL+LL
SIZE OF FOOTING

332.25
202.67
383.14
175.57
426.32
339.64
390.59
220.58
108.11
388.07
518.94
298.00
304.65
389.49
207.11

AREA
m2
3.046
1.858
3.512
1.609
3.908
3.113
3.580
2.022
0.991
3.557
4.757
2.732
2.793
3.570
1.899

Name

L/W
Req.

L/B (m)
Provided

L/B (ft)

AREA (m2)

F3
F1
F3
F1
F4
F3
F3
F1
F1
F3
F5
F2
F2
F3
F1

1.75
1.36
1.87
1.27
1.98
1.76
1.89
1.42
1.00
1.89
2.18
1.65
1.67
1.89
1.38

1.91
1.42
1.91
1.42
2.06
1.91
1.91
1.42
1.42
1.91
2.21
1.70
1.70
1.91
1.42

6 '- 3.0''
4 '- 8.0''
6 '- 3.0''
4 '- 8.0''
6 '- 9.0''
6 '- 3.0''
6 '- 3.0''
4 '- 8.0''
4 '- 8.0''
6 '- 3.0''
7 '- 3.0''
5 '- 7.0''
5 '- 7.0''
6 '- 3.0''
4 '- 8.0''

3.6
2.0
3.6
2.0
4.2
3.6
3.6
2.0
2.0
3.6
4.9
2.9
2.9
3.6
2.0

250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250

Total depth at
face of
Column (mm)

FY (kN)

(Assumed)

Depth at the
edge of footing
(mm)

Grid Num

FOOTING DESIGN SUMMARY

400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400

Spacing

of bar

(Inch)

12

Provide Double Tie Beam along X-X direction and Z-Z direction throughout the all footing. Also provide Strap Footing for
eccentric footing.

39

Design of Combine footing


Bearing Capacity =
Fy=
Fck =

120 KNm
500
20

dimension
b(m)
l(m)
col1 =
0.304
0.304
col2 =
0.304
0.304
1)
Length of footing
UnFactored Load from
col1
col2
436.32
388.07 KN
s' =
x1 =
S =
x2 =
X

Length =
Total Load =

1.2
1.352
1.2
2.552
1.92
3.83

2)

Adopt

3.81 m

824.39 KN

Wt. of footing including Earth


width of footing =

1.258

1.98

906.829 KN
Adopt

1.98 m

Longitudingal Bending moment and shear


Factored Load from
col1
col2
654.48
582.105

KNm

163.92 KN/m2

Net upward soil pressure


=

Net upward soil pressure per unit =length

324.56 KN/m

max shear force at the centre line of col 1


v1 =
v2 =

-438.80917 KN
215.670835 KN

max shear force at the centre line of col 2


v1 =
v2 =

408.300244 KN
-173.80476 KN

Point of Zero shear force from centre of the col 1


x=

Max BM computed from left side =

0.66 m

224.9787841 KNm

40

Max BM computed from Right side =


0.54
1.26
Design BM =

224.98 KNm

depth from BM consideration =


Adopt D =
Adopt d =

For BM =

210.2842891 KNm

450 mm
400 mm
0.4 m
B=
D=
d=
224.98 KNm

206.7 mm
0.21 m
cover =

50 mm

1980 mm
450 mm
400 mm

Required Ast 1350.557


=
mm2
Min ast =

0.12 %

Final Required ast =

950.4 mm2

1350.557 mm2

Area of bar dia = 12 =


113.0973355
No of bars required =
11.94
12
Ideal Ast provided =
cover =
50
spacing =
171 mm
Adopted spacing of the bars for the longitudinal bar at the top =

1357.168026 mm2

150 mm
6 inch

1880
12.53333333 13.53333333 1530.583941
i)

shear one way action


Max shear force occur in
Col 1

col size (b)=


0.304 m
Design SF(KN)215.671
=
Vu =

0.304

36.51 KN

Nominal Shear Stress


P%

col size (l) =

Tv =

Vu/bd =

0.05 N/mm2

0.20 %

Shear Strenght for the M20 concrete0.31841243


=
N/mm2
OK

41

ii)

shear two way


shear strenght of concrete
Tc' =Ks*Tc

trial

betta =
Ks =

1
1.5

Ks =
concrete grade =
Tc =
Tc' =

short =
Long =

0.304
0.304

1
M 20
1.118
1.118

shear force Vu 540.467


=
Nominal shear stress

Tv =

Vu/bo/d =

0.48

OK
3)

Positive longitudinal reinforcement at the bottom of footing beyound column faces


BM at face of col 1 =
BM at face of col 2 =
M20

Design BM =

233.69 KNm
198.51 KNm

Fe 415

B=
D=
d=
233.69 KNm

1.106
1980 mm
450 mm
400 mm

Required Ast =1405.36 mm2


Minimum Ast =

0.12 %

Final Required Ast =

950.4 mm2

1405.36 mm2

Area of bar dia = 12 =


113.0973355
No of bars required =
12.43
12.5
cover =
50
spacing =
163 mm
Adopted spacing of the bars for the longitudinal bar at the bottom =

4)

Transverse Reinforcement

FOR

COL 1
col size (m) =
0.304
d (footing) (m) = 0.4
Band width =
1.104 m
Bar dia provided in longitudinal dir =

150 mm
6 inch

12 mm

Effective d in transverse dir =0.388 m

42

B=
d=

1104 mm
388 mm

Factored upward pressure under col 1 =

330.55 KN/m

BM at the face of col 1 = 116.06 KNm


0.838
Ast =

717.715 mm2

for BM =

116.06 KNm

Area of bar dia = 12 =


113.0973355
No of bars required =
6.35
7
cover =
50
spacing =
167 mm
Adopted spacing of the bars for the transverse bar at the bottom =

FOR

150 mm
6 inch

COL 2
col size (m) =
0.304
d (footing) (m) = 0.4
Band width =
1.104 m
Bar provided in longitudinal dir =

12 mm

Effective d in transverse dir =0.388 m


B=
1104 mm
d=
388 mm
Factored upward pressure under col 2 =

293.99 KN/m

BM at the face of col 1 = 103.23 KNm


0.838
Ast =

635.15 mm2

for BM =

103.23 KNm

Area of bar dia = 16 =


201.0619298
No of bars required =
3.16
3.5
cover =
50
spacing =
402 mm
Adopted spacing of the bars for the transverse bar at the bottom =
TRANSVERSE AT THE TOP

150 mm
6 inch

Minimum Ast = 0.12%


514.022
Area of bar dia = 12 =
113.0973355
No of bars required =
4.54
5
cover =
50
spacing =
251 mm
Adopted spacing of the bars for the transverse bar at the top =

150 mm
6 inch

43

C2
D2

Foundation wt.

10%

Load Combination

DL+LL
SIZE OF FOOTING
L(m)
L (m) W (m) AREA
Req.
Pro.
Pro.
(m2)

FY (kN)

Total
Force

202.67
383.14

585.81

FY (kN)

Total
Force

339.64
390.59

730.23

7.465

CF1

AREA
Name
m2
5.370

CF1

AREA
Name
m2
6.694

CF1

3.77

3.81

1.98

7.6

SIZE OF FOOTING
L(m)
L (m) W (m) AREA
Req.
Pro.
Pro.
(m2)
2.82

2.82

1.91

5.4

SIZE OF FOOTING
L(m)
L (m) W (m) AREA
Req.
Pro.
Pro.
(m2)
3.51

3.51

1.91

6.7

300

300

300

Total
depth at
face of
Column
(mm)

814.39

450
Total
depth at
face of
Column
(mm)

426.32
388.07

AREA
2
Name
m

Depth at
the edge
of footing
(mm)

FY (kN)

Total
Force

KN/m2

450
Total
depth at
face of
Column
(mm)

Node

A2
B2

120
Isolated Square

Depth at
the edge
of footing
(mm)

Node

C1
F1

Soil Bearing Capacity


Footing Type

Depth at
the edge
of footing
(mm)

Node

COMBINED FOOTING DESIGN SUMMARY

450

Spacing

of bar (Inch)
12

Spacing

of bar (Inch)
12

Spacing

of bar (Inch)
12

44

Slab Design Detail


Slab conditions : Two way
Slab total depth
cover
assumed steel dia
eff depth
Short span,
Long Span
ratio
Design udl
Concrete Grade (fck)

adjacent edge discontinuous


D
127.00 mm
c
15.00 mm
0
8.00 mm
d
108.00 mm
lx
3.969 m
ly
4.404 m
r
1.110
w
11.513
M 20

udl :
Slab load =
LL =

3.18
2.00
1.00
1.50
7.68

Partition load =

FF =
udl =
SHORT SPAN COEFFICIENT :
(Alpha_x)
For Neg mom at cont edge : (A-x(lower value of (ly/lx)
upper value of (ly/lx)
lower value of Alpha-x
upper val of Alpha-x
Alpha-x (-)
For Pos mom at mid span :
lower value of Alpha-x
upper val of Alpha-x
lower value of (ly/lx)
upper value of (ly/lx)
Alpha-x (+)
LONG SPAN COEFFICIENT :
(Alpha_y)
Alpha-y (-)
Alpha-y (+)
MOMENTS :
Short Span Moments :
at cont edge
at mid span
Long Span Moments :
at cont edge
at mid span

kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2

r_l
r_u
A_x_l
A_x_u
A_x(-)

1.100
1.200
0.053
0.060
0.0537

A_x_l
A_x_u
r_l
r_u
A_x(+)

0.040
0.045
1.100
1.200
0.0405

A_y(-)
A_y(+)

0.047
0.035

Mx(-)
Mx(+)

9.73 kN-m/m
7.34 kN-m/m

My(-)
My(+)

8.52 kN-m/m
6.35 kN-m/m

45

Check For Deflection:


Total Depth
Effective Depth

0.127
0.108

Basic L/d Ratio ()


Provide L/d Ratio
Provide Factor (Required factor for
tension reinforcement)

23.00
36.750
1.598

Concrete fck

20

Rebar fy

500

Mu=.87*sy*At(d-(sy*At)/(sck*b)

a=.87*sy^2/( sck*b)
b=- .87*sy*d

c=Mu
Ast==(0.87*Fy*d-SQRT(0.7569*Fy^2*d^2M*3.48*Fy^2/(Fc*b)))/(1.74*Fy^2/(Fc*b))= =(b(b^
24ac))/2a

Required Ast=
pt required
Provide Ast mm^2/m
pt prov
fs
(Provided factor for tension
reinforcement)
STEEL :
min steel (0.15 %)
Steel Grade:
Required Ast
Steel area required for Mx(-)
Steel area required for Mx(+)
Steel area required for My(-)
Steel area required for My(+)
Assumed steel dia for X direction
Area
Assumed steel dia for Y direction
Area
Spacing for Mx(-)
Spacing for Mx(+)
Spacing for My(-)
Spacing for My(+)
Actual spc provided at x
Actual Ast at x
Actual spc provided at y
Actual Ast at y

10.875
-46980.00
7341283.92
162.366548
162.37 mm^2/m
0.128
mm^2
300.00
0.2362 %
0.2778
156.954
mm^2/m
2 OK
Ast_min
fy
Ast_x(-)
Ast_x(+)
Ast_y(-)
Ast_y(+)
0_x
A_0_x
0_y
A_0_y
Spc_x(-)
Spc_x(+)
Spc_y(-)
Spc_y(+)

mm^2/m
mm^2/m
190.50 mm^2/m
500
mm
218.211 mm^2
300.000 mm
189.769 mm^2
139.622 mm/m =
mm/m =
8.00 mm/m =
50.29 mm/m =
8.00 mm/m =
50.29 mm^2/m
230.45 mm/m =
167.62 mm^2/m
264.98
360.16
152.40
329.96
152.40
329.96

190.50
190.50
190.50
190.50

9.07
6.60
10.43
14.18
6.00
300.00
6.00
189.77

" c/c
" c/c
" c/c
" c/c
" c/c
" c/c

46

Basement wall Design


Unit wt of soil =
Heignt of wall =
Heignt of soil =
Length of wall =
Design moment =
Design shear force =
Concrete grade =
Rebar grade =
Angle of friction =
Depth of Wall =

19.000
2.845
2.845
3.734
12.587
30.470
M20
Fe500
30.0
203.2

KN/m3
m
m
m
KNm
KN

Degree
mm

Check for depth:


Mu = 0.138xfckxbxd2
d=
67.530 mm
Assume thickness of wall
D=
203.200 mm
d=
173.200 mm
Calculation of area of reinforcement:
Vertical reinforcement
Mu = 0.87. . . 1

8.00 inch

.
. .

2
964.855 mm

Ast =

Horizontal reinforcement
Ast =
0.25% of h*t
0.25% of 2845*203.20
1445.260
mm2
Provide 12mm rebar @ spacing 100mm for Vertical reinforcement
2
Ast prov =
1130.973 mm
Provide 12mm rebar @ spacing 150mm for Horizontal reinforcement
2
Ast prov =
1608.810 mm
Check for shear
Tv =
V/bd
30.47*1000/(1000*203.20)
0.150
N/mm2
Percentage of steel =
Tc =
0.500 N/mm2
Tc>Tv

0.557 %

ok

47

Check for Weak Beam Strong Column


Beams
Beams Concrete Grade
Steel Grade

20.000 N/mm2
500.000 N/mm2

Transverse Beam Detail


b
D
d

Along Z
228.600 mm
355.600 mm
320.600 mm

Reinforcement
Top

Nos
2.000
2.000

Area Of Steel
Percent
Bottom

Dia of Bar
Area of Steel
16.000
402.124 mm2
12.000
226.195
628.319 mm2
0.857 %

2.000
1.000

16.000
12.000

Area Of Steel
Percent
Hoggging Moment
Sagging Moment

Along X
228.600 mm
355.600 mm
320.600 mm

Reinforcement
Top

Nos

Bottom
Area Of Steel

Hoggging Moment
Sagging Moment

mm2
mm2
mm2
%

68.845 Knm
59.225 Knm

Transverse Beam Detail


b
D
d

Area Of Steel
Percent

402.124
113.097
515.221
0.703

Dia of Bar
Area of Steel
2.000
16.000
402.124
2.000
12.000
226.195
628.319
0.857
2.000
1.000

16.000
12.000

402.124
113.097
515.221
0.703

mm2
mm2
mm2
%
mm2
mm2
mm2
%

68.845 KNm
59.225 KNm

48

Column Details
Concrete Grade
Steel Grade
X dir
Z dir
Reinforcement
Bar 1
Bar 2

20.000
500.000
304.800
304.800
Nos
4.000
4.000

N/mm2
N/mm2
mm
mm
Dia of Bar
Area of Steel
16.000
804.248
16.000
804.248

Area Of Steel
Percent

1608.495
1.731

p/fck
d'
d'
d'/D

0.087
50.000
304.800
0.164

It is conservative here to calculate the moment capacity of column with zero axial loads
for lower values of Pu/fckbD. In actual practice, it is desirable to take minimum Pu/fckbD2
corresponding to actual Pu/fckbD obtained from different load combinations. It may be
noted that for higher values of Pu/fckbD the corresponding values of u/fckbD2 will be less
and hence the value corresponding to Pu/fckbD = 0 .00. is to be considered. As per chart
49 of SP 16 : 1980.
Mu/fckbD2
0.130
Thus,
Mu
73.624 KNm
For Check in Z direction
Sum of Moment Capacity of column
Sum of Moment Capacity of Beam
Ratio

For Check in Z direction


Sum of Moment Capacity of column
Sum of Moment Capacity of Beam
Ratio

147.248
128.070
1.150 Safe

147.248
128.070
1.150 Safe

49

Check of Irregularity

Story
Story4
Story3
Story2

KX
kN/m
39511.661
61829.140
73752.877
175093.68

KY
kN/m
32783.050
54215.332
66949.720
153948.10

XCM
m
5.549
5.695
4.915

YCM
m
5.604
6.020
7.344

XCR
m
5.657
5.759
5.313

YCR
m
5.194
5.308
5.872

ex
m
0.11
0.06
0.40

ey
m
0.41
0.71
1.47

L
m
12.40
12.40
12.40

B
m
12.70
12.70
7.95

XT
m
6.74
6.64
7.09

YT
KR
KxY2
KyX2
m
5.19 1065767.04 1490625.54
5.31 1741830.70 2390836.31 12594563.45
5.87 2543200.75 3362303.10
5350798.49 7243764.95

rex
8.48
8.48
8.48

rey
9.04
9.04
9.04

check
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE

The structural eccentricity shall be smaller than 30% of the torsional radius (ex < 0.3 rx,ey<0.3 ry)
(EXAMPLE CALCULATION Seismic Actions to BC3: 2013)

50

Annex
References
IS: 456 2000

Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete

IS: 875 (Parts 1-5)

NBC 105: 1994

Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and
structures (second revision)
Part 1 Dead loads
Part 2 Imposed loads
Code of practice for Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal

IS: 1893 2002

Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures

IS: 13920 - 1993


SP: 16 1980

Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic


forces - Code of Practice
Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456 1978

SP: 34 1987

Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement Detailing

Pillai

Pillai, S. Unnikrishna, Marie A. Erki, and Donald Wayne Kirk. Reinforced


concrete design. Whitby, Ont.: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1999.
Sinha, S. N. (2002). Reinforced concrete design. Tata McGraw-Hill
Education.

Sinha,S.N.

51

l8hfOg/ k/fdz{bftfn] eg'{kg]{ k|fljlws ljj/0f kmf/dx?

52

3=@ ejg P]g @)%% df jlu{s[t ju{ v cGt/utsf ejgx? sf] nfuL dfq eg]{ kmf/dM
- ._
-s_ cfls{6]Sr/ l8hfOg ;DjlGw

-s_ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
Building Elements
Building Purpose

As Per Submitted
Design

Remark

Apartment
Residential
Hospital
Industrial
Educational
Cinema
Auditorium
above 500
Auditorium
below 500
Public
Assembly
Commercial
Cold Storage
and Wear house

Staircase
Min. Tread width of Staircase excluding
nosing (in mm)

Min 250 mm

Riser of Staircase (in mm)


Check according to
Clear width of Staircase (in mm)

building purpose

Height of Handrail (in mm)


Max. no. of riser per flight (Nos)
Max. head room under staircase from the
nosing of the road (mm)

Exit
Max. travel distance to exit point in each
floor (m)
Min. width of exit door including frame

53

(mm)
Min. Height of exit door including frame
(mm)
Shutter opening of exit door to staircase &
public passage

Inward
Outwards

Total width of exit door (mm)

Light & Ventilation


Total Floor Area of Largest Habitable room
(sq. m)
Min. opening area of window for lighting
largest habitable room from external wall
(sq. m)
Min. opening area of natural ventilator for
largest habitable room from external wall
(sq. m)
Min. size of ventilator for water closets and
bathroom (sq. m)

Requirement for the physically disabled


Is there a provision of separate entrance for
disabled people next to the primary entrance
of a building?

Yes
No

Max. gradient for wheel chair ramp at


entrance of building
Min. width of wheel chair ramp at entrance
of building (in mm)

Lifts
Total habitable Height of the Building (in m)
Provision of Lift

Yes
No

No. of Lift per bank (Nos)

Other
Provision of fire escape and fire safety

Yes
No

54

Parapet heights
Height of parapet wall & balcony handrail
(in mm)

55

-v_STRUCTURAL DESIGN(Type B)
As Per Submitted
Design

Building Elements

Remark

General
Frame Structure
Load bearing
Other

Building Structure Type


Number of storeys applied for permit (in
Nos.)

Number of storeys considered in structural


design (in Nos.)

3+basement

Total height (h)


extension(in m)

of

structure

with

Largest lateral base dimension of the


structure (D), (in m)

Materials to be used in structure (tick the


listed materials that will be used in structural
element)

9.550

11.866
Timber
Structural Steel
Structural Aluminum
Stone Masonry
Brick Masonry
RCC (Reinforcement
Bar)

56

v=!STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Building Elements

(RCC Frame Structure)


As Per Submitted
Design

Remark

General
NBC 102-1994 Unit Weight of Materials
Specify the design unit weight of materials:
Steel (in kg/m3)

7850

Specify the design unit weight of materials:


RCC (in kg/m3)

2500

Specify the design unit weight of materials:


Brick Masonry (in kg/m3)

1900

NBC 103-1994 Occupancy Load (Imposed Load)

Residential
Mercantile
Institutional
Building
Educational
Building

Building Use type

Assembly Building
Business and
Office
Hotel, Hostel and
dormitories
Storage

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load


in kN/m2) for Rooms and Kitchen, wards,
dressing rooms

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load


in kN/m2) for Corridors, Staircase, Store

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load


in kN/m2) for Balcony

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load

57

in kN/m2) for Retail shops


Special occupancy 1:................................

Special occupancy 2:..............................

Special occupancy 3:.............................

NBC 104-1994 Wind load


Wind Zone
Basic wind speed (in m/s)

NBC 105-1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal


Method adopted for earthquake resistant
design

Subsoil category
Adopted Code for Seismic Design
Seismic Weight (W) (in kN)

Seismic Coefficient
Approach
Response Spectrum
Method
Others
Type I (Hard)
Type II (Medium)
Type III (Soft)
NBC 105
IS 1893:2002
Others: .......... (name)

1544.57 KN

Considered Structure height for time period


calculation

8.535

Fundamental time period considered (Tx)


(Seconds) in first direction

0.218

Fundamental time period considered (Ty)


(Seconds) in second direction

0.215

Basic seismic coefficient (C)(if NBC used)


Seismic zoning factor (Z) (if NBC used)
Importance Factor (I)

Structural Performance factor (K) (if NBC


used)
Seismic zoning factor (Z) (if IS 1893:2002
used)

0.36

58

Spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) (if IS


used)

2.5

Response reduction factor (R) (if IS used)

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient (Ah)(if


IS used)

0.09

Design horizontal Seismic coefficient (Cd) (if


NBC used)
Base Shear(VB) for Seismic Coefficient

139.012 KN

Generated Base Shear in first axis through


Response spectrum Analysis (if Response
spectrum used )
Generated Base Shear in normal to first axis
through Response Spectrum Analysis (if
response spectrum method used)
Base Shear multiplication Factor (if response
spectrum method used)
Maximum Inter-storey Drift

L/831

Maximum total deflection

15.2 mm

NBC 106-1994 Snow Load


Perennial
Occasional
No snowfall

Snowfall type or condition


Elevation of construction site (in m)
Design Depth of snow (in cm)
Design Density of snow (in g/cm3)

NBC 108-1994 Site Consideration for Seismic Hazards


Distance
of
construction
site
toe/beginning of downward slope?

from

50 m

Distance of construction site from river bank?

Availability of soil test report

50 m
Yes
No

Mandatory, if
Distance within 50 m
and Commercial
Buildings and/ or

59

Residence building
more than 5 storey.

Structural Data for Framed RCC Structure


NBC 110-1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete
Concrete grade in structure
Reinforcement Steel Grade

Fe-415
Fe-500
Fe-550

Slab design

Boundary condition of slab

Effective Thickness of slab (d) (in mm)


Short span of Critical slab panel (L) (in mm)
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio
(L/d) for the corresponding slab
Basic (L/d) ratio
Required modification factor

4 side continuous
1 short side
discontinuous
1 long side
discontinuous
2 adjourning side

continuous
2 long side continuous
2 short side continuous
1 long side continuous
1 short side continuous
4 side discontinuous

108

3969 mm

36.750
23
1.598

Tension reinforcement(Ast) Percentage(%) for


short span bottom reinforcement

0.2362%

Modification factor for tension reinforcement

Check for Critical beam, if span equals to


or more than 7 m
Effective depth of beam (d) (in mm)
Critical span (L) (in mm)

60

Long Term Deflection including creep,


shrinkage

Check for weak beam strong column


concept

Yes
No

Sum of moment capacity of beams at critical


beam-column joint

128.070

Sum of moment capacity of columns at


critical beam-column joint

147.248

Design Philosophy

Limit state method

Load Combinations
1: DL

1.5

1: LL

1.5

1: EQ

2: DL

1.2

2: LL

1.2

2: EQ

+-1.2

3: DL

1.5

3: LL

3: EQ

+-1.5

4: DL

0.9

4: LL

4: EQ

+-1.5

Whether sample design calculations of


foundations, columns, beams and slabs are
submitted

Yes
No

Type of Foundations

Isolated
Combined
Raft
PILE

61

Depth of foundation from ground level to the


bottom of footing (in m)

1.5 m

Structural Data for Other types of structures


NBC 111-1994 Steel (in case Steel section used as structure member)
Design assumptions

Simple connection
Semi-rigid connection
Fully rigid connection

Yield Stress
Least wall thickness in mm for following
Exposure conditions
For Exposed Section Pipe
For not Exposed Section - Pipe
For Exposed Section - Webs of Standard size
For not Exposed Section - Webs of Standard
size
For Exposed Section - Composed section
For not Exposed Section - Composed section
Have you used Truss?
Critical span of purlin
Purlin size

NBC 112 Timber (In case, timber used as


structure members)
Name of structural wood

Sal
Sisau
Khotesalla
Gobresalla

Modulus of Elasticity
Critical span of the beam element
Designed Deflection
Permissible deflection

62

NBC 113-1994 Aluminium (in case,


Aluminium used as structure members)
Please mention the name of design code.

63

You might also like