Professional Documents
Culture Documents
124342
On its face, there is clearly some tension here between the declaration of
fundamental rights and the declaration of victims rights. This is
symptomatic of a more widespread tension between the universality of
human rights and concreteness of the legal practises in which it emerges,
as well as the embedded quality of the social practises it wants to
manage.1
1 Peter D. Rush in Clare McGlynn and Vanessa E. Munros (eds) Rethinking Rape
Law (2010) 240.
1
LAW 638
124342
This essay will discuss the human rights implications of sexual offences in
the Tasmanian judicial context. It draws upon a number of international
covenants and treaties to illustrate a standard that can be applied to the
Tasmanian law in order to better articulate the interests of those involved
in a sexual offence matter. This essay contemplates these rights in
relation to the statutory definitions of both rape2 and consent3 under the
Tasmanian Criminal Code. It also considers the implementation of this
legislation, as well as the application of the laws of evidence 4, in light of
current procedural practise. In conclusion this essay establishes that it is
inevitable that some rights will be compromised in judicial proceedings
pertaining to the prosecution of sexual offences. It is therefore of pivotal
importance that all parties are equally equipped and represented by the
law throughout this process,5 and that public discourse continues in
relation to the shifting boundaries of lawful and unlawful sex.
In the context of sexual offences, this essay identifies a number of key
provisions which may inform6 the creation and implementation of
2 Criminal Code 1924 (Tas) s 185.
3 Criminal Code 1924 (Tas) s 2A.
4 Evidence Act 2001 (Tas).
5 See Fiona E. Raitt in Clare McGlynn and Vanessa E. Munros (eds) Rethinking
Rape Law (2010) 268.
6 In the absence of an Australian charter or bill of rights, human rights law in
Australia stems from specific domestic legislation, such as the Racial
Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), several select common law rights and through the
recognition of International agreements and treaties. It is therefore difficult to
2
LAW 638
124342
discern whether such principles are binding on Australian courts, or where the
judiciary will choose to recognise them. However, for the purpose of this essay,
these provisions provide a general standard that can be applied in order to better
understand the complex rights of all respective players involved in sexual
offence matters.
7 The rights this essay implicates are also critical for the law itself, and for the
institution of the judiciary, as will be further discussed.
8 Momcilovic v The Queen & Ors [2011] HCA 34.
9 See also the Australian Constitution s 80.
3
LAW 638
124342
The codification of the crime of rape has been subject to ongoing reform. 10
This is in part due to the attempts of the legislature to better delineate the
context in which the generally accepted behaviour of sexual intercourse
ought to constitute a criminal offence.11 Legislators are in effect searching
for a grand theory, founded in moral certainty, which will identify the
particular scenarios in which an offender is deserving of conviction. 12
However, the equation of law with Platonic ideals of morality 13 is a
dangerous assumption as it presupposes the existence of commonly held,
moral objectives. This is not consistent with the views of contemporary
commentators, such as Ngaire Naffine, who recognises that morality is a
relative concept.14 The law therefore ought to reflect the complex society
in which it is to operate and the interests of the real people and real
institutions15 that Naffine articulates. This requires a careful balancing of
the values of current society, with notions of what is just and equitable.16
10 Criminal Code Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas) and Criminal
Code Amendment (Consent) Act 2004 (Tas).
11 Kate Warner Sexual Offending: Victim, Gender and Sentencing Dilemmas in
Duncan Chappell and Paul Wilson (eds) Issues in Australian Crime and Criminal
Justice (2005) 236-7.
12 Note Ngaire Naffines notions of mala in se and mala prohibita in Ngaire
Naffine Moral Uncertainties of Rape and Murder: Problems at the Core of
Criminal Law Theory in McSherry B, Norrie A and Bronitt S (eds) Regulating
Deviance (Hart Publishing, 2009).
13 For an example, see Platos allegory of The Cave.
14 Ngaire Naffine Moral Uncertainties of Rape and Murder: Problems at the Core
of Criminal Law Theory in McSherry B, Norrie A and Bronitt S (eds) Regulating
Deviance (Hart Publishing, 2009).
15 ibid.
16 Clearly, this is a difficult task as notions of what is just and equitable naturally
extend from the values society holds. See Cockburn H, The Impact of Introducing
an Affirmative Model of Consent and Changes to the Defence of Mistake in
4
LAW 638
124342
LAW 638
124342
LAW 638
124342
relation to female complainants, and it has been suggested that the state
plays some role in indirectly fostering the subordination of women in
society.26 This is evinced further below.
LAW 638
124342
29 Fiona E. Raitt in Clare McGlynn and Vanessa E. Munros (eds) Rethinking Rape
Law (2010) 273.
30 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, s 14(2).
31 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11(1).
32 R v Oakes [1986] 1 SCR 103.
33 Momcilovic v The Queen & Ors [2011] HCA 34.
34 Jeremy Gans et al, Criminal process and Human Rights (2011) 498.
35 ibid 512-513.
8
LAW 638
124342
36 Fiona E. Raitt in Clare McGlynn and Vanessa E. Munros (eds) Rethinking Rape
Law (2010) 276, specifically, ss 3, 18, 13 of the European Convention on Human
Rights.
37 LHeureux Dub J in R v OConnor [1995] 4 SCR 411 at 154. For recognition of
privacy rights in the Australian context see Toonen v Australia, Communication
No. 488/1992.
38 ibid.
39 Royal College of Art London, Rape and the Law: He Said, She Said (2010)
YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmM5X-NSUhc> at 24 May 2013.
9
LAW 638
124342
LAW 638
124342
LAW 638
124342
49
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
This essay has demonstrated the difficulties involved in establishing just
and equitable laws governing sexual offences in Tasmania. The application
of human rights principles to the definition of rape under the Code and the
laws of evidence applicable at trial demonstrates the multiplicity of
interests that the law has a moral and legal duty to uphold. Further, as the
title of this paper suggests, the implication of principles of human rights is
problematic given the sovereignty of national law and the day to day
social behaviours it tries to rationalise. Nevertheless, this essay concludes
that continuing discourse on this topic is inexhaustibly beneficial to the
creation and implementation of the best possible legislative and
procedural law regarding sexual offences. As Warner recognises, this
requires a collective approach to reform which provokes lawyers, judges,
juries and the public to reflect critically about what constitutes rape and
the shifting boundaries between rape and lawful sex. Clearly, as Warner
implores, we cannot leave sexual assault to the criminal law alone.50
49 Helen Reece in Royal College of Art London, Rape and the Law: He Said, She
Said (2010) YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmM5X-NSUhc> at 24
May 2013.
50 Kate Warner Sexual Offending: Victim, Gender and Sentencing Dilemmas in
Duncan Chappell and Paul Wilson (eds) Issues in Australian Crime and Criminal
Justice (2005) 248.
12
LAW 638
124342
1,990 words.
13