Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To estimate the magnitude of a flood peak the following alternative methods available:
1. Rational method
2. Empirical method
3. Unit-hydrograph technique
4. Flood-frequency studies
The use of a particular method depends upon (i) the desired objective, (ii) t available data,
and (iii) the importance of the project. Further the rational formula only applicable to small-size (< 50
km2) catchments and the unit-hydrograph method is normally restricted to moderate-size catchments
with areas less than 5000 km .
Consider a rainfall of uniform intensity and
very
long duration
occurring
over
basin. The runoff rate gradually increases from zero to a constant value a indicated
in Fig. 7.1.
of
the
The runoff
catchment
reach
increases as
the
outlet.
more and
Designating
more
flow
the
time
taken
J^
Jconccntra-
from the farthest part of the catchment to reach the outlet as tc= time of concentration, it is
obvious that if the rainfall continues
beyond
tc,
and at the peak value. The peak value of the runoff is given by
the
runoff
will
be
constant
(7.4)
K1= L3/H
where
in which the coefficients K, a, x and n are specific to a given area. Table 2.8 (preferably
in its expanded form) could be used to estimate these coefficients to a specific
catchment. In USA the peak discharges for purposes of urban area drainage are calculated
by using P = 0.05 to 0.1. The recommended frequencies for various types of
structures used in watershed development projects in India are as below:
Types of structure
Storage and Diversion dams having
Return
Period
(Years)
50-100
permanent spillways
25-50
25 10-15
10
15
CiAi /A
Empiricalformulae
The empirical formulae used for the estimation of the flood peak are essential regional formulae based on
statistical
correlation
of
the
observed
peak
and
important
an
catchment properties. To simplify the form of the equation, only a few of the many parameters affecting the flood
peak are used. Forexample, almost all formulae use ucatchment area as aparameter affecting the flood peak and most
ofthemneglect u flood frequency asaparameter. Inview ofthese, the empirical formulae are applicable only in the
region from which they were developed and when applied to other areas they can at best give
approximate values.
FLOOD PEAK-AREA RELATIONSHIPS
By far the simplest of the empirical relationships are those which relate the flood pea to the drainage area. The
maximum flood discharge Qp from a catchment area Agiven by these formulae as
Qp= f(A)
While there are a vast number of formulae of this kind proposed for various parts c the world, only a few
popular formulae used in various parts of India are given below.
DICKENS FORMULA (1865)
Qp = CD A3/4
where Qp = maximum flood discharge (m3/s)
CD = Dickens constant with value between 6 to 30 .The following are some guidelines in
selecting the value of CD:
Values of CD
North- Indian plains
11-14
Central India
14-28
22- 28
For actual use the local experience will be of aid in the proper selection of C IT v ens formula is used
in the central and northern parts of the country.
RYVESFORMULA (J884)
Qp = CR A2/3
where Q= maximumflooddischarge(m3/s) A = catchment area (km2) and CR = Ryves coefficient
This formula originally developed for the Tamil Nadu region, is in use in Tamil Nadu and parts of Karnataka and
AndhraPradesh.The valuesofCR recommended byRyves for use are:
CR = 6.8 for areaswithin 80 kmfromthe east coast
=8.5forareaswhichare80160kmfromtheeastcoast
=10.2 for limited areas near hills
INGUS FORMULA (1930):This formula is based on flood data of catchments in Western Ghats in
Maharashtra. The flood peak Qp in m/s is expressed as
Qp = 124A / (A + 10.4)
There are many such empirical formulae developed ill various
where A is the catchment area in km .
Equation with small modifications in the constant in the numerator (124) is in use Maharashtra for
designs in small catchments.
OTHER FORMULAE parts of the world, References 3 and 5 list many such formulae suggested for use in
various parts of India as well as of the world
There are some empirical formulae which relate the peak discharge to the basin area and also include
the flood frequency, Fuller's formula (1914) derived for catchments in USA is a typical one of this
kind and is given by
Qp = CfA0.8 (1+0.8log T)
QTP= Maximum 24-h flood with a frequency of T years in m3/s , A= catchment area n km2 , Cf= a
constant with values between 0.18 to 1.88.
ENVELOPE CURVES
In
regions
having
same
climatologically
characteristics,
if
the
available flood data are meagre, the enveloping curve technique can be used to develop a relationship
between
the
maximum
flood
flow
and
drainage
area.
In
this
method
the available flood peak data from a large number of catchments which do not significantly differ from each
other in terms of meteorological and topographical characteristics are collected. The data are then plotted on
a log-log paper as flood peak v, catchment area. This would result in a plot in which the data would be
scattered. If an enveloping curve that would encompass all the plotted data points is drawn, it can be
used to obtain maximum peak discharges for any
given
area.
Envelop
curves
thus
obtained are very useful in getting quick rough estimations of peak values. If equa tions are fitted to these
enveloping curves, they provide empirical flood formulae of the type,
Q =f(A).
Kanwarsain and Karpov (1967) have presented enveloping curves representing the relationship between
the peak-flood flow and catchment area for Indian conditions. Two curves, one for the south Indian rivers and
the other for north Indian and central Indian rivers, are developed (Fig. 7.2). These two curves are based on
data covering large catchment areas, in the range 103 to 106 km2.
Based onthe maximum recorded floods throughout the world, Baird and Mclllwraitli (1951) have correlated the
maximum flood dischargeQmp in m3/s withcatchment area A in km2 as
Qmp= 3025A/ (278+A) 0.78
Frequency Analysis
For gauged catchments with long records (e.g. greater than 25 years) the techniques of
frequency analysis may be applied directly to determine the magnitude of any flood event (Q)
with a specified return period (Tt) The concept of return period is an important one because it
enables the determination of risk (economic or otherwise) associated with a given flood
magnitude. It may be formally defined as the number of years, on average, between a flood
event of magnitude (X) which is greater than or equal to a specified value (Q). The qualifier
'on average' is often misunderstood For example, although a 100 year flood event will occur,
on average, once every 100 years, it may occur at any time (i.e. today or in several years'
time). Also, within any particular 100 year period, floods of greater magnitude may occur.
The probability of occurrence P(X Q) is inversely related to return period (Tt), i.e.
P(X Q) = 1/Tt
This relationship is the starting point of frequency analysis.
The point of this analysis is that it makes it possible to estimate the probability that the
discharge will exceed any given value greater than the maximum value in the data set (90m3/s
in this case). Replacing the histogram with the pdf allows such estimates to be made.