Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.
No law granting any tax exemptions shall be passed
without the concurrence of a majority vote.
Ruling:
Finding in favor of the respondents contention, the Supreme
Court held that being an attribute of sovereignty, the power to tax is
the strongest of all the powers of the government. So powerful that
Chief Justice Marshall once said that the power to tax involves the
power to destroy. However, the power to tax is restricted by the
equal protection clause and due process clauses of the Constitution.
Hence, Justice Frankfurter could rightfully concluded: The web
unreality spun from Marshalls famous dictum was brushed away by
one stroke of Mr. Justice Holmess pen stating that The power to
tax is not the power to destroy while the court sits
The Constitution as the fundamental law overrides any
legislative or executive act that runs counter to it. In any case,
therefore, where it can be demonstrated that the challenged
statutory provision fails to abide by its command, then the court
must declare and adjudge it null.
9. Grant of power to the local government units to create its
own sources of revenue.
City of Baguio vs. De Leon, October 31, 1968, 25 SCRA 938
Facts:
Facts:
Petitioners assail the constitutionality of RA 7116 imposing
Value Added Tax (VAT) on the sale, barter or exchange of goods and
properties as well as on the sale of exchange services. It is
equivalent to 10% of gross selling price or gross value in money of
good or properties sold, bartered or exchanged or the gross receipts
from the sale or exchange services. RA 7716 seeks to widen the tax
base on exiting VAT system and enhance its administration by
amending the NIRC. The contention of petitioners is that in enacting
the VAT law, Congress violated the Constitution because RA 7716
did not originate exclusively in the House of Representatives,
because it is in fact the result of the consolidation of two distinct
bills, one from the House of Representatives and the other from the
Senate.
Issue: Is contention of the petitioners correct?
Ruling:
No, it is not the law but the revenue bill which is required by
the Constitution to originate exclusively in the House of
Representatives. A bill originating in the House of Representatives
may undergo extensive changes in the Senate that may result in
the rewriting of the whole. To insist that the revenue statute and not
only the bill must substantially be the same as the House bill will be
to violate the Senates power to concur and propose amendments.