Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perfetti 1995
N=218
R=.76
N=218
R=.56
r = .79
r = .70
r = .69
Reading
Fluency
Verbal
Non Verbal
Memory
60
55
50
47
40
3rd Grade
30
23
20
17
12
10
7
Individually
Unique
2
92
3
102
4
119
5
148
Fluency percentile
6th
32th
56th
78th
93rd
Phonemic decoding
25th
45th
59th
74th
91st
Verbal knowledge/
reasoning
42nd
59th
72nd
91st
98th
WPM on FCAT
Fluency
Verbal
Non Verbal
Memory
60
51
50
43
40
7th Grade
30
22
20
10
5
Individually
10
2
Unique
88
113
122
144
156
Fluency percentile
7th
25th
45th
82th
95th
Phonemic decoding
27th
53rd
53rd
74th
84th
Verbal knowledge/
reasoning
34th
45th
64th
88th
93rd
WPM on FCAT
Fluency
Verbal
Non Verbal
Memory
60
52
50
40
10th Grade
32
30
28
20
15
7
10
5
Individually
2
Unique
130
154
175
184
199
Fluency percentile
8th
30th
68th
87th
93rd
Phonemic decoding
18th
27th
45th
56th
72nd
Verbal knowledge/
reasoning
30th
60th
66th
84th
89th
WPM on FCAT
80
70
67
71
66
56
60
53
50
44
36
40
32
30
20
10
0
3
10
Instructional challenges
1. Who is responsible for providing instructional
support for the continued growth of literacy skills
from 4th through 12th grades for students reading
at grade level?
2. Who is responsible for providing instruction support
for an overall increase reading proficiency from
adequate to proficient
No difference
Instructional challenges
1. Who is responsible for providing instructional
support for the continued growth of literacy skills
from 4th through 12th grades for students reading
at grade level?
Who is responsible for providing instruction support
for an overall increase reading proficiency from
adequate to proficient
Once we decide who is responsible, what will that
instruction and support look like?
Level 2:
Level 3:
Level 4:
Level 5:
all
most
some
Teaching Concepts
Concept Mastery Routine
Concept Anchoring Routine
Concept Comparison Routine
Increasing Performance
Quality Assignment Routine
Question Exploration Routine
Recall Enhancement Routine
http://smarttogether.org/clc/index.html
Level 2:
Level 3:
Level 4:
Level 5:
Learning Strategies
.
.
Teaching students how to think
about and solve problems,
orteaching students how to
learn
Acquisition
Storage
Word
Identification
First-Letter
Mnemonic
Paraphrasing
Paired Associates
Paragraphs
SelfQuestioning
Listening/Notetaking
Error
Monitoring
LINCS Vocabulary
Visual
Imagery
Interpreting
Visuals
Multipass
Sentences
Themes
Assignment
Completion
http://smarttogether.
org/clc/index.html
Test-Taking
Questions/Discussion
www.fcrr.org
Science of reading section
References
Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary. Newark,
DE:International Reading Association.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University
Press.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding:
Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica,
CA: RAND Corporation. (available online at
www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/)
Williamson, G.L. (2004). Student readiness for postsecondary options.
Metametrics, Inc. Technical Report. Available at
http://www.lexile.com/lexilearticles/Student%20Readiness%20for%20
Postsecondary%20Options%20(v4_1).pdf
References
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2004). Pennsylvania
reading requirements for school, the workplace and society:
Executive summary of findings. [Online]. Available:
http://www.pde.beta.state.pa.us/career_edu/lib/career_edu/pennsylv
ania_reading_requirements_for_school_summary_repor.pdf.
Bulgren, J. (2004). Effective content-area instruction for all students. In
T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in Learning and
Behavioral Disabilities: Vol. 17. Research in Secondary Schools, (pp.
147-174).
Lenz, B. K., and Deshler, D. D. (2003.) Teaching Content to All:
Evidence-Based Inclusive Practices in Middleand Secondary Schools.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.