Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Question of Altitude
exploring the limits of highland pastor alism in the prehispanic andes
Kevin Lane and Jennifer Grant
139
140
Paleoenvironmental data in the Andes has been advancing by leaps and bounds so that a more subtle and detailed appreciation of past climate is now within our
grasp. The main data collection from ice cores in Peru
(Huascarn and Quellcaya) and Bolivia (Sajama) has
been undertaken by Lonnie Thompson and his team over
the past few decades (Thompson et al. 1985; Thompson et
al. 1995; Thompson et al. 1998) while another recent ice
core was taken from the Nevado Illimani in Bolivia
(Ramirez et al. 2003). These initial investigations have
been augmented by other studies, such as a study measuring the ammonium content in the ice cores (Kellerhals
et al. 2010), including oxygen isotopic ratios (18O); ITAZ
(Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone); a study of migration,
ammonium, and nitrate concentration (Thompson et al.
2013); and studies of other proxies such as lakes (Baker et
al. 2001; Chepstow-Lusty et al. 2003) and coral reef cores,
among others. These initial and subsequent papers provide a series of proxies with which to elucidate past climate change and how it impacted prehispanic cultural
development (e.g., Shimada et al. 1991).
A Question of Altitude
141
T a ble 9.1. The differ ent cl assifications for ecologica l zones in the A ncash highl a nds .
ECO-ZONE
C L ASSIFICATION
(I NRENA 2000)
ECO-ZONE
CL ASSIFICATION
(TOSI 1960)
ECO-ZONE
CL ASSIFICATION
(PULGAR VIDAL
1946)
Spinous steppe
Montane Lower
[ee-MB]
Kichwa
2,100 to 3,100
250 to 500
Agriculture: potato,
beans, peas, maize
Desert weeds
Montane [md-M]
Suni / Jalka
3,100 to 3,600
250 to 500
Agriculture: potato,
maize, tarwi beans
Montane steppe
[e-M]
Suni / Jalka
3,600 to 4,100
250 to 750
Agriculture: potato
(bitter); Herding
Humid paramo
Subalpine [ph-SA]
Puna baja
4,100 to 4,600
500 to 1,000
Tundra muy
hmeda Alpino
[tmh-A]
Puna brava
4,600 to 5,100
500 to 1,000
Herding
ALTITUDE
[IN M ASL]
R AINFALL
[IN MM]
142
as active agents of wide and comprehensive change involving local ecology and landscape. As Ellenberg
(1979:401) suggests, the human is not only a partner of
the ecosystem he lives in, [but] has become more and
more a super-organic factor.. . . He changed, and continues to change, the water balance and nutrient turnover of
nearly all ecosystems. This leads toward an espousal of
what Karl Zimmerer (1994) describes as New
Ecologya view of ecology in which the stability or
homeostasis of the environment is disputed, opting
rather for disequilibria, instability, and even chaotic
fluctuations in biophysical environments, both natural
and human-impacted (Zimmerer 1994:108, emphasis
added). This position opposes trends that emphasize an
ecological determinism in which humans are the passive
victims of climate and of the environment in general (for
an application of this hypothesis see Binford et al. 1997)
and moves toward the more anthropogenic interpretations of political ecology (Greenberg and Park 1994;
Robbins 2004).
Given the difficulties in aligning geological or ecological chronologies with archaeological ones (Calaway
2005), it is hardly surprising that human decisions are
increasingly proposed as the prime mover in areas such
as landscape use, resource access, and marginality
(Paulson et al. 2003). These are some of the key issues that
are slowly being brought to bear on archaeological case
studies (e.g., Beresford-Jones et al. 2009). In the case of
the altitudinal limits of Andean camelid pastoralism a
similar human-influenced, paradigm-busting explanation is sought here to counter the modern agro-centric
dominant narrative.
Therefore here we do not contest the relevance of environmental issues in the past, but we do contend their primacy. As Zimmerer (1994:112) states, Explanations of
human behavior based primarily, or entirely, on ecological
concepts of adjustment and adaptation ... overlooked the
roles of ethnicity and power in shaping human behavior.
This concept of human decision-making regarding uses of
the environment leads toward an anthropocentric perspective (Erickson 2000:316) on ecology in which the landscape is modified from a standpoint of a prevailing and
structured social logic that covers economic, political,
social, and religious pressures. Zimmerers (1991) political
ecology stresses this relationship between human politicoeconomic decisions and ecology, while a critical realist approach (Bhasker et al., 2010; Vayda and Walters 1999;
Walker 2005) anchors our use of political ecology around
a concrete archaeological case study.
A Question of Altitude
Political ecology therefore stresses the whole spectrum of human actions at different levels and scales and
by different actors, underlining the manner in which
human action can proscribe the specific physical limits of
a resources production without an overt emphasis on the
resources supposed biological or ecological limits.
For instance, the general postcontact altitudinal increase in agricultural cultivation along the slopes of the
Andes that Cardich (1985:305) observed200 m in the
last 150 yearscould be reinterpreted not as a condition
primarily of a general amelioration of climate but rather
to changing circumstances in a community-based, local
political ecology ensconced in a larger regional and
national political ecology that emphasized agricultural
products over animal ones. Archaeologically, the growth
of maize around Lake Titicaca through the use of raised
fields (camellones) displays a similar forcing of a crop
(Erickson 1986; Graffam 1992). Likewise, a pattern of increased wetland colonization and production has been
identified by Zimmerer (1991) among the modern communities of Colquepata in Southern Peru. As an exponent of political ecology, Zimmerer has reasoned that the
demands for agricultural products from external markets
has led to the increased exploitation of these previously
abandoned lands. It is time to apply this self-same reasoning embedded in human agency and political ecology
to prehispanic camelid pastoralism and the limits of its
altitudinal range.
pa s t o r a l i s m a n d t h e c o r d i l l e r a n e g r a
143
Chaclancayo River in the Nepea headwaters zone demonstrated that the areas grazing capacity per km 2 was
equal to that of the Ayacucho area and the Titicaca
basin (Lane 2006b:505).
If present economic productivity is low, the highlands
nevertheless have a long tradition of sustaining and encouraging large populations (Murra 1978 [1955]). As
Brush (1976:160) reiterated, it is evident that the major
prehispanic settlements were significantly higher than
they are today. Most were located in the upper jalka
[puna] zone, just below the jalka fuerte [puna brava]
zone. The reason for siting these settlements in the inaccessible upper limits of the cordillera cannot have been
just a factor of defense but was also a matter of basic economics. Settlements were located alongside or near to the
upper suni and puna ecozones, which would thereby represent their production zones.
To reiterate and expand, a production zone as defined by Mayer (2002:241) is a culturally constructed
plot of managed land with the added implication that it
is possible to push or move a given biomass, be it a plant
or an animal, into a particular ecological location according to human needs. As we have argued above, the
rules used in the management of production zones do
not necessarily correspond to the assumed ecological
limits of the crop or animals in question. These rules are
rather political decisions that human agents make
within a given ecology and they often push the limits of
a crop or animal even when this renders the resource
economically risky, ecologically fragile, or borderline
viable, as is the case of maize in the circum-Titicaca area
(Erickson 2000:324).
Our central argument in this chapter though does not
entail pushing camelids to areas where they are economically unviable given that they (especially the llama) can
subsist in almost all Andean environments (Franklin
1982). Rather, we are arguing for a push downward of agriculture to accommodate greater camelid numbers in
the top bracket of the suni area (3,6003,900 m asl), thus
greatly expanding camelid numbers for the period in
question. The evidence presented here for this discussion
is mainly derived from a detailed landscape analysis of
the sites, technology, and features in the study area (see
Figure 9.1) of the Cordillera Negra of the Peruvian
Province of Ancash.
To this end we concentrate on three zones within this
area: the Rico and Huinchos micro-valley and confluenceZone A; the Chorrillos micro-valleyZone B; and
the lower-lying Pamparoms open valleyZone C;
144
Figure 9.1. Map of study area, showing total area surveyed. Coutesy of Kevin Lane.
A Question of Altitude
145
(Co 2). Even so, this dense settlement pattern across these
three ecozoneskichwa, suni, punashows the almost
seamless progression between farming and herding
among the communities in this area of the Andes, further emphasizing the need to consider these activities as
integral aspects of a conjoined, interrelated economic
system combining both farming and herding.
Nevertheless, a much more important marker of
which type of economy predominates is technology, as
found embedded in the landscape (Lemonnier 1993). It is
to this that we turn to next. Zones A and B (see Figure
9.2) covers primarily the suni and puna areas of the
Chaclancayo River, and the focus of these two areas is
Cerro Rico (5,100 m asl), the apex of both the Rico (Zone
A) and Chorrillos (Zone B) Valleys. Of the two areas, the
Chorrillos was the more densely populated, with settlements stretching from approximately 3,650 m asl [Cho
11] through to the main settlement of Yurakpecho at
146
SECTOR
SITE NAME
ALTITUDE (M)
NOTES
Zone A
Br 1
4100
Chullpa
Br 2
38004010
Necropolis
Br 3
39004050
Farmstead
Br 4
4050
Estancia
Br 5
4000
Estancia
Br 6
4075
Estancia
Br 7
4025
Chullpa/Estancia
3825
Silt dam
Co 1
Copalococha
Co 2
Intiaurn
38003920
Intiaurn
3900
Estancia
Intiaurn
3985
Silt reservoir
3950
Necropolis
Co 4
3930
Chullpa/Estancia
Co 5
3900
Estancia
3800
Water reservoirs
3800
Estancia
Co 3
Cj 1
Nununga
Cj 2
Cj 3
Settlement
3850
Necropolis
3890
2x Silt reservoirs
Cj 5
3951
Settlement
Cj 6
4313
Estancia
Cj 4
Represa Decisin
N/A
Ricohirca
4600
Ra 1
Ricococha Baja
4485
Water dam
Ra 2
Ricocochoa Alta
4560
Water dam
Ra 3
4656
Chullpa
Rac 10
4721
Estancia
Zone B
Cho 1
Yanacocha
4550
Water dam
Cho 2
Olern Cocharuri
4200
Silt dam
Cho 3
Yurakpecho
4570
Settlement
Yurakpecho
4412
Estancia
Yurakpecho
4375
Estancia
Yurakpecho
4380
Estancia
4660
Water dam
Cho 6
Orconcocha
Cho 7
Putacayoc/ Kaukayoc
37504050
Silt reservoirs/Estancia
Cho 8
Llanapaccha
36003750
Necropolis/Water reservoirs
and terraces
Cho 9
Kakacucho
3990
Necropolis
Cho 10
Torreqaka
4312
Settlement
Cho 11
Kunka
3666
Settlement
Zone C
Lla 1
Atunhirca
3500
Settlement
Atunhirca
3475
Settlement/Chullpa
Atunhirca
3500
Settlement/Chullpa
Lla 2
2850
Farmstead?
2875
Ceramic scatter
2938
Ceramic scatter
Lla 3
A Question of Altitude
SITE CODE
SECTOR
SITE NAME
ALTITUDE (M)
Zone C
Lla 4
147
NOTES
Racratumanka
3302
Settlement
Racratumanka
3295
Settlement
Racratumanka
3349
Settlement
Racratumanka
3350
Lla 5
Putaqaqa
3373
Necropolis
Pa 1
Punepampa
3025
Farmstead?
Cajarumi
3627
Necropolis
Cajarumi
3630
Necropolis
Pa 3
Tayapucro
4250
Estancia
Pa 4
Racracocha
4350
Water dam
Puk 1
Cruzqaqa
3275
Machay
Badaquishar
3375
Necropolis
Pa 2
Puk 2
Caschapampa
3275
Terraces/Settlement?
Puk 3
Kolmut
3225
Settlement
Puk 4
Atamar
3562
Chullpa
Cruzpunta kunka
3649
Chullpa
Kiapampa
3698
Chullpa
Cruzpunta
3659
Settlement
Puk 6
Titatuscar
3610
Terraces
Puk 7
Artesaqaqa
3557
Necropolis
Puk 5
Puk 8
Campanarumi
3000
Farmstead
Kipia
3306
Settlement
Kipia
3286
Carved stones
3328
Settlement
3332
Pukullo 2
Puk 10
Colpan
2588
Farmstead
Puk 11
Corpas Rumi
3316
Necropolis?
Capliacasha
3399
Farmstead?
Puk 9
Puk 12
Capliacasha
3453
Terraces?
Puk 13
Intirumi
3434
Chullpas 2
Puk 14
Pumpumyac
3617
Huancas
3187
Platform/Huanca
Puk 15
Puk 16
3591
Chullpas 3
San Juanito
3088
Water reservoir
San Juanito
3073
Settlement/Carved stones
SJ 1
SJ 2
SJ 3
San Juanito
3100
Settlement
San Juanito
3127
Settlement?
San Juanito
3111
Settlement
Warunpunku
3047
Settlement
Warunpunku
3050
Settlement
Tunanquita
2807
Water reservoir
SJ 4
SJ 5
Markita
2881
Settlement/Necropolis
Markita
2827
Settlement
Markita
2820
Settlement
148
T a ble 9.3. R a dioca r bon dates from sites in the surv ey a r ea ca libr ated using the O x C a l 4.2 progr a m a nd the
I nt C a l 09 ca libr ation curv e .
SITE
SITE
CODE
L AB NO.
14
C YEARS
B.P.
CAL 1
R ANGE
CAL 2
R ANGE
PHASE
A SSOCIATION
CONTEXT AND
M ATERIAL
Intiraurn
CO 2
A13211
35040
1455
1637 CE
1440
1653 CE
Late Intermediate
Period/Inca/Colonial
Yurakpecho
CHO 3
A13212
66035
1275
1395 CE
1266
1406 CE
Late Intermediate
Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15861
48922
1411
1445 CE
1401
1453 CE
Late Intermediate
Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15862
46923
1416
1451 CE
1407
1467 CE
Late Intermediate
Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15863
97622
1016
1154 CE
995
1157 CE
Middle Horizon/Late
Intermediate Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15864
39423
1441
1620 CE
1436
1633 CE
Late Intermediate
Period/Inca/Colonial
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15865
80222
1208
1273 CE
1171
1278 CE
Late Intermediate
Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15866
35818
1459
1632 CE
1450
1635 CE
Late Intermediate
Period/Inca/Colonial
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15867
48219
1415
1445 CE
1408
1450 CE
Late Intermediate
Period
Kipia
PUK 9
MAMS15868
35920
1455
1632 CE
1449
1636 CE
Late Intermediate
Period/Inca/Colonial
A Question of Altitude
149
Figure 9.3. Map of Co 1Co 2 agropastoralist landscape. Note corral areas (Co 2, Sectors: 6 & 7; Co 4 and Br 4) and terraced area
(Co 2, Sector: 2). Courtesy Kevin Lane and Luis Coll.
the large and important LIP and subsequent Inka settlement site of Intiaurn (Co 2) (Lane 2011). Numerous estancias7 were also associated with the Collpacocha (Co 1),
further reinforcing the importance of this technology for
the local agropastoralist economy.
Farther upstream toward the twin dammed lakes of
Ricococha Baja (Ra 1A) and Ricococha Alta (Ra 2) are
remains of silt reservoirs similar to those found along the
Chorrillos Valley (see Figure 9.5ad). In a similar fashion
to silt dams, but on a much smaller scale, silt reservoirs
create a small area of biomass-rich pasture (Lane 2009).
Furthermore the dam at Ricococha Baja (Ra 1A) shows
signs of having had water siphoned off below it to create
an area of bofedal through the use of canals (see Figure
9.6ab), a technique similar to that employed by the herders of Chichillapi in Puno (Palacios Ros 1977, 1981, 1996).
150
Figure 9.4. Aerial photograph of Co 1 showing silt basin. Based on the Peruvian IGN (1960).
A Question of Altitude
151
C
D
Outtake
sluice
Figure 9.5. Photographs of pastoralist landscape features, including silt reservoirs: (a) silt reservoir of Patoparinan (Cho 2C), (b) silt
reservoirs on the Rico Valley (note change in pasture tone denoting bofedal vegetation), (c) detail of silt-reservoir dam wall located
in the Rico Valley (with G. Contreras), (d) silt reservoir at Putacayoc (Cho 6C) with outtake sluice at center of structure. Courtesy
Kevin Lane.
152
East Canal
Ricococha
Baja
West Canal
Figure 9.6. Photographs of Ricococha Baja (Ra 1A) basin, showing: (a) route of East and West canal and (b) detail of eastern canal.
Courtesy Kevin Lane.
conclusions
The description of sites above presents considerable evidence of a farmer-herder landscape in which water, and
also soil, was managed at the community and ayllu level
across whole watersheds or valleys (Lane 2009). It is imperative to emphasize this, to wit, that it is a farmerherder landscape, albeit one in which the herders were
the dominant political power. Hence, given that the location of the majority of these dams and reservoirs was in
the upper altitudinal bracket3,800 m asl and aboveof
the cordillera, it would not be remiss to state that control
must also have been exerted primarily from this area. The
number of large, defensible settlements in this upper
zone further supports this suggestion. By implication
then, the dominant political-ecology narrative would
seem to be pastoralist in nature.
Nevertheless, in a bid to avoid the fallacies of old by
just inverting the old agro-centrist argument into a
herder-centric one, we should not obviate the rich agricultural component in this valley. Indeed, we are in the
presence of a truly agropastoralist landscape, agropastoralist insofar as both economies are strongly interrelated and integrated across the communities that
inhabited the whole of the kichwa, suni, and puna
ecozones in this area.
A Question of Altitude
kichwa Zone C. What we are seeing here then is a progressive pushing of the limits of pastoralism downward
to include the more marginally productive agricultural
lands in the suni zone, lands which when rendered to
herding represented a manifold increase in pasture and
animal-carrying capacity.
The other main point to highlight is that ecological
limits are not rigid. If, as we know, maize is sometimes
grown well above its optimal ecological level, then it is
perfectly plausible that other plants and animals were
similarly pushed or shifted from their assumed traditional boundaries. In describing agropastoral communities in the north-central Andes during the late
prehispanic period, we argue that the animals, artificial
pasturage, and probably fodder cultivation produced a
productive suite that was pushed down from the puna
into the cultivated suni zone. This pushing did not
necessarily obey an ecological imperative, rather it was
the result of decisions taken by the dominant section of
a dyadic agropastoralist societyin this case the
herders.
With this in mind it might be necessary to reassess
the role and extent of pastoralism across the Central
Andes. For instance, if we take the limits of agricultural
terracing as a possible cue for determining agricultural
limits and the start of herding in a given area, we can
see that even a cursory survey of existing literature
across such divergent areas as the Colca Valley (Treacy
1994), the middle Mantaro Valley (Bonavia 1968), the
upper Mantaro Valley (DAltroy 1992), Huamachuco
(McGreevy and Shaughnessy 1983), and Chachapoyas
(Schjellerup 1986) all coincide with terraces petering out
in the 3,6003,900 m asl bracket, well within the suni
ecozone. The only exception to the rule is the circumTiticaca region (Erickson 2000), where the presence of
the lake ameliorates the atmospheric temperature, permitting agriculture at a higher elevation.
This begs the question asked throughout this chapter:
What then is happening in this liminal zone? Here we
suggest that human agency allied to a specialized pastoralism within a herder-farmer economy is using this area
to maximize herding production from at least the LIP
through to the LH. More work is obviously necessary to
assess, reinforce, or discard this hypothesis across the
Central Andes. Nevertheless, preliminary work in the
upper Ica Valley (French et al. 2012) is again reinforcing
this pattern with terracing finishing at, or near to, the
3,700 m asl mark before giving over to the sloped and
rolling uplands of the Ica highlands. The implications of
153
not es
154
Cardich, Augusto
1985 The Fluctuating Upper Limits of Cultivation in the Central Andes and Their Impact on Peruvian Prehistory. Advances in World Archaeology 4:293333.
Chepstow-Lusty, Alex J., Michael R. Frogley, Brian S. Bauer,
Mark B. Bush, and Alfredo Tupayachi Herrera
2003 A late Holocene Record of Arid Events from the Cuzco
Region, Peru. Journal of Quaternary Science 18(6):491
502.
Chepstow-Lusty, Alex J., Michael R. Frogley, Brian S. Bauer, M. J.
Leng, K. P. Boessenkool, C. Carcaillet, A. A. Ali, and
A. Gioda
2009 Putting the Rise of the Inka Empire within a Climatic and
Land Management Context. Climate of the Past 5:114.
DAltroy, Terence N.
1992 Provincial Power in the Inka Empire. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Denevan, William M.
1992 The Pristine Myth: The Landscape of the Americas in
1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers
82(3):369385.
Doughty, P. L., and M. F. Doughty
1968 Huaylas: An Andean District in Search of Progress. Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Duviols, Pierre
1973 Huari y Llacuaz: Agricultores y Pastores. Un Dualismo
Prehispnico de Oposicin y Complementaridad. Revista
del Museo Nacional 39:153191.
1986 Cultura Andina y Represin: Procesos y Visitas de Idolatrias y Hechicerias, Siglo XVII. Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos Bartolom de las Casas, Cusco.
2003 Procesos y Visitas de Idolatras: Cajatambo, siglo XVII.
IFEA, PUCP, Lima.
Ellenberg, Heinz
1979 Mans Influence on Tropical Ecosystems in South America: The Second Tansley Lecture. Journal of Ecology
67(2):401416.
Erickson, Clark L.
1986 Agricultura en Camellones en la Cuenca del Lago Titicaca. In Andenes y Camellones en el Peru Andino: Historia, Presente y Futuro, edited by Carlos de la Torre and
Manuel Burga, pp. 331350. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia
y Tecnologa (CONCITEC), Lima.
2000 The Lake Titicaca Basin: A Precolumbian Built Landscape. In Imperfect Balance: Landscape Transformations
in the Precolumbian Americas, edited by David L. Lentz,
pp. 311356. Columbia University Press, New York.
Espinoza Soriano, Waldemar
1978 Huaraz: Poder, Sociedad y Economa en los Siglos XV y
XVI. Reflexiones en Torno a las Visitas de 1558, 1594, y 1712.
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.
Finucane, Brian
2009 Maize and Sociopolitical Complexity in the Ayacucho
Valley, Peru. Current Anthropology 50(4):535545.
A Question of Altitude
Finucane, Brian, Patricia Maita Agurto, and William H. Isbell
2006 Human and Animal Diet at Conchopata, Peru: Stable Isotope Evidence for Maize Agriculture and Animal Management Practices during the Middle Horizon. Journal of
Archaeological Science 33(12):17661776.
Flannery, Kent V., Joyce Marcus, and Robert G. Reynolds
1989 The Flocks of the Wamani: A Study of Llama Herders on
the Puna of Ayacucho, Peru. Academic Press, San Diego,
California.
Flores Ochoa, Jorge A.
1968 Los Pastores de Parata: Una Introduccin a su Estudio.
Serie Antropologa Social 10, Instituto Indigenista Interamericano, Mexico, DF.
1980 Causas que Originaron la Actual Distribucion de las Alpacas y Llamas. In El Hombre y su Ambiente en los Andes
Centrales, edited by Luis Milliones and Hiroyasu Tomeada, pp. 6392. Senri Ethnological Studies, Osaka.
Franklin, William L.
1982 Biology, Ecology, and Relationship to Man of the South
American Camelids. In Mammalian Biology in South
America, edited by Michael A. Mares and Hugh H. Genoways, pp. 457489. Special Publication Series, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
French, Charles, David Beresford-Jones, and Kevin Lane
2012 Changes in Ancient Land and Water-Use along the Ro Ica,
South-Central Andes. Leverhulme Large Research Project,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Gade, David W.
1999 Nature and Culture in the Andes. University of Wisconsin
Press, Wisconsin.
Gose, Peter
1993 Segmentary State Formation and the Ritual Control of
Water under the Inkas. Comparative Studies in Society
and History 35(3):480514.
Graffam, Gray
1992 Beyond State Collapse: Rural History, Raised Fields, and
Pastoralism in the South Andes. American Anthropologist
94(4):882904.
Grant, Jennifer L., and Kevin Lane
2013 La Evolucin del Pastoralismo Sudamericano: Una Perspectiva desde los Andes Centrales y Centro-Sur. In
XVIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueologa Argentina, edited by Daniel E. Olivera. Sociedad de Arqueologa Argentina, La Rioja.
Greenberg, James B., and Thomas K. Park
1994 Political Ecology. Journal of Political Ecology 1(1):112.
Hernndez Lefranc, Harold
2007 De Santiago Matamoros a Santiago-Illapa. Arqueologa y
Sociedad 17:313341.
INRENA
2000 Base de Datos de Recursos Naturales e Infrastructura:
Departamento de Ancash-Primera Aproximacion.
INRENA, Ministerio de Agricultura, Lima.
155
156
Lynch, Thomas F.
1983 Camelid Pastoralism and the Emergence of Tiwanaku
Civilization in the South-Central Andes. World Archaeology 15(1):114.
Mchtle, B., and B. Eitel
2012 Fragile Landscapes, Fragile Civilizations: How Climate
Determined Societies in the Pre-Columbian South Peruvian Andes. Catena 103:6273.
Mayer, Enrique
2002 The Articulated Peasant: Household Economies in the
Andes. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
McGreevy, Tom, and Roxanne Shaughnessy
1983 High Altitude Land Use in the Huamachuco Area. In Investigations of the Andean Past: Papers from the First Animal Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and
Ethnohistory, edited by Daniel H. Sandweiss, pp. 8286.
Latin American Studies Program, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York.
Meddens, Frank M.
1989 Implications of Camelid Management and Textile Production for Huari, in Peru. In The Nature of Wari: A Reappraisal of the Middle Horizon Period in Peru, edited by
R. Michael Czwarno, Frank M. Meddens, and Alexandra
Morgan, pp. 146165. BAR International Series 525, British Archaeological Reports, Archaeopress, Oxford.
Mengoni Goalons, Guillermo L.
2008 Camelids in Ancient Andean Societies: A Review of the
Zooarchaeological Evidence. Quaternary International
185:5968.
Miller, George R. and Richard L. Burger
1995 Our Father the Cayman, Our Dinner the Llama: Animal
Utilization at Chavin de Huantar, Peru. American Antiquity 60(3):421458.
Murra, John V.
1968 An Aymara Kingdom in 1567. Ethnohistory 15:115151.
1978 [1955] The Economic Organisation of the Inka State. JAI
Press, Greenwich.
2002 El Mundo Andino: Poblacin, Medio Ambiente y
Economa. Pontificia Universidad Catlica del Per, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima.
Netting, Robert McC.
1993 Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
Neukom, R., J. Luterbacher, R. Villalba, M. Kttel, D. Frank,
P. D. Jones, M. Grosjean, H. Wanner, J.-C Aravena, D. E.
Black, D. A. Christie, R. DArrigo, A. Lara, M. Morales,
C. Soliz-Gamboa, A. Srur, R. Urrutia, and L. von Gunten
2011 Multiproxy Summer and Winter Surface Air Temperature
Field Reconstructions for Southern South America Covering the Past Centuries. Climatic Dynamics 37(12):3551.
A Question of Altitude
Rostworowski, Mara, and Pilar Remy
1985 Las visitas a Cajamarca 157172/1578: Documentos. Volumen I. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima.
Sarmiento de Gamboa, Pedro
1999 [1572] History of the Inkas. Dover Publications, London.
Schjellerup, Inge
1986 Andenes y Camellones en la regin de Chachapoyas. In
Andenes y Camellones en el Peru Andino: Historia, Presente y Futuro, edited by C. de la Torre and M. Burga, pp.
133150. CONCYTEC, Lima.
Shimada, Izumi, Crystal B. Schaaf, Lonnie G. Thompson, and
Ellen Mosley-Thompson
1991 Cultural Impacts of Severe Droughts in the Prehistoric
Andes: Applications of a 1,500-Year Ice Core Precipitation
Record. World Archaeology 22(3):247270.
Stanish, Charles
2001 Aymara Kingdoms. In Encyclopedia of Prehistory, Volume
7: South America, edited by Peter N. Peregrine and
M. Ember, pp. 3437. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Stein, William W.
1961 Hualcn: Life in the Highlands of Peru. Cornell University
Press, Ithaca, New York.
Stern, Steve J.
1993 Perus Indian Peoples and the Challenge of Spanish Conquest: Huamanga to 1640. University of Wisconsin Press,
Madison.
Thompson, L. G., E. Mosley-Thompson, J. F. Bolzan, and B. R.
Koci
1985 A 1500-Year Record of tropical Precipitation in Ice cores
from the Quelccaya Ice Cap, Peru. Science
229(4717):971973.
Thompson, L. G., E. Mosley-Thompson, M. E. Davis, P. N. Lin,
K. A. Henderson, J. Cole-Dai, J. F. Bolzan, and K. B. Liu
1995 Late Glacial Stage and Holocene Ice Core Records from
Huascarn, Peru. Science 269:4650.
Thompson, L. G., E. Mosley-Thompson, M. E. Davis, V. S. Zagorodnov, I. M. Howat, V. N. Mikhalenko, and P. N. Lin
2013 Annually Resolved Ice Core Records of Tropical Climate
Variability over the Past ~1800 Years. Science
340(945):945950.
Thompson, L. G., M. E. Davis, E. M. Thompson, T. A. Sowers,
K. A. Henderson, V. S. Zagorodnov, P. N. Lin, V. N.
Mikhalenko, R. K. Campen, J. F. Bolzan, J. Cole-Dai, and
B. Francou
157