Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Link Between Musical Achievement and Academic Achievement of Young Children
The article I read is a study of music and whether there is a link between students who are
involved in music and academic success. The authors wanted to know if music education helped
develop students minds and increase intelligence in core subject areas, such as math and
language, etc. They also wanted to find out what other types of skills developed while learning
music.
Summation of Research Literature
School educators have speculated as to whether music actually has an effect on students.
Many studies have taken place over the years in the realm. Some studies have shown that some
teachers prefer music to be an extra activity such as a fun activity. Obviously music educators
feel the opposite. Music teachers feel that music should be intertwined with lessons. Music
should also be used to allow students to tap into talents and abilities.
References
Costley, K. C. (2011). The Link between Musical Achievement and Academic
Achievement of Young Children. Online Submission,
Rickard, N. S., Bambrick, C. J., & Gill, A. (2012). Absence of Widespread
Psychosocial and Cognitive Effects of School-Based Music Instruction in 10-13-Year-Old
Students. International Journal Of Music Education, 30(1), 57-78.
The three forms of mixed-methods designs start with Triangulation. In this design
researchers use quantitative and qualitative data, which have to be collected in one visit to the
field. Explanatory Design only uses quantitative data and unlike Triangulation researchers are
allowed a second trip to the field to collect data. The resources are also limited they have to
collect one at a time, whereas in Triangulation offers the ability to analyze large amounts of date
individually or as a team. Lastly, Exploratory Designs are exclusively qualitative in nature and
like Explanatory, there is no known instruments or variables. Its conducted in two phases like
Triangulation but has limited resources just like exploratory.
Action research differs from formal in several ways. The goals of formal research are
general where as action research is applied to a situation. Identifying the problems is different as
well. Formal is a review of previous material and action is current problems being faced. Formal
is also rigorous with a long time frame and action everything is looser, and the time frame is very
short. Researchers would choose actions research for current issues in the world. They would use
it because it is not something that needs to be dwelled on but has to have a quicker decision.
because of the way each country views their particular music history and it is very much
different than the other.
References
Marshall, N. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2008). Teachers' views of the primary-secondary transition
in music education in England. Music Education Research, 10(1), 63-74.
Chun In. P. (2009), A Study of the Periodization of the History of Korean and Japanese Music.
Acta Koreana, 12(2), 79-126.
Four hundred and fifty seven sixth graders were chosen from ten elementary schools in
Slovenia. Two different questionnaires were created to find how much cognitive and affective
processes took place in music theory learning. A final revised questionnaire was given in the
classroom.
Results and Conclusions
In the end it was found that there was a connection between the two. Students who found
the learning useful use more cognitive strategies to figure out music theory. Self-motivating only
worked with the students who had a vested interest in the subject. For those that did not, it didnt
matter either way. Students needed to enjoy the subject which some didnt.
References
COUTINHO, C., & MOTA, P. (2011). Web 2.0 Technologies in Music Education in
Portugal: Using Podcasts for Learning. Computers In The Schools, 28(1), 56-74.
Smolej Fritz, B., & Peklaj, C. (2011). Processes of self-regulated learning in music theory
in elementary music schools in Slovenia. International Journal Of Music Education, 29(1), 15.