Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
)
Plaintiff-Appellee,
)
)
v.
)
)
EDMOND LEON LEOPARD, also known as )
Red Leopard,
)
)
Defendant-Appellant.
)
______
No. 96-7064
(D.C. No. CR-90-43-1)
(E. Dist. of Oklahoma)
See Fed. R.
trial,
of
five
counts
involving
the
manufacturing
of
127
months
concurrently.
imprisonment
on
Counts
II
and
V,
to
run
On October 24,
the district courts October 24, 1995, Minute Order denying his
Motion to Modify Term of Imprisonment.
In support of his
appeal
and
jurisdictional.
that
this
requirement
is
mandatory
and
- 3 -
(the court may not enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal
. . . except as specifically provided by law.).
See Certain
Therefore,
However,
Leopard did not file a motion for an extension of time until April
18, 1996; over five months past the final deadline.
The district court did not have the power or authority to
grant Leopards motion to file an untimely notice of appeal at such
a late date.
- 4 -
- 5 -