Professional Documents
Culture Documents
N ICHO LA S R . B OY D ,
Petitioner-A ppellant,
v.
No. 05-1543
(D . of Colo.)
Respondents-Appellees.
This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of
the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders; nevertheless, an order may be cited under the terms and
conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
**
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
district court to dismiss [the] action in its entirety without prejudice. Ross v.
County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1189 (10th Cir. 2004); see 42 U.S.C.
1997e(a) (stating [n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions
under section 1983 . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other
correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are
exhausted). Because Boyd did not completely exhaust administrative remedies
for all of his claims, 1997e(a) requires his complaint to be dismissed.
A ccordingly, for the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM. W e further DENY
Boyds motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Entered for the Court
Timothy M . Tymkovich
Circuit Judge
-5-