Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THIS
B. W. MacKenzie
The court-
The adjudged
A month later,
United
Id. at 666.
60 M.J. at 664.
Here,
(C.A.A.F. 2003).
Although
These
Even in an extraordinary
This rise
Length of Delay
As noted, the
This
The Government did not give any reason for the delay.
See United States v. Dunbar, 31 M.J. 70, 73 (C.M.A. 1990)
(delay in forwarding a record of trial to the Court of
Criminal Appeals is the least defensible of all posttrial delays).
Oestmann.
(3)
None of
Prejudice
The
any excessive
94 F.3d at 212.
presumption.
Any delay that reflects a disregard for the rights of
convicted servicemembers is troublesome.
Delays between
Review at a Court of
United States v.
In that same
Diaz, 59 M.J. at