Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
1 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
NAVIGATE anvilfire
Guru's Den
V.Hammer-In
Slack-Tub Pub II
Tailgate Sales
FAQs
Glossary
Links
NEWS!
Plans
Armoury
iForge How-To
When I started making armor as a hobby some 20 years ago, I was faced with a problem.
Health and Safety
Book Reviews
I wanted to make deep-drawn shapes, particularly helmets, without modern welding techniques. For
forming small or shallow pieces like breastplates, knee-cops, and so forth, working with cold sheet steel was
eBooks On-line
not much of a burden. Starting material was usually .080" at thickest, and often much thinner. Cold-working
techniques used by sculptors of non-ferrous stock (such as silver or copper) worked all right - although
scaling the tools up in weight by a factor of two or three really helped!
Anvil Gallery
Vice Gallery
Calendar of Events
The noise was really irritating, though, especially when working against metal forming tools. Steel gives
Story Page
bright, high-pitched bangs when hit cold, especially after it work hardens a bit. I didn't like the repeated
shocks to my hands and arms, either, when forming the heavier gauges.
AnvilCAM - II
Touchmark Reg.
It was helmet-making that finally defeated me. I made many helmets by forming heavy-gauge (14 to 12)
halves in a metal die, then welding the halves together. I hated it. The trimming, fitting, clamping, welding,
Power Hammers
and cleanup were processes that (I thought) weren't teaching me anything I wanted to know, and were
boring to boot. I wanted to make helmet skulls out of one-piece blanks, with no weld seams - the grand old
What's New
way. But a couple of attempts at sinking and raising large pieces of 12 gauge plate utterly vanquished me. I
simply did not have the strength or endurance!
The solution had to be the use of heat. But was this "period"? Back in the 1980's, when I started out, most
literature on the subject of actual armor fabrication did not deal much with the use of heat during forming
operations. Brian Flax, in his SCA periodical "The Hammer", published in the early 80's, dealt with raising as
a helmet-making technique, but his experiments were done with cold metal, although frequently annealed
Daily Comics
in a forge. Mainstream books published on arms and armor usually described manufacturing operations only
in the broadest, briefest terms (e.g., "metal was cut from plates, then hammered over stakes", etc).
Then one day I talked to Robert MacPherson, one of the most accomplished armorers on the planet (and an
excellent fellow, by the way); he heard out my troubles, and explained to me that cold-raising heavy steel
plate was "an act of heroic madness". He used heat. That was good enough for me!
Webring Nexus
Our Sponsors
Welcome visitor from
So, I tried some sinking and raising of 14 gauge plate using a coal forge that I had built some years
previously for making tools. I had some success; I actually managed to roughly raise a small sallet using
the forge and an improvised stake made from a torch-cut piece of railroad rail. The awkwardness of
constantly tending the fire, dealing with bursts of smoke, and the fact that I was working in my carport and
annoying my neighbors, convinced me to find another way.
What about a propane forge? Mr. MacPherson (as I recall) used an oxy-fuel torch to heat plate for raising.
Canada
An oxy-acetylene rosebud heating tip can indeed bring a good area of steel plate up to workable
temperature fast, but I wanted to try a different approach: make a propane-air rig for the purpose. The fuel
would be relatively cheap, and if properly designed, such a forge could hold the work while heating it.
So, around 1995 (I can't remember the exact date), I set about it.
To start, some obvious parameters. First: Helmets start out as disks. Well, to be more precise, their starting
blanks are based on disks; they fit egg-shaped human heads, so they have to finish approximately as
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
2 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
domes or cylinders. Simple skull-type helmets (Norman, say) start as disks of 15" in diameter, or so. The
biggest helmet blank I ever could conceive of using was about 22" in diameter. Therefore, I needed a forge
with a "throat" of about 12"; if it could heat the center of a 24" diameter blank, I figured I would be
covered. Even large breastplates could be accommodated.
Next parameter: size of the heated zone. In theory, you can build a huge furnace and heat the entire blank
for every "stanza", as the silversmiths call it. Not desirable. Enormous waste of fuel, heating areas that
don't get worked. Great loss to firescale. Handling a big, totally orange-hot sheet. If I were feeding the
blank into a giant toggle press, a la 1930's auto industry, heating the whole thing might make sense; but
alas, I can only hammer a small area of the blank before it needs reheating. So, I wanted to heat an area of
about 5" square. I estimated that was about the limit I could work during a useable heat.
Next: The forge has to be able to keep heating the piece as it changes shape! Most helmets start as a flat
disk, teardrop, oval, etc; then they become deeper and narrower bowls, and (sometimes) can become
nearly a foot deep, and less than 7" wide in some internal dimensions.
From 1995 to about 1999 I messed around with various configurations. I had some embarrassing failures,
but around the year 2000 I came up with a design that I have now been using for seven years with very
minor modifications.
I'll skip the trauma of the formative years; here are photos of my current forge.
Nasty-looking thing, really, but I am fairly happy with it. There are about a dozen refinements that I would
like to install, but I feel no great urge for another "Mark" in design; this basic configuration does what I
need. Most of the time.
Forge Design
The forge consists of the following units: Frame, chamber, deck (or stage), and burner. The gas hoses,
valves, regulator, tank and so on are all easily available commercial products, and can be found in just
about any large town in the USA.
Frame:
Most of the frame is 1" square tubing, 14 gauge wall. It is cheap, easy to work, and fairly strong. If I ever
build another forge, I will go up one size, to 1.25" tubing, just for the extra strength and mass the bigger
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
3 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
stuff affords.
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
4 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
Side note: The mechanically adept among you may shiver a bit when you see how often I pierced these
frame members with holes that decrease their wall strength. Mea culpa. This is the main reason why I will
eventually rebuild this forge with bigger, thicker tubing. The frame has held up fine for years, but those
holes do bother me. This is especially true around the pivot pin; this is the weakest area of the frame.
Naturally, this design limits the travel of the deck support. It can only go up until the deck hits the bottom of
the chamber (no great reason for it to go much higher than that), or the screw hits the bottom arm (unless
you slotted the bottom arm, of course). It can only go down until you run out of screw length.
If I rebuild, I will probably keep most of the dimensions, or maybe enlarge them 10-15%; this setup has
worked well for me. But I would almost certainly beef up the pivot pin section. I might go to a 3/4" pin, and
maybe to a 7/16" or 1/2" screw. I might also mount the pin between ears outside the top arm, thus getting
rid of the side holes.
The top-crank design for raising and lowering the deck support seems awkward; you have to reach around
the (hot!) chamber to work it. Curiously, though, I got used to this fairly quickly, and I don't really mind it.
It was very simple to build.
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
5 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
One smith of my acquaintance built a version of this forge and installed a foot-operated lever arrangement
to raise/lower the deck support from below. Very ingenious, but he is very mechanically skilled, and I am
definitely not. I will probably stick to the hand-crank.
Now, why the sockets to hold the chamber and the deck? Well, that suggestion was actually made by John
Segura, a member of the Arizona Artist Blacksmith Assocation (AABA), our chapter of ABANA. In an earler
model, I bolted them onto the arms. He pointed out that with sockets, you could very quickly change
chambers and decks, if you had different sizes of them. That turned out to be a great idea, as will be shown
later.
Deck:
More properly, decks; plural. I have two. The one
on the left is 8" wide, the other is 6" wide. I start
blanks on the big one; when the helmets (or
other pieces) get narrow, I switch to the little
one.
These decks were built up and somewhat modified over time. I've settled on a basic design. I bend 1/8"
metal strap into a U-shape of width I want. I weld another straight piece of same metal across open end of
U, giving a D-shape. I then weld on a sheet metal bottom, 12 or 14 gauge; doesn't much matter. The depth
of the deck is determined by the refractories I have on hand. In the bottom of the deck, I put insulating
refractory, like soft kiln brick. On top of that, I put a slab of hard alumina kiln shelving. Both the insulating
layer and top layer must be sawn to fit the deck, fitting very loosely, since they will expand when highly
heated. So, ideally, the height of the deck walls is the sum of the two refractory layer thicknesses.
As you can see in the photos above, neither of these decks are ideal height; the 8" one had to have pieces
spliced on to hold the kiln shelf, and the 6" one was a tad too high. Oh, well. They work fine.
It's easy to saw soft insulating brick; I just ruin a cheap hacksaw blade. I cut kiln shelf with a wet diamond
tile saw, which I rent from a big box store.
The hard deck floor absorbs a lot of heat when the forge operates, especially when I am working on the
piece and the forge is empty. When the piece is put back in, the hot floor helps reheat it. Of course, this
means the floor goes through big temperature cycles many hundreds of times; eventually, it develops at
least one big hairline crack. But that doesn't really affect performance.
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
6 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
Chamber:
This was the most trying part of the design. The chamber I use today is the fifth or sixth one I've tried. I'm
fairly happy with it, although I may try a slightly larger one in the future.
The stainless steel ring goes on loosely, held by three stainless clips, which in turn are held to the chamber
outer wall by three very short stainless machine screws. They're short, so they don't go into the insulation
wall any great distance.
I mount the burner so that only 2-3 millimeters of the nozzle pokes into the chamber; barely passing
through the metal, into the hole in the ceramic wool ceiling. The slightly flared hole in the wool functions as
a sort of nozzle extension; the flame seems to propagate well. This is why the ceiling hole must be heavily
coated with ceramic paint. One benefit of this is that the burner nozzle functions for hundreds of hours with
almost no erosion.
As noted above, my current chamber is 8" in diameter at the base. With 1" wool insulation, that means the
ID is 6" at the base. I figured this would heat a round spot of 4" to 5" in diameter fairly quickly, and so it
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
7 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
does. For some operations, like massive sinking, I would like a bigger zone, so I may build a 10" OD
chamber someday, which will probably heat a 7" zone.
The chamber being 8.5" high, it seems a rather skinny shape. I've found this half-angle to work well; the
flame seems to propagate and "wash" the inside of the chamber, and get the inside up to incandescence in a
few minutes. Shorter, squatter chambers did not seem to work as well. If I build that 10" OD chamber, I will
stretch the height accordingly to keep the same proportions as my current 8" chamber.
Burner:
I use a 3/4" T-Rex Burner, purchased from hybridburners.com. I've made a few of the Ron Reil design
burners, and they functioned fairly well; but getting a professionally-made burner upped the performance of
the forge markedly. In the future, I will probably buy more burners of the T-Rex line, rather than making my
own.
Operation
A couple of views, after the forge reaches full heat. Input gas pressure is about 8 lbs. The deck and walls
get to a good orange, and mild steel plate reaches working heat fairly quickly.
5/16/2016 12:57 AM
8 of 8
http://www.anvilfire.com/article.php?bodyName=/plans/ething_forge/sh...
This was my solution to the sheet metal heating problem. One thing I must emphasize: This forge is a
specialized tool. It works well for heating plate; but for almost any other purpose, it is very inefficient. It is
definitely not a general purpose design for blacksmithing! The 360 degree access, and its very "openness",
means that the chamber never gets super hot. A horizontal enclosed gas forge of good design will get much
hotter, even reaching welding heat with sufficient gas pressure.
Copyright
5/16/2016 12:57 AM