You are on page 1of 1

What is a Greek Myth?

there are no claims o f d i v i n e i n s p i r a t i o n ; m o r e o v e r , the stories


n o r m a l l y are t o l d i n p r i v a t e and i n prose; I t has recently been
persuasively suggested that the w o r d Sage presupposes an archaic,
perhaps even I n d o - E u r o p e a n , n a r r a t i v e prose t r a d i t i o n . U n l i k e at
R o m e , however, where the f o u n d a t i o n m y t h o f R o m u l u s and
R e m u s was a p p a r e n t l y handed d o w n i n prose, i n archaic Greece
m y t h s were the exclusive t e r r i t o r y o f poets. It is true that dist i n g u i s h e d scholars, such as G . S. K i r k , have made use o f the
n o t i o n o f the folktale to e x p l a i n motifs o f Greek m y t h , but it must
be stressed that such tales s i m p l y are not attested
Greece.

i n archaic

17

W h a t exactly is a G r e e k m y t h ? W e started this chapter w i t h


B u r k e r t ' s d e f i n i t i o n o f m y t h as 'a t r a d i t i o n a l tale w i t h secondary,
p a r t i a l reference

to s o m e t h i n g o f collective i m p o r t a n c e ' . T h i s

d e f i n i t i o n has p r o v e d to be v a l i d for the whole p e r i o d o f Greek


h i s t o r y . A t the same t i m e , h o w e v e r , we have seen that m y t h s are
not always t r a d i t i o n a l tales, n o r is t h e i r collective i m p o r t a n c e the
same d u r i n g the whole o f Greek h i s t o r y . Perhaps one could propose a slightly simpler d e f i n i t i o n :

' t r a d i t i o n a l tales relevant to

society'. I t is true that to us the appearance o f gods a n d heroes is


an essential part o f Greek m y t h , but the supernatural presence is
only to be expected

when religion

is embedded

in society.

18

W e s t e r n secularised societies have nearly abolished the supern a t u r a l , but they usually still have their favourite (historical) tales
that serve as models o f b e h a v i o u r o r are the expression o f the
c o u n t r y ' s ideals. I t is t h e i r relevance to G r e e k society that makes
the mythoi still fascinating today, for however different the Greeks
were from us, they were also very m u c h the s a m e .

19

Notes
1. T h e notes are confined to the most recent literature. I am in general much
indebted to Fritz Graf, Gnechtsche Mythoiogie ( M u n i c h and Z u r i c h , 1985).
2. For a survey of the various explanations, see G . S. K i r k , Myth: Its Meaning and
Functions in Ancient Mythology and Other Cultures (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London,
1970) 1 - 4 1 ; W . Burkert, 'Mythos und Mythoiogie', in Propylden Geschuhte der
Ltteratur, I (Berlin, 1981) J 1 - 3 5 ; Graf, Mythoiogie, 1 5 - 5 7 .
3. Traditional tales: K i r k , Myth,
3 1 - 4 1 and The Nature of Greek Myth
(Harrnondsworth, 1974) 2 3 - 3 7 ; Burkert, S&H, 23; Graf, Mythoiogie, 7.
4. Pre-Homeric mythology: Graf, Mythoiogie, 5 8 - 6 8 . Mycenaean layer: A .
Hoekstra, ' E p i c Verse before H o m e r ' , Med. Ned. Ak. Wet., AJd. Letterk., NR., JOS
(1981) 5 4 - 6 6 ; note also A . Snodgrass, 'Poet and Painter in Eighth-Century

You might also like