Plagiarism Scan Report

Summary
Report Genrated Date

24 Jun, 2016

Plagiarism Status

0% Unique

Total Words

999

Total Characters

6281

Any Ignore Url Used

s.
co

Content Checked For Plagiarism:

lS
eo
To

ol

The UN's basic philosophy is both anti-American and pro-totalitarian. Our Declaration of
Independence proclaims the "self-evident" truth that "men ... are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable rights." But, in its Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN ignores God's
existence, implies that it grants rights, and then repeatedly claims power "as provided by law" to
cancel them out of existence. If any government can place restrictions on such fundamental rights as
freedom of speech, the right to keep and bear arms, freedoms of the press, association, movement,
and religion, soon there will be no such freedoms.

al

2. The UN was founded by Communists and CFR members whose common goal was a socialist world
government. Sixteen key U.S. officials who shaped the policies leading to the creation of the UN
were later exposed in sworn testimony as secret Communists. These included Alger Hiss, chief
planner of the 1945 founding conference, and the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Harry Dexter
White. The Soviet Union under Stalin and the entire Communist Party USA apparatus worked
tirelessly to launch the UN. Since its beginning in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has
always worked for world government. The key CFR founder, Edward Mandell House, in his book,
Philip Dru: Administrator, called for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx ..." The CFR was an
early promoter of the UN, and 43 members of the U.S. delegation at the UN founding conference
were or would become CFR members.

Sm

3. The UN has always chosen socialist one-worlders for leaders. The Secretary-General at the UN
founding conference was Soviet spy Alger Hiss. He was followed as Secretary-General by Norwegian
socialist Trygve Lie, Swedish socialist Dag Hammarskjold, Burmese Marxist U Thant, Austrian
(former Nazi) Kurt Waldheim, Peruvian socialist Javier Perez deCuellar, and Egyptian socialist
Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Each has consistently used the full resources of the UN to promote
Communist and socialist causes around the world. The Socialist International (which proudly traces
its origins to the First International headed by Karl Marx) today claims tens of millions of members
in 54 countries. At its 1962 Congress, it declared: "The ultimate objective of the parties of the
Socialist International is nothing less than world government ... Membership of the United Nations
must be made universal ..." Almost all of the UN's "independent" commissions for the last thirty
years have been headed by members of the Socialist International.
4. The UN seeks power to control the environment, population, children...the world. Both the 1972
UN Environmental Program and the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development laid
plans to whip up widespread environmental concerns (some exaggerated, many completely
fabricated). These concerns would then be used as justification for increasing UN authority on
environmental issues. The statements and publications of these UN programs leave little doubt that

their goal is a world government with the power to cancel national sovereignty, regulate economic
activity, and control the human race all, of course, under the banner of "protecting the
environment." In late 1994, UN planners meeting in Egypt approved a 20-year, $17 billion plan to
"stabilize" the world's population. The UN's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging
abortion, sterilization, and controlled human breeding. The UN Convention on the Rights of the
Child also claims power not only to grant rights but also to cancel them "as provided by law." It
claims that governments must guarantee children "freedom of expression ... freedom to seek, receive,
and impart information ... freedom of thought, conscience, and religion," regardless of the wishes of
their parents.

s.
co

5. The UN Charter outlines the path to world tyranny. After giving lip service about not intervening
"in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state ...," the UN Charter
continues, "but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under
Chapter VII." Chapter VII discusses sanctions and boycotts, but if these are decided to "be
inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or
restore international peace and security." The UN used this broad assertion of authority as the
pretext for its armed intervention in the domestic turmoil in Somalia and Haiti.

al

lS
eo
To

ol

6. The UN is building its own army to enforce its will. In 1992, UN Secretary-General Boutros
Boutros-Ghali, fulfilling a directive from the UN Security Council, unveiled An Agenda for Peace, a
plan to strengthen UN "peacekeeping" capabilities. The plan calls for armed forces to be made
available to the UN "on a permanent basis." It ominously warns, "The time of absolute and exclusive
sovereignty has passed" and proceeds to name a long list of "risks for stability" that would be used to
justify use of the "permanent" UN army to enforce its will. Incredibly, U.S. leaders are using
America's military to pave the way for this UN army. In Bosnia, Somalia, Haiti, and elsewhere,
foreign UN commanders have controlled our troops. When 15 Americans were killed over Iraq in
mid-1994, Vice-President Gore extended condolences "to the families of those who died in the
service of the United Nations." Even more incredibly, it has been the official policy of the U.S.
government since 1961 to disarm America and create a UN army. This policy concludes:
"progressive controlled disarmament would proceed to the point where no nation would have the
military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force." (See State Department
publication 7277: Freedom >From War.)

Sm

7. The UN doesn't settle disputes - it makes them worse! Our ambassador to the UN in 1982,
although a UN supporter, admitted, "The UN has become an arena in which countries are drawn
into problems they might never have become involved in. " Ask yourself: Should Seychelles or Benin
or Guyana or Barbados have to take sides in a clash that breaks out on the opposite side of the world?
When centuries-old animosities erupt in the former Yugoslavia, why does the UN inject its presence
with troops, blockades, bombing,
Report generated by smallseotools.com