Professional Documents
Culture Documents
php
Semantic
The subject:
discontinuity
The predicate:
These sentences are written in the active voice because the subject of the
sentence is doing the action. i.e. the lion does the chasing and James does the
writing. The following sentences are written in the passive since subject of the
sentence has the action done to it.
The tree was chopped down by the lumberjack.
The car was driven by the chauffeur.
The tree (subject) was chopped down by the lumberjack and the car (subject)
was driven by the chauffer.
N.B. If you ever want to check whether a sentence is written in the active or
passive voice then type it into a standard word-processing package such as
Microsoft Word or Lotus and you will find that sentences written in the passive
voice will usually be underlined in green.
Writing in the passive voice is common in scientific writing but not exclusive to
it. Osborne and Wellington suggest the reasons why reports are written in the
passive voice:
'…reports or explanations tend to remove the agents, the scene, the motives
and any sense of temporality. It is generally argued that science seeks to
portray itself as a source of objective knowledge… it (science) seeks to
distance itself (from subjective accounts of experience) and portray the
knowledge it offers as something which is the reflection of a real world which
is independent of any observer.' (Wellington and Osborne, 2001, p 65)
However, we suggest that there is another reason why science is often written
in the passive voice. Consider the sentences below:
In each case, the sentence is written in the passive voice or, in other words,
the verb is passive. This means that the subject of the sentence (electricity,
fruits and seeds and food and oxygen) has the action done to it. In the
active voice, the sentences would be written as:
Here the verb is active; the subject of each sentence (wire-cable, parent-
plant and blood) is doing the action. So, by writing in the passive voice, the
subject of the sentence is changed. This is significant because, science is not
always concerned with the subject when the verb is active. For example, the
following sentence would be appropriate if the focus of the report was on how
electricity is transferred from place to place:
However, the sentence below would be more appropriate if the report was
concerned with conductors and insulators:
Similarly, the sentence below would be appropriate if the focus of the report
was about plants and how they pollinate.
From these few examples, we hope to have shown that it is not just a tactic
used to persuade the reader of the authority of an argument or statement but
is a genuine resource used in scientific writing to communicate.
And we are all familiar with those who, not being scientists, have borrowed
the trappings of scientific language and are using it purely as a language of
prestige and power - the bureaucracies and technocracies of governments and
multinational corporations. In bureaucracies these features have no reason to
be there at all, because there is no complex conceptual structure or thread of
logical argument. But they serve to create distance between writer and
reader, to depersonalise the discourse and give it a spurious air of being
rational and objective.
Back
All site content © 2002 The Order of Things Site designed and built by JetLabs Ltd.