Professional Documents
Culture Documents
June 5, 1996
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-1240
Petitioner,
v.
Respondent.
____________________
ERRATA SHEET
The
opinion of
this Court
issued on
May 30,
1996 is
amended as follows:
date, add
____________________
No. 96-1240
Petitioner,
v.
Respondent.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
__________
BIA
decision.
reasons stated
Accordingly, we affirm,
in that
in the
the following
comments.
1.
conviction
deportation
is an "aggravated felony"
proceeding.
See
___
U.S.C
1101(a)(43)
("aggravated
controlled
felony"
includes
substances
as
defined
924(c));
In any
the definitions
event, the
petitioner
point is
conceded
his
in
trafficking
21
U.S.C.
crimes as defined in 18
(explaining
illicit
in
802,
U.S.C.
of "aggravated"
and "felony").
not properly
deportability in
raised to
the
us, as
proceedings
2.
The
BIA's
description
of
petitioner's juvenile
witnesses.
characterization
"robbery," we
find any
background point to
such inaccuracy on
be harmless.
this tangential,
See White v.
INS, 17 F.3d
___ _____
Cir. 1994)
(INS error is
___
harmless unless
it
-2-
3.
We perceive no merit
"many
or
ignored."
Our
discloses
that
fair
opportunity to
review of
the
record
to it.
See 8 U.S.C.
___
brought
1105a(c); Alleyne v.
_______
4.
no
grounds
for
reversal.
The
BIA
considered
all
the
because of the
petitioner's
favor.
Even
in
light
of
the
outstanding
BIA
discretion, and
Board on the
this court
manner in
which it
will not
"second-guess the
weights different
factors
There
being
no
substantial
question for
review,
we
summarily affirm the decision of the BIA and deny and dismiss
______
____
_______
-3-