Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 1. Map of Diaguita territory and archaeological sites mentioned in this paper.
immediately
prior to the Diaguita. Physical
anthropological studies indicate a population change
occurred similar to that of the Molle culture associated
with the Early Agro ceramic period (Niemeyer et al.,
1997).
With nimas, polychrome ceramics become
very popular in the region together with the use of thick
geometric outlines, the painting of both outer and inner
surfaces, and the smoking of the interior surface of
vessels. The quadripartite division of the design field is
very common in Animas pottery, involving the use of
triangular spaces that go from the rim edge to the base of
the bowl (see Figure 2).
Evidence for the consumption of hallucinogens
in the nimas culture include bone spatulas (some with
representations of speckled felines and personages with
headdresses [the Sacrificer]); tubes made of bird bone
Figure 3. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Cuzco iconography: 1) slanting reticulate pattern; 2-13)
checkered pattern; 14) quadripartite pattern B; 15-28) rhomboid pattern in translation.
14
Figure 4. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Cuzco iconography: 1-6) clepsydra pattern between
parallel bars in translation (4.2: Bird-handled plate N727, Museo Arqueolgico de La Serena; 4.4: Bird-handled plate
N907, Museo Arqueolgico de La Serena); 7-15) Cuzqueo zigzag pattern; 16) perpendicular reticular pattern; 17-18)
triangles in horizontal translation pattern.
15
Figure 5. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Cuzco iconography: 1) slanting parallel bars in horizontal
translation; 2) curved lines in horizontal translation; 3) ferns or maize plant in translation; 4) vertical parallel lines in
translation; 5) crosses in horizontal translation; 6-7) concentric circle; 8-11): lambda-type Inca; 12) triangle in displaced
reflection; 13-15) scrolls in rotation; 16) and 18) vertical zigzag in translation; 17) undulating vertical lines in horizontal
translation; 19) double specular reflexion of lambda-type (Quatripartite D); 20) concentric circles in translation; 21)
horizontal parallel bars with slanting outlines; 22) diametral cross; 23) clepsydra inserted in a square; 24) speckled
felines; 25) "Z" in horizontal translation; 26) triangles in rotation and reflection; 27) Suche fish of the altiplano and
rectangles in translation (Plate N1059, Museo Arqueolgico de La Serena).
16
17
Altovalsol
I. Cuzqueos
1. Slanting reticulate pattern
2. Checkered pattern
3. Rhomboid pattern in translation
4. Clepsyidra pattern between parallel bars in translation
5. Ferns or maize plant in translation
6. Slanting parallel bars in translation
7. Triangles in horizontal translation pattern
8. Cuzqueo zigzag pattern
9. Isolated rhombus
10. Four zigzag vertical lines in translation
11. Vertical parallel lines in translation
12. Lambda-type Inca
13. Perpendicular reticular pattern
14. Curves in horizontal translation
15. Horizontal lines in translation
16. Concentric circle
17. Triangles in rotation and reflection.
18. Triangles in rotation
19. Double specular reflection D or Quatripartite D
20. Scrolls in rotation
21. Horizontal parallel bars with slanting outlines
22. Zet in horizontal translation
23. Clepsydra inserted in a square
24. Speckled felines
25. Diametral cross
26. Four Triangles with lamda in vertical reflection
27. Four rectangles in translation
28. Four "Suche" fish in rotation.
29. Concentric circles in vertical and horizontal translation
30. Undulated vertical lines in translation
II. Diaguitas
1. Zigzag B 2
2. Zigzag D2
3. Zigzag C
4. Zigzag D
5. Zigzag J
6. Double Zigzag A
7. Double Zigzag D1
8. Double zigzag D2
9. Double zigzag D3
10. Waves A
11. Waves C 2
12. Waves F1
13. Chains A 2
14. Chains C
15. Chains D
16. Chains F 1
17. Chains F2
18. Chains H
19. Diaguita Reticular A
20. Fourth Style
III. Mixed Inca Diaguita
1. Zigzag G
112
8
7
31
11
4
3
5
9
1
2
2
3
1
Huana
62
17
9
14
1
Pisco Control
54
5
3
5
12
1
2
11
1
4
1
1
2
4
2
2
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
41
6
3
10
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
12
1
1
23
1
2
3
10
2
2
4
1
1
4
2
4
1
2
1
1
5
16
18
1
1
6
1
Total
228
30
19
50
24
5
3
7
21
1
3
7
3
4
5
5
2
1
1
1
4
3
1
2
2
13
1
5
1
3
1
74
9
3
14
3
3
13
1
1
2
2
1
4
2
4
1
2
1
1
6
1
24
1
1
1
1
1
7
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
7
5
5
5
186
13
7
6
6
6
345
1
1
1
1
68
91
Table 2: Decorative patterns of Diaguita-Inca phase from dwelling sites of Choapa Valley.
Cuzqueos
1. Slanting reticulate
pattern
2. Checkered pattern
3. Rhomboid pattern in
translation
4. Clepsyidra pattern in
translation
5. Fernst in translation
6. Slanting parallel bars
in translation
7. Triangles in horizontal
translation pattern
8. Cuzqueo zigzag
pattern
9. Isolated rhombus
10. Zigzag vertical lines
in translation
11. Vertical parallel lines
in translation
12. Lambda-type Inca
13. Perpendicular
reticular pattern
14. Curves in horizontal
translation
15. Horizontal lines in
translation
16. Concentric circle
17. Crosses in horizontal
translation
18. Double specular
reflection B
Diaguitas
Zigzag A
Zigzag B2
Loma Los
Brujos
196
122
4
18
S.
Ramrez
2
F.
Carvajal
Crcamo
6
3
Csped
1
2
2
Csped
3
2
Agua
Amarilla
8
Total
213
124
1
3
13
5
22
13
6
3
6
3
2
1
9
2
3
2
6
2
2
2
2
1
19
1
44
11
2
51
4
6
19
56
4
5
28
2
1
135
8
4
141
7
1
474
37
19
4
1
8
1
11
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
16
1
60
4
1
1
3
14
3
3
3
1
17
1
2
22
1
7
6
6
1
1
2
5
1
6
96
1
247
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
151
1
1
696
3
1
1
3
10
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
2
4
1
1
1
3
4
1
24
7
1
99
2
1
1
1
2
1
219
46
51
59
31
139
20
Figure 6. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Diaguita iconography: 1) zigzag A; 2) zigzag B; 3) zigzag
C1; 4) zigzag C2; 5) zigzag C3; 6) zigzag C4; 7) zigzag D; 8) zigzag J1; 9) zigzag J2; 10) zigzag L; 11) double zigzag A1;
12) double zigzag A2; 13) double zigzag A3; 14) double zigzag A4; 15) double zigzag A5; 16) double zigzag A6; 17)
double zigzag B; 18) double zigzag C; 19) double zigzag D1; 20) double zigzag B2; 21) double zigzag D3.
21
Figure 7. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Diaguita iconography: 1) double zigzag E1; 2) double
zigzag E2; 3) double zigzag F; 4) waves A1; 5) waves A 2; 6) waves A3; 7) waves A4; 8) waves A5; 9) waves B; 10)
waves C1; 11) waves C2; 12) waves D; 13) waves E; 14) waves F1; 15) waves F2; 16) waves F3; 17) waves G; 18)
labyrinth C; 19) and 20) labyrinth A; 21) labyrinth B.
22
Figure 8. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase with Diaguita iconography:1) chains A1; 2) chains A2; 3) chains
B1; 4) chains C1; 5) chains C3; 6) chains D1; 7) chains E1; 8) chains E2; 9) chains G; 11) chains H; 12) Diaguita
reticular; 13) stepped in horizontal reflection; 14) fourth style; 15) stepped lambda in rotation and slanting translation.
Figure 9. Decorative patterns of the Diaguita-Inca Phase of mixed Inca and Diaguita iconography: 1) Diaguita reticular B;
2) labyrinth D; 3) horizontal stepped in vertical translation; 4) stepped rectangles in translation; 5) stepped in vertical
reflection; 6) double specular reflection A; 7) double specular reflection C; 8) double specular reflection D; 9) double
specular reflection E; 10) zigzag G; 11) zigzag I; 12) zigzag K; 13) zigzag M; 14) zigzag N; 15) double zigzag G1; 16)
double zigzag G2; 17) double zigzag H; 18) double zigzag I1; 19) double zigzag I2; 20) stepped and checked in interior
lateral reflection; 21) anthropomorphic representation; 22) four triangles in translation.
24
25
Table 3: Representation of decorative patterns than express the symbolic principle of quadripartition in archaeological
sites from the Diaguita-Inca phase under study. The percentages presented here are calculated on the basis of the total
count of individual decorative patterns identified at each site.
Altovalsol
Pisco
Control
Huana
53
25
Mixed
Inca-Diaguita
Decorative Patterns
Inca Paya Decorative Patterns
11
11
75 (40%)
29
(43%)
26
Sucesin
Ramrez
Crcamo
6
Agua
Amarilla
14
Loma
Los
Brujos
33
14
(15%)
33
(15%)
1 (2%)
3 (5%)
1 (0.6%)
Figure 11. Graphical representation of the symbolic principle of yanantin in Diaguita-Inca Phase iconography with its
complementary principles of Awqa, Taypi, Tinku and Kuti from exterior surface of a bell-shaped bowl (N1704, Museo
Arqueolgico de La Serena).
This work has been supported by the Fondecyt Agency (Grant Nos.
1950012, 1980248, and 1040154).
28
Cuzqueo
60%
Altovalsol
Pisco Control 79%
Huana
68%
Diaguita
22%
15%
25%
Mixed
Inca-Diaguita
9%
23%
7%
Saxamar
6%
1.5%
Inca Paya
(NOA)
3%
1.5%
of
the
Body
in
30
the
References Cited
X. Preliminary Conclusions
Given the information presented in this paper, it is
possible to see how the Inca manifest a strategy of
differential interaction in the interior of Diaguita territory.
In the central and northern Diaguita areas, a unique
process of cultural mixing between Incas and Diaguitas
seems to have been underway, which is visible even in
the mortuary practices.
On one hand, this relationship made possible the
transference and translation of a rich and complex
iconography from the Cuzco area that was associated
with the nobility, while at the same time permitting the
co-existence and interaction with local graphic
manifestations in the Diaguita region. This transferral
accentuated an extant internal differentiation within the
local population, amongst whom the shamans stand out
as having been a particularly important social element.
Parsinnien (2003, p.157), citing Karsten (1946), however,
reminds us that, "nothing was more foreign to the Inca
mentality than the idea of equality between human
beings. It is for this reason that one sees the clear
segregation of local populations from the "true Inca"
throughout the empire. This is visible on the local scale in
the southern Diaguita area.11 Because of this general
tendency on the part of the Inca, it is particularly
interesting to note the seeming disruption of this pattern
in the central and northern Diaguita region.
This paper offers a contribution to our growing
understanding of the specific processes of social
integration and distancing that occurred during the late
prehispanic period. It also demonstrates the essential role
played by the visual art systems of both the Incas and
Diaguitas in these processes.
11
See chapters by Bray and Horta, this volume, for more detailed
discussion of specific material culture elements in local contexts.
31
GONZLEZ, P., 1995. Diseos cermicos DiaguitaInka: estructura, simbolismo, color y relaciones
culturales. Memoria para optar al ttulo de arqueloga,
Departamento de Antropologa, Universidad de Chile.
GONZLEZ, P., 2001. El arte visual Diaguita preincaico y su vinculacin con tradiciones chamnicas
sudamericanas. XIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueologa
Argentina, 4-8 octubre 1999, Crdoba, Tomo I. Crdoba:
Editorial Brujas, 223-233
REICHEL-DOLMATTOFF,
G.,
1985.
Aspectos
chamansticos y neurofisiolgicos del arte indgena. In:
MUSEO CHILENO DE ARTE PRECOLOMBINO, ed.
Estudios en Arte Rupestre. Santiago: Museuo Chileno de
Arte Precolombino, 291-307.
33