Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared By:
David R. Dearth, P.E.
Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.
16731 Sea Witch Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Telephone (714) 846-4235
E-Mail AppliedAT@aol.com
Web Site www.AppliedAnalysisAndTech.com
For purposes of this analysis a medium mesh model definition was borrowed from an
Abaqus example problem “3.2.11 Notched unreinforced concrete beam under 3-point
bending”. (2.)
Since Marc uses a linear tension softening modulus, Es, results from Abaqus/Standard
with linear tension softening are used for comparison. [Ref. Figure 3.2.11-6 Plane stress
Abaqus/Standard mesh refinement study – medium mesh.]
Note: As noted in the Abaqus example, when linear tension softening is assumed in the
Abaqus solution, this leads to a response that is overly stiff compared with the
experimental observations of Petersson.
Enforced Displacements
dy = - 0.8 mm (0.0315")
“d” “b”
“a”
“e” Simple
Supports
“L” Both Ends
Y-Z Symmetric
Plane, BC = Tx
The concrete is idealized using 2D Plane Stress elements. Young’s modulus of elasticity for the concrete is given as:
MSC/Marc vs Abaqus/Standard
Reference 1
References
1) Petersson, P. E., “Crack Growth and Development of Fracture Zones in Plain
Concrete and Similar Materials” Report No. TVBM-1006, Division of Building
Materials, University of Lund, Sweden, 1981
http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/13/668/13668228.pdf
2) Dassault Systems, 3.2.11 Notched unreinforced concrete beam under 3-point bending
Abaqus 6.13 Abaqus Benchmarks Guide, 2013
http://129.97.46.200:2080/v6.13/books/bmk/default.htm
3) MSC/Marc Reference Manuals & Finite Element Analysis System: Volumes A, B, C, D"
MSC Software Corporation, 2 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana, California 92707