Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAPER
1.
Introduction
View Online
2.
Experimental
View Online
before and after the ball-milling for 48 h are shown in Fig. 1. The
XRD pattern before the treatment showed diffraction peaks of
cellulose crystalline around 16 , 22 , and 34 . From the XRD
pattern, the crystallinity of cellulose was calculated to be about
75%.20 In contrast, the crystalline peaks disappeared but the
amorphous halo peak appeared around 20 in the XRD pattern
of the milled cellulose, which indicated that the crystallinity of
cellulose was markedly decreased by the ball-milling treatment.
The SEM images of the milled cellulose are shown in Fig. 2.
The powder was between 10 and 100 mm in size. The brous
morphology was not observed.
Table 1
Characterization data
SiO2
g-Al2 O3
H-mordenite (10)
H-beta (13)
H-ZSM5 (45)
H-beta (75)
Activated-carbon
AC-SO3 H
Sulfated zirconia
Amberlyst 15
Si/Al molar
ratio
S contents/
mmol g-1
Acid sitesa /
mmol g-1
SAb /
m2 g-1
nd
nd
10
13
45
75
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
0.0
0.44
1.2
1.7
0.095
0.049
0.7
1.05
0.30
0.18
1.25
1.63
1.60
1.8
407
140
15
105
124
315
1243
806
52
nd
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of cellulose before (a) and after the ball-milling
(b).
The characterization data of the catalyst materials are summarized in Table 1, in which the values given in parentheses
for the H-form zeolites are the Si/Al ratios. In the case of Hform zeolites, the amounts of Al atoms theoretically correspond
to the amounts of Brnsted acid sites. The acid sites were
determined by the titration method in aqueous solutions and
were inversely proportional to the Si/Al ratios, except for Hmordenite (20). It was difcult to accurately determine the acid
sites of H-mordenite (20) because the powder was suspended
in the NaOH aqueous solution and some parts of the powder
couldnt be separated from the aqueous solution for the titration.
The specic surface areas of catalysts were measured without
pre-heating treatments (Table 1). The areas of the H-form
zeolites were lower than those after the dehydration treatment
at about 673 K. In particular, the H-form of zeolites with lower
Fig. 2
View Online
Fig. 4 Changes in product yields during the cellulose hydrolysis using the dilute acid of 0.01 M H2 SO4 (a) and the AC-SO3 H catalyst (b) at
423 K. Reaction conditions; Catalyst 50 mg, cellulose 45 mg, distilled water (or dilute acid) 5mL, agitation.
View Online
Fig. 5 Recycle catalytic runs. (a) After the 1st run with AC-SO3 H
catalyst, the catalyst was removed by ltration, and then fresh cellulose
was added into the ltrate solution without solid catalyst and the 2nd run
occurred. (b) After the 1st run with AC-SO3 H catalyst, fresh cellulose
was added into the slurry solution including solid catalyst and products.
After the 2nd run, fresh cellulose was added again into the solution with
the catalyst, and the 3rd run occurred. Reaction conditions were same
as those in Fig. 1.
4.
Conclusions
We have presented for the rst time that solid acid catalysts hydrolyze cellulose selectively into glucose by an environmentally
friendly chemical process. Among H-form zeolite catalysts, the
hydrophobic zeolites with high Si/Al ratios showed the relatively
high yield of glucose from cellulose under hydrothermal conditions at 423 K. The sulfated zirconia and Amberlyst 15 catalysts
showed higher activity than the H-form zeolite catalysts, however there were large amounts of SO4 2- ions and by-products in
the resultant solution. The sulfonated activated-carbon catalyst
showed high activity and remarkably high selectivity for the
glucose production from cellulose. This hydrothermal process
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. M. Ikehara for CHNS analysis, Prof. A. Usui
for SEM observations, and the Catalysis Society of Japan for
reference catalysts.