You are on page 1of 9

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

DOI 10.1007/s12665-012-1822-9

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Optimization of concurrent mining and reclamation plans


for single coal seam: a case study in northern Anhui, China
Zhenqi Hu Wu Xiao

Received: 1 September 2011 / Accepted: 2 July 2012 / Published online: 19 July 2012
Springer-Verlag 2012

Abstract The extraction of underground ore body inevitably causes a large amount of land subsidence. Current
reclamation technologies in China mainly focus on stable
subsided land, which means most of the affected lands are
submerged into water because of the high groundwater
table in some areas, leading to the loss of soils and inefficient reclamation. Therefore, a new technology for
reclaiming unstable subsiding land is being studied for
restoring farmland as much as possible, based on a case
study in northern Anhui, China. In consideration of the
mining plan, subsidence processes in various stages were
analyzed and some related factors such as vertical subsidence, post-mining slope, water area, and land use condition were also simulated. Due to mining activities, useful
farmland has gradually decreased to merely 14.4 % of the
pre-mining area. In this study, the following stages were
modeled from pre-mining to post-mining: (1) percentage of
farmland was 100 % in stage (a) (pre-mining), (2) 72.5 %
in stage (b), (3) 67.3 % in stage (c), and (4) 14.4 % in stage
(d) (post-mining). The results show that 86.6 % of cultivated land was submerged into water and lost its capacity
for cultivation after coal mining. Reclamation plans for
stages (b), (c), and (d) were made by a traditional reclamation method called Digging Deep to Fill Shallow.
Based on scenario simulation of reclamation, the farmland
reclamation percentages were improved to 78.3, 73.3, and
40.70 %, respectively. Taking the percentage of reclaimed
farmland as the preferred standard, concurrent mining and
reclamation for stage (b) and (c) could increase farmland

Z. Hu (&)  W. Xiao
Institute of Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration,
China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),
Beijing 100083, China
e-mail: huzqbj@yahoo.com.cn

reclamation percentages to 37.6 and 32.6 %, respectively,


compared with the farmland reclamation percentage of
post-mining [reclaiming the land in stage (d)]. The results
reveal that optimum reclamation time should be at stage
(b). Therefore, under current technical conditions, concurrent mining and reclamation could enhance the quantity
of cultivated land and provide better land protection and
food security in the mined areas with high groundwater
table.
Keywords Mining subsidence 
Concurrent mining and reclamation  Land protection 
Subsidence prediction  Planning scheme  Optimization

Introduction
China is the number one coal production and consumption
country. The coal outputs exceeded 3 billion tons in 2010,
accounting for 42 % of the global production (Wang 2009).
However, mining and utilization of coal may cause serious
environmental impacts such as coal waste disposal, poisonous gas emissions, land subsidence, landscape change,
etc. Comparatively, land subsidence seems to be one of the
most prominent problems in China, because 92 % of the
coal output comes from underground mining, with thousands of underground long wall panels. Underground
mining activities disturb the surface severely, and this situation is even more prominent in east and northeast China
(Xiao et al. 2009), which are both main coal and agricultural production regions (called Overlap Region). The
Overlap Region covers 40 % of the total farmland in China
and contains 58 % of national coal production and 45 %
of food production (Hu and Luo 2006). High-intensity
extraction of underground coal results in large-scale

123

1248

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254


Table 1 Percentage of coal production by mining method in 2006
Country

Underground (%)

Surface (%)

China

95

2,380

USA

31

69

1,054

India

19

81

447

Australia

22

78

Russia

Fig. 1 Coal yield and growth rate from 1990 to 2010 in China

257

Germany

197

Indonesia

195

Poland

156

123

60

40

6,195

Abandoned mine site hazards assessment (Kim et al.


2006, 2009) and mine land reclamation have been extensively studied by many scholars (Bascetin 2007; Wu et al.
2009; Xiao et al. 2011). Approximately, 60 % of the
worlds coal production comes from underground mines,
and China accounts for much of the worldwide underground operations (Table 1). Comparatively, the other four
main coal production countries such as USA, India,
Australia, and Russia adopt less underground mining.
Therefore, farmland subsidence and related reclamation are
relatively less of a concern in these countries (Bell et al.
2005). The impact of subsidence may vary from site to site
due to differences in geology and soil conditions. For
example, Illinois, USA, also a typical coal and agricultural
production overlap region, has maximum subsidence of
about 3 m (Darmody et al. 1992; Darmody 1995), thus,
making reclamation work much easier as compared to
China. In addition, reclamation strategies are much more
diverse outside of China where agricultural land resources
and population pressures are not as pressing.
Since the 1980s, Chinas land reclamation has made
considerable progress in restoring subsidence land with
different methods (Hu 1994a, b); they are:
(a)

Fig. 2 Cultivated land quantity variation from 2001 to 2008 in China

405
309

South Africa

Total world

ground settlement, barren farmland, and a decrease in


cultivated land. It is estimated that the subsidence area
extends from 0.2 to 0.33 ha, when 10,000 tons of coal are
extracted underground. Subsidence is expected to expand
2 9 104 ha annually throughout China (Hu 1996). Thousands of hectares of affected land lost the capacity of
cultivation because of extraction of a thick coal seam and
high groundwater table. The depth of ponding water on the
ground surface could reach 13 m (Wang et al. 2009). Thus,
farmland loss and degradation caused by underground
mining activities is serious in China. In fact, coal mine
production increased over the past 10 years and reached its
peak with 18.35 % growth rate in 2003 (Fig. 1). It is predictable that mining production will continue to expand in
the foreseeable future, because of rapid economic growth.
Thus, the quantity of subsided agricultural land will continue to rise.
According to the Annual Bulletin issued by the Ministry
of Land and Resource (MLR) in 2008, cultivated land was
decreased to 1.22 9 108 ha at the end of December 2008,
with merely 0.09 ha farmland per capita (Fig. 2). Consequently, the Chinese government also retains the amount of
1.2 9 108 ha farmland as a base red line to ensure food
security in 2020. How the limited cultivated land resources
are protected is particularly important at this stage of rapid
economic growth.

Total (Mt)

Digging Deep to Fill Shallow: The technology


divides the subsidence-prone area into two parts: deep
and shallow, then makes the deep area deeper by an
excavator for digging a fish pond, and the excavated
soil is moved to the shallow part for reclamation of
cultivate land. Hydraulic dredge pumping is one of
the Digging Deep to Fill Shallow methods.
(b) Directly reconditioning: If there is no water in some
shallow subsidence areas and the subsurface water
level is not very high, the method of directly
reconditioning the subsided land can be used. Usually, the subsided land is leveled by bulldozers or
often by manual work. If the slope of the subsided
land is large, terraces should be used.

1248

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254


Table 1 Percentage of coal production by mining method in 2006
Country

Underground (%)

Surface (%)

China

95

2,380

USA

31

69

1,054

India

19

81

447

Australia

22

78

Russia

Fig. 1 Coal yield and growth rate from 1990 to 2010 in China

257

Germany

197

Indonesia

195

Poland

156

123

60

40

6,195

Abandoned mine site hazards assessment (Kim et al.


2006, 2009) and mine land reclamation have been extensively studied by many scholars (Bascetin 2007; Wu et al.
2009; Xiao et al. 2011). Approximately, 60 % of the
worlds coal production comes from underground mines,
and China accounts for much of the worldwide underground operations (Table 1). Comparatively, the other four
main coal production countries such as USA, India,
Australia, and Russia adopt less underground mining.
Therefore, farmland subsidence and related reclamation are
relatively less of a concern in these countries (Bell et al.
2005). The impact of subsidence may vary from site to site
due to differences in geology and soil conditions. For
example, Illinois, USA, also a typical coal and agricultural
production overlap region, has maximum subsidence of
about 3 m (Darmody et al. 1992; Darmody 1995), thus,
making reclamation work much easier as compared to
China. In addition, reclamation strategies are much more
diverse outside of China where agricultural land resources
and population pressures are not as pressing.
Since the 1980s, Chinas land reclamation has made
considerable progress in restoring subsidence land with
different methods (Hu 1994a, b); they are:
(a)

Fig. 2 Cultivated land quantity variation from 2001 to 2008 in China

405
309

South Africa

Total world

ground settlement, barren farmland, and a decrease in


cultivated land. It is estimated that the subsidence area
extends from 0.2 to 0.33 ha, when 10,000 tons of coal are
extracted underground. Subsidence is expected to expand
2 9 104 ha annually throughout China (Hu 1996). Thousands of hectares of affected land lost the capacity of
cultivation because of extraction of a thick coal seam and
high groundwater table. The depth of ponding water on the
ground surface could reach 13 m (Wang et al. 2009). Thus,
farmland loss and degradation caused by underground
mining activities is serious in China. In fact, coal mine
production increased over the past 10 years and reached its
peak with 18.35 % growth rate in 2003 (Fig. 1). It is predictable that mining production will continue to expand in
the foreseeable future, because of rapid economic growth.
Thus, the quantity of subsided agricultural land will continue to rise.
According to the Annual Bulletin issued by the Ministry
of Land and Resource (MLR) in 2008, cultivated land was
decreased to 1.22 9 108 ha at the end of December 2008,
with merely 0.09 ha farmland per capita (Fig. 2). Consequently, the Chinese government also retains the amount of
1.2 9 108 ha farmland as a base red line to ensure food
security in 2020. How the limited cultivated land resources
are protected is particularly important at this stage of rapid
economic growth.

Total (Mt)

Digging Deep to Fill Shallow: The technology


divides the subsidence-prone area into two parts: deep
and shallow, then makes the deep area deeper by an
excavator for digging a fish pond, and the excavated
soil is moved to the shallow part for reclamation of
cultivate land. Hydraulic dredge pumping is one of
the Digging Deep to Fill Shallow methods.
(b) Directly reconditioning: If there is no water in some
shallow subsidence areas and the subsurface water
level is not very high, the method of directly
reconditioning the subsided land can be used. Usually, the subsided land is leveled by bulldozers or
often by manual work. If the slope of the subsided
land is large, terraces should be used.

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

(c)

Filling: A type of landfill method, filling subsidence


land with some filling materials such as coal wastes
and fly ash.
(d) Drainage: Establishment of a system of drains such as
a trench can make the impounded water drain away
and lower the subsurface water level so that the
subsidence land is relatively raised.
Both filling and non-filling methods are good earthwork
measures and well applied in China. However, all reclamation works were focused on stable subsided land, which
means subsidence reaches the final settlement condition
after the excavation of coal is completed. In this situation,
more than half of the subsided land was already submerged
in water and the fertilized topsoil was lost permanently. The
manner of reclamation is a kind of post-mining retreatment;
it leads to a low percentage of farmland reclamation and
inevitably increases the reclamation cost. Therefore, it is
necessary to develop a new technology that could take
measures for advance planning, conservation, and management before land subsidence falls below the water table.
The improved plan and technology could raise the farmland
percentage and lower reclamation costs. This research takes
a colliery located on the eastern plain in China as an
example, to analyze and simulate subsidence processes
according to the geological condition and mining system,
and optimize concurrent mining and reclamation planning.

Basic information in the study area and research


methods
Basic information in the study area
The study area is located in the northern part of Anhui
Province in eastern China, covering about 24.1 ha. It is a
typical plain mining area in eastern China, with flooded
subsidence lands and densely populated villages. The natural elevation is ?30 to ?32 m above mean sea level, with
an average of ?31.0 m. The underground water table is
about 2 m below the soil surface, and the ground is flat
with a slope of 02. The climate is humid continental,
typical of that of eastern China, with great inter-annual
variability of precipitation. Most precipitation falls
between June and September. Because of its humid climate, abundant sunshine, and four distinct seasons, it is one
of the most important grain production areas in China.
The main coal seams in this area are named nos. 4 and 6,
with an average thickness of about 2.2 and 2.8 m, respectively. The buried depths of coal seams are about
350450 m and 380550 m, respectively. The dip angle of
coal seams varies from 3 to 15. The overburden has
a thick alluvial strata reaching 120160 m, and the

1249
Table 2 Basic parameters for surface movement and deformation
prediction
Parameters

Value

Coefficient of the initial mining (q)

0.96
0

Coefficient of the repeated mining (q )

1.20

Horizontal movement coefficient (b)

0.3

Influence propagation angle tangent (tgb)

1.80

The displacement distance (S)

0.03H0

Subsidence velocity factor (c)

11.6

Influence angle (h)

89

Fig. 3 Schematic of typical geological section in the study area

compaction of soil caused by the loss of water makes the


subsidence factor reach 0.96 (Table 2). A schematic of a
typical geological section is shown in Fig. 3.
The eight panels referring to no. 6 coal seam were
extracted from March 1997 to the end of 2004 leading to a
maximum subsidence depth of 2.5 m. The subsided land
was reclaimed to some fish ponds and farmlands with
original elevation in 2005. Excavation of the no. 4 coal
seam commenced in January 2007; four panels were
included and will last till September 2012. The layout of
panels and mining schedule are illustrated in Fig. 4 and
Table 3. Thus, the influence of the mining activity in the
study area could be treated as a single coal seam (no. 4)
extraction. This paper analyzed the dynamic evolution of
ground condition and land use to optimize the concurrent
mining and reclamation.
Research methods
Dynamic mining subsidence prediction and geological
information system (GIS) were used in this paper; the
process of dynamic scenario simulation was derived
according to the specific geological condition and mining
schedule in different stages. Mining subsidence prediction

123

1250

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

function, and probability integration method have been


produced. In the recent 30 years, deterministic (mechanistic) methods including finite element method and
boundary element method based on rock mechanics were
presented (Kratzsch 1983). In deterministic modeling, the
in situ mechanical properties of rocks are of particular
importance. Probability integration method, developed
from random medium theory, is the most mature and
applied prediction model in China; the software (MSPS)
used in this paper was programmed based on this theory.
Dynamic subsidence prediction was also applied, utilizing
one of the most widely used time functions proposed by
Knothe (1959):
f x 1  ect
where t is the time that elapsed from the opening of the
cavity and c is the subsidence velocity factor, whose value
depends on the characteristics of the ground and on the
units in which the time is expressed.
3.

Construction of dynamic ground subsidence model

Dynamic ground subsidence model can be constructed


in two phases: raster interpolation and superimposition.
Fig. 4 Layout of no. 4 coal seam workface

(a)

Table 3 Mining schedule of no. 4 coal seam


Number of
panel

Mining time

Average
depth (m)

Average seam
thickness (m)

452

2007.12007.12

280

2.2

453-1

2009.122010.6

280

2.3

453-s2

2010.112011.3

280

2.3

454

2011.92012.9

300

2.0

455

2008.42009.7

250

2.1

system (MSPS), developed by China University of Mining


and Technology, was chosen to analyze the mining impact,
and Arcinfo, released by Environmental Systems Research
Institute (ESRI), was chosen for ground analysis and simulation. The procedures are as follows:
1.

Acquisition of original terrain data

According to the information provided by Hengyuan


colliery, the topographic map surveyed in 2005 by the total
station was adopted, which contains elevation points and
isograms.
2.

Acquisition of subsidence information in various


stages

After decades of research, some useful theories and


methods of mining subsidence prediction (Konthe 1959;
Peng and Luo 1991) such as profile function, influence

123

Raster interpolation

Interpolation predicts values for cells in a raster from a


limited number of sample data points. It can be used to
predict unknown values for any geographic point data:
elevation, rainfall, chemical concentrations, noise levels,
and so on. Since the obtained original terrain data and
dynamic subsidence information in step (1) and step (2)
were presented as points and isograms, interpolation was
then adopted by Arcinfo to achieve comprehensive raster
information. The vector information (points and isograms)
was converted to raster data format automatically by
Arcinfo.
(b)

Superimposition

Superimposition between interpolated raster data of step


(1) and step (2) could generate a state of ground subsidence. By using this method, dynamic ground subsidence
could be produced for different mining stages.
4.

Analysis and monitoring

The dynamic ground subsidence model for each panel


and various stages could be determined and analyzed based
on mining plan. Temporal and spatial dynamic changes of
the ground could be monitored, including vertical subsidence, extent of water area, land use change, slopes, and
aspects of surface in each mining stage. Virtual reclamation schemes at different stages were produced. Finally, the
percentage of restored farmland was considered as the
preferred standard to optimize the schemes.

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

1251

(B)

panels 452, 455, and 453-1 were mined completely in


September 2010,
(C) panels 452, 455, 453-1, and 453-2, were mined
completely in March 2011,
(D) panels such as 452, 455, 453, and 454 were all mined
completely in September 2012.
Movement and deformation at various stages were represented as subsidence isograms and deformation isograms.
The study area is located in eastern China, a region with
thick alluvium on the near surface and a high underground
water table (the groundwater table is 13 m below the soil
surface). According to previous studies, cracks derived
from deformation have a small influence on the utility of
the cultivated land surface. The most significant impacts to
cultivated land were submergence into water caused by
vertical subsidence, and soil erosion and deterioration
caused by additional slope at the edges of the subsidence
basin (Hu et al. 1997). Therefore, dynamic vertical subsidence based on temporal and spatial distributions was
treated as a major consideration for scenario simulation.
Fig. 5 Pre-mining TIN in the study area

Results and analysis


Scenario simulation
1.

Original terrain data

The study area is 24.1 ha, with a northsouth length of


about 1,100 m and eastwest width of about 220 m
(Fig. 5). The surface was roughly flat before extraction of
no. 4, with the elevation between 30 and 32 m and slope
between 0 and 2. The study area was good farmland with
aquaculture ponds on both sides.
2.

Mining subsidence prediction at various stages

Prediction of ground subsidence associated with underground mining based on the shape of the final settlement
trough of the ground surface could be insufficient. Surface
subsidence due to mining is a dynamic process which
obeys mechanical principles (Saids 1995). Particularly,
dynamic processes of land use change and water ponds
distribution in temporal and spatial domain could provide a
more intuitive and rational vision for the manager and
engineer in the coal and grain overlap region. Characteristics and timing of mining subsidence could be monitored
through dynamic prediction. The prediction parameters are
indicated in Table 2.
In consideration of the mining schedule and layout, the
study area was divided into four stages as shown below:
(A)

two panels 452 and 455 were mined completely in


July 2009,

3.

Scenario simulation at various stages

Based on the local conditions, the local government set


the criteria for subsidence damage: the land becomes a
permanent water area when the vertical subsidence reaches
2.0 m, and the land becomes a seasonal water area when
the vertical subsidence reaches 1.5 m. The criteria were
validated through field measurement in this research, and
ground elevations of ?29.0 and ?29.5 m were defined as
permanent and seasonal water criteria. These validated
criteria would benefit temporal and spatial analyses. The
development of ponding areas at various mining stages is
subdivided into four stages, as shown in Fig. 6.
Stage (A) (2007.12009.7): Excavation of coal at panels
452 and 455 were completed. Mining activities only
reached a super-critical level in strike orientation and were
sub-critical in inclination orientation because two panels,

Fig. 6 Changes of water area at various stages

123

1252

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

Fig. 7 Land use changes at various stages on the ground

Fig. 8 Reclamation layout and


elevation at various stages
exception of the stage A without
reclamation work

453 and 454, were not mined. Thus, vertical subsidence on


the ground was not serious and created no ponding area.
Stage (B) (2009.82010.9): Excavation of panel 453-1.
In this stage, water rose in the ground and expanded
gradually until September 2010.
Stage (C) (2010.92011.3): After a slight break, the
extraction of panel 453-2 made the situation even worse.
However, the water area, including both perennial and
seasonal, changed slowly.
Stage (D) (2011.42012.10): Panel 454 was the final
panel in this mining area. Its excavation led to a severe water

123

expansion in the ground, because the mining reached a supercritical level both in inclination and strike orientation.
According to dynamic ground subsidence simulation,
land use change was analyzed (Fig. 7). (a), (b), (c), and
(d) correspond to the four mining stages of (A), (B), (C),
and (D). Although the excavation of panel 452 and 455
impacted the ground, it did not change the land use because
there was no water accumulation on the surface (Fig. 8).
Along with the excavation of panel 453-1, water gradually
rose in the ground and finally reached 20.6 ha, accounting
for 85.6 % of the study area; the area of cultivated land

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

1253

decreased to 3.5 ha, only accounting for 14.4 % of the


study area. The proportions of cultivated land were 100,
72.5, 67.3, and 14.4 %, respectively, corresponding to the
four mining stages. This shows that the excavation of no. 4
coal seam led to a lot of farmland loss because of water
accumulation due to mining subsidence.
Optimization of reclamation plans and analysis
Dynamic ground scenario simulation provides a vision to
understand the development of subsidence in the ground.
If reclamation work was launched after all the mining
activities had ended, a lower percentage of farmland restoration would be produced because most of the land would
subside into water and lack of filling materials. Furthermore, the existence of large areas of water may make the
reclamation work more difficult and increase reclamation
costs. Because of submergence of important topsoil into
water, the reclaimed land might have poor soil condition
due to lack of topsoil. Therefore, reasonable reclamation
time and the best reclamation plan seem to be particularly
important in a high underground water table area.
1.

Optimization of reclamation plan

Following are the basic principles for making a concurrent mining and reclamation plan:
(a)

Reclamation earthwork adopted Digging Deep to


Fill Shallow technology.
(b) Filling materials from outside of the study area for
reclaiming the subsided land were not used.
(c) Dynamic subsidence prediction for every stages was
adopted and the elevation of reclaimed land at every
reclamation stage should be rational to ensure that the

reclaimed land could withstand the impact of following settlements.


According to the considerations above, different stages
of mining reclamation measures were taken into account.
The extraction level of panel 452 and 455 had less impact
on agriculture in stage (a); therefore, only reclamation in
stages (b), (c), and (d) was considered. The layout and
designed elevation are shown in Fig. 8. The percentage of
reclaimed farmland reaches 78.3, 73.3 and 40.7 % at the
stage (b), (c), and (d), respectively.
2.

Result analysis

Extracting a horizontal layered ore body is a continuous,


slow, and gradual subsidence process. The manner and
extent were different in various stages. Table 4 shows the
advantages, disadvantages, and the reclamation efficiency
at various stages.
If reclamation measures were taken too early (stage a),
the influence of underground extraction would not be
transmitted to the ground completely or the effect may not
be sufficient to interrupt normal agricultural activities. This
means increased costs and more interruption of agricultural
activities. The reclamation project needs to accommodate
subsequent settlement, including vertical subsidence, tilts,
horizontal deformation and curvatures. Conversely, if reclamation measures are taken too late (stage d), most of the
topsoil will sink below the water table and soil resources
cannot be guaranteed for reclamation. This increases both
reclamation costs and construction difficulties, and may
lead to a very low percentage of farmland reclamation and
poor farmland productivity. Therefore, the most appropriate stages would be stage (b) and stage (c), when panel 453
was under mining. At this stage, the land began to

Table 4 Optimization and comparison of reclamation plans in various stages


Stages

Mining condition

Condition before
reclamation

Advantages

Disadvantages

Percentage
of reclaimed
farmland
(%)

(a)

452 and 455

Start of subsidence,
no water area

Most of the topsoil resources


available, high percentage
of reclaimed farmland

High reclamation costs, occupying


the land for so long a period
influences normal agricultural
work, more residual subsidence

(b)

452, 455, and 4531

Water area rise, with


less area

More topsoil could be


protected, high percentage of
reclaimed farmland

High reclamation costs, partial


residual subsidence influence

78.3

(c)

452, 455, and 453

Subsidence increases,
water area expands,
but with a low
proportion

More topsoil could be


protected, high percentage of
reclaimed farmland

High reclamation costs, partial


residual subsidence influence

73.3

(d)

452, 455, 453, and


454

Most of the area


submerged into water,
little farmland exists

Stable ground, less residual


settlement exists

No topsoil resource, low percentage


of reclaimed land

40.7

123

1254

Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:12471254

submerge into water and the land reclaimed at this stage


could save a lot of soil and guarantee high percentage of
farmland reclamation.

Conclusions
1.

2.

3.

Based on mining schedule and geological condition,


dynamic scenarios of land subsidence due to coal
mining are simulated by dynamic subsidence prediction and spatial analysis for a horizontal layered single
coal seam. This paper simulated three stages of land
subsidence caused by underground mining. The failure
mode, damage area, and degree of damage were analyzed quantitatively. The results revealed that: the
percentage of farmland decreased gradually from 100
to merely 14.4 % from pre-mining to post-mining due
to mining subsidence (the four stages correspond to
100, 72.5, 67.3, and 14.4 %, respectively). If reclamation measures were adopted until the ground stabilized, 86.6 % of cultivated land would submerge into
water and lead to a low percentage of reclaimed
farmland (40.7 %).
Based on the scenario simulation, a virtual reclamation
plan was under consideration for three mining stages.
Farmland reclamation percentages were 78.3, 73.3,
and 40.7 % corresponding to stage (b), stage (c), and
(d).
Taking the percentages of reclaimed farmland as the
preferred standard, the farmland reclamation percentages at stages (b) and (c) could be increased to 37.6
and 32.6 %, respectively, compared against delaying
reclamation until the land stabilizes [stage (d)].
Consequently, restoring subsided land in stage (b) or
stage (c) would decrease construction difficulty, protect the topsoil maximally, and enhance farmland
reclamation percentage. The optimum reclamation
time was at stage (b).

In summary, research shows that using dynamic subsidence


prediction with reclamation scenario simulation and taking
the percentage of reclaimed farmland as the preferred
standard, the best concurrent mining and reclamation time
and plan can be obtained.
Acknowledgments The research has been supported by nonprofit
industry research and special funds provided by the Ministry of Land
and Resources in China, approval no. 200911015-03. The authors
offer their special thanks for the research and valuable assistance
provided by Anhui Wanbei Coal Group and Anhui Hengda Ecological
Construction Engineer Co., Ltd. Special thanks also go to Dr. R.G.
Darmody (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Dr. Richard
Barnhisel (Executive Secretary of American Society of Mining and
Reclamation), Dr. S.K. Chong (Southern Illinois University at Carbondale) and Mr. Steve Hewitt for their comments and editing.

123

References
Bascetin A (2007) A decision support system using analytical
hierarchy process (AHP) for optimal environmental reclamation
of an open-pit mine. Environ Geol 52:663672
Bell FG, Donnelly LJ, Genske DD, Ojeda J (2005) Unusual cases of
mining subsidence from Great Britain, Germany and Colombia.
Environ Geol 47:620631
Darmody RG (1995) Modeling agricultural impacts of longwall mine
subsidence: a GIS approach. Int J Min Reclam Environ 9(2):
6368
Darmody RG, Hetzler RT, Simmons FW (1992) Coal mine
subsidence: effects of mitigation on crop yields. Int J Min
Reclam Environ 6(4):187190
Hu ZQ (1994a) The technique of reclaiming subsidence areas by use
of a hydraulic dredge pump in Chinese coal mines. Int J Min
Reclam Environ 8(4):137140
Hu ZQ (1994b) Land reclamation plan for mining subsidence. Mining
survey 2:134139
Hu ZQ (1996) Subsidence land management and reclamation in coal
mining areas. Coal Industry Press, Beijing
Hu ZQ, Luo YM (2006) Problems, reasons and countermeasures for
environmental quality and food safety in the overlapped areas of
crop and mineral production. Sci Technol Rev 24(3):9394
Hu ZQ, Hu F, Li JH, Li HX (1997) Impact of coal mining subsidence
on farmland in eastern China. Int J Min Reclam Environ
11(2):9194
Kim KD, Lee S, Oh HJ, Choi JK, Won JS (2006) Assessment of
ground subsidence hazard near an abandoned underground coal
mine using GIS. Environ Geol 50:11831191
Kim KD, Lee S, Oh HJ (2009) Prediction of ground subsidence in
Samcheok city, Korea using artificial neural networks and GIS.
Environ Geol 58:6170
Konthe S (1959) Observation of surface movement under influence of
mining and their theoretical interpretation. Proc European Congr
on Ground Movement (Leeds, UK)
Kratzsch H (1983) Mining Subsidence Engineering. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin
Peng SS, Luo Y (1991) Subsidence prediction in Illinois coal basin.
In: Proc. 10th Int Conf on Ground Control in Mining, West
Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, pp 212219
Saids I (1995) Dynamic subsidence prediction over longwall mining
in Abu-Tartur mines. Land Subsidence Proceedings of the
Fifth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, Egypt,
pp 161166
Wang XZ (2009) Actively respond to challenges of the financial
crisis, promote healthy and sustainable development of coal
industry: International Coal Summit 2009 Speech. China Coal
Industry Association, Beijing
Wang ZL, Zhang QB, Li R (2009) Study on flood resources
comprehensive utilization and ecological restoration technology
of coal mining depressed area. J Nat Resour 24(7):11561162
Wu QY, Pang JW, Qi SZ, Li YP, Han CC, Liu TX, Huang LM (2009)
Impact of coal mining subsidence on the surface landscape in
Longkou city, Shandong Province on China. Environ Earth Sci
59:783791
Xiao W, Hu ZQ, Xu XL, Fu YH (2009) Cost definite method of land
reclamation in coal mining area. J Coal Sci Eng 35:175179
Xiao W, Hu ZQ, Gong BK, Zhang PP, Han B (2011) Visualization of
the characteristics of mining subsidence with the consideration
of topography: a case study in China. Int J Min Miner Eng
3(1):1625

You might also like