International Journal of Computer Systems (ISSN: 2394-1065), Volume 03 Issue 02, February, 2016

Available at http://www.ijcsonline.com/

Measuring Sensitivity Secure Login Information Systems by using SPSS Software

(An application on Neelain university SUDAN )

Dr. Mozamel M. Saeed

Associate professor, Department of Computer Science,
Collage of Science Prince Sattam Bin Abdul-Aziz University, KSA

Abstract
Research conducted to measure the sensitivity of secure login information (username / password) in the field of
electronic systems through three different electronic systems in nature (electronic tests, electronic banking accounts and
personal sites for social networking),by using SPSS program. Application on the community of (Neelain university
SUDAN). Targeting a random sample of (80) respondents from the university (Students and teaching staff members
males and females). Research concluded that the three systems (electronic tests, electronic banking accounts and
personal sites for social networking), differ statistically and significantly in the extent of their need to secure access to
data entry (username / password). It concluded that the electronic banking system is more sensitive compared to the
other systems. Followed by the electronic testing systems then the social networking systems. Research applied (T) Test
and examined that there is a general interest in securing the login information (username / password) in the field of
electronic systems.
Keywords: Sensitivity of information, Electronic systems, Information access, Neelain university, SPSS..

I.

II.

INTRODUCTION

The electronic communities were found since the

emergence of the internet. They provided means for
communication and exchange of information on specific
topics of common interest to all people from all over the
world, enabling numerous opportunities to share
information between all network subscribers with
possibilities of interactivity. There is disagreement with
regard to the meaning of privacy and personal life as a
result of this communication, where information is shared
with others, even without request. Therefore there is a need
of security protection for this information.
The process of protecting information systems depend
primarily on its sensitivity. It is important that there should
be a clear classification of the importance of information.
Where, for example, it can be classified into five levels, (
normal , prohibited , secret , highly confidential and
personal). It can also be more or less than these levels,
depending on the nature of the information. The main
objective of this classification is to provide the overall
information protection, using different means according to
its importance and sensitivity to preserve privacy. It is
necessary to protect these species of information at all
costs, and should be handled with caution and discretion,
with particular emphasis on the protection of personal
information through passwords and user name or any of the
various methods and encryption tools.
This paper, will measure the sensitivity of the secure
login information (username / password) through three
different electronic systems in nature including the online
tests, online banking accounts and social networks to
determine the extent of awareness of the importance of
ensuring access to such systems for users of our society.

HYPOTHESES

The researcher works through this paper to establish the

basic premise and several secondary premises as follows:
A. The major hypothesis
The three systems (Bank accounts, tests, and social
networks) differ statistically and significantly in the extent
of their need to secure access to data entry (username /
password).
B. The subsidiary hypotheses
Males are more interested in the question of secure data
entry, for others to enter their personal accounts.
Faculty members are more interested than students to
the question of secure data entry, for others to enter
their personal accounts.
There is a direct correlation between a person's
educational level and the degree of interest in securing
its data entry, for others to enter their personal
accounts.
There is a direct correlation between the age of the
person and the degree of interest in securing its data
entry, for others to enter personal accounts.
III.

METHODOLOGY & TOOLS

This section identified the methodological strategy.

Data collection tools selected to analyse the relationships
between variables. Research targeted (80) respondents
from university of (Neelain- SUDAN ). It is a stratified
random sample of split, between males and females and
between students and faculty members, meaning that the
selected male respondents: (Half are students and half are
faculty members). Also the selected female respondents:

139 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 02, February, 2016

Dr. Mozamel M. Saeed et al

Measuring Sensitivity Secure Login Information Systems by using SPSS Software

(Half are students and half are faculty members). The aim
was to measure the sensitivity of secure login information
in electronic systems.
IV.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

The multiplicity of the hypotheses of the study need

multiple statistical tools, using (F) test to test the equality
of several medians (the basic premise and the two
subsidiary hypotheses 1 and 2 ), linear correlation
coefficient (Pearson correlation) to test the link between
relationship variables ( the two subsidiary hypotheses 3 and
4). And (T) test to test the difference between the
arithmetic for independent suburban samples (the major
hypothesis and the two subsidiary hypotheses 1 and 2).
Each hypothesis of the study will be addressed
separately by following it on each axis and then collect all
the paragraphs on each axis of the different resolution then
comment on all relevant axes regarding the hypothesis and
then public commenting on the hypothesis considering all
the given parts together as follows:
The three systems (Bank accounts, tests, and social
networks) differ statistically and significantly in the
extent of their need to secure access to data entry
(username / password).

From the above table No (1-A): We can note that the

value of moral level (Sig) in the last column, is equaling
,000 . It is less than the value .50 that is representing the
allowed error in the study. It means the refusal of the null
hypothesis which states that there is no statistical and
significant difference between the three electronic systems
in the extent of their need to secure access to data entry
(username / password). It is an indication to support with
confidence amounting to 95% accepting the first part of the
major hypothesis of the study. Which states that the three
systems differ statistically and significantly in term of
access to secure entry data.
For testing the second part of the hypothesis, it is
necessary to use test (T), which has given the following
tables:
Table No (1-B): (T) Test (computational median for
three systems)
One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std.
Error
Mean

Df

Sig. (2tailed)

80

11.15

.386

5.574

79

.000

Total social
media
80
system hubs

7.94

.303

-3.511-

79

.001

Total
account
80
system hubs

11.88

.317

9.072

79

.000

Total axes
system
testing

The wording of this hypothesis is:

H0 : 1 = 2 = 3
H1 : 1 2 3
Or
H1 : 3 1 2
Where
1 arithmetic for system testing
2 arithmetic mean for social networking system
3 arithmetic system for bank accounts
(SPSS) program has given the table of variance
analysis as follows:

Table No (1-A): ANOVA (Contrast table for averages of

three systems)
Sum of
Squares
Between
Groups
Within
Groups

Total

df

702.658

2153.638

237

2856.296

239

Mean
Square

351.329 38.663

9.087

Sig.

.000

It is clear from the above table No (1-B): Through its

last column, that all values of moral level are less than the
value .50 . All mathematical circles differ semantically
from the arithmetic mean value which is equal to the 9
while the arithmetic mean for system testing which is
equaling (11.15) and the arithmetic mean of the bank
system is equaling (11.88) . They are higher than the
mean of the default. The arithmetic of social networking
system is equaling (7.94) which is less than the arithmetic
mean of the default which means the weak interest of
dealers with this secure access.
And from the same table, we note that the order of
these systems in terms of the mathematical community
values (the provided bank account system is the first one,
followed by testing system and then social networking
system). This can support with confidence amounting to
95% accepting the second part of the major hypothesis of
the study.
Subsidiary hypothesis No (1) which states that:
(Males are more interested in the question of secure
data entry, for others to enter their personal
accounts).
The wording of this hypothesis is:

140 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 02, February, 2016

Dr. Mozamel M. Saeed et al

Measuring Sensitivity Secure Login Information Systems by using SPSS Software

sum of the arithmetic means for those systems which is

equaling ( 9 + 9 + 9 = 27).

H0 : 1 = 2
H1 : 1 2
Where
1 arithmetic of males
2 arithmetic of females
The following table No(3) has been obtained:
Table No (3): (T) Test (the moral differences in
mathematical circles for gender)

der
Total
axes
system
testing

male

Std.

Gen

Since the results do not support the hypothesis on two

of three systems in total, it is arguably an 95% degree of
confidence not supporting the hypothesis number one (1) of
the study that males more than females with respect to
securing access to these regulations but which is supported
by field studies that arithmetic for females and the degree
of moral arithmetic of males which females were most
interested in the question of secure login even if we found
that the arithmetic mean for males is The largest as is the
case in the system of social networking the difference
between the two communities was not statistically
difference.

Mea Error
N

Mean

40

9.63

.511

Df

Sig. (2tailed)

Subsidiary hypothesis No (2): states that (faculty

members are more interested than students in
terms of securing data).
Statistical formulation of the hypothesis is:
H0: 1: = 2
H1: 1 2

fema
le

-4.387

78

.000

40 12.68 .471

Where
1 arithmetic faculty members
2 arithmetic for students

Total

male

40

8.43

.375

7.45

.467

The following table has been obtained:

social
media
system
hubs
Total

fema
le

1.628

78

.108

40

practical case
10.43 .457

male

40

account
system

fema

hubs

le

13.33 .300

-5.303

78

.000

-3.183

78

.002

40
28.47 1.16

Total
axes

Table No (4): (T) Test (the moral differences in

arithmetic means for the practical case)

male
fema
le

40
33.45 1.05
40

From the above table No (3): It is noted that as for

system testing, the arithmetic mean, which equals 12.68 is
greater than the arithmetic mean of the males which equals
9.63. The last column shows the difference between the
two communities (males & females) in this system, and it
is considered as a moral difference by zero value of moral
level. And the same analysis applies to the system of bank
accounts and total systems. As for the social networking
system, the arithmetic mean of males is equaling 8.43
which is greater than the arithmetic mean of females,
which is equaling 7.45. But considering the value of moral
level return which equals .108 which is greater than the
value .05 . It is an indication that no moral difference
between the two the arithmetic means of default (males
and females) in this system. It is worth mentioning that the
arithmetic mean of default for the total systems is the total

Std.
T
Error
Mean Mean

Sig.
(2Df
tailed
)

Total
axes
Student 40 8.90 .461
-7.683
system dimen
78 .000
testing sion1
employ
40 13.40 .361
ee
Total
social
Student 40 6.63 .385
media dimen
-4.938 78 .000
system sion1
employ
hubs
40 9.25 .366
ee
Total
account
Student 40 10.53 .465
system dimen
-4.823 78 .000
hubs
sion1
employ
40 13.23 .311
ee
Total
axes
dimen
sion1

Student 40

26.05
.810
00

-7.961 78 .000

employ
35.87
40
.931
ee
50

141 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 02, February, 2016

Dr. Mozamel M. Saeed et al

Measuring Sensitivity Secure Login Information Systems by using SPSS Software

Schedule No (4): It is noted that the arithmetic means

for faculty members in all three systems and in total is
greater than the arithmetic means for students. And the
moral levels zero values in the last column in the table,
indicates the moral differences between those arithmetic
means. Now it can be reported with 95% degree of
confidence the acceptance of the hypothesis of the study,
which states that the faculty members are more interested
than the students in terms of ensuring access to such
systems.
Subsidiary hypothesis No (3): states that (there is a
direct correlation between a person's educational
level and the degree of interest in securing access).
Statistical formulation of the hypothesis is:

the third hypothesis of the study. Which states that there is

a link between a person's educational level and the degree
of interest in securing data access to accounts on all
systems under study.
Subsidiary hypothesis No (4): states that (there is a
direct correlation between the age of the person
and the degree of interest in securing data).
Statistical formulation of the hypothesis is:
H0 : R = 0
H1 : R 0
The following table has been obtained:
Table No (6): Correlations (correlation between age and
each system)

H0 : R = 0
H1 : R 0

Axes

Where R linear correlation between level of education

and degree of income security for the systems under study.
And null hypothesis refers to a lack of correlation between
two variables while the alternative hypothesis states that
there is a correlation between two variables, but that the
relationship is statistically significant relationship whereby
any educational level is a direct correlation with the degree
of insurance.

Total axes
testing

system

Total social
system hubs

media

The following table has been obtained:

Total account system

hubs
Total axes

Table No (5): Correlations (Correlation

educational level and each system)
Axes
Total axes system
testing

Total social media

system hubs
Total
account
system hubs
Total axes

between

Educational
levels

Indicators
Pearson Correlation

.455

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.548

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.450

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.588

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Indicators

Age

Pearson Correlation

.596

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.556

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.463

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Pearson Correlation

.660

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

Schedule No (6): It is noted that all the values

corresponding to the correlation coefficients (Pearson
Correlation) that are listed in the middle column, are all
positive (greater than zero). It indicates that there is an
existence of a positive correlation between the two
variables. It is also noted that, the given values that are
listed in the third column and corresponding the moral
standards (Sig. (2-tailed)) in the middle column, are all
zero (Smaller than the value .05), it indicates the moral
relationship for all systems and total systems axes. Thus we
can confidently report with 95% the acceptance of the
fourth hypothesis of the study. Which states that there is a
link between the person and the degree of interest in
securing data access to accounts on all systems under
study.
V.

RESULTS

Through the study, the following results were achieved:

Schedule No (5): It is noted that all the values

corresponding to the correlation coefficients (Pearson
Correlation) which are listed in the middle column, are all
positive(they are greater than zero). It indicates that there
is an existence of a positive correlation between the two
variables. It is also noted that, the given values which are
listed in the third column and corresponding the moral
standards (Sig. (2-tailed)) in the middle column are all zero
(which is smaller than the value .05 Which indicates the
moral relationship for all systems and total systems axes).
Thus we can confidently report with 95% the acceptance of

The three electronic systems vary in the extent of their

need to secure access to data entry (username and
password). And the sensitivity of the electronic
banking accounts systems is with greater range,
followed by the electronic tests, then social systems.
The degree of importance and sensitivity of the secure
login systems in females is higher than in males.
Faculty members are more interested than students in
securing information access systems.
There is a direct correlation between a person's
educational level and the degree of interest in securing
login information. (The higher educational level of a

142 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 02, February, 2016

Dr. Mozamel M. Saeed et al

Measuring Sensitivity Secure Login Information Systems by using SPSS Software

person the higher becomes his/ or her interest in

securing login information).
The age of a person is an indicator of the extent of his
interest in securing login information. (Whenever the
age of a person increases, the extent of his interest in
securing information also increases).
VI.

CONCLUSION

In the light of the finding of the study, Research

concluded that the SPSS program is an effective tool in
measuring the sensitivity of securing login information
access systems. The results showed that the three systems
(Bank accounts, tests, and social networks) differ
statistically and significantly in the extent of their need to
secure access to data entry (username / password). It
concluded that the electronic banking system is more
sensitive compared to the other systems.( The electronic
testing followed by the social networking systems).
Research finally concluded that necessary attention is
required to raising awareness of the importance and
secrecy of the secure login information for all users of
these systems, and especially e-banking accounts systems
to preserve privacy and protects property.

REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]

[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]

C. Bennet and C. Raab, The Governance of privacy: policy

Instruments in global perspective, 2nd edition-2006.
C. Calvert, Voyeur Nation: Media, privacy, and peering in modern
culture, New York, 2004.
D.J. Solove, Understanding Privacy, 3rd edition, 2010.
D. J. Solove, The future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and privacy
on the internet, New Haven, 2007
G. lauri, Genetic privacy: A challenge to medico- legal Norms,
Cam- bridge- Cambridge University press, 2002.
H. Jenkins, Convergence culture: where old and new media collide,
New York, 2008.
H. Tornlinson, privacy and the media: the developing law, London,
2002.
Institute for the study of privacy Issues(ISPI) http://www.privacy
News .com
J. Alan Fox, Randomized Response and Related Methods:
Surveying Sensitive Data (Quantitative Applications in the Social
Sciences), 2015.
J. Zittrain, The future of internet: And how to stop it, London,2008
People for Internet Responsibility (PFIR)http://www.pfir.org.
Platform for privacy preferences (p3p) http://www.w3.org/p3p/.
Privacy International http://www.privacy International.org.
Privacy News and Information http://www.privacy.org.
S. Gutwirth, privacy and the information Age , 2002.

143 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 02, February, 2016