Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Although the theory of evolution has been utterly discredited in every field of
science, there have been determined efforts to keep it alive, for various
ideological reasons, for over the last 150 years.
An examination of evolutionist literature shows how the evidence
evolutionists have produced, in support of their theory, has subsequently
either emerged to be fraudulent or else, scientifically invalid.
Even some leading evolutionists now agree on the fact that evolution
possesses no tangible scientific evidence, and that the supposed proofs
produced to date are all invalid and unscientific.
There are so many admissions regarding the invalidity of the theory of
evolution made by evolutionists that they could fill several volumes of books.
Yet the theory of evolution continues to receive the support that it has failed to
receive from science, from various ideological circles and part of the media,
which has assumed the responsibility for propagating these circles
propaganda.
These circles still impose the false and misleading evidence that even
evolutionists have removed from the literature and which have been left with
absolutely no validity, on society in press and media organs, as if they still
represented scientific reality.
Their aim is to turn people away from the fact that God created them, and
thus convince them to the lie that they are individuals which came into being
by chance and descended from apes.
The aim is thus to produce large masses of people, stripped of all moral and
spiritual values, unaware, unbelieving and dehumanized, who can easily be
led in the direction desired by certain centers of power.
We need to have a sound knowledge of the true nature of the theory of
evolution and the kinds of false evidence on which it is built in order to not be
deceived by these circles with their ulterior motives.
In this film we will be examining just some of the false and misleading
evidence and deceptions that some evolutionists have come up with in order
to lead people astray over the course of the last 100 years or so.
THE PILTDOWN MAN HOAX
In 1912, a team led by a British amateur paleontologist by the name of Charles
Dawson discovered a fossil, the jaw of which exhibited ape-like
characteristics, although the cranium itself had human features.
The fossil was given the name Piltdown man and was exhibited as definitive
proof of evolution in the worlds best-known museums over the following 40
years.
The fossil possessed a number of very interesting features.
Although the cranium had quite a large volume, its jaw resembled that of an
orangutan, on which were two molar teeth, again similar to those in human
beings.
These characteristics stunned the scientific world.
A scientific classification Eoanthropus dawsoni - was soon produced for this
fossil, which began being referred to as Piltdown Man.
It was estimated to be around 500,000 years old.
It was, thus, depicted as supposed evidence for the claim that human beings
and apes are descended from a common ancestor.
An air of rejoice immediately began dominating the evolutionist press.
The impact of the fossil on the world of paleontology was truly enormous.
So enormous that some 500 doctoral theses would be written about it over the
next 40 years until it was understood to be a hoax.
This fossil, which symbolized the alleged victory of evolution, was put on
display in the British Museum, one of the most famous in the world.
It was examined not only by famous scientists from all over the world, but
also by countless visitors. But, Piltdown Mans victory was to be short-lived.
Piltdown was discovered in 1953 to have been nothing more than an Ape's
jaw placed with a human skull. It was a hoax placed on purpose. They
recognized neither the jaw to be an ape's or the skull to be a human's. Instead,
they declared each part as an in between of ape and human. They dated it to be
500,000 years old, gave it a name (Eoanthropus Dawsoni or `Dawn Man'),
and wrote some 500 books on it. The `discovery' fooled paleontologists for
forty-five years.
HAECKELS FAKE ILLUSTRATIONS
A most famed of the supposed pieces of evidence proposed by evolutionists
was the deceptive scheme of embryo development drawn up by the
evolutionist biologist, Ernst Haeckel.
Darwin had asked Haeckel, a close friend of his, to contribute to his theory by
telling him that he would have performed a great work by disseminating the
evolutionary doctrine.
Haeckel did not turn down this request, and came up with a fictitious thesis
in order to establish evidence in favor of evolution.
He called this, the theory of recapitulation.
According to this thesis, during the developmental stage living embryos
undergo a short repetition of the evolutionary process that species
supposedly underwent.
For example, a human embryo in the mothers womb first exhibited fish and
then reptile features, before finally turning into a human being.
However, observations and research in modern laboratories showed that all
the illustrations produced by Haeckel in order to back this theory up were
fake.
In its September 5, 1997 edition, the famous journal, Science, published an
article titled, "Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered." This is what was
stated:
Not only did Haeckel add or omit features, Richardson and his colleagues
report, but he also fudged the scale to exaggerate similarities among species,
even when there were 10-fold differences in size. Haeckel further blurred
differences by neglecting to name the species in most cases, as if one
In 1922, a time of intense efforts aimed at finding evidence for the theory of
evolution, Henry Fairfield Osborn, director of the American Museum of
Natural History, announced that he had discovered a fossil molar tooth dating
back to the Pliocene epoch near Snake Valley in West Nebraska.
It was commonly agreed, on the basis of one single tooth, that this belonged to
a so-called ape-man.
Profound scientific debates were initiated on the subject, which was in fact
nothing more than a fantasy.
This fossil, which sparked off great controversy, was given the name of
Nebraska Man.
Nebraska Man was also immediately given a "scientific name,"
Hesperopithecus haroldcooki.
Many authorities supported Osborn.
On the basis of this single tooth, reconstructions were made of Nebraska
Mans skull and body.
They went even further and published illustrations of Nebraska Man with his
wife and children in their natural environment.
Once again evolutionists began mobilizing all the means at their disposal for a
fictitious scenario.
William Bryan, a politician from the state of Nebraska correctly maintained
that the evidence regarding Nebraska Man was totally inadequate, that the
evidence available proved nothing, and that people needed to wait for a while
longer.
Aware that they would be left without their only so-called evidence,
evolutionist scientists immediately counter-attacked and began issuing
statements to the effect that Bryans mindset was outdated and far from being
scientific.
Other parts of the skeleton were discovered in 1927.
According to these, the original tooth belonged neither to an ape nor a human
being. It was realized that the tooth belonged to an extinct species of
American wild boar.
An article by William Gregory, in Science magazine, which announced this
error, was titled, "HESPEROPITHECUS APPARENTLY NOT AN APE NOR
A MAN."
As a result, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his family were hurriedly
removed from the relevant literature.
Yet, as usual, evolutionists continued to behave as if nothing had happened.
THE ARCHAEOPTERYX DECEPTION
The only evidence that evolutionists point to in favor of their claims that
birds evolved from dinosaurs is the 150-million-year old fossil bird
Archaeopteryx, which they maintain was a half-bird and a half-dinosaur unable
to fly particularly well.
However, the latest discoveries have shown that the animal in question is
merely an extinct species of bird.
The fact that it lacked a sternum, the breastbone where the muscles
essential for flight are attached, was indicated as the most important evidence
that it was unable to fly.
The seventh Archaeopteryx fossil to be discovered in 1992, however, showed
that the creature did actually possess such a bone, contrary to what
evolutionists had imagined.
The presence of this bone proved that Archaeopteryx was a flying bird.
Evolutionists depicted the claws on its wings and, the teeth in its jaw as proof
that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate form.
But, this was distortion, rather than evidence.
Birds such as the Taouraco and the hoatzin, which are living today, also have
claws permitting them to cling onto branches.
Some other birds that lived in the past also had teeth.
All that had happened was a change in the numbers of already existing moth
species. The moths acquired no new organs or features that might lead to a
species change.
That is the general response to be given to evolutionist claims regarding the
peppered moths.
However, there is another even more interesting aspect to the subject:
In the same way that the evolutionist explanation is incorrect, it also consists
of a blatant deception. In his book, The Icons of Evolution, published in 2000,
the molecular biologist, Jonathan Wells, describes how the experiment
performed by Kettlewell was actually a scientific scandal.
The moths, photographed by Kettlewell, on tree bark, were actually dead.
Kettlewell attached these dead creatures on the tree bark with pins and
adhesives, and photographed them.
Since the moths settle on the undersides of branches rather than on the tree
trunks, Kettlewell had no means of taking any such pictures.
It was eventually realized that Kettlewells account of peppered moths was
based on a fraudulent experiment.
Researchers investigating peppered moths encountered an even more striking
state of affairs; while one would expect there to be greater numbers of light
colored moths in those parts of Britain unaffected by industrial pollution,
there were actually four times as many dark colored moths as light colored
moths.
In other words, there was no correlation between the moth populations and
tree bark of the kind claimed by Kettlewell, and repeated in just about every
evolutionist reference source.
This collapse of the peppered moth myth, the main element in introductory
courses in evolution for decades, created enormous disappointment among
evolutionists.
One of these evolutionists, Jerry Coyne, admitted thus:
... Throughout the history of horses, the species are well-marked and
static over millions of years. At high resolution, the gradualistic picture of
horse evolution becomes a complex bush of overlapping, closely related species.
It has been calculated that, the true dimensions of the living things portrayed
as the forerunners of the horse and arranged chronologically in order of size,
from small to large, in the sequence in question, have been distorted.
In his book, The Great Evolution Mystery, the evolutionist author, Gordon
Rattray Taylor, describes this deception with these words:
But the fact is that the line from Eohippus to Equus [present-day horse] is very
erratic. It is alleged to show a continual increase in size, but the truth is that
some variants were smaller than Eohippus, not larger.
In November 1980, a four-day conference attended by 150 evolutionists and
considering the problems facing the theory of evolution was held at the
Chicago Museum of Natural History.
Boyce Rensberger, one of the speakers at the conference, expressed his
thoughts in these words:
The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual
sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million
years ago to today's much larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be
wrong.
American paleontologist Niles Eldredge has this to say on the subject:
I admit that an awful lot of that has gotten into the textbooks as though it were
true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs is the
exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been
presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is
lamentable, particularly because the people who propose these kinds of stories
themselves may be aware of the speculative nature of some of the stuff.
All of these facts have revealed that the schematic illustrations of the
supposed evolution of the horse, depicted as one of the soundest pieces of
evidence in favor of evolution, actually consist of distortions devoid of any
reality.
THE FICTITIOUS HUMAN FAMILY TREE
Therefore, the fossil remains of around 6000 extinct species of ape represent a
rich resource for evolutionists.
Evolutionists put together skulls and bone fragments from some of these
extinct species according to their requirements.
They then arrange these in order of size, from small to large, and write
scenarios of human evolution by adding skulls belonging to some extinct
human races to this series.
This scenario contains a great many imaginary species that never actually
existed at all.
The false nature of all these imaginary species claimed to represent the
forerunners of human beings, such as Java man, Beijing Man, and Lucy, have
all been demonstrated over and over again.
And, evolutionists have countless times admitted that the fossils they have
submitted as evidence are a very far cry from being, in the slightest bit,
scientific.
A great many fake fossils have been proposed as so-called forerunners of
human beings, including
Java Man, discovered on the island of Java by the Dutch anatomist, Eugene
Dubois, and claimed, on the basis of a skull, which later transpired to belong
to a gibbon, to be a so-called ancestor of human beings.
Beijing Man was heralded as a forerunner of human beings on the basis of
independent bone fragments found at different times over the course of a 10year period in the area around Beijing. These fragments then mysteriously
disappeared, leaving behind nothing more than fantastical pictures and
models.
Then, there was the Pithecanthropus fossil, discovered in India in 1932, and
alleged to represent the first stage in the supposed transition from ape to man.
This was used as definitive evidence by evolutionists for 50 years, until it was
realized in 1982 that the fossil actually belonged to an ancient species of
orangutan.
The lies told by the professor, who was forced to resign as a result of this
development, are still described as facts in anthropology textbooks, and the
authorities admit that radical changes need to be made in order for these to be
corrected.
According to the findings of the commission of enquiry, Professor Protsch had
systematically distorted the ages of a series of fossils unearthed in Europe,
portraying them as thousands of years older than they actually were.
The scandal regarding the evolutionist professor went even further than this.
In addition to what we have just heard, the British daily, The Guardian, wrote
that the professor had also manufactured fake fossils.
The Guardian account included a statement from the university, saying: The
commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific
facts over the past 30 years.
The fraud came to light when fossil specimens, unearthed in Europe and
claimed by Professor Protsch to date back to the Pliocene epoch, came into
doubt. They were sent to Oxford University for further tests.
The results obtained from the university radiocarbon dating unit revealed a
complete fiasco, as scientists described it.
It was realized that a female skeleton, Protsch had dated as 21,300 years old,
was in fact only 3,300 years old, and another one to which he attributed an age
of 27,400 years transpired to belong to an old man who had died only some
250 years previously.
Among the fossils to which the professor had attributed false dates was,
Hahnhfersand Man, which evolutionists had portrayed as a highly
significant intermediate form.
The false age attributed by Protsch to Hahnhfersand Man was 36,000 years.
Protsch declared that this fossil represented an important missing link in socalled human evolution, and the fossil went on show in the Helms Museum in
Hamburg.
The walls of the museum were bedecked with posters depicting
Hahnhfersand Man as an ape-man in a completely fantastical manner.
Sadly, evolutionists are still applying the same techniques and are attempting
to impose the lie of evolution on public as if it were a scientific reality.
Exhibitions of evolution held in many parts of the world are concrete
examples of evolutionist propaganda encouraging people to believe in an
unscientific theory for totally ideological reasons by displaying false evidence
of evolution.
It is high time that the proponents of evolution realized that people are much
more aware of such propaganda, which particularly targets children and
young people by mustering support from one section of the press, than was
the case in the past. This propaganda will no longer have the impact it once
did.
CONCLUSION
Modern science has proved that life and the nature is the work of an Almighty
and Omniscient Creator.
The evidence that has accumulated over the decades in such areas of science
as paleontology, microbiology, molecular biology, biochemistry, and genetics
has definitively discredited the theory of evolution and proved that it is
nothing more than a myth.
As we have seen throughout the course of this film, evolutionists are in a state
of despair because of sciences failure to provide the evidence they seek; and
they resort to manufacturing such evidence by unscientific means.
That is the reason for the efforts to keep the theory of evolution the worst
deception in the history of science on its feet by fraudulent means.
New evolutionist frauds are inevitable, so long as these efforts continue.
It is crystal clear, however, that opposing the facts, and especially by resorting
to deception and other unscientific methods, will continue to be a waste of
time and bear no fruit whatsoever.