Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Andrzej Wojciechowski
Natalia Sobczak
Krystyna Pietrzak
Rajiv Asthana
Dariusz Rudnik
WFO
Commision 8.1
Cast Composites
ATLAS
OF CAST
METAL-MATRIX
COMPOSITES
STRUCTURES
Motor
Transport
Institute
2007
Foundry
Research
Institute
Jerzy Sobczak
Natalia Sobczak
Rajiv Asthana
Andrzej Wojciechowski
Krystyna Pietrzak
Dariusz Rudnik
ATLAS
OF CAST
METAL-MATRIX
COMPOSITE
STRUCTURES
Part I
Qualitative analysis
ISBN 978-83-60965-00-9
Copyright 2007 by
Motor Transport Institute - Warsaw
Foundry Research Institute - Cracow
All rights reserved
Published by
Motor Transport Institute - Warsaw
Foundry Research Institute - Cracow
First edition
PRINTED IN POLAND
Contents
Page
Summary
Foreword
11
11
31
47
61
64
70
80
81
83
83
85
92
95
96
96
99
101
106
V. Nano-composites
109
114
114
114
115
119
121
125
Acknowledgements
143
126
126
129
131
134
135
137
140
Summary
Foreword
Over the last fifty years, metal-matrix composites have seen wide-ranging
applications beyond the aerospace sector for which they were originally intended.
Consumer industry, electronic packaging industry, and most importantly,
transportation industry have been the most prominent sectors to adopt metal-matrix
composites in niche applications such as the brake disc and parts of the suspension,
power train and the engine including pistons and cylinder blocks' sleeves. The
remarkable design flexibility that these composites, and their higher-temperature
counterparts, ceramic-matrix composites, exhibit enables the composites practitioner
to design and adapt the material to suit the needs of the user industry.
In the ATLAS, the authors have put together an impressive collection of metalmatrix composite microstructures synthesized by them in Poland and USA using the
solidification and casting techniques. The microstructures of cast composites based
on low-melting, medium-melting, and high-melting point metal matrices ranging from
lead, zinc, magnesium, aluminum and copper to nickel-based intermetallics, are
presented. The diversity of these composites is captured in hundreds of scientifically
valuable and aesthetically beautiful photomicrographs, each of which is accompanied
with a description of the prominent structural features, including structural defects, if
any, processing conditions as well as proven and potential properties of the
manufactured composites. The photomicrographs display the composites containing
a wide variety of reinforcement including silicon carbide, aluminum oxide, graphite
and fly ash. In addition, the ATLAS presents the microstructure and processing of
new and emerging metal-based nanocomposites and gasar materials that are sure to
gain wider acceptance in industry in years to come.
I am unaware of any previous effort of this magnitude and scope at
systematizing and assembling the unique structural attributes of cast composites in
a single resource. The principal authors are leaders in the metal-matrix area and
deserve to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to the technical literature
that will undoubtedly be of immense value and use to the researcher and practitioner
alike.
10
11
I.
I.1.
SiO2
58.0
38.5
Al2O3
32.2
17.1
Fe2O3
5.05
25.1
K2O
3.5
2.5
MgO
1.6
1.0
TiO2
1.2
1.5
CaO
0.8
4.0
Na2O
0.7
0.5
SO3
0.3
1.9
P2O3
0.1
0.5
An example appearance of the external cenospheres collected from another electrical power plant
(Dayton Power and Light Co., USA), used in the subsequent tests, is shown in Fig. I.1.1.
Manufacturing method: mechanical stirring method (vortex) with gravity casting into grey iron die.
Following melting, the composite slurry was subjected to squeeze casting under a pressure of
220 MPa for 45s (die temperature - bottom cavity/top squeeze plunger: 190-230/170-200C). The
casting temperature of the composite suspension was maintained within 670-690C range. Squeeze
cast cylinder of 80 mm diameter and 25-30 mm height was subjected to the following heat treatment
according: solutionizing at 540C/12 h, cooling in water at 70C; artificial aging at 160C/24 h.
Properties: lower (microgranules reinforcement) and very low (cenospheres reinforcement) density,
increased and satisfactory mechanical properties, significant resistance to grinding (wear off) and
thermal shock, decreased thermal expansion and thermal conductivity, good machinability,
advantageous economic and ecological manufacturing parameters (mainly due to waste material
character of the reinforcing phase).
Structural characteristics (Figs. I.1.2 - I.1.7): dominating effect of the external pressure during
solidification is noticeable in the fly ash-reinforced aluminum composites, characterized by low content
of cenospheres and microgranules relatively uniformly dispersed in the metal matrix. Microstructural
investigation proved that the hydrostatic pressure, applied to the solidifying composites prevents the
growth of eutectic phase crystals in the favored directions after the eutectic temperature has been
achieved. External pressure also leads to the increase of the -phase amount in the structure and
solidification of the cooled eutectic in the direct vicinity of the dendritic solidification front. As a result of
the pressure application, liquid aluminum alloy fills up the microspheres, solidifying inside them in
a much pulverized structure. Modifying influence of the external pressure is also observed on the
structure of the whole composite matrix.
12
Fig. I.1.1.
As-received fly ash reinforcing phase used for manufacturing ALFA composites. This is fly ash from the Dayton
Power and Light Co electrical power plant, (USA), in the shape of glassy-like cenospheres with the following
chemical composition (converted into oxides, wt. %): 61.0 SiO2, 25.8 Al2O3, 5.0 Fe2O3, 3.6 K2O, 1.6 MgO,
1.0 TiO2, 0.8 CaO, 0.7 Na2O, 0.3 SO3, 0.1 P2O3. Cenospheres, representing mainly amorphous material, are of
varying size as well as non-uniform color due to diversified chemical composition (e.g. ginger brown color revels
high content of the iron oxides)
13
Fig. I.1.2.
Fig. I.1.3.
Structure of 52K/5 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Non-etched sample.
Polarized light
Structure of 52K/5 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Sample etched with
Keller reagent. Polarized light
14
Fig. I.1.4.
Structure of 52K/10 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Non-etched sample.
Polarized light
15
c
Fig. I.1.5.
Structure of 52K/10 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Sample etched with
Keller reagent. Polarized light
c
Fig. I.1.6.
Structure of 52K/15 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Non-etched sample.
Polarized light
16
Fig. I.1.7.
Structure of 52K/15 vol. % fly ash aluminum alloy composite, obtained by vortex method. Following melting, the
composite was subjected to squeeze casting and heat treatment (precipitation hardening). Sample etched with
Keller reagent. Polarized light
17
Matrix: AK12 aluminum alloy (AlSi12CuNiMg) 12.20 Si, 1.15 Cu, 0.95 Ni, 0.90 Mg, 0.60 Fe,
0.20 Zn, 0.19 Mn, 0.09 Ti (wt. %).
Reinforcing phase: fly ash from Dayton Power and Light Co. electrical power plant (USA) contains
mainly microgranules of the following chemical composition: 55.9 SiO2, 30.2 Al2O3, 5.4 Fe2O3,
1.3 CaO, 2.7 K2O, 1.0 MgO, 1.6 TiO2, 0.2 Na2O, 0.3 SO3, 0.4 P2O3.
Manufacturing method: introduction of initially enriched reinforcing phase by mechanical stirring
(vortex) under argon and squeeze casting under the pressure of 170 MPa for 45 s, (die temperature
bottom/top - 180/220C). The slurry was poured into the die at the temperature of 750C and squeeze
cast in order to produce combustion engine pistons of 90 mm diameter.
Structural characteristics (Fig. I.1.8): good acceptability of the reinforcing phase by the metal matrix
is noticeable due to intensive chemical character of the interaction between the composite
constituents. This statement reflects the presence within the structure of the large primary silicon
crystals, formed as a result of the reaction between the oxides (mainly SiO2 and FexOy) with liquid
aluminum according to the oxy-redox reaction 3MeO+2Al=Al2O3+3Me. Also significant amount of
cracked fly ash microgranules is an indirect proof of intensive interactions taking place in a given
composite.
18
Fig. I.1.8.
Structure of squeeze cast AK12/9 wt. % fly ash composite. As-cast. Non-etched sample. Polarized light (a, b, d,
f) and phase contrast (c, e, g)
19
Reinforcing phase: fly ash from Skawina electrical power plant (Poland) of the following composition:
38.5 SiO2, 17.1 Al2O3, 25.1 Fe2O3, 4.0 CaO, 2.5 K2O, 1.0 MgO, 1.5 TiO2, 0.5 Na2O, 1.9 SO3, 0.5 P2O3
(5 wt. %).
Manufacturing method: mechanical stirring method (vortex) using the device for refining and
modifying Al alloys (URM-1 type, designed by Foundry Research Institute) and gravity casting into
permanent mould (made from grey iron). Following melting, the composite was subjected to squeeze
casting under a pressure of 230 MPa for 45 s (die temperature bottom/top: 190-230/170-200C).
The casting temperature of the composite slurry was maintained within 670-690C range. Cylindrical
castings (70 mm diameter and 90 mm height) were subjected to the following heat treatment:
solutionizing at 430C/16 h, cooling in water at 70C; natural aging for 96 h.
Properties: lower density, satisfactory mechanical properties, significant resistance to grinding (wear
off) and thermal shock, decreased thermal expansion and thermal conductivity, good machinability
properties, advantageous economic and ecological manufacturing parameters (mainly due to waste
material character of the reinforcing phase).
Structural characteristics (Fig. I.1.9): The characteristic feature of the composites manufactured
using fly ash from Skawina electrical power plant is the less uniform arrangement of the reinforcing
phase in the metal-matrix when compared with composites obtained using fly ash from the PSI Energy
electrical power plant (USA) (Figs. I.1.2 - I.1.7). It is, however, a deceptive effect because it is linked
with the reinforcing phase properties in the as-received state and not with an effect of agglomeration
during the composite manufacture. In the case of coal burning in the Skawina electrical power plant,
resultant fly ash contains a large amount of primary agglomerates, consisting of a few to a few dozens
of different size particles, permanently bridged with one another. The squeeze pressure facilitates
filling with the liquid metal the cavities between the particulates and even micro-cracks and open
porosity within individual particles. While visible in the photomicrographs, the structural discontinuities
are within large agglomerates and form enclosed porosity.
20
g
Fig. I.1.9.
Structure of AG10/5 vol. % fly ash composite: (a, b) gravity cast and (c-g) squeeze cast. Non-etched sample.
Polarized light (a, b, d-g) and phase contrast (c)
21
Reinforcing phase: fly ash from the Dayton Power and Light Co electrical power plants (USA) mainly
containing microgranules of the chemical composition (wt. %.): 55.9 SiO2, 30.2 Al2O3, 5.4 Fe2O3,
1.3 CaO, 2.7 K2O, 1.0 MgO, 1.6 TiO2, 0.2 Na2O, 0.3 SO3, 0.4 P2O3.
Manufacturing method: mechanical alloying method involving mixing of matrix powder with fly ash
particles in a rotating and vibrating mill, under argon atmosphere, and then compacting the mixture
under pressure.
Properties: lower density, increased mechanical properties (particularly ultimate tensile strength),
significant resistance to grinding (wear off) and thermal shock, fundamentally decreased thermal
expansion and thermal conductivity, good machinability, advantageous economic and ecological
manufacturing parameters (mainly due to the waste material character of the reinforcing phase).
Structural characteristics (Figs. I.1.10 - I.1.11): The characteristic features of the initial constituent in
the form of composite powder are (Fig. I.1.10):
1) presence of a substantial amount of the reinforcing phase,
2) a high degree of reinforcing phase break-up, stemming from the milling effect of the fly ash
particulates, while a significant part of microspheres of diameter below 10 m does not get
destroyed,
3) a high degree of homogeneity in the arrangement of the reinforcing phase within metal matrix,
4) relatively low presence of structural discontinuities in the regions of large composite particles,
which are essentially agglomerates of composite particulates (from several dozens to several
hundred times smaller).
The characteristic features of the composite obtained from composite powders using powder
compaction under pressure are (Figs. I.1.11 - I.1.12):
1) complete lack of structural discontinuities,
2) complete disappearance of microspheres as well as larger fractions of microspheres due to
their interaction with metal matrix,
3) more than ten times smaller size of the reinforcing phase precipitates in comparison with the
primary composite powder,
4) very minute reinforcing phase precipitates are created mainly by aluminum oxide particulates
produced due to oxy-redox reaction between aluminum and fly ash constituents
(2Al+3MeO=Al2O3+3Me), mainly silicon oxide and iron oxide since the reactivity of titanium
oxide is negligible, while calcium oxide and magnesium oxide do not react with the metal
matrix,
5) banding of the fine aluminum oxide precipitates, resulting from Al/metal oxide interactions.
22
23
Fig. I.1.10.
Structure of Al/25 wt. % fly ash composite (initial composite powders) obtained by mechanical alloying.
Non-etched sample. Polarized light (a-f, g, h, j, l) and phase contrast (i, k, m)
24
Fig. I.1.11.
Structure of Al/25 wt. % fly ash composite obtained by mechanical alloying followed by compaction of composite
powders by know-how technology. Transverse section. Non-etched sample. Polarized light (b, c, e, g) and phase
contrast (d, f, h). Figure (a) shows macrostructure of investigated section
25
Fig. I.1.12.
Structure of Al/25 wt. % fly ash composite obtained by mechanical alloying followed by compaction of composite
powders by know-how technology. Longitudinal section. Non-etched sample. Polarized light (b, c, e, g) and
phase contrast (d, f, h). Figure (a) shows macrostructure of investigated section
26
20 m
a
10 m
b
Fig. I.1.13.
Structure of Al/30 vol. % fly ash composite obtained by mechanical alloying followed by compaction of composite
powders under a pressure of 3000 MPa. Non-etched sample
27
28
Fig. I.1.13.
Structure of Al/60 vol. % fly ash composite, obtained by squeeze infiltration of the porous preforms made of
cenospheres. Non-etched sample. Phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
29
30
Fig. I.1.14.
Structure of A356/15 wt. % fly ash composite, manufactured by vortex method using initial preparation of the
reinforcing phase by mechanical alloying method. Conventional light (a, b, d, f, h) and phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
31
I.2.
10 m
Fig. I.2.1.
Structure of squeeze cast Al/5 vol. % GrNi composite. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
32
Graphite
Siprimary
Sieut
Al3Ni
Graphite
a
20 m
33
Si prim.
Al3Ni
Graphite
20 m
b
10 m
c
Fig. I.2.2.
Structure of AK11/2.5 vol. % GrNi composite: gravity cast (a), squeeze cast (b, c). Sample etched with Kellers
reagent. Polarized light
20 m
a
34
20 m
b
Fig. I.2.3.
Structure of AK11/5 vol. % GrNi composite: gravity cast (a), squeeze cast (b). Sample etched with Kellers
reagent. Conventional light (a) and polarized light (b)
35
36
Fig. I.2.4.
Structure of squeeze cast AK20/5.7 vol. % GrNi composite. Top of the casting. Non-etched sample. Polarized
light (a, b, d, f, h) and phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
37
38
Fig. I.2.5.
Structure of squeeze cast AK20/5.7 vol. % GrNi composite. Middle of the casting. Non-etched sample. Polarized
light (a, b, d, f, h) and phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
39
Fig. I.2.6.
Structure of squeeze cast AK20/5.7 vol. % GrNi composite. Bottom of the casting. Non-etched sample. Polarized
light (a, b, d, f, h) and phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
40
Fig. I.2.7.
100 m
41
c-d
e-f
I
Fig. I.2.8.
g-h
i-j
k-l
II
m-n
o-p
III
r-s
t-u
IV
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/5.7 vol. % Ni-coated graphite (50:50) composite. The sequence of structure
evolution is shown, beginning with the external layer, through the middle zone, the transition zone, and ending
with the internal (near centre) zone. Remarks on the picture refer to Figs. I.2.9 and I.2.10
42
43
Fig. I.2.9.
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/5.7 vol. % Ni-coated graphite (50:50) composite. The sequence of structure
evolution is shown, beginning with the external layer I (a - h), through the middle zone II (i - l), the transition zone
III (m, n), and ending with the internal zone IV (o - u). Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and
phase contrast (on the right). 100x
44
45
46
Fig. I.2.10.
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/5.7 vol.% Ni-coated graphite (50:50) composite. The sequence of structure
evolution is shown, beginning with the external layer I (a - h), through the middle zone II (i - l), the transition zone
III (m, n), and ending with the internal zone IV (o - u). Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and
phase contrast (on the right). 500x
47
I.3.
50 m
Fig. I.3.1.
Structure of 2014l/xSiC graphite composite obtained by mechanical stirring coupled with ultrasonic vibration and
then gravity cast to mould. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
48
20 m
20 m
Fig. I.3.2.
Structure of Al/20 vol. % Ni-coated SiC squeeze cast composite. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
49
F3S.15S (A359/15 vol. % SiC), F3S.20S (A359/20 vol. % SiC) as well as F3S.30S (A359/30 vol. %
SiC) composite (F3S.xxS composites family)
Matrix: A359 (AlSi9Mg) aluminum alloy 8.50-9.50 Si, 0.45-0.65 Mg, 0.20 Fe, 0.20 Cu, 0.20 Ti
(wt. %).
Reinforcing phase: silicon carbide particulates of average diameter 20 m.
Manufacturing method: mechanical stirring method (vortex) similar to the method patented by
DURALCAN Co., involving remelting and gravity casting into grey iron die and/or squeeze casting
under the pressure of 230 MPa for 45 s (die temperature bottom/top 190-230C/170-200C). The
casting temperature of the composite slurry was maintained at 670-690C. A cylinder (80 mm
diameter and 40 mm height) was squeeze cast. A precipitation hardening heat treatment was applied:
solutionizing at 538C/8 h, cooling in water to 70C, followed by aging at 154C/5 h.
Properties: increased mechanical properties, especially after squeeze casting (including fatigue
properties), considerable improvement of tribological characteristics (significant reduction of wear, to
the highest cast iron grades), a reduction in the coefficient of thermal expansion, an increase in the
thermal conductivity.
Structural characteristics (Figs. I.3.3 - I.3.8): SiC particulates are wetted by the liquid Al matrix and
bond well with the matrix upon solidification. No structural discontinuities are observed at the interface
between SiC particulates and metal matrix in either as-cast composite or fractured composite
(Fig. I.3.3).
The macro-scale structure of the F3S.20S gravity cast composite containing 20 vol. % SiC is
characterized by a homogeneous distribution of the reinforcing phase particulates. However, at the
micro-scale, SiC particulate agglomerates are observed in, the inter-dendritic regions, and within the
surrounding (Al-Si)eut eutectic. This agglomeration is due to the particle pushing phenomenon created
by growing (Si) phase, and taking place during composite solidification (Fig. I.3.4).
The squeeze cast composite shows much higher degree of structure homogeneity resulting from the
formation of Al(Si) solid solution. Another characteristic feature of such composites is the significant
refinement of the primary (blocky) silicon crystals and modification of the eutectic silicon (Sieut)
precipitates.
Irrespective of the composite manufacturing method, there is a tendency for both Sieut phase and ironrich phases to grow on the surface of the SiC particulates, which in turn leads to creation of bridges
between reinforcing phase particulates. This is particularly clearly revealed under polarized light
(Figs. I.3.4 e, I.3.5 e), when parts of SiC particulates become transparent, with an appropriate setting
of the polarizer.
Heat treatment of such composites causes an increase in the volume fraction of the Al(Si) phase
precipitates as well as spheroidization of eutectic silicon precipitates. The effect of heat treatment on
composite structure is shown in Fig. I.3.6.
Observations of composite microstructure under polarized light (Fig. I.3.7) at optical magnifications
demonstrate that the undesirable aluminum carbide (Al4C3) phase does not form. The second phase
precipitates growing on SiC particulates (clearly visible under different polarizer settings, because SiC
particle becomes transparent) represent eutectic silicon.
An increase in SiC content to 30 vol. % is an additional factor which increases the homogeneity of the
reinforcing phase distribution in the metal matrix (Fig. I.3.8).
50
SiC
SiC
Fig. I.3.3.
SEM view of the fracture surface of squeeze cast F3S.15S (A359/15 vol. % SiC) composite. As-cast
51
Si eut
e
Fig. I.3.4.
The structure of gravity cast F3S.20S composite (A359/20 vol. % SiC). As-cast. Non-etched sample.
Conventional light (a, c, e) and phase contrast (b, d)
52
e
Fig. I.3.5.
The structure of squeeze cast F3S.20S composite (A359/20 vol. % SiC). As-cast. Non-etched sample.
Conventional light (a, c, e) and phase contrast (b, d)
53
Fig. I.3.6.
The influence of heat treatment on the structure of squeeze cast F3S.15S composite (A359/15 vol. % SiC):
(a-c) as-cast, (d-f) after heat treatment. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
54
c
Fig. I.3.7.
Fig. I.3.8.
The structure of squeeze cast F3S.15S composite (A359/15 vol. % SiC) after heat treatment, shown under
polarized light (various images of the same place taken under different settings of microscope polarizer),
illustrating growth of eutectic silicon precipitates on the SiC particulates. Non-etched sample
The structure of F3S.30S composite (A359/30 vol. % SiC). Non-etched sample. Phase contrast
55
Reinforcing phase: single crystal silicon carbide platelets (hexagonal, -SiC) (from Third Millennium
Technologies, Inc., USA); of three average platelet sizes - 250-500 m diameter and 25-50 m
thickness; 50-250 m diameter and 5-25 m thickness; and 20-70 m diameter and 0.50-5 m
thickness; both as-received and copper-coated SiC platelets were utilized.
Manufacturing method: counter-gravitational infiltration of packed binder-less silicon carbide platelets
(packing density ~52%) by the molten 2014 aluminum alloy under nitrogen gas pressure; SiC platelets
were packed in quartz tubes via multistage compaction of loose powders; infiltration was done in
a stainless steel pressure vessel with a melting furnace, consisting of two semi-cylindrical heating
elements, housed inside the pressure vessel; quartz tubes containing packed SiC were attached using
leak-tight fittings to the lid of the pressure vessel which, upon closure, led to partial immersion of the tube
in the molten alloy held in a graphite crucible inside the pressure vessel; an argon blanket was maintained
over the SiC inside the quartz tube to reduce the oxidation of the liquid front; preheating time of SiC beds:
3-5 min; melt temperature: 800C; nitrogen gas pressure: variable, 525-850 kPa; infiltration time: 3-5 min;
slow cooling at the conclusion of infiltration in ambient air.
Both as received and copper-coated SiC platelets were infiltrated. Cu-coating was done to promote
the wettability and facilitate the infiltration. Copper coating was deposited on SiC using an electroless
plating technique. For this, SiC platelets were stirred for 3 h in a solution of 10 g/l of SnCl2 and 40 ml/l of
concentrated HCl. The platelets were then stirred for 15 min in a solution 0.5 g/liter PdCl2 and 1 ml/l
concentrated HCl. After stirring, the solution was decanted, and platelets washed twice with distilled water.
Finally, the platelets were stirred for 15 min in the plating bath of following composition: 10 g/liter
CuSO4.5H2O, 10 g/liter NaOH, 50 g/l sodium potassium tartrate, and 10 ml/l formaldehyde. The coating
deposition was confirmed with the SEM examination.
Properties: considerable improvement of tribological characteristics expected, significant reduction in
thermal expansion coefficient and increase in the thermal conductivity, increased hardness and
strength, and decreased ductility.
Structural characteristics: A high volume fraction and a uniform distribution of SiC platelets are
achieved in the SiC/2014Al composites via infiltration of fine and coarse SiC (Fig. I.3.9); however,
some metal-starved cavities persist in the cast microstructure because of the difficulty of filling small
gaps between closely-spaced or nearly-touching platelets. Color-etching of polished samples reveals
the presence of micro-segregation in the alloy matrix between coarse (250-500 m x 25-50 m) SiC
platelets (Fig. I.3.10); micro-segregation is nearly completely erased when inter-particle spacing
becomes very small as in the case of fine (20-70 m x 0.50-5) SiC platelets (Fig. I.3.11). The growth of
primary Al dendrites is physically constrained by the SiC platelets as shown in Fig. I.3.12, and the
inter-dendritic eutectic deposits on the SiC. A number of secondary phases in the alloy matrix of the
infiltrated composite bars (Fig. I.3.13) are revealed by color etching, which include Al15(CuFeMn)3Si2,
CuAl2, Al20Cu2Mn3, Mg2Si and CuAl2Mg.
20 m
a
Fig. I.3.9.
20 m
Structure of 2014/xSiC composites transverse to the infiltration direction, pressure: 710 kPa, melt temperature:
800C, infiltration time: 3 min; as-received SiC platelet size: 20-70 m diameter and 0.50 - 5.0 m thickness (a);
250-500 m diameter and 25-50 m thickness (b)
56
200 m
Fig. I.3.10.
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite transverse to the infiltration direction showing SiC distribution and microsegregation; pressure: 525 kPa, melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 5 min, SiC size: 250-500 m diameter
and 25-50 m thickness, as-received SiC. The sample was color etched with a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g
NaOH in 1 l distilled water
10 m
Fig. I.3.11.
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite showing suppression of coring in the solidified matrix due to diffusional
constraints imposed by small inter-particle spacing in compacts made from fine SiC platelets; pressure: 750 kPa,
melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 5 min, SiC size: 20-70 m diameter and 0.50 - 5.0 m thickness, asreceived SiC. The sample was color etched with a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g NaOH in 1 l distilled water
57
10 m
a
Fig. I.3.12.
10 m
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite showing two regions. Section transverse to the infiltration direction showing
physically constrained growth of Al dendrites, the inter-dendritic eutectic, and micro-segregation in cored
dendrites growing within the network of packed SiC platelets; pressure: 825 kPa, melt temperature: 800C,
infiltration time: 5 min, SiC size: 50-250 m diameter and 5-25 m thickness, Cu-coated SiC; the sample was
color etched with a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g NaOH in 1 l distilled water
10 m
a
Fig. I.3.13.
10 m
Structure of two regions of a color-etched 2014/SiC composite transverse to the infiltration direction showing
secondary phase precipitation in the inter-particle regions. The composite was produced by gas pressure
infiltration using nitrogen gas at a pressure of 525 kPa (melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 5 min). The
sample was color etched with a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g NaOH in 1 l distilled water. The phases that form
during normal solidification of 2014 Al alloy include: Al15(CuFeMn)3Si2, CuAl2, Al20Cu2Mn3, Mg2Si and CuAl2Mg
58
c
Fig. I.3.14.
Structure of squeeze cast AK12/60 vol. % SiC composite (silicon carbide preform, infiltrated with AlSi12CuNiMg
alloy under pressure. Non-etched sample. Phase contrast
59
c
Fig. I.3.15.
Structure of squeeze cast AK12/60 vol. % SiC composite (silicon carbide preform infiltrated with AlSi12CuNiMg
alloy under pressure). Non-etched sample. Polarized light
60
15 m
Fig. I.3.16.
Structure of Al/70% vol. % SiC composite, manufactured by gas pressure infiltration in the autoclave.
Non-etched sample. Polarized light
I.4.
61
10 m
Fig. 1.4.1.
SEM image of the reinforcing MICRAL-20 microgranules based on aluminum oxide with fine spinel particulates
on their surface
62
63
h
Fig. I.4.2.
i
TM
Structure of A356/20 vol. %. aluminum oxide (COMRAL ) composite, gravity cast into a metal die. Non-etched
sample. Conventional light (a, b, d, f) and phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
20 m
a
20 m
b
Fig. I.4.3.
TM
Structure of squeeze cast A356/20 vol. % aluminum oxide (COMRAL ) composite. Non-etched sample.
Polarized light
64
I.5.
b
Fig. I.5.1.
Structure of hybrid composite produced from A356 alloy reinforced with 15 vol. % SiC and 5 vol % graphite,
gravity cast into die. Non-etched sample. Phase contrast (a) and conventional light (b)
65
Reinforcing phase: silicon carbide particulates of average 20 m diameter and graphite particulates
of about 100 m diameter.
Manufacturing method: mechanical stirring method (vortex) and centrifugal casting in graphite mould
of 100 mm internal diameter, rotational speed of 1000 rpm.
Properties: unique set of tribological properties, varying radially outward from the cylindrical cast axis,
self-lubricating properties of the internal layer (graphite-enriched) and high resistance to wear of the
external layer (silicon carbide-enriched).
Structural characteristics (Fig. 1.5.2 - 1.5.3): Segregation of particulates of both reinforcing phases
and shaping of the laminar structure indicate the important influence of the centrifugal force on the
spatial distribution of the reinforcing phases according to their densities. SiC particulates being heavier
than the metal-matrix are driven outward towards the external layer of the centrifugal cast. In contrast,
lighter graphite particles tend to migrate towards internal layer, while the transition layer is devoid of
the reinforcing phase. Besides SiC particulates, individual graphite particles of very large dimensions
are observed in the external zone. In the internal zone, there are gas bubbles besides graphite. In
comparison to the reinforced areas, the thickening of dendrites in the metal matrix is visible within this
layer, which is devoid of SiC and graphite particulates. This suggests that the reinforcing particles
restrict the growth of dendrites.
a-b
Fig. I.5.2.
c-d
e-f
g-h
i-j
k-l
m-n
o-p
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/15vol.%SiC/5vol.% graphite composite. The sequence of the layers structure
is shown: graphite-rich internal layer (a-b, c-d, e-f), transition layer (g-h), and SiC-rich middle - external layers (i-j,
k-l, m-n, o-p)
66
67
Fig. I.5.3.
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/15vol.%SiC/5vol.%Gr composite. Internal layer (a-f), transition layer (g-h),
and middle - external layer (i-p). Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and phase contrast (on the
right). 100x
68
69
Fig. I.5.4.
Structure of centrifugally cast A356/15vol.%SiC/5vol.%Gr composite. Internal layer (a-f), transition layer (g-h),
and middle - external layer (i-p). Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and phase contrast (on the
right). 500x
70
I.6.
II
200 m
III
Fig. I.6.1.
Structure of the C90300/7.5 vol. % graphite composite, gravity cast into a graphite mould: I top of the casting,
II middle of the casting, III bottom of the casting. Non-etched sample
Fig. I.6.2.
71
Structure of C90300/7.5 vol. % graphite composite, obtained by vortex method and gravity cast in a grey iron
die. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
72
c-d
e-f
I
Fig. I.6.3.
g-h
i-j
II
k-l
m-n
III
Structure of centrifugally cast C90300/7.5 vol. % graphite composite. The sequence of the layers structure
evolution is shown: I external layer (graphite free), II transition layer, III internal layer (graphite enriched).
Non-etched sample. Conventional light. Markings on the picture refer to Fig. I.6.4 and I.6.5
Structural pictures shown indicate various reasons for the porosity to occur depending on centrifugal
casting spot being analyzed. In the external graphite free layer, the sporadic gas shrinkage porosity
occurs (with a domination of shrinkage porosity) typical for the matrix alloy. In the internal layer
however, enriched with graphite, the occurrence of large gas bubbles is linked with gassing up of the
liquid metal-ceramic suspension (typical for the vortex method) and formation of large graphite
particulates agglomerates, combined with bas bubbles, being pushed out towards the centre of the
cylindrical casting under the centrifugal force.
73
74
Fig. I.6.4.
Structure of centrifugally cast C90300/7.5 vol. % graphite composite. The sequence of the layers structure
evolution is shown beginning with external layer I (a - h), through the middle one II (i - j), ending with III (k-n).
Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and phase contrast (on the right). 100x
75
76
Fig. I.6.5.
Structure of centrifugally cast C90300/7.5 vol. % graphite composite. The sequence of the layers structure
evolution is shown beginning with external layer I (a - h), through the middle one II (i - j), ending with III (k-n).
Non-etched sample. Conventional light (on the left) and phase contrast (on the right). 500x
77
Cu-Ni/Gr composite
Matrix: pure copper (initial), Cu-Ni alloy.
Reinforcing phase: nickel-coated graphite (50 : 50).
Manufacturing method: gravity-assisted infiltration of loose nickel-coated graphite deposit (50 : 50)
conducted in a graphite mould.
Properties: improved tribological characteristics, especially at increased temperatures.
Structural characteristics (Fig. I.6.5): very homogeneous arrangement of graphite particulates in the
metal matrix. Good infiltration of the inter-particle cavities between the graphite particulates because
of the dissolution of nickel coating in pure copper. Nickel segregation in the metal matrix takes place.
Fig. I.6.5.
Structure of Cu-Ni/Gr composite obtained by gravity-assisted infiltration of loose nickel-coated graphite deposit
(50 wt. % Ni). Non-etched sample. Conventional light
78
Cu
Cast iron
Cast iron
Cu
79
Fig. I.6.6.
Structure of centrifugally cast CuFe10Sn7Zn3/2.0 vol. % graphite composite: (a-d) external layer, (e-h) transition
layer, (i-l) internal layer. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
80
I.7.
20 m
Fig. I.7.1.
Structure of Pb/60 vol. % fly ash composite obtained by squeeze infiltration. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
1.8.
81
82
Fig. I.8.1.
Structure of Pb/60 vol. % GrNi composite obtained by squeeze infiltration. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
(a, b, d, f) and phase contrast (c, e, g)
II.
II.1.
83
Fig. II.1.1.
84
c
Fig. II.1.2.
Structure of AK12/78 vol. % Al2O3 composite produced by squeeze infiltration of porous preform (made from
short alumina fibers with SiO2 binder) with AlSi12CuNiMg alloy. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a, b)
and phase contrast (b)
II.2.
85
Fig. II.2.1.
86
87
Fig. II.2.2.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated Al/carbon felt composite. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a, b, d, f, h) and
phase contrast (c, e, g, i)
88
d
Fig. II.2.3.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated AlTi4/carbon felt composite. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
89
90
91
h
Fig. II.2.4.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated AK12/carbon felt composite. Non-etched sample. Polarized light (a-f) and
conventional light (g-h)
92
II.3.
93
94
n
Fig. II.3.1.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated Zn/carbon felt composite. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a-e) and
polarized light (f-n)
II.4.
95
Fig. II.4.1.
96
III.
III.1.
97
Fig. III.1.1.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated AlTi4/carbon fiber composite. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a, b, d, f)
and phase contrast (c, e, g)
98
b
Fig. III.1.2.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated Al/nickel coated carbon fiber composite. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
III.2.
99
100
Fig. III.2.1.
Structure of squeeze infiltrated Cu/carbon fiber composite. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a, b, d) and
phase contrast (c, e)
101
III.3.
200 m
25 m
a
Fig. III.3.1.
Structure of NiAl/saphire fibers composite made by powder-cloth (PC) method. The arrows in (b) denote the
residual micro-porosity from incomplete densification of the NiAl matrix powders during composite fabrication
Structural characteristics: in the powder-cloth (PC) composite, polycrystalline NiAl matrix contains
rows of sapphire fibers distributed in the matrix (Fig. III.3.1 a), and there is some residual porosity
(marked by arrows in Fig. III.3.1 b). After hot pressing there is no evidence of interfacial reaction. The
directional solidification (DS) of polycrystalline PC feedstock reduced the number of NiAl grain
boundaries coincident on the fiber surface (Fig. III.3.2), which led to an increase in the
room-temperature fiber/matrix interfacial shear strength. This is because the NiAl grain boundaries
coincident on the fiber surface act as crack initiation sites during loading of the fiber. In a manner
102
similar to the PC composites, there was no evidence of interfacial reaction layers in the DS
composites; however, porosity in the matrix persisted after the DS. The surface appearance of
sapphire fibers extracted the sapphire-NiAl matrix composites synthesized by different fabrication
techniques is shown Fig. III.3.3; there is no evidence of extensive surface degradation or damage. The
original fiber distribution of the PC feedstock was slightly altered after DS (Fig. III.3.2), but the overall
uniformity of fiber distribution was not appreciably affected. The matrix structure of the DS composites
(Fig. III.3.2) exhibited coarser grains, as compared to the NiAl matrix in the PC composites
(Fig. III.3.1).
Unlike Yb in NiAl, chromium alloying of NiAl only moderately attacks the sapphire; Cr preferentially
precipitates on to the sapphire fiber, as revealed by the SEM examination (Fig. III.3.4) of fibers
separated from the NiAl(Cr) matrix by etching. In addition, Cr bonds to the sapphire fiber (Fig. III.3.5).
There is, however, no evidence of reaction product layer formation. The DS structure of the
NiAl(Cr)/sapphire composite displays NiAl cells with fine Cr precipitates distributed within the cells and
the eutectic in the intercellular colonies (Fig. III.3.6). Depending upon whether the fiber resides
predominantly in the intercellular colonies or within the NiAl grains, preferential segregation of either
eutectic Cr or primary Cr precipitates, respectively occurs at the fiber/matrix interface (Fig. III.3.7).
In contrast to both Yb and Cr alloying of NiAl, with 1.5 at. % W in NiAl, the fiber/matrix interface is
completely devoid of any reaction products and secondary precipitates (Fig. III.3.8.). The addition of
W and Cr to NiAl and incorporation of sapphire in the composite creates fiber-reinforced composites
with dual-phase toughening potential together with attainment of high-temperature strength.
200 m
25 m
a
Fig. III.3.2.
Structure of NiAl/saphire fibers composite after directional solidification (DS) from PC feedstock. The arrows in
(a) indicate the porosity in the matrix. The DS was done in the floating-zone mode. DS reduced the number of
NiAl grain boundaries coincident on the fiber surface, which led to an increase in the fiber/matrix interfacial shear
strength. No interfacial reaction layers at optical magnifications. Non-etched sample
100 m
a
Fig. III.3.3.
SEM views of the surface of fibers extracted from NiAl/sapphire fibers composites processed under the following
conditions: (a) powder-cloth (PC) composites that were subsequently directionally solidified using the
floating-zone directional solidification (DS) technique, (b) vacuum induction melted and chill cast (in copper
mould) composites after DS in the floating-zone mode. The fibers were extracted from the composite by
dissolving the matrix in a boiling solution of 75% acetic acid, 23% nitric acid, and 2% HCl acid. Average fiber
diameter 178 m. The matrix contained equi-atomic fractions of Ni and Al
103
1 m
7 m
a
Fig. III.3.4.
SEM view of a sapphire fiber extracted from a sapphire-reinforced NiAl(Cr) composite at (a) low- and (b) high
magnifications. The composite was fabricated using the floating-zone directional solidification (DS) of vacuum
induction melted and chill cast composite (fiber volume fraction ~0.5 wt. %, average sapphire fiber diameter
178 m). The fiber surface shows good bonding between the chromium precipitates and the oxide fiber. The
fibers were extracted from the composite by dissolving the matrix in a boiling solution of 75% acetic acid, 23%
nitric acid, and 2% HCl acid
30 m
Sapphire/NiAl(Cr)
interface region
Eutectic chromium
Sapphire fiber
Cr precipitates
Eutectic chromium
2 m
c
Fig. III.3.5.
SEM views of the fiber/matrix interface in a directionally solidified NiAl(Cr)/sapphire fibers composite: (a)
chromium-rich layer around a sapphire fiber embedded in the composite matrix, (b) a higher magnification view
of a region of Fig. (a), and (c) the sapphire/NiAl(Cr) interface region showing intimate bonding between eutectic
Cr particles and the sapphire fiber. Also noticeable is the cellular NiAl matrix structure and the fine secondary Cr
precipitates that form from supersaturated NiAl matrix during cooling at the conclusion of solidification. The
composite was produced by vacuum induction melting and chill casting in a copper mould followed by directional
solidification (DS) in the floating-zone mode. The fiber volume fraction in the composite: ~0.5 wt. % with
average fiber diameter of 178 m
104
a
Fig. III.3.6.
Secondary Cr
precipitates and
wear tracks
Eutectic Cr
Fiber
Fiber
2 m
a
Fig. III.3.7.
SEM views of de-bonded interfaces in DS NiAl(Cr)/sapphire fiber composite after the fiber push-out test. The DS
was done on vacuum induction melted and chill cast feedstock (fiber volume fraction < 0.5%). Front-face of
a composite wafer showing secondary Cr precipitates within the NiAl cells and microplastic grooving of the NiAl
matrix during sliding of the fiber (a), and preferential segregation of eutectic Cr at the fiber/matrix interface in the
region of the displaced fiber (b). The composition of the DS matrix (in at. %) is 60.2Ni-28.2Al-11.4Cr and
~300 ppm oxygen
a
Fig. III.3.8.
4 m
Fiber
Fiber/matrix interface in NiAl(W)/sapphire composite produced by vacuum induction melting and chill casting in
a copper mould followed by directional solidification (DS) in the floating-zone mode. Reaction-free fiber/matrix
interface on a polished surface (a) and within the region of a pushed fiber in a fiber push-out test (b). The fiber
volume fraction in the composite: ~0.5 wt. %, average fiber diameter is 178 m, and the composition of the
matrix (in at. %) is 67.4Ni-31.4Al-1.5W and ~300 ppm oxygen
105
500 m
200 m
10 m
50 m
c
Fig. III.3.8.
Structure of Hastealloy/sapphire fibers composite produced by pressure infiltration showing fibers distribution in
the cross-section of the infiltrated composite bar (a) and (b), and higher magnification views of the fiber
arrangement, and capillary channels between fibers (c) and (d). Fiber diameter 130 m
106
300 m
70 m
300 m
c
Fig. IV.1.
20 m
107
300 m
300 m
300 m
300 m
70 m
70 m
108
20 m
20 m
g
Fig. IV.2.
SEM images illustrating the structural changes in the nickel gasar, depending on the technological parameters of
the manufacturing process. Transverse cross-section (a, c, e, g) and lengthwise section (b, d, f, h)
Structural specifics: gasars can be classified as a separate, specific group of metal composite
materials manufactured using liquid-phase techniques. Gas being released from liquid metal (during
directional solidification, under variable ambient pressure) is regarded as a reinforcing phase.
For the purpose of practical applications, the most desirable bubble morphology is the one that closely
resembles cylindrical, parallel and evenly arranged capillaries, allowing full permeability of gasars in
a direction parallel to crystallization front to be achieved.
Final structure
Solid phase
Gas phase
Liquid
Gas
Cooling direction
1<2<3
Fig. VI.3.
Proposed scheme of gasar growth kinetics based upon structural examination, during different time of directional
solidification () at a constant velocity. The fracture surface of a copper gasars is shown as a final structure
under original magnification of 35x (SEM)
Solid phase
Gas phase
Metallic liquid
Gas
Non-metallic inclusions
Cooling direction
Fig. IV.4.
SEM micrographs and corresponding evaluation schemes of the nickel gasar structure formation beginning from
quasiboiling process (blister-like structure) (a) through the increase of crystallization velocity Vs (b, c, d) and
development of required dendritic structure (e)
109
Nano-composites
V.
Nano-composites
Fig. V.1.
Structure of the Pyrograf - III nano-fiber after catalytic elongation and thickening (CVD - chemical vapour
deposition). Thickness of the nano-pipe wall in the initial stage is about 20 nm ( 20%)
Table V.1.
Selected physical, mechanical and thermal properties of the Pyrograf - III nano-fibers in relation to heat treatment
Properties
3
Thickness, g/cm
Tensile strength, GPa
Young module, GPa
Thermal expansion coefficient, m/mK
Electrical resistance, cm
Thermal conductivity, W/mK
Nano-fibers as-received
1.8
2.7
400
1000
20
Properties: lower density, significantly increased stiffness and strength, significantly lower thermal
expansion, drastically increased thermal conductivity.
Manufacturing method I: squeeze infiltration of the loose carbon fibers deposit by liquid alloy at
740C, under a pressure of 120 MPa for 30 s; die temperature - bottom/top: 180/220C.
Structural characteristics (Fig. V.2): optical microscopy examination of nano-composites at the
micro-scale has only illustrational value due to the very fine dimensions of individual nano-fibers,
which are impossible to be. In the next stage of structural examinations, it is necessary to use high
resolution electron microscopy (HREM). Nevertheless, even observations under an optical microscope
show that arrangement of the reinforcing phase is non-uniform. There are areas of varying degree of
nano-fibers density, which may not be properly described even as nano-fiber colonies.
110
Nano-composites
Fig. V.2.
111
Nano-composites
Manufacturing method II: squeeze infiltration of the thermally-activated carbon nano-fiber preform
bonded with hydrated sodium silicate (about 75 vol. % porosity) with liquid alloy at 740C under
a pressure of 120 MPa for 30 s; die temperature - bottom/top: 180/220C.
Structural characteristic (Fig. V.3): observations under the optical microscope, especially with
500-1000x magnifications, show colonies of nano-fibers located in the preform walls, and being
divided by a significant amount of unburned (unremoved) bonding compound. In this case,
a heterogeneous arrangement of fibers in the infiltrated preform results from the specifics of the
preform preparation technology itself.
112
Fig. V.3.
Nano-composites
Structure of AK7 alloy reinforced with carbon nano-fiber preform by squeeze infiltration. Non-etched sample.
Conventional light (a, b, d, f) and phase contrast (c, e, g)
113
Nano-composites
Al/50 wt. % carbon nano-fibers composites
Matrix: pure aluminum.
Reinforcing phase: pipe-like carbon nano-fibers (Fig. V.1), thermally treated and known by the trade
name - Pyrograf - III (PR-19-LHT); these nano-fibers have high graphite content and unique
combination of properties, especially high thermal conductivity, the highest out of all known reinforcing
phases.
Manufacturing method: powder metallurgy (know-how)
Structural characteristics (Fig. V.4): microscopic observations show relatively uniform arrangement
of the nano-fiber colonies in comparison to liquid-phase methods. A characteristic feature of the
microstructure is the arrangement of the fiber colonies along the direction of deformation.
d
Fig. V.4.
Structure of Al/50 wt. % carbon nano-fibers composite obtained by powder metallurgy. Cross section (a, b) and
longitudinal section (c, d) related to the deformation direction. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
114
VI.
b
Fig. VI.1.1.
Macrostructures of the lengthwise cross-sections of gravity cast composite ingots illustrating segregation of
reinforcing phase as a result of: a) sedimentation of the silicon carbide particulates in the A356/20 vol. % SiC
composite, for which dSiC>dA356; b) graphite floatation in the AK12/5.7 wt. % nickel coated graphite (50 wt. % Ni)
composite, for which dGr<dAK12
115
Secondary agglomeration occurs during liquid-state processing, i.e. at some stages in the
formation of the metal-ceramic slurry or solidification of the composite casting. It is directly linked
with the particulate-liquid matrix or particulate-solid matrix interactions, which determine the
character of a particulate arrangement in the liquid metal bath or in the solidified composite
casting. Even initial de-agglomeration of the reinforcing phase prior to its introduction to the bath,
does not ensure homogenous arrangement of the reinforcing phase in the final product.
Interaction between reinforcing phase particulates and gas bubbles in the metal bath or as
a result of gas adsorption from the bath surface, which contributes to creation of clusters
containing few or a dozen of particulates linked with common blister (Figs. VI.1.2.2 a, b) or gas
layer (Fig. VI.1.2.2 c).
Local non-wetting of the reinforcing phase by liquid matrix, which contributes to a particle-particle
interaction in metal-ceramic slurry and facilitates gathering of the particulates in agglomerates in
such a way, that they touch each other but some voids remain between these particles because
they are non-wettable by the liquid matrix (Fig. VI.1.2.3).
Pushing out of the reinforcing phase particulates in front of the solidifying metal matrix (pushing
phenomenon), causing their forced undesirable redistribution. Significant fact is, that after
creating very homogenous metal-ceramic slurry using intensive mechanical stirring method, the
gravity castings of such composites have relatively homogenous distribution of the reinforcing
phase in the metal matrix on the macro-scale. However, the observation of the structure in the
micro-scale shows considerable segregation of the reinforcing phase particulates. This is linked
with the phenomenon taking place in the composite casting already during its solidification, thus
not really being a proof of the lack of homogeneity of the suspension formed. In case of
aluminum alloys matrix composites, the solidification begins from the formation of primary
precipitates of the solid phase solution. Further growth of its dendrites causes pushing
reinforcement phase particulates out, which are gathered, following solidification process, as
agglomerates in the eutectic between -phase dendrites (Fig. VI.1.2.4). The use of
technological operations decreasing grain size of primary phase precipitates, effectively
enhances homogeneity of the reinforcement phase distribution in the aluminum matrix of the
gravity cast composites (e.g. refining, use of the external pressure, fast cooling).
116
d
Fig. VI.1.2.1.
Structure of squeeze cast AG10/5.0 wt. % fly ash composite, illustrating occurrence of primary agglomeration;
(a, b) depict stable (hard) agglomerates, while (c, d) depict the agglomerate of the particles, which partially
becomes destructed, because fly ash particles are separated with a metal-matrix layer, maintaining their initial
position though, in relation to each other (structure heredity phenomenon). Non-etched sample. Phase contrast
(a, c, d) and conventional light (b)
117
c
Fig. VI.1.2.2.
Structure of gravity cast AK12/3.7 wt. % fly ash composite (Dayton Power and Light Co., USA), illustrating
secondary agglomeration due to particle-gas bubble interaction. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
Fig. VI.1.2.3.
SEM image of gravity cast F3S.15S composite fracture (A359/15 vol.% SiC), depicting secondary agglomeration
of a few SiC particles due to local non-wetting of reinforcing phase by the liquid matrix evidenced by the absence
of continuous contact between SiC particles and metal matrix)
118
Fig. VI.1.2.4.
Structure of gravity cast F3S.15S composite (A359/15 vol. % SiC). Arrows show secondary agglomeration effect
due to particle pushing phenomenon in such a way that the reinforcing particles are being gathered in low
melting temperature matrix component (in this case, the Al-Si eutectic). Non-etched sample. Polarized light
119
This type of structural macro discontinuity is characteristic to gravity casting. The main reason for the
gas bubbles to occur is excessive gassing of the composite slurry during melting of metal-matrix or
during intensive mechanical stirring of metal bath itself while introducing reinforcing phase. The
presence of ceramic particles in the bath contributes to increasing stability of gas bubbles formed,
because particulates gather on the bubble surface, creating rigid skeleton like three-dimensional
construction (Fig. VI.1.3.1). The occurrence of shrinkage porosity is liked with the tendency of the
metal matrix to shrink during solidification and further cooling of the casing. It is possible to
differentiate between these two types of porosity by the shape of the defect itself, because the gas
bubbles naturally have the spherical shape, while shrinkage porosity has irregular shape, often of very
developed area (Fig. VI.1.3.2).
b
Fig. VI.1.3.1.
Structure of gravity cast F3S.15S composite (A359/15 vol. % SiC), depicting the gas bubbles and shrinkage
porosity. None-etched sample. Polarized light
120
Fig. VI.1.3.2.
Structure of A356/20 vol. % alumina composite (COMRAL) cast into the metal mould, depicting
micro-shrinkage (marked with arrows). Non-etched sample. Polarized light
Fig. VI.1.3.3.
Structure of AK12/fly ash (microspheres) composite obtained by squeeze infiltration, depicting gas-shrinkage
porosity (marked with arrow). Non-etched sample. Phase contrast
121
122
Si
Si
Si
Fig. VI.1.4.1.
Structure of AK12/3.7 wt. % fly ash composite (Dayton Power & Light Co., USA), depicting excessive reactivity of
the fly ash particulates in contact with liquid matrix, which leads to reduction of such type of oxides as SiO2 and
mullite by Al (main fly ash ingredients) and the formation of Si. In the saturated with silicon metal-matrix, large
primary precipitations of the Si crystals form, growing on the surface of the ash particulates (arrows indicate
cracks in the particulates). Non-etched sample. Conventional light
Fig. VI.1.4.2.
Structure of 52K/15 vol. % fly ash composite, depicting cracking of the microsphere and its filling with the liquid
matrix as well as the formation of large amounts of Si and iron-reach precipitates inside the microsphere as
a result of chemical reactions taking place between liquid matrix and oxides. Sample etched with Kevlar agent.
Polarized light
123
Al4C3
Fig. VI.1.4.3.
Structure of Al-graphite composite after heating to about 950C, depicting cracking of the large graphite particle,
due to excessive reactivity caused from aluminum carbide formation. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
Al
Al4C3
graphite
Fig. VI.1.4.4.
Structure of the Al/graphite interface after heating up to 950C for 30 min and weathering out in the open for
1 month. Al4C3 precipitates are visible at the metal graphite interface as well as deformation lines and cracks in
Al as a result of gas product formation (methane) due to reacting Al4C3 with water vapor from the atmosphere.
Non-etched sample. Polarized light
124
Fig. VI.1.4.5.
Structure of gravity cast F3S.20S composite structure (A359/20 vol. % SiC) after heating in the liquid state with
visible needle-like Al4C3 precipitates formed on the surface of SiC particles. Effective methods to prevent
occurrence of aluminum carbide in DURALCAN composites are: thorough temperature control of the liquid
suspension as well as increased silicon contents in the matrix (usually Si 7 wt. %). Non-etched sample.
Polarized light
125
Typical example of the contamination of the cast composites that may take place during improper
melting process is presence of continuous oxide films (Fig. VI.1.5).
c
Fig. VI.1.5.
Structures of gravity cast F3S.20S composite (A359/20 vol. % SiC), illustrating inhomogeneous distribution of
reinforcing phase due to the formation of the oxide films and their getting through from the areas inside the
composite casting. Non-etched sample. Polarized light
126
Fig. VI.2.1.1.
SEM images of the AK12/22 vol. % Al2O3 composite fracture, depicting the solidified infiltration front inside short
fiber preform (MORGAN Company) due to its unfinished infiltration with AK12 alloy (time of pressure being
exerted about 3 s)
Fig. VI.2.1.2.
127
SEM images of the AK12/20 vol. % Al2O3 composite fracture, depicting the solidified infiltration front inside short
fiber preform (DIDIER Company) due to its unfinished infiltration with AK12 alloy
128
Fig. VI.2.1.3.
Structure of AK12/fly ash composite (microspheres) obtained by squeeze infiltration of porous preform with AK12
alloy, illustrating its incomplete filling with liquid matrix due to insufficient wettability in the metal-ceramic system
(marked with arrow). Non-etched sample. Phase contrast
129
VI.2.2. Structural heterogeneity and discontinuities resulting from the improper preform
preparation
Both heterogeneous thickness of the nickel coating layer on the fibers as well as their heterogeneous
distribution contribute to the formation of significant Ni segregation in the matrix, where the areas
between the fibers are used up by eutectic (Al+Al3Ni), while other area by Ni solid solution in Al
(Fig. VI.2.2.1).
130
Fig. VI.2.2.1.
Structure of Al/nickel coated carbon fibers composite, depicting structural heterogeneities caused from
nonuniform distribution of reinforcing phase in Al matrix, nonuniform thickness of nickel coating and matrix
segregation due to the dissolution of Ni coating in liquid Al. Non-etched sample. Conventional light (a, b, d, f) and
phase contrast (c, e, g)
131
Fig. VI.2.3.1.
Structure of Al matrix composite reinforced with porous preform made from short Al2O3 fibers and SiO2, depicting
cracking of the reinforcing phase as a result of its interaction with metal matrix. Non-etched sample. Phase
contrast (a-c) and conventional light (d)
132
200 m
SiO2 + Mg
SiO2 + 2Mg
Al(Mg) + Si
MgSiO2
2MgO + Si
[Al(Mg) + Si]eut
Mg
b
Fig. VI.2.3.2.
Structure of MgAl8Zn2 alloy locally reinforced with ceramic preform (MORGAN, UK), consisting of 95 wt. % short
fibers (96% Al2O3 and 4% SiO2) as well as 5 wt. % of SiO2-based binder, showing the dimensional and shape
changes of the preform, its deformation and cracking (a). Scheme (b) shows changes in the preform structure
caused from two effects, i.e. applied external pressure and weakening of interfiber connections in the preform
that takes place due to consumption of binder by chemical reactions liquid.
133
c
Fig. VI.2.3.3.
Structure of Al/carbon fiber composite obtained by gas pressure infiltration in the autoclave (p = 7 MPa,
T = 800C, = 30 min), depicting the formation of the aluminum carbide at the fiber/matrix interface. Non- etched
sample. Polarized light
a
Fig. VI.2.3.4.
Structure of the composite obtained with initially pure Al matrix and reinforced with nickel coated carbon fibers
using gas pressure infiltration in the autoclave (p = 7 MPa, T = 800C, = 30 min). As a result of intensive
interaction between nickel coating and Al, a complete dissolving of Ni in the metal matrix takes place, and thus
exposing the fibers. This causes further chemical reaction between Al and nickel and formation of large amount
of aluminum carbide (Al4C3). At the same time, a disadvantageous change of chemical composition of the matrix
itself, takes place, caused by rapid growth of Ni content as well as contributing to the formation of large amount
of brittle Al3Ni precipitates. Non-etched. Polarized light
134
c
Fig. VI.2.4.1.
Structure of AK11/carbon felt composite in the vicinity of the casting surface, depicting structural discontinuities
due to occurrence of oxide films. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
135
Fig. VI.3.1.
Structure of lower part of the gravity cast hybrid composite made from A356 matrix reinforced with 15 vol. % SiC
and 5 vol. % nickel coated graphite particles. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
136
SiC
Al3Ni
Al3Ni
SiC
Al3Ni
Graphite particle
Ni coating
Al3Ni
Fig. VI.3.2.
Al3Ni
Structure of hybrid composite produced from A356 alloy reinforced with 15 % silicon carbide and 5 % graphite,
gravity cast into the metal die. Sample etched with Kevlar agent. Conventional light
137
138
200 m
Fig. VI.4.1.
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite showing channeling near the periphery of specimen transversed to the
infiltration direction. Sharply demarcated SiC-starved and SiC-enriched regions form because of channeling in
the packed SiC network under melt shear; pressure: 825 kPa, melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 3 min,
SiC size: 50-250 m diameter and 5-25 m thickness, as-received SiC. Non-etched sample. Conventional light
20 m
10 m
Fig. VI.4.2.
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite at two magnifications of cored dendritic structure in the channeled region (SiC
impoverished region) of sample of I.3.12; pressure of 825 kPa, melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 5 min,
SiC size: 50-250 m diameter and 5-25 m thickness, as-received SiC; the sample was color etched with
a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g NaOH in 1 l distilled water. Conventional light
139
10 m
a
Fig. VI.4.3.
10 m
Structure of 2014/xSiC composite showing the variation of microstructure and SiC distribution with height in
composite produced by infiltration counter to gravity. The microstructures are shown for samples cut lengthwise
across their diameters (i.e., views are parallel to the infiltration direction): (a) shows greater porosity and second
phase precipitation near the top of the infiltrated bar, and (b) shows less porosity and secondary phases at the
bottom (melt entrance) but also greater directional stratification of the platelets due to greater melt shear at the
bottom; pressure of 825 kPa, melt temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 5 min, SiC size: 250-500 m diameter
and 25-50 m thickness, Cu-coated SiC; the sample was color etched with a solution of 4 g KMnO4 and 2 g
NaOH in 1 l distilled water. Conventional light
10 m
Fig. VI.4.4.
Transverse section of 2014/xSiC infiltrated counter-to-gravity with a 30 min hold at 800C. The image, taken from
a section near the bottom of the infiltrated bar, shows extensive degradation of the Cu-coated SiC platelets due
to chemical reaction of SiC with molten Al upon prolonged contact; infiltration pressure: 525 kPa, melt
temperature: 800C, infiltration time: 30 min, SiC size: 50-250 m diameter and 5-25 m thickness, Cu-coated
SiC. Conventional light
140
141
field. In contrast, the composite made by vacuum induction melting and chill casting in copper mould
do not show any appreciable fiber breakage.
a
Fig. VI.5.1.
(a) Matrix region around a debonded sapphire fiber in a powder-cloth (PC) sapphire/NiAl composite showing
porosity due to incomplete densification during composite fabrication, and (b) shows wear tracks on NiAl grains
that formed due to sliding of debonded fibers during fiber push-out test. The matrix contains approximately
TM
equi-atomic fractions of Ni and Al. Reinforcement: single crystal sapphire fibers (Saphikon ), average fiber
diameter: 178 m
200 m
10 m
Fig. VI.5.2.
Structure of NiAl(Y)/saphire fibers composite produced by the powder-cloth (PC) technique. Arrows in (a)
denote the porosity in the matrix due to incomplete densification during hot pressing, and arrows in (b) denote
the Ni3Al phase that formed at matrix grain boundaries in the NiAl(Yb) matrix. A reaction layer at the fiber/matrix
interface in (b) is also visible. Non-etched sample
Fig. VI.5.3.
Low (a) and high (b) magnification views of a sapphire-reinforced NiAl(Yb) matrix composite after floating-zone
directional solidification. The DS was done on Powder-Cloth (PC) feedstock specimen. Extensive fiber/matrix
interfacial reaction and formation of shrinkage cracks is observed. Reinforcement: single crystal sapphire fiber
TM
(Saphikon ), fiber diameter: 178 m
142
a
Fig. VI.5.4.
SEM images of the surface of fibers extracted from the PC composite (a) and the DS composite (b). The fiber
surface shows extensive chemical attack of the sapphire by the ytterbium in the NiAl(Yb) matrix. The fibers were
extracted from the composite by dissolving the matrix in a boiling solution of 75% acetic acid, 23% nitric acid,
TM
and 2% HCl acid. Reinforcement: single crystal sapphire fibers (Saphikon ), average fiber diameter: 178 m.
The composition of the powder-cloth (PC) feedstock (in at. %) is 62.1Ni-36.8Al-0.36Yb. There was some loss of
Yb in the fiber/matrix interface reactions; as a result, there was less Yb in the DS material. The composition of
the DS composites (in at. %) is 62.5Ni-36.4Al-0.19Yb
e
Fig. VI.5.5.
Structure of various NiAl/sapphire fibers composites: (a) powder-cloth (PC) composite showing fiber breakage
during composite fabrication by hot pressing, (b) directionally solidified (DS) composite made from a PC
feedstock, (c) composite made by vacuum induction melting and chill casting in copper mould, (d) DS composite
showing fiber fragmentation due to matrix recirculation in the molten zone, and (d) fibers in a sapphire-NiAl(Yb)
composite
143
Acknowledgments
In the course of the preparation of this atlas, the results of experimental research were used, which in
turn were obtained during the following research projects:
1. Infiltration processing of silicon carbide platelet-reinforced aluminum alloy composites. Doctoral
Dissertation by R. Asthana, 1991, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA (Adviser:
P.K. Rohatgi)
2. Complex investigation of the interfacial phenomena of the liquid metals in contact with solid
bodies, Project No. MP/NIST 92-90, conducted in 1992-1996 by the Foundry Research Institute
and University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA, and financed by Polish-American M. SklodowskaCurie Fond (Principal Investigators: N. Sobczak, P.K. Rohatgi)
3. Physical and chemical mutual interaction on the solid body liquid metal contact border, as a
factor shaping the structure and properties of heterogenic materials of aluminum alloys matrix.
Research project No. 773729203, conducted in 1992-1995 by the Foundry Research Institute and
financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Project Manager: N. Sobczak)
4. Working out comprehensive technology to manufacture new generation castings reinforced with
ceramic or composite insertions using squeeze casting technology. Research project No.
7S20201804, conducted in 1993-1996 by the Foundry Research Institute, financed by the
Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator: J. Sobczak)
5. Zone directional solidification of sapphire-reinforced NiAl-matrix composites, U.S. National
Academy of Sciences (through National Research Council), 1994-95, USA (Principal Investigator:
R. Asthana)
6. Effect of external pressure during solidification on the production of metal matrix composites and
use of such products in automotive industry, Project No. MP/NIST-95-231, conducted in 19951998 by the Foundry Research Institute and University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA, financed
by Polish-American M. Sklodowska-Curie Fond (Principal Investigators: J. Sobczak, P.K. Rohatgi)
7. Settling behaviour of ceramic reinforcements in composite slurries, Faculty Research Initiative
Grant, University of Wisconsin-Stout, 1996, USA (Principal Investigator: R. Asthana)
8. Graded products with local composite reinforcement manufactured using centrifugal casting.
Research project No. 7T08B02211, conducted in 1997-1999 by the Foundry Research Institute
and financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator:
J. Sobczak)
9. New generation of pistons for combustion engines as a result of optimising their properties by
formation of composite material structure. Ph.D. project No. 9T12C0131, conducted in 2000-2001
by the Motor Transport Institute and financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland
(Principal Investigator: J. Sobczak, Ph.D. student: D. Rudnik)
10. Metallographic quantitative criteria of the selected service properties of composite materials made
brake discs. Ph.D. project No. 7T08B02718, conducted in 2000-2001 by the Motor Transport
Institute and financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator:
J. Sobczak, Ph.D. student: A. Wojciechowski)
11. Working out the foundation of gasars technology new highly porous materials with
predetermined spatial lay out of porosity. Research project No. 7T08B01419, conducted in
2000-2003 by the Foundry Research Institute in cooperation with the Motor Transport Institute
and financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator:
J. Sobczak)
12. Physicochemical aspects of in-situ synthesis of Al-Al2O3 composites by liquid-phase processing.
Research project No. 7T08B00320, conducted in 2001-2004 by the Foundry Research Institute
and financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator:
N. Sobczak)
13. Starting up production of brake discs made of composite materials for the automotive industry
needs: Working out comprehensive technology of manufacturing brake discs out of Al/SiC
composites. Target project No. 10T120132000C/5220 conducted in 2001-2004 by the Motor
Transport Institute with the participation of the Foundry Research Institute, commissioned by the
Institute of Implementations and Polish Foundries Technologies Ltd. Project co-financed by the
Committee for Scientific Research, Poland
144
14. Optimisation of car component properties by formation of the new composite material structure.
Research project No. 9T12C01218 conducted in 1999-2002 by the Motor Transport Institute and
financed by the Committee for Scientific Research, Poland (Principal Investigator: K. Pietrzak)
15. Development of the synthesis of the light and economically justified construction materials
utilising waste products (fly ashes). Research project No. 3T08B06426, conducted in 2004-2007
by the Foundry Research Institute in co-operation with the Motor Transport Institute and financed
by the Ministry of Science and Information Technology, Poland (Principal Investigator:
J. Sobczak)
16. Effect of technological parameters on structure and properties of fly ash reinforced aluminum
matrix composites. Ph.D. project No. 3T08B05728, conducted in 2005-2007 by the Foundry
Research Institute and the Motor Transport Institute, and financed by the Committee for Scientific
Research, Poland (Principal Investigator: J. Sobczak, Ph.D. student: P. Darlak)
17. Innovative materials and processes for use in foundry industry. Commissioned research project
No. PBZ-KBN-114/TO8/2004, conducted in 2004-2008 by the Foundry Research Institute in cooperation with the Motor Transport Institute, and financed by the Ministry of Science and
Information Technology, Poland (Principal Investigator: J. Sobczak)
ISBN 978-83-60965-00-9