Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Fundamental studies related to thermal convection in porous
media have increased significantly during recent years. This
interest is due to the presence of porous media in diverse
engineering applications including geothermal systems, building thermal insulation, enhanced oil recovery, nuclear waste
disposal, packed bed chemical reactors, and solid-matrix heat
exchangers. Earlier investigations were based on the Darcy flow
model and comprehensive reviews were provided by Combarnous and Bories (1975), Cheng (1978), and Catton (1985).
Lately, non-Darcy effects on thermal convection in porous
media have been considered by several investigators, including
Vafai and Tien (1981), Poulikakos and Bejan (1985), Beckermann et al. (1988), and Lauriat and Prasad (1989) among
others and more recent reviews of this subject are provided by
Kakac et al. (1991) and Nield and Bejan (1992).
The problem of forced convection in porous media is mostly
relevant in flow through packed beds and in solid matrix heat
exchangers. Koh and his co-workers (1974, 1975) investigated
the performance of a heat exchanger containing a conductive
porous matrix. They used a slug flow model that was limited
to porous media with very low permeability. In a study based
on the Brinkman-extended Darcy flow model, Kaviany (1985)
reported analytical and numerical results for forced convection
in a porous channel bounded by isothermal parallel plates. A
similar problem was solved numerically by Poulikakos and
Renken (1987) who used a general flow model, which included
the effects of flow inertia, variable porosity, and Brinkman
friction. Cheng et al. (1988) reported results for a thermally
developing forced convective flow in a packed channel heated
asymmetrically. Renken and Poulikakos (1989) conducted an
experimental study of boundary-layer forced convection from
a flat isothermal plate placed in a packed bed of spheres.
Analytical solutions of fully developed forced convection in a
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division and presented at the ASME Winter
Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, November 25-30, 1990. Manuscript received
by the Heat Transfer Division November 1992; revision received July 1993.
Keywords: Electronic Equipment, Forced Convection, Porous Media. Associate
Technical Editor: C. E. Hickox, Jr.
POROUS MATRIX
HEAT SOURCES
POROUS MATRIX
<<"."""< </{(/-
_
Mathematical Formulation
A schematic of the physical model and coordinate system
is shown in Fig. 1(a) for the fully porous channel and Fig. 1(b)
for the partially porous channel, which contains porous layers
located above the heat sources and is nonporous elsewhere.
For convenience, the latter case is identified simply as "the
partially porous channel." It is assumed that the flow in the
channel is steady, laminar incompressible, and two dimensional. The porous medium is considered to be homogeneous
and isotropic and is saturated with a single-phase fluid, which
is in thermal equilibrium with the solid matrix. The thermophysical properties of the solid matrix and of the fluid are
assumed to be constant. Although for certain porous media
such as spherical beads the porosity may vary due to channeling
near the walls (Vafai, 1984), in the current study, fibrous media
are considered for which the porosity and permeability are
constant even close to the walls (Hunt and Tien, 1988a). Finally, viscous dissipation is neglected in the energy equation.
The governing equations can then be written separately for the
fluid and porous layers. For the fluid layers:
Continuity:
V'V = 0
(1)
(2)
Momentum:
7779t
TrrrW |
s
HEAT SOURCES
Energy:
{pc)f{\-VT)=kfV2T
For the porous layers:
Continuity:
(3)
V-V = 0
(4)
Momentum:
^(V-V)\=-Vp
V+/V2V
+ pg-
(5)
Energy:
(pc)/(V-"7T)=keV2T
(6)
Nomenclature
c
C
Da
g
h
H
KB
K =
L =
Nu =
Nu, =
NuL =
P =
Po =
P = dimensionless pressure
=p/(f>Ul)
Pe = Peclet number = RePr
Pr = Prandtl number = v/a.
q = uniform heat flux from each
heat source, W/m 2
Re = Reynolds number = UJti/v
Rk = thermal conductivity ratio
= ke/kf
s = spacing between heat sources,
m
T = temperature, K
To = uniform inlet temperature, K
u = velocity in x direction, m/s
U0 = uniform inlet velocity, m/s
dimensionless velocity in x
u = direction
=u/U0
v = velocity in y direction, m/s
V = dimensionless velocity in y
direction = v/U0
V = velocity vector, m/s
w = width of heat source, m
x = horizontal distance, m
X = dimensionless distance in x
direction =x/H
y
Y
P =
. e
r=
G =
X =
/* =
4>
vertical distance, m
dimensionless distance in y
direction =y/H
thermal diffusivity of the fluid
= kf/(pcp)f, m 2 /s
thermal expansion coefficient
of the fluid, K ' 1
porosity
vorticity
dimensionless temperature
=
(T-T0)/(qH/kf)
binary parameter defined in
Eq. (8)
dynamic viscosity, kg/m-s
effective dynamic viscosity,
kg/m-s
kinematic viscosity, m 2 /s
stream function
Subscripts
e = effective (i.e., fluid-saturated
porous medium)
/ = fluid
o = inlet
w = wall
Transactions of the ASME
where
\\\=\fu2+v2
(7)
In Eqs. (2) and (5), the convective term on the left-hand
side of the momentum equations is included in order to account
for the development of the hydrodynamic boundary layer,
which may be significant especially in the case when the channel
is partially porous. The momentum equations for the porous
region are enhanced by the use of the Brinkman-Forchheimerextended Darcy model, which accounts for both viscous and
inertia effects (Vafai and Tien, 1981; Beckermann et al., 1988;
Lauriat and Prasad, 1989). In the energy equation, axial conduction is accounted for since it is significant at low Reynolds
number (Hadim, 1994). The apparent viscosity / / , in the
Brinkman extension of the momentum equations, may have a
different value than the fluid viscosity but for most porous
media, setting /x' = ^ provides good agreement with experimental data (Lundgren, 1972). Thermal dispersion in the porous matrix is assumed to be constant and it is incorporated
in the effective thermal conductivity. This assumption is reasonable for low Reynolds number (Hunt and Tien, 1988a).
The boundary conditions for the configurations shown in
Fig. 1 are such that no slip occurs at the impermeable walls.
At the bottom wall, there is a uniform heat flux q, which is
distributed over each heat source and the portion of the wall
between heat sources is adiabatic. The top wall is entirely
adiabatic. At the channel inlet, the fluid has a uniform velocity
U0, and a uniform temperature T0. The boundary conditions
at the exit are obtained by extrapolation and will be discussed
later in this section.
In the case of a partially porous channel, the two sets of
equations are coupled by the matching conditions at the fluid/
porous-layer interface. These conditions express continuity of
normal and tangential velocities, pressure, normal and shear
stresses, temperature, and heat flux. The inclusion of the
Brinkman extension in the momentum Eqs. (5) for the porous
layer allows for continuity of velocity and shear at the fluid/
porous-layer interface and a no-slip condition on the solid
walls.
For the partially porous channel case, instead of solving the
two sets of describing equations separately, the equations can
be combined into one set by introducing the binary parameter
(Poulikakos, 1987a, b; Beckermann et al., 1988)
fl
\0
vV=r
MiL+i2L
l-(X-l)
dYdX
AC
ReDa
dXdY
hmv-h^u
dYdX
dXdY
Pe
* *
+^- v r
Re
1)+1]V 2 0
(ii)
(12)
at X=0,
f=0,
d \L
= - 1 ,
dY
dd_
dY
* = 0,
6> = 0
(13fl)
0 at insulated area
-1 at heat source
(136)
dt
(13c)
=0
dY2' i H l , dY
For the fully porous channel case, the boundary conditions at
the exit are given by the following conditions for hydrodynamically fully developed flow (Roache, 1982):
at =l,
r=
d2x/y
dt
(13d)
qH
(Tw-T0)kf
(14)
Ap
l/2pUl
(15)
3
Z
10""
10"s
10"4
10""
Da
10"'
b)
Fig. 2 Comparison with results from the literature: (a) fully developed
centerline velocity; (>) fully developed Nusselt number
2.025
1500
1'
1178
1096
1054
1025
0.999
'
0500
0.178
-(
0.096
X = 0.054
- ~ -
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
1999
1.500
1.178
1096
10
0.75
-,
VOM
1.025
U.999
l
^
13
0.500
0.178
0.096
X = 0.054
c)
3
Fig. 3 Development of the velocity profile for Re = 250 and Da = 10 " : (a) nonporous channel; (b) fully porous
channel; (c) partially porous channel
Re
50
100
250
1000
/z
-cffSSS-'
Re = 1000
1 I I Minii I i iiiuii
r /\1
'
Do
\ .;!
10~6 2
\ 'i
TO"
\
10-'
V
nonporous
\
ni
""
i i MIIMr-r
1 1 Mllll
10
10"
10"
Da
Fig. 5 Effects of Darcy and Reynolds numbers on the axial centerline
velocity variation in the fully porous channel
0.5
Y
Fig. 4 Effects of Darcy and Reynolds numbers on the fully developed
velocity profile in the fully porous channel
Hydrodynamic Results. The velocity profiles in the channel are illustrated in Fig. 3 for Re = 250 and Da = 10"3. In the
nonporous channel (Fig. 3a), it is known that the velocity
distribution develops from a flat profile at the inlet to a fully
developed parabolic profile beyond the entrance region. At a
very short distance from the channel entrance, a dip in the
velocity profile is observed in Fig. 3(a) and it is evident that
the maximum velocity does not occur at the centerline. This
central concavity diminishes with increasing axial distance and
eventually vanishes completely within a short distance from
the channel entrance. This phenomenon was also reported by
Wang and Longwell (1964) and Zeldin and Schmidt (1972) in
their numerical solutions. In the fully porous channel (Fig.
3b), due to the bulk damping caused by the presence of the
porous matrix, the viscous effects are confined to the region
near the walls. This results in a flat profile of the velocity in
the core region. As the Darcy number is decreased, the boundary layer thickness decreases and the flat portion of the velocity
profile extends gradually toward the solid surfaces. This trend
was reported by Vafai and Tien (1981) and Kaviany (1985)
who showed that the boundary layer thickness was of the order
of (K/e)[n. The development of the velocity profile in the
partially porous channel is shown in Fig. 3(c). In the first
nonporous layer (0<A'<1), the profiles are identical to the
ones shown in Fig. 3(a). As the fluid progresses through the
first porous layer (1 <X< 2), the hydrodynamic boundary layer
thickness decreases and a flat profile is obtained similar to the
one shown in Fig. 3(b) for the fully porous channel. When the
flow passes through the nonporous layers, it is shown in Fig.
3(c) that for s/H = 1, the viscous effects do not penetrate deeply
into the core region. Thus, even at low Reynolds number, the
development of the velocity profile does not reach a parabolic
shape in the fluid layers and as the flow progresses through
the next porous layer, the velocity profile flattens after a short
distance and closely approaches that of the fully porous channel even at relatively high Darcy number. Such flow behavior
has an important bearing on the heat transfer as discussed in
the next section. The hydrodynamic development length decreases significantly as the Darcy number is decreased. This
result was discussed in more detail by Hadim (1994).
The effects of Darcy and Reynolds numbers on the fully
developed velocity profile in the fully porous channel are illustrated in Fig. 4. As the Darcy number is decreased, the
Journal of Heat Transfer
0.0
2.0
4,0
6.0
8.0
10.0
0.0
2.0
4,0
X
Re=50
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
X
Re=100
8.0
10.0
0 .0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Do
1.0E-06
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
10.0
X
X
Re=250
Re=KX>0
Fig. 6 Effects of Darcy and Reynolds numbers on the axial centerline
velocity variation in the partially porous channel
A
/ / "
i -'"'K
1//"
j
3.0
Do
ioe-06
1.0E-03
IOE-02
*b-
loe-oi
nooporous
Re
.20
100
. 1000
Da
10-6
10~3
4.0
X'
Nuc
Fig. 7 Effects of Darcy number on the bottom wall temperature variation in the fully porous channel for Re = 250
nonporous
t>
Nu,
Fig. 8 Effects of Darcy number on the local Nusselt number variation
for Re = 250
t>
~ii
10'
i i M 11
103
itf
Re
porous channel with that of the fully porous channel is presented in Fig. 12 where the variation of the average dimensionless pressure drop with Darcy and Reynolds numbers is
displayed. It is obvious in both cases that the pressure drop
increases as the Darcy number decreases. The pressure drop
in the partially porous channel is significantly lower than in
the fully porous channel and this difference increases as the
Darcy number decreases. In the Darcian regime, for the case
when the spacing between heat sources is equal to the width
of the heat source, the pressure drop in the partially porous
channel was found to be approximately one half of the pressure
drop in the fully porous channel.
_Re==50
/
i
-rte==250
-Re==1000
0.0
-Re==100
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
X
Fig. 11 Local pressure distribution in the partially porous channel for
Da = 10"3 and various Reynolds numbers
Do=1.0E-06
\ ^ ^
b.
a-.
th
Da=1.C-03 " - ^ _ ^ ^
"fe =
Do=1.0E-02 ~~~~-~~--___r"
Do=1.0E-01 ^ - " - I Z l Z ^ l r
" O T
<b10'
nonporous
"
^ ^
'
1.
icf
r i i i 1
yd
Re
Fig. 12 Total dimensionless pressure drop in the channel versus Reynolds number at various Darcy numbers
Conclusions
A numerical study of laminar forced convection in a porous
channel with discrete heat sources on the bottom wall was
performed. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer results are reported for two cases: (1) a fully porous channel and (2) a
partially porous channel, which contains porous layers located
above the heat sources and is nonporous elsewhere. In both
cases, the Nusselt number increases as the Darcy number decreases. The increase in heat transfer is more significant at
higher Reynolds number, and at the leading edge of each heat
source.
Results for the partially porous channel indicate that almost
the same increase in heat transfer (especially at low Darcy
number) and a significantly reduced pressure drop can be obtained compared with the fully porous channel. Therefore, this
technique appears to be promising for application to electronics
cooling, especially in applications characterized by large power
dissipation.
Further experimental and numerical studies are needed in
order to demonstrate clearly the feasibility of the proposed
heat transfer augmentation technique and to optimize the configuration of the partially porous channel for maximum heat
transfer and minimum pressure drop.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Mr. Angel Bethancourt and
Mr. Guoqi Chen, graduate research assistants, for their help
with some of the numerical computations.
References
Beckermann, C , Viskanta, R., and Ramadhyani, S., 1988, "Natural Convection in Vertical Enclosures Containing Simultaneously Fluid and Porous
Layers," J. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 186, pp. 257-284.
Catton, I., 1985, "Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Porous Media," in:
Natural Convection: Fundamentals and Applications, Hemisphere, New York.
Cheng, P., 1978, "Heat Transfer in Geothermal Systems," Advances in Heat
Transfer, Vol. 14, pp. 1-105.
Cheng, P., Hsu, C. T., and Choudhury, A., 1988, "Forced Convection in
the Entrance Region on a Packed Channel With Asymmetric Heating," ASME
JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER, Vol. 110, pp. 946-954.
Kakac, S., Kilkis, B., Kulacki, F. A., and Arinc, F., 1991, Convective Heat
and Mass Transfer in Porous Media, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Kaviany, M., 1985, "Laminar Flow Through a Porous Channel Bounded by
Isothermal Parallel Plates," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 28, pp. 851-858.
Koh, J. C. Y., and Colony, R., 1974, "Analysis of Cooling Effectiveness for
Porous Material in Coolant Passage," ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER, Vol.
96, pp. 324-330.
Koh, J. C. Y., and Stevens, R. L., 1975, "Enhancement of Cooling Effectiveness by Porous Materials in Coolant Passage," ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT
TRANSFER, Vol. 97, pp. 309-311.
Kuo, S. M., and Tien, C. L., 1988, "Heat Transfer Augmentation in a FoamMaterial Filled Duct With Discrete Heat Sources," Proc. Thermal Phenomena
in Electronics Components Conference, Los Angeles, CA, May 11-13, pp. 8791.
Lundgren, T. S., 1972, "Slow Flow Through Stationary Random Beds and
Suspensions of Spheres," / . Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 51, pp. 273-299.
Lauriat, G., and Prasad, V., 1989, "Non-Darcian Effects on Natural Convection in a Vertical Porous Enclosure," Int. I. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 32,
pp 2135-2147.
Lauriat, G., and Vafai, K., 1991, "Forced Convection and Heat Transfer
Through a Porous Medium Exposed to a Flat Plate or a Channel," in: Convective
Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media, S. Kakac, B. Kilkis, F. A. Kulacki,
and F. Arinc, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 289-327.
Nield, D. A., and Bejan, A., 1992, Convection in Porous Media, SpringerVerlag, New York.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere,
New York.
Poulikakos, D., and Bejan, A., 1985, "The Departure From Darcy Flow in
Natural Convection in a Vertical Porous Layer," Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28,
pp. 3477-3484.
Poulikakos, D., 1987a, "Buoyancy Driven Convection in a Horizontal Fluid
Layer Extending Over a Porous Substrate," Physics of Fluids, Vol. 29, pp.
3949-3957.
Poulikakos, D., 1987b, "Thermal Instability in a Horizontal Fluid Layer
Superposed on a Heat Generating Porous Bed," Numerical Heat Transfer, Vol.
12, pp. 83-100.
Poulikakos, D., and Renken, K., 1987, "Forced Convection in a Channel
Filled With a Porous Medium, Including the Effects of Flow Inertia, Variable