writes with a poets care. The manuscript has a classic feel, and is I think quite consciously epic in the classical sense. Fate, prophecy, war, civilization, and the extremes of human nature are rolled operatically into one sweeping narrative but anchored by one clear hero (in this case, Lily). In both tone and scope, it reminded me in many ways of Lavinia by Ursula K. LeGuin, only instead of novelizing a hazy, mythical past, Gutteridge is sculpting against the terra firma of relatively well-known historical information. As sweeping as it is, Lilys interior life is complicated, full, and poignantly drawn. The intelligent and empathetic orphan coming of age in rough circumstances is an efficient if familiar conceit. However, Lily is also the vehicle for an affecting but clear-eyed portrayal of the myriad physical, emotional, and political challenges facing women in the towns and backwoods of 19th- and early 20th-century Canada. To support Lily, Gutteridge manages a massive cast, and he sketches the evolving politics and polyglot culture of mid-to-late-nineteenth century Ontario with a steady hand. As one of his blurbers mentions, the novel is about Lily, but it is also about the land itself: about how land is carved up and repurposed; how the wild space of Ontario becomes legally and culturally defined on its way to becoming a nation. In this way, the goal of the novel resembles Wolf Hall in the way it focuses on a single personality, surrounded by a large cast, to create a world through details, but also to tell a sort of parable about the complicated birth of a nation. The personalities as well as the landscapes of pioneer life do indeed throb with
vitality, as the agents description claims.
Along with his numerous compelling (and convincing) characters, he is also very good at landscapes and costumes. There is a degree of detail here (exhaustive, immediate, and often elegant) that could only come from a lifetime of study. And indeed, the novel is as vividly drawn as it is well-researched. To his verdantly imagined world Don adds the texture and authority of contemporary documents, excerpting bits of journals and letters and maps and surveys, which he manages to incorporate rather seamlessly. Looming figures of Canadian history appear, including Louis Riel and Major John Richardson. History buffs would swoon (or maybe fall to historiographical nitpicking, no doubt) over this book. All of this is expertly and lovingly done. And while I admire the writing very much, the lush, poetic style can be so thick at times that the prose borders on purple, giving things a rather precious tone something of another time, perhaps? Where the book has an edge, it gets it from its verisimilitude: its unwavering portrayal of the brutal, inhuman work of colonialism and nation building. The writing, on the other hand, is smooth and flowery, swerving often toward sentimentality. As capable, consistent, and erudite as DG is, he does not entirely transcend the perennial challenges of pulling off a period piece. We are at times aware that we are being lectured, or that a bit of detail is coming to us directly from an archival moment. I personally dont find the pronounced erudition here to be a huge problem: as an erstwhile student of history, I enjoyed the documentary texture DG layers over the human saga (and others probably would, as well). But it adds heft to an already hefty narrative.