Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Quinoa (Chenopodiumquinoa Willd) is an Andean pseudocereal which is currently
attracting considerable international attention as a food supplement not only for its
protein content and quality but also for its fat, vitamins and minerals. For example,
quinoa shows an average protein content of 14.6% (fresh weight) with some
Ecuadorian varieties showing protein contents as high as 21.9 %. This protein is of
good quality, supplying 200% of the histidine, 377 % of the isoleucine, 347 % of the
lysine, 312% of the methionine +cysthe, 363 % of the phenylalanine + tyrosine,
411% of the threonine, 180% of the tryptophan and 346% of the valine
recommended in protein sources for adult nutrition by the FAO/WHO/UNU joint
21 1
J Sci Food Agric 0022-5142/91/$03.50 0 1991 SCI.Printed in Great Britain
M J Koziol
212
expert consultation (1985) (Koziol 1990). Quinoa shows an average fat content of
5.6 % (fresh weight) with linoleic and linolenic acids accounting for about 55 % of
the fatty acids (Kozioll990).It is a good source of vitamins E, B, and B,, folic acid
and biotin, and of potassium, iron, copper, magnesium and manganese (Koziol M
unpublished data).
Quinoa is classified as sweet or bitter depending upon its saponin content.
Although certain sweet varieties have been developed, such as Sajama, Cheweca,
Piartal, Nariiio and the Latinreco varieties V12-1 and V12-2, most of the quinoa
grown in South America is of the bitter variety which poses a problem for its
incorporation into food products.
Fortunately, the saponins are concentrated in the outer layers of the grain
(perianth, pericarp, seed coat and a cuticle-like layer) which facilitates their removal
by abrasive dehulling (Reichert et al 1986) or by the more traditional method of
washing the grains with water. Verification of the efficiency of debittering quinoa
and the continuing research to develop new low-saponin varieties necessitate a
simple and rapid assay which can be used in the factory or field.
Although nine triterpenes have been identified as the sapogenin moieties of
quinoa saponins, with oleanolic acid and hederagenin dominating (BurnoufRadosevich and Delfel 1984; Burnouf-Radosevich et al 1985), the respective
glycosidic moieties have yet to be determined. Without such complete structural
information for the calculation of the molecular weights of the saponins the
analytical methods quantitating only sapogenins are of little practical use (see Price
et all987 for a review of analytical methods). This consideration eliminates many of
the gas and liquid chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods for reasons
other than the paucity of such equipment in local (ie South American) factories and
field stations. Thin layer chromatography without ancillary techniques and pure
standards is qualitative; haemolytic techniques require a standardised supply of
blood and suffer the complication that not all saponins show similar haemolytic
activity; gravimetric methods are fraught with difficulties not least of which is a nonspecific extraction of soluble compounds; and the simplest bioassay of all, tasting
the grain, is complicated by the variation in the human ability to detect bitterness,
fatigue in tasting and by the fact that not all saponins taste bitter.
The property common to all saponins, indeed the very basis for their generic
name, is their ability to produce a soapy lather in water. Although an afrosimetric
analysis also has its complications, it is the method most easily adapted to local
factory and field use.
213
water (1:1:1 v) using 5 ml of solvent for each 1 g of extract, and applied to a column
of aluminium oxide of 125 ml bed volume to remove the pigments extracted along
with the saponins. Saponins were eluted from the column with 250 ml of the same
solvent and the eluate was evaporated to dryness. This crude saponin extract was
stored desiccated over silica gel at room temperature (25-27C). Analysis of the
extract showed 15.0% protein (Kjeldahl N x 6.25), 3.8 % ash (incineration for 4 h at
55OOC)and 2.4 % water content (oven drying for 4 h at 102C): the purity of this
crude saponin extract (ie 78.8%) was taken into consideration in preparing all
solutions.
Standard afrosimetric method
Quinoa seeds (0.50+ 0.02 g) are weighed directly into a screwcap test tube (160 mm
long, 16 mm dia). Upon the addition of 5 ml of distilled water the tube is capped and
shaken vigorously (4 shakes s- l, up and down movement) for 30 s. After a 30-min
rest the tube is again shaken vigorously for 30 s. After a second 30-min rest the tube
is shaken vigorously for 3Os, given a last shakedown as one would to an oral
thermometer and allowed to rest for 5 min before reading the foam height to the
nearest 0.1 cm.
Rapid afrosimetric method
As above, except that foam height is read 5-10 s after the initial shaking.
Saponin-sensitive taste panel
(1) those who could not distinguish between distilled water and 10mg saponin
litre-' (both liquids identified as non-bitter) nor between 50 and l00mg
saponin litre-' (both identified as slightly bitter);
(2) those who could not distinguish between distilled water and 10 mg saponin
M J Koziol
214
litre- but who, in all three tastings, successfully distinguished getween 50 and
100mg saponin litre-; and
(3) the three most sensitive individuals who consistently arranged the four liquids
in order of increasing saponin concentrations.
The 10 volunteers who were classified as either category 2 or 3 were elected to the
taste panel.
To train the tasters to identify the characteristic bitterness of quinoa saponins,
pastes were prepared with uncooked quinoa flours by mixing 15 g of flour with
24ml of distilled water. Two varieties of quinoa, Sajama (sweet) and LR-012
(bitter), both purified through years of careful selection by the Agronomy
Department of Latinreco, were used in this part of the study. On three consecutive
days, tasters were presented with a reference paste of Sajama flour and a paste of
98 % Sajama and 2 % LR-012 flours for comparison: all tasters agreed that the latter
was distinctly bitter.
Once trained to identify the bitterness of saponins in the pastes, the tasters were
presented with a reference paste of Sajama flour and four mixtures of Sajama flour
containing either 0.4,0.6,1*0or 1.6% LR-012 flour in randomly numbered cups and
asked to indicate which of the four samples were more bitter than the reference flour
paste. The tastings were conducted in triplicate. Whole quinoa seeds of both the
sweet and bitter varieties were mixed in the same proportions as in the flours and the
saponin content was estimated afrosimetrically.
As expected, detection of bitterness in pastes of uncooked flours was more
difficult than in distilled water, especially as some tasters found the reference flour
paste to be slightly bitter, though of a different nature to the bitterness of saponins.
Subject response also varied; for example, one taster classified the flour mixture
containing 0 6 % LR-012 flour as more bitter than the reference paste only two out
of three times. A subjective decision was taken to classify as bitter a flour paste
which received more than 50% of positive marks (indicating the tasters found it
more bitter than the reference flour) as summed over the triplicate tastings.
215
TABLE 1
Estimation of saponin concentrations in quinoa with the standard
afrosimetric method
Quinoa variety
mg Saponin
(g-' j-esh wt)
Mean
SD
'Sweet'
Sajama 01
Sajama 02
Sajama 03
Perulac, polished
0.1"
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.1
BLD~
0 31
0.57
0.05
'Bitter'
Perulac, whole grains
Porotok
LR-013
1.4
5.6'
7.5'
0-4
0.6
0.5
1.60
ALDd
ALD
instability is due to the extracted albumins, it is curious that this effect is not
observed with other varieties of quinoa, leading to the supposition that some
varieties of quinoa must have radically different protein and/or saponin profiles or
contain some other foam-destabilising factors.
As the foaming behaviour of proteins depends upon their structure (German et a1
1985), it would seem reasonable to assume the same for saponins. There is currently
no information available that compares saponin profiles among varieties of quinoa,
so it was considered more prudent to calibrate this method with saponins extracted
from a mixture of bitter varieties thus averaging at the outset any possible
differences in saponin profiles and foaming behaviour. Such a calibration should be
viewed not as potentially sacrificing specificity but rather as a necessary
generalisation of the applicability of the method given the current small-scale
production of quinoa which presents a mixture of varieties to the commercial
market.
Preliminary investigations showed that although significant differences in foam
height were found within a range of sample weights from 0.45 to 0.55 g, no such
effect was seen within the range 0.48-0.52 g and hence the stipulation of sample
weight of 0.50+ 0.02 g.
Calibration curve
Figure 1 shows the calibration curve obtained using solutions of the crude saponin
extract and following the standard afrosimetric procedure. The levelling off of foam
heights at saponin concentrations greater than 0.4 mg ml-' is probably due to
216
M J Koziol
'1
6-
5-
i5
I
E,0
u.
Saponins
-1
mg mi
Fig 1. Foam production by saponins extracted from quinoa. Solid circles, foam produced by solutions of
the crude saponin extract. The equation for the linear portion of the curve (0-0.4 mg ml- ') used to
estimate saponin concentrations by the standard afrosimetric method is: y = 7.638xf0.173, r =0.992
( P < 0,001, F-test) and standard error of the coefficient (slope)= 0.462. Open squares, foam produced by
the addition of 0.50g of Sajama (sweet quinoa) grains to solutions of the crude saponin extract in an
attempt to improve agitation. The possibility that the saponins were being absorbed by and/or adsorbed
on to the sweet quinoa grains was confirmed by the obtention of similar results using grains of polished
bitter quinoa (open triangles).
217
(1)
Table 1 shows the results of applying the afrosimetric method to some of the quinoa
varieties from the experimental plots of Latinreco: the varieties were classified as
'sweet' or 'bitter' by taste testing. As quinoa saponins have been so little studied
there are no suitably accurate methods with which to compare this afrosimetric
method. On a dry weight basis, Blanca de Junin, a low-saponin variety of quinoa,
was estimated to contain 0.09 % saponins by TLC (Burnouf-Radosevich and
Paupardin 1983) and 0 1 6 % by haemolysis (Reichert et al 1986). With this
afrosimetric method, Sajama 03 showed 0.07% saponins on a dry weight basis
which, when compared with the estimates of saponin concentrations in Blanca de
Junin, seems a reasonable value for a sweet quinoa.
Whole grains of Perulac, classified as bitter and giving a foam height of 1.4 cm,
were successfully debittered by abrasive dehulling (polishing). The data in Table 1
imply that an inflexion point between sweet and bitter quinoa occurs between
0.06 % and 0.16 % saponin content (foam heights of 0.6 and 1.4 cm, respectively).
Pastes made with sweet quinoa flour (Sajama)doped with flour from a bitter quinoa
(LR-012) were presented to a panel of tasters along with a reference paste of Sajama
flour to determine when bitterness was definitely detected. This point was
arbitrarily set as a flour mixture receiving more than 50% positive marks summed
over three tastings: a positive mark indicated that the flour was judged more bitter
than the reference flour. Saponin concentrations in the flour mixtures were
estimated afrosimetrically using whole grains of both the sweet and bitter quinoas
mixed in the same proportions as in the flours. The results showed that the addition
of 1.6 % bitter quinoa flour to the Sajama flour met the criterion set for bitterness
(Table 2). Quinoa can thus be considered sweet if it contains 0.11% saponins or less
TABLE 2
Determination of the threshold for the detection of bitterness in mixtures
of flours of sweet (Sajama) and bitter (LR-012) quinoa
7; LR-012
in mixture
Saponins in
flour mixture
Corresponding
foam height (cm)
% Positive
responses"
0.4
0.08
0.10
0.8
09
1.o
1.2
26
48
0.6
1.0
1.6
0.11
0.13
42
71
In the taste testing, a positive response indicated that the flour mixture
was judged to be more bitter than the reference flour (Sajama). The
bitterness threshold was arbitrarily set at that point at which a flour
mixture received more than 50% positive responses, summed over three
taste testings. Thus, quinoa is judged bitter if it contains more than 0-11 %
saponins and gives a foam height greater than 1.0 cm.
218
M J Kozioi
on a fresh weight basis. Thus the afrosimetric method can be used as pass/fail test,
classifying as sweet those varieties of quinoa that produce 1.0 cm of foam or less.
Interestingly, these data also underscore the potency of the bitterness of quinoa
saponins, given that only 1.6% of bitter quinoa flour was sufficient to impart an
unacceptable level of bitterness to the flour mixture.
With this rapid afrosimetric method, quinoa is classified as sweet if it gives a foam
height of 1.3 cm or less, and the total time to perform the analysis is reduced to
about 7 min.
However, such rapidity of saponin estimation is not to be had without sacrifices
and there are several caveats to be borne in mind when applying the rapid
afrosimetric method. First, foam height is changing rapidly from both directions,
rapidly decaying at the upper surface while the foam-liquid interface is in the
process of defining itself. These factors exert a combined effect on the uncertainty of
the measurement of foam height. Secondly, the correlation assumes variation in
only one parameter, in this case foam height as influenced by the time of extraction
of the saponins. Yet the efficiency of the extraction is itself a function not only of time
but also of the surface area presented by the quinoa grains in the sample being
analysed, the saponin concentration, how readily the saponins can be leached from
the grains and the foaming properties of the leached saponins.
Nevertheless, this rapid afrosimetric method has been successfully applied in the
field by the agronomists of Latinreco in screening over 5000 individual quinoa
plants grown on our various experimental plots (taking the precaution of retesting
promising individuals with the standard method, of course). It has also been
successfully applied, again with the backup of the standard method, in trials on the
efficacy of abrasive dehulling conducted in our pilot plant.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Sras M E Montalvo, S
219
Fonseca, V Burbano and L Mendoza in preparing and analysing the crude saponin
extract, and thank Ing M Alvarez for testing the method under field conditions.
REFERENCES
Burnouf-Radosevich M, Delfel N E 1984 High-performance liquid chromatography of
oleanane-type triterpenes. J Chromatogr 292 403-409.
Burnouf-Radosevich M, Paupardin C 1983 Elaboration de saponines triterpeniques par de
tissus de Chenopodium quinoa Willd. cultives in vitro. C R Acad Sci Ser III (Physiol Veget)
296 429-432.
Burnouf-Radosevich M, Delfel N E, England R 1985 Gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry of oleanane- and ursane-type triterpenes-application to Chenopodium
quinoa triterpenes. Phytochemistry 24 2063-2069.
FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation 1985Energy and Protein Requirements Tech Rep Ser
724. World Health Organization, Geneva.
German J B, ONeill T E, Kinsella J E 1985 Film forming and foaming behaviour of food
proteins. J Amer Oil Chem SOC 62 1358-1366.
Koziol M J 1990 Composicion quimica. In: Quinua: Hacia su Cultivo Comercial, ed Wahli
Ch. Latinreco SA, Quito.
Price K R, Johnson I T, Fenwick G R 1987 The chemistry and biological significance of
saponins in foods and feeding stuffs. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 26 27-135.
Reichert R D, Tatarynovich J T, Tyler R T 1986 Abrasive dehulling of quinoa (Chemopodium
quinoa):effect on saponin content was determined by an adapted hemolytic assay. Cereal
Chem 63 471-475.
Rossi M, Pagliarini E, Peri C 1985 Emulsifying and foaming properties of sunflower protein
derivatives. Lebensm Wiss Techno1 18 292-299.
Scarpati de Briceiio Z , Briceiio P 0 1980 Evaluacion de la composicion quimica y nutricional
de algunas entradas de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) del banco de germoplasmo de
la Universidad Tecnica del Altiplano. Anales Cient Univers Nacional Agraria (La Molina,
Lima, Peru) 18 125-134.