SUMMARY OF METHOD TO CHOOSE PROVIDER REFER TO PRESIDENT

REGULATION NO. 54 YEAR 2010 AS AMANDED FOR THE 4TH TIMES BY

PRESIDENT REGULATION NO. 4 YEAR 2015

By :
Nanda Riwanto
031311133006
A-3

Fakultas Hukum
Universitas Airlangga 2016

METODE PEMILIHAN PENYEDIA BERDASARKAN PERPRES 54 TAHUN 2010

SEBAGAIMANA DIRUBAH KEEMPAT KALINYA DENGAN PERPRES NOMOR 4
TAHUN 2015
1. Penyedia Barang
a. Pelelangan Umum

Pasal 35 (2)

Pasal 36

KRITERIA
Public Auction is a method for selecting

dan Pasal

the Goods / Works Construction / Other

57

Services for all jobs that can be followed

by all Goods / Works Construction / Other

Services which are eligible.

Basically selection of Goods / Works
Construction

Other

Services

are

conducted through the method of Public

Auction
Selection of Goods / Works Construction /
Other Services using Public Auction
announced at least on the website of the
Ministry / Agency / Local Government /
Institutions, an official announcement
board for the community, and through the
National Procurement Portal through
LPSE, so the public and the business are

b. Pelelangan Terbatas

c. Pelelangan Sederhana

Pasal 36

interested and qualified to apply.

In the Public Auction there is no technical

and price negotiations.

Only use for complex procurement and

there is limitation for the value

Limited Auction is a specific method for

dan Pasal

selecting the Goods / Works Construction

57

with a limited number of providers and

Pasal 37

for complex work.

The step is the same with Public Auction
The auction is a simple method for

selecting the Goods / Other Services for

the

maximum

value

is

Rp5,000,000,000.00 (five billion rupiah)

Published at least on the website of the

Ministry / Agency / Local Government /

Institution, the official notice board of the
society, and National Procurement Portal
trough LPSE, so that the public and the
business world who are interested and

qualified to apply.
In this method there is no technical and

price negotiations.
Procurement jobs that are not complex
and

d. Penunjukan Langsung

the

maximum

value

is

Rp5,000,000,000.00 (five billion rupiah)

Direct appointment is a method for

Pasal 38

selecting the Goods / Services by

directly appoint one Goods / Services

provider.
Direct appointment

is

done

by

inviting one Goods / Construction

Work / Other Services Provider which
are capable of carrying out the work

and / or qualified.
Direct appointment is using technical
and price negotiations in order to
obtain an appropriate price with the
market

price

and

technical

accountability.
Direct appointment can be conducted
on Procurement of Goods / Works
Construction / Other Services with

e. Pengadaan Langsung

Pasal 39

maximum value Rp200.000.000,00

Direct procurement can be conducted on
Procurement
Construction

of
/

Goods
Other

Services

Works
with

maximum value Rp200.000.000,00

This method requires some condition with
the following provisions:
1. the operational needs of the K / L / D / I;

2. simple technology;
3. small risk; and / or
4. implemented by the Goods / Services
efforts of individuals and / or small
business

concerns

cooperatives,
package

except

that

and
for

requires

small

the

work

technical

competence that can not be met by the

Micro, Small Business, and
5. small cooperatives.
(2) Direct Procurement implemented
based on the prevailing price in the
market to the Supplier of Goods / Works

Construction / Other Services.

(3) PA / KPA prohibited from using Direct
Procurement as an excuse to break up
procurement

f. Kontes

Pasal 40 (2)

package

into

multiple

packages with a view to avoid bidding.

Contest used to Procurement which has
the following characteristics:
1. do not have a market price; and
2. can not be determined based on the

unit price.
Used specifically for the election of
Goods / Other Services which is the result
of the Creative Industries, innovative, and

2. Penyedia Pekerjaan
Konstruksi
a. Pelelangan Umum

Pasal 35 (3)

Pasal 36

culture in the country.

KRITERIA
Same.

dan Pasal
b. Pelelangan Terbatas

57
Pasal 36

Same.

dan Pasal
c. Pemilihan Langsung

57
Pasal 37

This method can be used if the procurement

jobs are not complex and the highest value is

d. Penunjukan Langsung
e. Pengadaan Langsung

Pasal 38
Pasal 39

Rp5,000,000,000.00
Same.
Direct procurement can be conducted on
Procurement

of

Construction

Goods
Other

Works

Services

with

maximum value Rp200.000.000,00

Requires some condition with

1.
2.
3.
4.

the

following provisions:
the operational needs of the K / L / D / I;
simple technology;
small risk; and / or
implemented by the Goods / Services
efforts of individuals and / or small
business

concerns

cooperatives,
package

except

that

and
for

small

the

requires

work

technical

competence that can not be met by the

Micro, Small Business, and
5. small cooperatives.
Direct Procurement implemented based
on the prevailing price in the market to
the

Supplier

of

Goods

Works

Construction / Other Services

3. Penyedia Jasa
Lainnya
a. Pelelangan Umum

Pasal 35 (3a)

KRITERIA

Pasal 36

Same.

dan Pasal
b. Pelelangan Sederhana
c. Penunjukan Langsung
d. Pengadaan Langsung
e. Sayembara
4. Penyedia Jasa
Konsultasi
a. Seleksi Sederhana

57
Pasal 37
Pasal 38
Pasal 39
Pasal 40

Same.
Same.
Same.
Same.
KRITERIA

Pasal 41
Simple Selection can be made for the
procurement of consulting services which
have simple characteristic and the maximum
value is Rp200.000.000,00 (two hundred

b.Penunjukan Langsung

million rupiah).
Direct procurement can be conducted on
Procurement
Construction

of
/

Goods
Other

Works

Services

with

maximum value Rp50.000.000,00 (fifty

c. Pengadaan Langsung

million rupiah).
Direct procurement

is

the

process

Procurement of Consultancy Services which

is the operational needs of the K / L / D / I
and / or appreciating with maximum amount
d.Sayembara

Rp50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah).

Sayembara is the method for selecting the
Service Provider which hold original idea,
specific creativity and innovation which
prices / costs can not be determined
based on the unit price.

Case Analysis
Decision No. : 272/G/2014/PTUN-JKT
PT. Dwitunas Mekarwangi (PT.DM)

sebagai pemenang lelang menggugat Biro

Umum, Pemprov DKI Jakarta atas pembatalan proyek pengadaan meubeler senilai Rp 29
miliar di Biro Umum, Pemprov DKI Jakarta di Pengadilan Tata Uasa Negara (PTUN). Dalam
gugatannya disebutkan, proses tender Pengadaan Meubeler Gedung Blok H Balaikota TA2014 miliki Biro Umum Setda Prov DKI Jakarta dengan nilai pagu +29 milyar itu telah
selesai ditenderkan Pokja 1B ULP DKI Jakarta dan menetapkan PT. Dwitunas Mekarwangi
(PT.DM) dengan nilai penawaran +Rp 25 Milyar sebagai pemenang lelang. Penetapan
pemenang lelang itu ditetapkan melalui penerbitan Surat Penetapan Pemenang No. 1138/IBP/PP-PB/2015 tanggal 5 Nopomber 2014. Setelah penetapan pememang lelang, Unit
Layanan pengadaan (ULP) DKI Jakarta menyerahkan hasil lelang yang dibuat pada tanggal
14 Nopember 2014 dan diserahkan ke Biro Umum tanggal 17 Nopember 2014. Dan
ditindaklanjuti Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) dengan mengeluarkan Surat Penunjukkan
Penyedia Barang Jasa (SPPBJ) dengan No. 9250/SPPBJ-PPK-BU/XI/2014 tgl 18 Nop 2014.

Namun PT. DM yang berharap harap akan segera memulai pekerjaan karena merasa
sudah mengantongi SPPBJ, tiba tiba satu hari seterimanya SPPBJ itu Kepala Biro Umum
Setdaprov DKI Jakarta, Agustino Darmawan (tergugat) berkirim surat dengan No. 4640/086.41 tgl 19 Nop 2014 ke PT.DM dan menyatakan batal pelaksanaan pekerjaan atas
pertimbangan sepihak waktu tidak mencukupi lagi. Ttindakan Kepala Biro Umum, Sekda
Provinsi DKI Jakarta, telah membawa akibat hukum bagi PT.DM sebagaimana diatur dalam
pasal 1 angka 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang PTUN jo Pasal 9 angka 1 UU
Nomor 51 tahun 2009, tentang Perubahan Kedua UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang PTUN.
Tindakan Kepala Biro Umum, Sekda Provinsi DKI Jakarta tidak mencerminkan asas-asas
umum pemerintahan yang baik (general principle of goverment), maka oleh karenanya PT.
DM mengajukan gugatan tata usaha Negara ke PTUN Jakarta.
Refer to article 1 (7) Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen or called as PPK is the authority
which is liable over the procurement. Furthermore refer to article 1 (22) the party in the
contract of procurement as mentioned in the article are PPK with the provider of good and
services. Therefore PPK is the party and have the consent over the contract. Because the
SPPBJ have been already issued to the provider,so refer to article 85 (1) Perpres No. 4 year
2015, if by point of view of PPK is there is no more problem as mentioned in the alphabet a
until c, the next step is the ratification of the contract. Is letter No. 4640/-086.41 date 19 Nop
2014 KTUN ?
First this letter is used to annul the contract by the defendant purposed for the
claimant. Second this lettter is issued by the defendant as his capacity/position as the public
authority. Therefore it is KTUN. But this KTUN is issued without proper legal standing. The
capacity of the defendant as PA/KPA is limited by the article 83 (3) Perpres No. 4 year 2015.
PA/KPA have no authority to cancel the auction if the auction have already in the step of
SPPBJ issuance. So, i agree if the judge decision is to annul the KTUN regarding the
cancellation of auction because is not the right of PA/KPA to cancel the auction. SO every
conduct of government should be based on legal basist and reflecting the principle of AUPB
or Good Governence Principle.