Enron: The smartest guy in the room tells us the story of the rise and fall of Enron, and how its ineffective corporate governance and perverse corporate culture led to one of the major business scandals in the US history. Founded in 1985, Enron Corporation was one the biggest and apparently most successful energy trading companies in the world. Enron was widely regarded as a model to follow to successfully compete in the New Economy, and its stock was considered blue chip for years. This business fairy tale started to come to an end in 2000/1, following the involvement of Enron in the California energy crisis, and the increasing pressures from financial analysts in questioning the regularity of Enrons financial statements and stock value. Enrons huge financial and accounting frauds were eventually uncovered and led the company to file bankruptcy in 2001. As a result, employees lost pensions funds and their life savings, and shareholders saw the value of their stock reduced to pennies. The reasons why the company managed to engage in deceitful and fraudulent practices for years is to be found first and foremost in the corporate culture instilled by the management. In particular, Jeffrey Skilling, Enrons charismatic CEO, was the one who mostly shaped a culture of unhealthy narcissism and social Darwinism. He hired the best talents and nurtured them to believe that they were the smartest guys and that they could achieve anything. Enrons Appraisal system contributed to strengthen this view. The rank and yank system, where the 15% least performing employees were fired every year, and the top performers could enjoy exorbitant bonuses, created a fierce competition in the workplace. In such a culture based on personal gain, the interests of the shareholders (e.g. Californian community during the energy crisis) and stakeholders were completely disregarded. Finally, Enron considered the companys stock price as the most important success metric, and it was ready to manipulate accounts and financial statements to meet analysts expectations. While the companys culture serves as at the background, the documentary showed how Enron managed for years to hide their debts and losses accumulated with its unsuccessful ventures. In particular, two practices contributed to the perpetration of Enrons lies. First, Enron was allowed to use mark-to-market accounting, an accounting method that enabled them to register expected future earnings by current projects as current earnings, even if there was no certainty that those projects would have been eventually successful. Enron inflated the future earnings to show profitability, hid the loss of multiple unsuccessful projects, and made its financial statements very complex in order to escape analysts close scrutiny. The second method used was a fraud created by the CFO, Andrew Fastow. Fastow created Special Purposed Entities, i.e. companies that had the purpose to trade with Enron, in order to instill money to the company and to show a lower debt-equity ratio. All these operations were conducted to bring stratospheric gains to the management directly or through trading shares. While the top management had the biggest role in the fraud, more parties are to be blamed. The Board of Directors and Internal Audit Committee failed their role or purposely stayed quiet. Moreover, Arthur Andersen, deliberately covered Enrons wrongdoings in name of their own business interests. Finally, many financial institutions were involved, and probably Bush administration had a stake on it as well. This scandal, among others, led to the enactment of the SOX law in 2002 to increase financial transparency and protect investors.