Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, 60 College St., Box 208034 New Haven, CT 06520, USA
b
Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
c
Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Received 1 January 1998; received in revised form 9 January 2000; accepted 26 January 2000
Abstract
Background: Among consumers insurers, and providers there is pervasive concern regarding the high incidence of cesarean section
delivery. To date, attempts to reduce these rates have focused on the clinical behavior of providers resulting in only minimal changes.
Therefore, non-medical variables must be investigated as potential explanatory factors for the decision to perform cesarean delivery.
Methods: Data were collected on clinical and non-clinical factors for obstetrician-gynecologists delivering at Yale-New Haven Medical
Center to measure the impact of these factors on the performance of cesarean sections. Specifically, variation in patient demographic,
ante- and intra-partum risk variables, practice setting, and doctor-specific characteristics were examined. Using contingency table and logistic regression analyses the contribution of selected factors was evaluated. Results: Multivariate modeling revealed that male physicians
were significantly more likely than their female colleagues to perform cesarean section. This relationship was particularly strong in the
university practice setting. Conclusions: Efforts to reduce the incidence of cesarean section need to focus on the continuing education of
health care providers and the delineation of non-clinical factors as essential elements in the election of specific clinical therapies. 2000
Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cesarean section; Physicians practice patterns; Clinical uncertainty; Physician gender
1. Introduction
In 1995 cesarean sections accounted for 21.0% of live
births in the United States [1], a rate that has nearly quadrupled over the prior two decades. While 14.5% of all deliveries are now accomplished by a primary cesarean operation,
repeat cesarean surgery accounts for 8.3% of total births [2].
Cesarean section comprises 4% of all surgical procedures in
short-term, non-federal hospitals, at a cost twice that of routine vaginal birth [3]. The greater expense of cesarean section reflects both higher hospital and physician charges, as
well as the substantial expenditures resulting from increased
maternal and neonatal morbidity [4].
Among consumers, insurers, and providers there is pervasive concern regarding the high incidence of cesarean
section delivery. To date, attempts to reduce these rates
have focused on the appropriateness of clinical indicators,
resulting in only minimal changes. Moreover, cesarean section rates have been found to vary substantially by patient
and other nonclinical factors as well [5]. Consequently, it is
important to understand any non-medical factors driving the
decision to employ the cesarean operation.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 203-786-2854; fax: 203-785-6287.
E-mail address: patricia.krieger@yale.edu (S.M. Horwitz)
0895-4356/00/$ see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
PII: S0895-4356(00)00 2 2 1 - 3
1031
evident in private pay patients receiving care in the community, due to referral of the most medically ill and obstetrically complex mothers to the high-risk practices at medical
centers. We anticipate that gender-specific differences in
the cesarean section decision will be most pronounced in
the university practice setting, both because clinical uncertainty in deciding appropriate treatment course is likely to
be greatest, and because physicians have greater discretion
in choosing the appropriate treatment course than in the
HMO setting.
2. Methods
2.1. Research design
This study examines the choice of cesarean delivery or
vaginal birth at Yale-New Haven Hospital. The obstetrical
service includes a clinic linked to a faculty-supervised highrisk service, two staff model health maintenance organizations, and a large private practice service that provides a
majority of the total pregnancy-related care in the community. This data set is based on a sample frame selected from
among 4460 total deliveries including 960 cesarean sections
for the year 1990 and 3875 total deliveries including 837 cesarean sections for the year 1995.
An unmatched casecontrol study was performed by examining the first 65 available records by date of discharges
from the obstetrical service for vaginal and cesarean deliveries from among the selected months, yielding a total sam-
Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of mothers, neonates, and delivering physicians at Yale-New Haven Hospital in 1990 and 1995overall and by practice setting
Characteristic
MD characteristics
Male (%)
Mean physician age (years)
Teaching appointment (%)
Board certified (%)
Fetal characteristics
Abnormal fetal test (%)
Mean number other conditions
Birth weight (1000s grams)
Apgar score
Oxytocin infusion (%)
Evening delivery (%)
Delivery year 1995 (%)
Maternal characteristics
Mean maternal age (years)
Black race (%)
Nulliparity (%)
Smoker (%)
Substance abuser (%)
Toxemia (%)
Comorbid illness (%)
Infection (%)
University practice
(n 308)
Private practice
(n 546)
HMO practice
(n 146)
C-sec
(n 140)
No C-sec
(n 168)
C-sec
(n 293)
No C-sec
(n 253)
C-sec
(n 66)
No C-sec
(n 80)
C-sec
(n 499)
No C-sec
(n 501)
68.6
36.3
90.1
72.9
41.1
33.9
29.8
22.6
75.1
45.3
95.2
94.5
54.5
44.1
73.1
72.7
19.7
36.2
78.8
74.2
10.0
35.8
27.5
20.0
65.9
41.6
91.8
85.8
42.9
39.4
51.3
47.5
40.1
0.2
2.7
8.2
38.6
42.9
55.6
20.8
0.05
3.0
8.5
34.5
48.2
57.1
15.4
0.1
3.4
8.8
39.6
37.9
48.1
9.1
0.04
3.4
8.9
39.5
45.8
49.4
15.2
0.05
3.6
8.9
53.0
45.5
47.0
8.8
0.04
3.3
8.6
33.8
48.8
36.3
22.4
0.1
3.3
8.7
41.1
40.3
50.0
13.0
0.04
3.3
8.7
36.9
47.1
50.0
26.4
42.9
43.6
49.3
25.0
10.7
26.4
16.4
24.2
50.6
33.3
38.1
25.0
4.2
16.1
10.1
31.9
6.8
46.4
13.0
8.2
6.5
13.0
3.1
29.9
5.1
43.1
12.6
5.9
2.4
6.7
0.004
31.4
16.7
54.5
18.2
12.1
9.1
15.2
10.6
29.7
22.5
41.3
20.0
8.8
0.05
0.05
0.04
30.3
18.2
46.7
23.8
13.4
8.2
17.0
7.8
28.0
23.2
39.5
22.4
12.8
3.4
9.6
4.2
C-sec patient has had prior cesarean section; No C-sec patient has not had prior cesarean section.
All practices
(n 1000)
1032
ple of 1000 births divided evenly for the years 1990 and
1995. Charts were chosen equally from the months of February, May, August, and November to balance the effect of
house staff training, which begins each July, on the clinical
performance of the physicians who staff the university service as resident physicians or fellows. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, prominent ante-partum exposures
and intra-partum events, practice and insurance setting, and
type of delivery, were abstracted from the hospital records
by one of he authors (L.K.M.). Physician demographic data
were supplied by the Office of the Chief of the Medical
Staff. To estimate appropriate sample size, a ratio of control
to cases of 1:1, 80% power, and an alpha (Type I) error of
P 0.05 were assumed.
Clinical characteristics of pregnancies included comorbid illness, testing indicating fetal jeopardy, toxemia, multiple gestation, presence of bleeding or infection including
sexually transmitted disease, congenital anomalies of the
newborn, and the use of oxytocin infusion. Patient-specific
variables included maternal age, race, parity, marital status,
geographic residence, smoking behavior and substance
abuse profile, type of insurance, and year of birth. Physician
and practice identifiers included provider age, gender, university teaching appointment, board certification, graduation from foreign medical school, and practice setting (uni-
Table 2
Contingency table analysis of cesarian section controlling for practice type
Percent cesarean sectiona
Characteristics
MD characteristics
Male
Physician age 42
Teaching appointment
Board certified
Fetal characteristics
Abnormal fetal test
Number other conditions
Birth weight 4000 gm
Low apgar scorec
Oxytocin infusion
Evening delivery
Delivery year 1995
Maternal characteristics
Maternal age 35
Black race
Nulliparity
Smoker
Substance abuser
Toxemia
Comorbid illness
Infection
University practice
Private practice
HMO practice
All practices
Odds
ratiob
58.2 (96/165)
45.7 (16/35)
71.8 (127/177)
72.9 (102/140)
61.5 (220/358)
53.6 (143/267)
60.1 (279/464)
60.1 (277/461)
61.9 (13/21)
58.3 (7/12)
70.3 (52/74)
75.4 (49/65)
60.5 (329/544)
52.9 (166/314)
64.1 (458/715)
64.3 (428/666)
2.57*
1.19
10.61*
6.66*
62.0 (57/92)
79.5 (31/39)
43.7 (125/286)
57.1 (12/21)
48.2 (54/112)
42.6 (60/141)
44.8 (78/174)
66.2 (45/68)
67.7 (21/31)
52.0 (232/446)
77.8 (7/9)
53.7 (116/216)
48.9 (111/227)
53.0 (141/266)
58.8 (10/17)
50.0 (3/6)
40.8 (49/120)
0.0 (0/3)
56.5 (35/62)
43.5 (30/69)
51.7 (31/60)
63.3 (112/177)
72.4 (55/76)
47.7 (406/852)
57.6 (19/33)
52.6 (205/390)
46.0 (201/437)
50.0 (250/500)
1.94*
2.83*
0.54*
1.38
1.19
0.76*
1.00
75.0 (18/24)
41.4 (60/145)
52.1 (61/117)
51.9 (69/133)
45.5 (35/77)
68.2 (15/22)
57.8 (37/64)
57.5 (23/40)
66.0 (64/97)
60.6 (20/33)
55.5 (136/245)
54.3 (38/70)
61.5 (24/39)
76.0 (19/25)
69.1 (38/55)
90.0 (9/10)
60.0 (15/25)
37.9 (11/29)
52.2 (36/69)
42.9 (12/28)
53.3 (8/15)
60.0 (6/10)
71.4 (10/14)
70.0 (7/10)
66.4 (97/146)
44.0 (91/207)
54.1 (233/431)
51.5 (119/231)
51.2 (67/131)
70.2 (40/57)
63.9 (85/133)
65.0 (39/60)
2.37*
0.68*
1.34*
1.09
1.06
2.48*
1.94*
1.94*
a
For each practice setting, these percentages represent the fraction of all deliveries with a given characteristic that wree delivered by cesarean section. Thus,
for the characteristic delivered by a male physician, 96/165, or 58.2% of such deliveries were by cesarean section in the university practice setting, 61.5% in
the private practice setting, and so on. Figures in parentheses thus represent the numbers of deliveries with that characteristic that were delivered via cesarean
section divided by the total number of deliveries with that characteristic.
b
For each percent cesarean section characteristic, this is the odds ratio across all practices. Thus, the odds ratio that a delivery by a male physician across all
practices is via cesarean section is 2.57.
c
A low Apgar score is defined as a score below 7.
*Statistically significant at the 1% level.
summary statistics are provided according to whether delivery was via cesarean section or vaginal routes. For mothers
who received cesarean sections, mean age was 30.3 years
and 18.2% of these mothers were black. Nearly a quarter
(23.8%) of these mothers were smokers. Comorbid illness
was present in 17.0% and toxemia in 8.2% of all mothers
who had cesarean section. Abnormal fetal tests occurred in
22.4% of these neonates. The mean physician age for cesarean delivery was 41.6 years, and 65.9% of these attending
physicians were male. Male physicians performed 543 deliveries and female doctors 457.
For the cohort delivered vaginally, mean maternal age is
slightly lower. These mothers are slightly more likely to be
black and to have other children. The incidence of abnormal
fetal tests, toxemia, comorbid illness, and infection are all
lower among the vaginal delivery cohort. Physician characteristics differ as well. Mothers delivered vaginally are
much less likely to have had a male physician, a board certified physician, or a physician with a teaching appointment.
Table 1 also reveals dramatic differences in the characteristics of mothers and neonates across practice settings. In
the university practice, 49.3% of mothers receiving cesarean sections are smokersmore than three times the incidence of smokers in private settings, and twice the incidence in the HMO. Fetal risk is substantially higher in the
university practice setting, as indicated by the markedly
higher rates of comorbid illness and abnormal test for fetal
well-being. Relative to private practice physicians, mean
physician age is substantially lower in the university practice and HMO practice settings.
Table 2 shows the results of the contingency table analysis. A characteristic associated with a cesarean section rate
substantially above or below 50% suggests that cesarean
surgery rates differ along this feature. The cesarean section
rate is markedly higher among male doctors: regardless of
practice setting, the cesarean section rate was approximately
60% among male physicians. University teaching appointment and board certification are other physician characteristics associated with a higher incidence of cesarean section.
Fetal characteristics associated with a higher incidence
of cesarean section include: abnormal test for fetal wellbeing and other fetal comorbidities (bleeding, congenital
defect, birth injury, and multiple pregnancy). Evening deliveries were less likely to have been cesarean sections.
Older age of the mother and nulliparity are associated
with a higher incidence of cesarean section. Mothers who
are black are less likely to receive cesarean sections. Comorbid medical illness in the mother, clinically apparent
maternal infection (e.g., sexually transmitted disease), and
toxemia were all associated with a significantly greater
probability of cesarean section.
Contingency table analysis thus provides a provocative
result: physician gender appears to affect the choice of cesarean section quite strongly. Several factors, including provider age as a surrogate for practice experience, teaching
appointment, and board-certification status, are potentially
1033
Table 3
Logistic regression for the outcome of cesarian section for the entire data set
Characteristics
Physician
Male
Physician age
Teaching appointment
Board certified
Fetal
Abnormal fetal test
Number other conditions
Birth weight
Apgar score
Oxytocin infusion
Evening delivery
Delivery year 1995
Maternal
Maternal age
Black race
Nulliparity
Smoker
Substance abuser
Toxemia
Comorbid illness
Infection
Odds ratio
1.38**
0.99
6.73*
1.52
1.001.88
0.971.00
3.2913.76
0.782.96
1.83*
2.27*
1.39*
1.03
0.94
0.75
0.78
1.162.88
1.224.22
1.091.79
0.891.19
0.681.31
0.561.02
0.581.06
1.07*
1.45
1.66*
1.57**
1.24
2.09**
1.61**
2.70*
1.041.10
0.952.20
1.212.29
1.062.33
0.762.03
1.024.28
1.032.54
1.395.26
Table 4
Odds ratios for the outcome of cesarian section for a male MD
Practice setting
University practice
All patients
No prior c-section
Private practice
All patients
No prior c-section
HMO practice
All patients
No prior c-section
All practice settings
All patients
No prior c-section
Odds ratio
2.82*
2.75*
1.435.55
1.355.60
1.65**
1.75**
1.052.60
1.062.88
0.46
0.43
0.111.86
0.101.90
1.38**
1.31
1.001.88
0.931.83
1034
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of
Dr. Edwin Cadman, Chief of Medical Staff at Yale-New
Haven Hospital for his assistance in providing physician demographic data.
References
[1] Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F. The risks of lowering
the cesarean-delivery rate. N Engl J Med 1999;340:547.
[2] Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Rates of cesarean delivery:
United States, 1993. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1995;
44:3037.
[3] Mushinski MA. Average charges for uncomplicated cesarean and
vaginal deliveries in the United States, 1993. Stat Bull Metro Ins
1994;75:2736.
[4] Gardner LP. Economic considerations in cesarean section use, In:
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
1035