You are on page 1of 3

TAULE vs. SANTOS (G. R. No.

90336)
TAULE vs. SANTOS
August 12, 1991
G. R. No. 90336
x----------------------x
This is a petition for certiorari seeking the reversal of the resolutions of respondent Secretary dated
August 4, 1989 and September 5, 1989 for being null and void.
Facts:
An election for the officers of the Federation of Associations of Barangay Council (FABC) was held on
June 18, 1989 despite the absence of other members of the said council. Including Petitioner was
elected as the president.
Respondent Verceles sent a letter of protest to respondent Santos, seeking its nullification in view of
several flagrant irregularities in the manner it was conducted.
Petitioner denied the allegations of respondent Verceles and denouncing respondent for intervening in
the said election which is a purely non-partisan affair. And requesting for his appointment as a member
of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of the province being the duly elected President of the FABC in
Catanduanes.
Respondent Santos issued a resolution on August 4, 1989 nullifying the election and ordering a new one
to be conducted as early as possible to be presided by the Regional Director of Region V of the
Department of Local Government. Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration but it was denied by
respondent Santos in his resolution on September 5, 1989.
Thus this petition before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
1)WON the respondent Santos has jurisdiction to entertain an election protest involving the election of
the officers of the FABC.
2)WON the respondent Verceles has the legal personality to file an election protest.
Decision:
Petition GRANTED. Assailed August 4, 1989 and September 5, 1989 resolution is SET ASIDE for having
been issued in excess of jurisdiction. However, the election on June 18, 1989 is annulled. A new
election of officers of the FABC be conducted immediately in accordance with the governing rules and
regulations. Supplemental petition is likewise partially granted.
Ratio Decidendi:

1. No. The Secretary of Local Government has no jurisdiction to entertain any protest involving the
election of officers of the FABC. He is only vested with the power to promulgate rules and regulations
and to exercise general supervision over the local government as provided in the Local Government
Code and in the Administrative Code.
It is the exclusive original jurisdiction of the inferior to hear election protest and the COMELEC have
the appellate jurisdiction over it.
2) Yes. The Governor has the personality to file the protest. Under Section 205 of the Local
Government Code, the membership of the sangguniang panlalawigan consists of the governor, the vicegovernor, elective members of the said sanggunian, etc. He acted as the presiding officer of the
sangguniang panlalawigan. As presiding officer, he has an interest in the election of the officers of the
FABC since its elected president becomes a member of the assembly. If said member assumes his place
under questionable circumstances, the sanggunian may be vulnerable to attacks as to their validity or
legality. Therefore, respondent governor is a proper party to question the regularity of the elections of
the officers of the FABC.
The election of officers of the FABC held on June 18, 1989 is null and void for not complying with the
provisions of DLG Circular No. 89-09.
DLG Circular No. 89-09 provides that "the incumbent FABC President or the Vice-President shall preside
over the reorganizational meeting, there being a quorum." It is admitted that neither the incumbent
FABC President nor the Vice-President presided over the meeting and elections but Alberto P. Molina,
Jr., the Chairman of the Board of Election Supervisors/Consultants. Therefore, there was a clear
violation of the said mandatory provision.
Pending resolution, petitioner also filed a supplemental petition alleging that public respondent Local
Government Secretary, in his memorandum dated June 7, 1990, designated Augusto Antonio, despite
him being absent on said election. The Secretary of Local Government has no authority to appoint
anyone who does not meet the minimum qualification to be the president of the federation of barangay
councils.

You might also like