A Study Guide

The Trinity, Paganism and Philosophy

Preface
Just a couple of quick facts and questions before getting into the paper
itself. I have made an observation about you of which I am acutely aware, but
I believe you don’t realize it. You show much more Loyalty and Devotion to your
church than the Scriptures themselves. I say that because (1) you have no rega
rd for the Torah (that is the Law, the Tanakn [OT]), (2) I have shown you how yo
ur church’s Doctrine is not based on the Scriptures yet you choose Doctrine over
Scripture every time, (3) I have shown you irrefutable Scriptural proof that th
ere is only One God in the New Testament (see John 17:3) and in the Tanakn (OT)
(see Isaiah 42:10), but you have disregarded the Scriptures in favor of church D
octrine. You Love Doctrine more than you Love and Respect God’s Holy Word.
The Torah did not die with the Death and Resurrection of Christ. Christ
did not come to Fulfill the Law (Torah), but is Coming to Fulfill the Law (Tora
h). In the Gospel of Matthew Christ says 5:17 Think not that I am come to destr
oy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 5:18 For
verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall i
n no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
The Law to which both Christ and I are referring to is not the Jewish Di
etary Laws, it is all the Law, Teachings and Instructions to be found in the Tan
akn (OT). The Bible says Christ taught daily, what did He Teach? You got it, t
he Tanakn! The Scriptures for Christ and all men was the Tanakn (OT).
The New Testament wasn’t Canonized until either 681 or 781 (sorry I can’
t remember which). Any reference to the Scriptures, like we find in Acts 17:11
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they re
ceived the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to
see if what Paul said was true, refers to the Tanakn (OT). Acts 17:11 says the
Bereans searched the Scriptures daily (the Tanakn that is) to see if Paul’s Gos
pel was True or not! They researched the Gospel in the Tanakn! So anyone who T
eaches that the Tanakn was Fulfilled or Superseded by the New Testament either h
as never read the New Testament, is a Blatant Liar or is promoting the Doctrine
of Demons and Unclean Spirits. The fact that this is the Doctrine of most every
church today bodes ill for the church.
So you see Christ Himself used the Torah, Christ Himself said the Torah
would not pass away until heaven and earth pass away. For the first 700 to 800
years of Christendom the Torah (Tanakn) was the only Scriptures available. I do
n’t know why I’m arguing the point for Common Sense should tell you that without
the Torah there is no way you can know what Sin is and what isn’t Sinful. With
out Torah you are living with a Philosophy known as Humanism or Existentialism w
hich is what our Godless schools are teaching our children. So who do you follo
w, the Scriptures (God s own Words) or church Doctrine?
A moment aside. You told me you couldn’t tell me how Christ could be Be
gotten and yet be Eternal and a co-equal god with Yahweh and the Holy Ghost. Th
en you told me that Christ Emptied Himself of His Godhood so that He could be a
man on earth. Where does it say that? Being such an important Principle it sho
uld be easy to Remember or Find. But you can’t remember where it says that, can
you?
I’ll tell you why you can’t remember where it says that. You can’t reme
mber because you just heard it. You were Taught it by the church as a part of i
t’s Doctrine. You were Taught it, but the Scriptures don’t say that anywhere!
I searched in more than 12 different Bible Translations it didn’t occur in any o
f them. I searched the Greek Manuscripts using a Greek English Parallel Bible,
but it isn’t in the Greek either. Whoever Taught you this (it just couldn’t be
the church could it) has never read the Scriptures, is a Blatant Liar or is teac
hing the Doctrine of Demons and Unclean Spirits.
You admitted that Christ was and is a man (see 1st Timothy 2:5). In adm
itting that you Destroyed the concept of a Holy Trinity because you admitted tha
t 1 of the 3 gods was a man leaving only 2 gods. And since a Trinity requires 3
gods by definition and you have only 2 gods and a man, there can be no Trinity.
Yet in Loving church Doctrine more than anything else, even Common Sense, you
cling to the Trinity Doctrine even though you yourself Destroyed it!
Another thing which I find to be troublesome is how you can have a Perso
nal Relationship with a god with no name? A Personal Relationship carries with
it a certain connotative Intimacy. And Intimacy carries with it a certain amoun
t of Knowledge about each other, and this Knowledge makes the Assumption that ea
ch party knows the other’s Name. Yet you told me the godhead has no name! I fi
nd this issue more than a little troubling because Christ Himself encourages an
intimate personal relationship as seen in John 17:3 Now this is eternal life: th
at they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
I find this issue to be very puzzling. Very puzzling indeed.
I will lightly touch on the Begotten issue because I devote a much more
in depth analysis later in this document. The Gospel of John begins with a Poem
. The first 18 verses are a Poem which becomes self-evident in the Greek. The
Poem opens with In the Beginning which Alludes to the Genesis In the Beginning,
and if In the Beginning is an Allusion then there must be a more imminent and im
mediate meaning to it. I am not going to bore you with a discussion of all the
Grammar and Linguistics and cut right to the point.
The Allusion to Genesis is not an Allusion of Creation but of the Dawnin
g of a New Age. A New Age had come about from the Age of Formlessness devoid of
Light and Life to a New Age of Light and Life. The immediate meaning of In the
Beginning is the Death of the Old Covenant and the Beginning of the New Covenan
t, the Beginning of the Gospel.
Now that John 1:1 – 18 has been resolved all the references to Christ be
ing the Creator (see John 1:3) and Firstborn of Creation (see Colossians 1:15 an
d Hebrews 1:6) begins to make a great of sense. The resolution goes a long way
in terms of resolving certain contradictions, like why does the Bible say Yahweh
and in opposition it also says Christ is the Creator; however, it kills the sin
gle most supportive statement for the Deification of Christ and an obtuse refere
nce to the existence of a Trinity.
With the dawning of the New Age we all have the opportunity to become So
ns of God through Christ. Adopted Sons but Sons nevertheless. Christ was Begot
ten through Mary and is an actual Son of God. Even your Precious Trinity Creed
says Christ was not made but Begotten; however, what they failed to do was menti
on that He was Begotten at the dawning of the New Age. And keeping in mind the
references to Him being the firstborn of Creation, this seems to be the Perfect
Resolution to the questions of when and how Christ was Begotten. And assuming t
his is the True and Correct Resolution, it follows that Christ is not Eternal no
r is He a co-equal of God nor is He a god; and thereby, Destroying the notion of
a Trinity.
What bothers me most is the Latter Day church Leaders and the Clergy in
general, they Know the Scriptures much better than me, and they Know Greek much
better than me and so they had to know these things. I mean that if I could fig
ure these things out, why didn’t they let people know? As this paper progresses
you’ll come to see that the church is the Great Harlot on the back of the Drago
n and is giving out the Mark of the Beast, the spirit of antichrist.
I’m almost done with this Preface. If you have been diligent and looked
up the References I gave you, and read them in Context to see whether I speak t
he Truth or not, you should be accepting the Tanakn (OT) as the Words of the Liv
ing God. If you still are not accepting of the Tanakn (OT) then let me know and
I will focus on that singular issue for you, and if you could write me a short
essay replete with Scriptural References, defending and explaining your position
I would be eternally Grateful.
Read Deuteronomy Chapter 13. It is short and gets right to the point.
It is a test to see if the God you worship is the True God or a False god. The
test is simple. Is the name of the God you follow Yahweh, Jehovah, I AM or EL.
 If the God or Godhead you follow is called by one of those names then He is the
True God; however, if the God or Godhead you follow isn’t called by any of thos
e name then he is a false god.
I happen to know that the godhead of the Trinity has no name! Since he
is not called by any of the listed names he must be a false god! To worship a f
alse god is to commit Idolatry. By following the Doctrine of the Trinity you ar
e accepting the Mark of the antichrist! I’m extremely serious. I touch on this
subject within the body of this discussion, and I plan on writing an intense in
depth analysis of that statement in the very near future.
Now I’d like you to open your Bible and find the Book of Isaiah (the Boo
k of Isaiah is one of my favorites) and turn to Chapter 43 verses 10 and 11: 43:
10You are my witnesses, says Yahweh, and my servant whom I have chosen; that you
may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no Go
d formed, neither shall there be after me. 43:11 I, even I, am Yahweh; and besid
es me there is no savior.
43:10 is problematic in a major way for those seeking to hold to the Fal
se Doctrine of a Trinity. I don’t feel it needs any explanation, and it’s meani
ng is self-evident. There was no god before Yahweh and there shall be none afte
r Him.
43:11 presents us with a seemingly unsolvable problem. It is only solva
ble if you are willing to drop the anti-sematic bigotry taught by, propagated by
and endorsed by the church, and viewing the passage through a Hebraic perspecti
ve.
The Bible was written by Hebrews, in a Hebrew nation, from within a Hebr
aic culture and for Hebraic people. The Bible can only be correctly interpreted
by Reading and Studying it through a Hebraic perspective. To the typical Chris
tian the dilemma presented by Isaiah 43:11 is only solvable if Christ was both a
man and a god which eventually leads one to the idea of a Trinity. However, to
a Jew there is no problem between Isaiah 43:11 and the Messiah for the Messiah
is a Shaliach of Yahweh.
I know, I know, you want to know what a Shaliach is, right? If the Earl
y Church hadn’t been such anti-sematic bigots, even Martin Luther and John Calvi
n of the Protestant Reformation were highly bigoted. Martin Luther even wrote a
book The Jews and their Lies. If this uncalled for hatred hadn’t happened you w
ould know what a Shaliach was. I go over what a Shaliach is and the idea of Age
ncy later in this document.
And if you were wondering I am not alone in these beliefs. There is a s
ect known as the Monotheistic Messianic’s which hold the same beliefs and points
-of-view that I do. I may not be mainstream and seem pretty far out there, but
I’m not alone.
This document may appear to be a Grilling of your beliefs, but in Truth it is no
t. I am not looking to Convert anyone or to Proselytize anyone. My Philosophy
or Doctrine is constantly in a state of flux, that is to say Evolving as I disco
ver new Truths. As I Hear or Read a new thing I Search the Scriptures to see i
f it is True or False. And like the early Christians I study or Search the Tana
kn (OT) in the main and Reference the New Testament as needed or required.
As you know I don’t Trust the New Testament as the Inspired Word of God due to t
he amount of Corruption and massive amount of Redaction it has been exposed to.
As Scribes would copy copies of copies of copies of copies they would either Cla
rify or Support certain Sections or Passages to Enhance their Idea or their Mast
ers Interpretation of the Truth or Doctrine, and conversely they would Diminish
those Sections or Passages by changing the wording or completely Removing those
Sections or Passages which they felt were Wrong or Contrary to their or their Ma
ster’s Doctrine. This Process is known as Redaction.
I used to play a game called Telegraph. In the game several kids would sit in a
circle, and the leader would whisper a word, phrase or sentence in his neighbor
s ear who would repeat, in a whisper, what they were told. And so it went until
it came to the last person who would repeat what they were told out loud. The
message would inevitably be changed or morphed into something totally different
from how it began bringing howls of delight from the players. In making the cop
y of copies of copies the same thing would happen. The Scribe would misread the
copy from which he was copying or his pen would slip adding another stroke and
changing the whole meaning of the word or any number of other mistakes would hap
pen. These changes are called Corruption.
The New Testament is so full of Redaction and Corruption that it is impossible t
o reconstruct the original Document. There are traces of Gnosticism, of Greco-R
oman Philosophies (especially of Plato and Stoicism), and finally a good deal of
Paganism.
It occurs to me that you may still harbor some thoughts or ideas about the exist
ence of a Holy Trinity. I have a couple of rather simple questions I want you t
o think about long and hard; keeping them in the back of your mind while you exa
mine the body of this document, If there is a Trinity why didn’t Christ Teach o
r Mention it? Why didn’t any of the Apostles write or teach it? If the Trinita
rian Creed is right then it follows that all the people they, meaning both Chri
st and the Apostles, supposedly Saved were actually being Doomed to Hell! If th
e 3 are Co-Equal why does Jesus say “for the Father is greater than I” in John 1
4:28?
If Jesus said to his disciples “If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours
also” (John 15:20) why is the Trinity not a part of the early Church and not ev
en heard of until over 400 years had passed? I can only remember a few precepts
of their, the Apostles, Doctrine: (1) That there is only One True God ( John 17
:3 has Christ saying “that they might know You the only true God”), (2) That Je
sus was and still is a man in whom YHWH dwells fully, (3) That Christ was born o
f a woman not a Virgin, (4) That Jesus was born under the Law and not by an Act
of GOD, (5) Baptize only in the name of Christ and not in the names of the Fathe
r, the Son and the Holy Ghost as spoken of in the Gospel of Matthew (the phrase
is a late addition, not present in the Gospel of Mark which is the Source for sa
id incident).
Colossians 1:19 reads “For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him
”. Please note how the word God is expressed in the singular pronoun ‘his’. An
d concerning Christ the Apostle Paul writes in 1st Timothy 2:5 “For there is one
God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”. Please note h
ow God is spoken of by the adjective ‘one’ and the singular Greek word Theos is
used to denote GOD and Jesus is spoken of in the present tense by the use of the
verb ‘is’.
How long can you ignore the simple Truth found in 1st Timothy 2:5? How long do
you think GOD will wait? Just saying I haven’t Studied it or I don’t understand
it, just doesn’t get it anymore. I’ll tell you your Problem with it: It destro
ys your Precious Trinity by stating that there is only One GOD, Yahweh, and that
Christ is not a Co-Equal god but just a Man.
Or how do you resolve Ephesians 4:5-6 “One lord, one faith, one baptism, One God
and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all." I grow
tired of repeating myself so here are a few Biblical References which Support th
e notion that YHWH is the One and Only GOD: Job 31:15; Zechariah 14:9; Malachi 2
:10; Matthew 19:17, 23:9; Mark 2:7, 10:18, 12:29,32; Luke 18:19; John 8:41; Roma
ns 3:30; 1 Corinthians 8:4,6; Galatians 3:20; Ephesians 4:6; 1 Timothy 2:5; Jame
s 2:19, 4:12 Exodus 8:10, 9:14, Deuteronomy 4:35-39, 7:9, 32:12-40; 1 Samuel 2:2
; 2 Samuel 7:22, 22:32; 1 Kings 8:23,39,60, 18:17-39; 2 Kings 5:15, 19:15-19; 1
Chronicles 16:25-26; 2 Chronicles 6:14, 13:9; Nehemiah 9:6; Job 9:8; Psalms 18:3
1, 62:2,5-6, 71:16,19, 72:18, 73,25, 83:18, 86:8-10, 89:6-11, 90:1-2, 96:4-5, 11
8:27; 136:4, 148:13; Isaiah 37:16-20, 40:18-25, 41:4, 43:10-13, 44:6-8,24, 45:5-
7,14,18,21-22, 46:9; Jeremiah 3:11, 5:7, 10:6-16, 16:20; Hosea 13:4; Joel 2:27;
Mark 12:32; John 13:16, 14:28, 17:3; Acts 19:26; Romans 16:27; 1 Corinthians 8:4
-6, 10:20; Galatians 4:8; 1 Timothy 1:17, 2:5, 6:15-16; 1 John 5:20; Jude 25; Re
velation 15:4 Deuteronomy 32:6; 2 Samuel 7:8-14; 1 Chronicles 17:11-14, 29:10: P
salms 2:7, 89:26-29; Isaiah 42:1, 61:1-2, 63:16, 64:8; Jeremiah 3:4,19, 31:9; Ma
lachi 1:6, 2:10; Matthew 11:25, 24:36; Mark 10:18, 13:32; Luke 10:21, 18:19; Joh
n 1:18, 5:43-44, 6:27,45, 8:41-42,54, 14:28, 17:1-3, 20:17; Acts 7:55-56; Romans
 1:7, 15:6; 1 Corinthians 1:3, 8:6, 11:3, 15:24; 2 Corinthians 1:2-3, 11:31; Gal
atians 1:1-5; Ephesians 1:2-3,17, 4:5-6, 5:20, 6:23; Philippians 1:2, 2:11, 4:20
; Colossians 1:2-3, 3:17; 1 Thessalonians 1:1-3, 3:11,13; 2 Thessalonians 1:1-2,
2:16: 1 Timothy 1:2; 2 Timothy 1:2; Titus 1:4; Philemon 3: Hebrews 12:7; James
1:27, 3:9; 1 Peter 1:2-3; 2 Peter 1:17; 2 John 3,9; Jude 1: Revelation 1:6. Th
ese are but a few of the References in Support of there being only One GOD. How
many References are there which Directly Support a Trinity? None? OK, I’ll ma
ke it simpler, how many times does the word Trinity occur in the Bible? What?
None again? For a Doctrine or Dogma to be True it MUST have at least a few Supp
orting Biblical References to be called a Biblically Based Doctrine or Dogma, ri
ght? So it follows that since there are NO Supporting Scriptures then it cannot
be a Doctrine born of GOD or the Bible, but is instead wholly a Doctrine of Man
.
How can Jesus be a Co-Equal god with YHWH and the Holy Ghost if he’s sitting on
a lesser Throne on the Right-Hand side of YHWH? Why is YHWH the only God to be
seated on the Great Throne? Why isn’t the Great Throne used by the Godhead? Wh
y is god the Son going to execute Judgment according to the Will of Yahweh and n
ot the Godhead? What Role or Function does the Godhead fulfill on Judgment Day?
Since Jesus said only the Father knows the Date and Time of Judgment Day, how
is it that the Godhead doesn’t know too? If the Trinitarian Creed was from GOD
why is there NO Biblical Support for these questions? Why is it that the Trinit
y Doctrine wasn’t even thought of until the Church said it was OK to adopt Pagan
Ideas and Doctrine?
The Church had a Problem. A very Big Problem. Only GOD could Forgive Sins, and
yet Jesus said he could too. The Bible says GOD is the Savior, the Redeemer, a
nd yet Jesus said he could. It was a Philosophical Problem where one’s Faith is
based upon Reason. Jesus would somehow have to be a god and a man; whereas, Lo
gic, Reason, Language and Grammar dictated that Jesus could be a god or a man bu
t not both because of the way each State is Defined.
And the Pagans had faced this same problem years upon years ago and resolved it
by using the concept of a Triad. The Pagans merely replaced the Mutually Exclus
ive or with the common conjunction and and made the Appeal to it’s being a Myste
ry due to the inability of a Finite Mind trying to grasp the Infinite Nature of
God.
However, what the Bishops missed was that Jesus had to be GOD, and not just a go
d, and a man because a god can’t die. So they Adopted the Pagan concept of a Tr
iad instead of the Truth. The Truth being that GOD, Yahweh, had Manifested Hims
elf three different ways to mankind. Jesus was YHWH’s Shaliach.
He Manifested Himself as GOD. He dwelt/Manifested Himself in Jesus Fully so tha
t He and Jesus became One. And He Manifested Himself as the Holy Ghost. Three
Manifestations of the same Singular God. This is as close to a Trinity as I dar
e go. I believe that herein lies the Truth about GOD, Jesus and the Holy Ghost
and is supported in it’s entirety by Scripture.
Now let us move on to another sensitive subject, Mary the Mother of Jesus. Ther
e are four different opinions on Mary and the conception of Christ, none of whic
h is supported by Scripture. The first opinion says that Mary was a Virgin and
she was ‘Overpowered’ by the Holy Spirit and conceived Christ; the second opinio
n says she was raped by a Roman Soldier whose name was Panthera. The following
dialog typifies the Rape stories.
"In 4 BCE Sepphoris, a major city one hour s walk from Nazareth, took part in a
rebellion against Roman rule. A Roman Army was sent to punish Sepphiors. "Every
body knew what happened when an invading army was making war on a civilian popul
ation. Women who had not fled or could not be safely hidden, especially the youn
g ones, could expect to be Raped.
"According to both Matthew and Luke, Jesus was born around the end of the reign
of Herod the Great, who died in the same year Sepphoris was destroyed. This puts
a Roman army on a punitive campaign in the Nazareth area during the range of ye
ars for the birth of Jesus. "All we can say is that it squares with what we kno
w about Roman military history and the available evidence about the approximate
year of Jesus’ birth.
On the one hand, we cannot know whether Mary was raped nor whether Jesus was bor
n nine months after Sepphoris was razed. On the other hand, historians cannot re
sponsibly ignore that a Roman army bent on rape and pillage was in just the righ
t place at just about the right time.
Regardless of the actual facts of Jesus birth, thirty years later people who kn
ew or could guess his age and knew he was from Nazareth, might well have put two
and two together and wonder whether he was a child of Roman rape. It s a certai
nty that there were such children about the same age as Jesus in the villages ne
ar Sepphoris. Some of them probably grew up with him in Nazareth."
And the third opinion which is contained in the following paragraph.
Celsus, a late second-century Greek philosopher and polemical writer against Chr
istianity, claimed that Jesus was an illegitimate child of a certain Roman soldi
er named Panthera, and that Mary had been turned out by her husband because she
was convicted of unfaithfulness (Origen, Contra Celsum 1:28-32). These claims ar
e related to the references in the Talmud to the figure of Ben-Pandera as Jesus’
supposed father. According to the early third-century Acts of Pilate, a apocryp
hal Christian work, the elders of the Jews stated to Pilate during the trial of
Jesus that he had been conceived through fornication.
The fourth opinion is that Joseph was the father.
The first opinion we’ll examine claims Scriptural Support from Isaiah 7:14, Matt
hew 1:23 and Luke 1:27 – 35. Isaiah 7:14 says “Therefore the Lord himself will
give you a sign: behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call
his name Immanuel”.
The word virgin comes from the Greek word parthenos, but the original Bo
ok of Isaiah was written in Hebrew which uses the word almah which translates yo
ung woman. Now the question comes. Who has the Right Translation of it; the or
iginal Hebrew Author or the much later Greek Scribe? Furthermore, in the Hebrew
Immanuel is a name “Shall call his name Immanuel”.
This is NOT a Prophecy about the coming Messiah. It is a near term Prophecy add
ressed to King Ahaz of Judah about two Northern Kings (the King of Israel [the 1
0 tribes] and the King of Syria) coming to lay siege to Jerusalem. But not to w
orry because GOD is going to thwart their plans and protect Jerusalem. GOD then
tells King Ahaz to ask for a sign of His Divine Intervention to which Ahaz repl
ies I will not tempt the Lord. Which brings us to 7:14:
THE JEWISH TRANSLATIONS ARE CONSISTENT IN CORRECTLY RENDERING THE TERM (HA ALM
AH) [WHERE THE DEFINITE ARTICLE (HA-) IS USED WITH THE NOUN (ALMAH)] AS THE
YOUNG WOMAN OR THE MAIDEN, PRESERVING THE DEFINITE ARTICLE IN THEIR RENDITIONS.
THIS INDICATES THAT THE REFERENCE BY ISAIAH WAS TO A SPECIFIC YOUNG WOMAN KNOWN
TO BOTH HIM, THE SPEAKER, AND TO KING AHAZ, THE ONE BEING ADDRESSED.
THE JEWISH TRANSLATIONS ARE GENERALLY CONSISTENT IN THEIR RENDITIONS OF THE TENS
E OF THE CONJUGATED VERB (HARAH) IN THIS VERSE, THOUGH FOUR OF THE FIVE SOURCE
S QUOTED IN TABLE II.B.1-1 RENDER THE CONJUGATED VERB IN THE PRESENT TENSE AS IS
WITH CHILD (ALREADY PREGNANT), THE ARTSCROLL TANACH HAS IT IN THE FUTURE TENSE
AS SHALL BECOME PREGNANT. HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE HERE, SINCE
A VERB CONJUGATED IN THE PERFECT TENSE, WHICH IS THE CASE HERE WITH (HARAH), C
AN ALSO BE UNDERSTOOD AS DESCRIBING AN IMMINENT ACTION, SOMETHING THAT IS ABOUT
TO OCCUR, IN THE NEAR FUTURE. SOME JEWISH SAGES USE THIS ASPECT OF THE PERFECT
TENSE IN THEIR COMMENTARY (E.G., RASHI), AND EVEN THE NOTED GERMAN GRAMMARIAN AN
D CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIAN, H. W. F. GESENIUS (1786-1842) MAKES NOTE OF SUCH APPLICA
TIONS [1].
In order to preserve Context you need to begin at Isaiah 7:3 and finish at Isaia
h 8:8. The section covers the growth of the boy Immanu-EL and tells of the kill
ing of the two Northern Kings as the boy reaches maturity. In 8:7 – 8 we read o
f a coming flood which will wipe out Assyria and then a statement directed to Im
manu-EL that the flood would reach Judah and be up to his neck.
Now that you’ve read Isaiah 7:14 in Context you can see how Artificial and Force
d the supposed connection to the Birth of the Messiah is. If the Church had not
Polluted itself with Paganism, Greco-Roman Philosophy and many other False Doct
rines and Dogma’s, and simply followed the Teachings of Christ and the Apostles
then we wouldn’t have to deal with this Virgin Birth Lie, and the impact it’ll h
ave on the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. I know of no Scriptures which requires
the Messiah being born of a Virgin.
The impact on the Gospels is minimal; however, the impact it has on most Churche
s Doctrine and Dogma is nothing short of catastrophic. The Trinity and Virgin B
irth are Cornerstones of almost every Church’s Founding Principles. Destroy the
concept of a Trinity and Virgin Birth and almost every Christian Church on Eart
h would crumble like a house made of cards.
But why? Shouldn’t they be firmly held up by the Teachings of Christ and the Ap
ostles? Shouldn’t the Cornerstones of their Foundations be fully Supported by t
he Scriptures? Instead they put all their eggs into Scripturally Unsupported id
eologies like the Trinity and Virgin Birth.
How many times does the word ‘Trinity’ appear in the OT? What was that? I thou
ght I heard you say Zero. So it must have come about with the Dawning of a New
Age and Covenant, how many times did Christ teach about the Trinity or any ideol
ogy even faintly resembling a Trinity? What’s that? None? Again?
Let’s try a different approach. How many times does the phrase ‘God the Father’
appear in the Scriptures? What’s that you say? A great many? Did Jesus teach
us about ‘God the Father’? Again a great many. I think we’re on to something
here. And the Apostles, did they teach us about ‘God the Father’? Yes, many ti
mes.
Let’s continue with this method. How many times does the phrase ‘God the Son’ a
ppear in the Scriptures? Ut oh. We’re back to none again. How many times does
the phrase ‘God the Holy Ghost’ or ‘God the Holy Spirit’ appear in the Scriptur
es? None, again?
How do we solve our little problem? What problem? Well Scripture tells us that
God is the only one who can be the Savior, the Redeemer, but Christ and the Apo
stles said Christ could Forgive Sins and thereby become the Savior, the Redeemer
; therefore, Christ must be a God. Hmm … that can’t be because a God can’t die,
and Jesus died; therefore Christ must be a man. Now do you see our little prob
lem?
Some of the Pagans we’ve allowed in brought their Triad with them and say there
is God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost all of one Substance, Co-E
ternal and Co-Equal and together they make God. But we still have our little pr
oblem. Eureka! I have a solution we’ll Adopt the Pagan Triad and say that Chri
st ‘emptied’ himself of his Godhood and became a man! So Jesus can be a God and
a Man. Note: I have Searched several Bibles (over 12) for the word Emptied occ
urring with Christ. It does not appear in any Bible!
We’ll make it Church Doctrine and tell the people that their Salvation depends u
pon this Doctrine and if they begin to question it we’ll just tell them “It’s a
Mystery due to a Finite Mind trying to Understand the Nature of an Infinite Triu
ne God”. If they continue to protest, deny, read or translate Scripture and fin
d out that the Scriptures don’t support our Trinity then we’ll have an even bigg
er problem. So we’ll just kill anyone who so much as questions the Doctrine and
pretty soon all the naysayers will be dead and everyone will agree that the Doc
trine of the Trinity is True and Good.
So the Church set about Killing anyone who even hinted that they didn’t agree an
d anyone bold enough to translate the Greek or Latin and read the Scriptures for
themselves. The Killing Spree lasted for years and in the end well over Fifty
Million that’s over 50,000,000 men, women and children were Burned or Mutilated
to death. All that death over a False Doctrine. All that death over an ideolog
y that wasn’t even thought of until the Church was over 500 years old. All that
Death over some Pagan ideology and some Greco-Roman Philosophy that neither Chr
ist nor the Apostles had ever hinted at or made Reference to. All that Death to
hide a Lie.
BE-AWARE (If this isn’t Satan’s work then I Evolved from a monkey) the Messiah’
s name is Yeshua which Translates to Joshua, and the name jesus is the name of o
ne of the Roman gods worshipped in Rome. This is no Joke. I am extremely serio
us about this. You have been Praying to and Worshipping a Pagan Roman god! And
I’d bet dollars to dimes that your Pastor Knew! Witness the following:
Furthermore, as mentioned previously, there is a LOT of powerful and convincing
evidence that shows the Greek name for Messiah, Iesous, may be derived from the
name of a pagan deity! YES, "JESUS" IS A WORD WHICH MAY DERIVE FROM THE NAME FO
R A PAGAN GREEK GOD! IT MAY GIVE HONOR TO A PAGAN DEITY! The aforementioned bo
ok, Come Our of Her My People, by C. J. Koster, provides a LOT of evidence of th
is as well as many other proofs of Christianity s pagan foundations. Of course,
few Christians dare investigate these things for fear of what they may discover
. Their fears are well founded since they WILL find ample facts proving Constan
tinian Christianity to be a counterfeit, Babylonian based. A religion that may
represent part of Satan s plan to usurp God and establish himself as the recipie
nt of mankind s worship.
Hellooo? Why are preachers intentionally discarding and censoring the true name
for Messiah and using a false name that honors a pagan god in its place?
Let me ask that again. Why are Christian leaders intentionally discarding and c
ensoring the true name for Messiah, (Yeshua) and using a false name instead (Jes
us). Worse still, the false name "Jesus" is a name for which very strong eviden
ce exists showing it may honor a pagan god?
I told you that there were Problems in the Bible especially the New Testament, a
nd I’ve been telling you that Churches have big time Problems especially with Do
ctrine and Dogma. This Name thing is just one more example. The Churches of to
day Value Tradition more than Truth. The Church Leaders all the way down to the
Pastor level, with Willful Intent and Malice LIE.
I don’t know if it affects our Salvation or not, but I do know that we have been
worshipping an ancient Roman god. We Confessed and said we Believe that an anc
ient Roman god was the only Begotten Son of God and we asked a Pagan god to Forg
ive us! We gave Praise and Glory to a Pagan god! We were even Baptized in the
Name of a Pagan god!
Another Lie they perpetrate is about the Rite of getting Baptized. Baptized
, like Anti-Christ is an untranslated Greek word that means to be fully immerse
d in water (I’ll address the Anti-Christ and the Spirit of the Anti-Christ later
). I also know for certain that this name thing displeases both God and Yeshua.
Why is the Clergy LYING to us? Is it a part of Satan’s Plan to garner more Wors
hippers than Yahweh and Yeshua to be Worshipped as god and to attain the Throne
on Judgment Day? I still believe that everything, all the Good and all the Evil
, comes from Yahweh; however, I am beginning to believe that there is a Satan,
and we must Battle him daily in the Spirit.
They have LIED to us about the Messiah’s Name. They have LIED to us about Bapti
sm. They have LIED to us about the Anti-Christ. They have LIED to us about the
Spirit of the Anti-Christ. They have LIED to us about the Trinity. Where and
when do the Lies stop?
I know when and how the Lies started. They began when Constantine called 318 Bi
shops together in Nicaea. Constantine presided over the Council. Constantine w
as High Priest for a Pagan Religion and was very well acquainted with Triune god
s and knew most of citizens were well acquainted with Triads. And since Christi
anity was going to be the Official Religion of Rome, it too needed a Trinity.
The Bishops also had the Pagans to deal with. When the Pagans joined the Church
, the Church allowed them to bring their Rites, Doctrine and Practices with them
. Some of them brought a Trinity Doctrines. So the multiple gods issue had alr
eady been resolved, and all that was left was Defining Yahweh and Yeshua (the Ho
ly Ghost wasn’t added for about another 400 hundred years). The issue was wheth
er Yahweh and Yeshua were made of the same ‘Substance’ Co-Equal, Co-Eternal, All
-Seeing and All-Knowing or if Yeshua was Created.
Now there were only 318 Bishops invited out of the Hundreds of Bishops in the Ch
urch. And out of that 318 Bishops 308 of them were from the Western Empire and
believed that Yahweh and Yeshua were of One Substance. The other 10 were from t
he Eastern Empire and believed Yeshua to be a Created Being. Can you guess who h
ad the most votes?
Constantine got exactly what he wanted; a Christian Church that was united and l
ooked exactly like the Pagan Babylonian Sun-god Mystery Church. This is Where a
nd How the Lies began.
There was no New Testament and wouldn’t be for another 500 years. There were, h
owever, a few copies of Paul’s Letters floating about and an odd Gospel (not any
thing like ours) or two. Sometimes one of these copies (both Letters and Gospe
ls) fell into the hands of someone Rich enough or Influential enough to hire a
Scribe to make some copies of the copies, but make a few ‘Editorial’ Changes to
make the document look as if it supported his Doctrine. This process is known a
s Redaction.
What we call the New Testament went through 500 years of Redaction. In fact the
re was so much Redaction and Corruption that it is impossible to filter it out t
o view the original document. That is one of the reasons I don’t trust the New
Testament. I can’t tell what is Gods Inspired Words and what is Man’s Pollution
!
When Reading or Researching in the New Testament and you run across the word “Sc
riptures” have you ever wondered about What Scriptures? I think the New Testame
nt wasn’t Canonized until late in the 7th Century and the Apostles were long dea
d by then. So what were these Scriptures? The Early Church used Them for at le
ast 5 Centuries. You got it! It’s the Old Testament.
I know that you spend as much time as is possible Studying the New Testament and
only going into the Old Testament only when a Reference takes you there. I don
’t know why but I suspect that it has something to do about Christ’s saying I di
dn’t come to Destroy the Law but to Fulfill it.
If you were to Study that Verse in Context you’d come to see that Yeshua says Mt
. 5:18 “I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest
letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law
until everything is accomplished.” Mt. 5:19 Anyone who breaks one of the least
of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in
the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be
called great in the kingdom of heaven”. In other words He says until the Heave
ns and Earth pass away the Tanakn (Old Testament) will be Valid.
Is it not puzzling how so many Christians rarely study the very "Bible" Yeshua a
nd his followers studied? Is it not strange that the sacred writ considered as
the ultimate source of wisdom and understanding by Yeshua and his followers is t
oday being preached as "abolished", "changed", or only of "historical" significa
nce? Is it not odd how many preachers claim to be "New Testament believers" by
unabashedly promoting the concept that the Old Testament is superseded by the Ne
w Testament or of only limited application today? Isn t it strange how, even th
ough the New Testament leaves no doubt that the Hebrew Scriptures are what Yeshu
a and his disciples considered Scripture, almost no time is invested by most Chr
istians (OR PREACHERS) to study those Hebrew Scriptures? Indeed, a TRUE New Tes
tament Christian - if he/she follows the teachings of the authors of the New Tes
tament - MUST accept the Tanakh (Old Testament) as authoritative Scripture to be
used for an understanding of truth; otherwise, he/she is in direct conflict wit
h the New Testament writers they claim to follow!
My son, it is ‘Scripturally’ obvious that many Christian ’Teachers’ are not foll
owing the clear instructions of Yeshua s followers because these "theologians" a
re often declaring as dead or virtually useless the very "Bible" the apostles co
nsidered alive and of infinite worth! The very "Bible" used and preached from b
y our Messiah and his followers has been discarded from the church or relegated
to "lesser" importance!
Just as an example let’s look at 2 Timothy 3:14 – 17:
But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured o
f, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known
the holy Scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through fa
ith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and
is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in rig
hteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all
good works.
So if the Tanakn (OT) is to be considered a valuable part of the Holy Scriptures
, why is the Church trying to discourage it’s use and/or abolish it? Why is the
Church trying to Destroy 2/3 of our access to God’s Sacred Word and leave us wi
th a Document which we know for certain has been Redacted several times and prob
ably has a good deal of Corruption?
This is beginning to look like a Grand Conspiracy by the Church in some Hollywoo
d movie. Could this really be a Grand Conspiracy by Satan? Is he that Real?
The Bible says at the end of this age that even the very elect shall be deceived
. Look at yourself, even you are ensnared in this Trap! You have basically dis
carded the Tanakn (OT) and there is a strong Bond between yourself and the Trini
ty.
I hope that you are beginning to open your mind to the Truth. I hope this Name
Change thing is resolved, and you are adjusting to His real name Yeshua (Ya – S
hoo – Ah) or Translated into English Joshua. If you need more Proof I can suppl
y you with one of the Source Documents I used and go lookup as many as you need
to Believe. Now onto the Trinity thing, again.
You have Closed your Mind, hardened your Heart and Stiffened your neck, you have
eyes but are Blind (Spiritually speaking) to the Truth as GOD defines it, and n
ot a LIE as from your Church.
First of all you Confessed to me that Yeshua is a man based upon 1 Timothy 2:5.
In agreeing that Joshua is a man you have effectively and appropriately Destroy
ed the Trinity Doctrine because you have Eliminated one of the 3 gods you Worshi
pped leaving only 2 gods, and a Trinity cannot exist with only 2 gods. To GOD’s
Greater Glory and the Grace of our Lord Yeshua, I give Thanks and Praise that y
our Eyes have been Opened. And I Thank You for taking that Giant Leap of Faith
which had to be very difficult for you as you had to Spiritually battle the Demo
n which had control of your Mind and probably getting Strength and Support from
Satan himself! For you are one of the Elect and made for a powerful ally for Sa
tan.
Logically you Destroyed the Trinity Lie when you confessed that Joshua was a man
while He was in our Midst because that left only 2 gods, and 2 gods cannot make
a Triune Godhead. Satan and his instrument the Church had Blinded you from see
ing this simple Truth. I knew you were well on the way down the Narrow Path whe
n you came to realize the Notion that Joshua had “emptied” Himself was just anot
her Church Lie propagated by Satan, a demon or an unclean Spirit’s Teaching.
I think that by now you can take in, assimilate, appreciate and Understand John
17:3.
"And this is life eternal, that they might know You the only true God, and Yeshu
a Christ whom You have sent."
Because of John 17:3 and a great many more just like it, the Holy Spirit becomes
GOD’s Spirit Working through Joshua in the world as opposed to the Notion that
it has been Personified into a god.
In John 17:3 there 3 significant items that indicate that the Notion of a Trinit
y is False and that Monotheism is True. The first Clause is Significant in that
it Supports Monotheism is “that they might know You the only true God and Yeshu
a Christ whom You have sent”.
The first item is Yeshua’s declaration that supports the Notion of Monotheism in
that it says You the only true God. The word only Denotes that the Object, God
, is Singular.
The second significant item occurs with the pronoun you. Greek has 2 forms of t
he pronoun you. The first form points to a Single Person, the second form is Plu
ral. In this case the first form is used and points to there being a Singular o
r Specific God.
The third significant item is the conjunction and which Associates two separate
but Related ideas or things together. The two separate but related ideas are ‘Y
ou the only true God’ and ‘Yeshua Christ whom You have sent’ are the two Separat
e ideas, and the Related words are the singular ‘you’.
I apologize for the incomplete Analysis, but I wanted to get to the main idea be
ing expressed by Yeshua, and be able to present my Analysis in the most Understa
ndable manner possible because I know that not everyone has been trained in the
use of Grammar and Linguistics. It is my fervent hope that your Heart has been
softened enough and your Mind Open enough to escape Satan’s snare which is Deliv
ered through his Instrument, the Church. And having said that it is my Prayer t
hat you are able to see or receive the Truth as I have presented it.
It is my belief that the Apostles and writers of the New Testament foresaw the C
hurch becoming an Instrument of Satan, and I think that I can substantiate that
Premise through Biblical and Empirical Evidence which I’ll cover in another Disc
ussion or possibly later in this Document.
I am going to assume that you have escaped the Traps and Snares set by Satan thr
ough his instrument, the Church. I have documented some of its’ many Lies and F
alse Doctrines. I found the number of Lies and False Doctrines to be Shocking a
nd left me Dumfounded and Speechless. That Satan is the Prince of this World bo
th Spiritually and Materially was more than appalling. I was Horrified and more
than a little Afraid that Satan is using the Actual Christian Church to accompl
ish his will.
The Church is a Real Entity both Materially and Spiritually. That Satan could u
se the Church as one of his instruments leaves me very Dismayed, but the number
of LIES and False Doctrines convinces me that they, the Church, is one of the Sp
irits of Anti-Christ.
The Church is supposed to be the Body of Christ! How did Satan get so much Cont
rol? There are only a few Churches which don’t use the Trinitarian Creed in the
ir Doctrine, but many of those fit the definition of Gnostic or Neo-Gnostic in P
ractice. And that means that Satan has control of all but a few of the Churches
which are Non-Trinitarian Churches but are innocently unaware of the Messiah’s
name and who or what jesus really is, and most of them are a part of the Jewish
Messianic movement.
There is a clear definition of the "antichrist" that Christianity seems to miss,
but it is easily Defined from the New Testament. The word "Antichrist" is a Gre
ek word that has never been Translated which makes me wonder what is the Church
trying to hide. Leaving it untranslated just adds to the Confusion and wild Spe
culation over its’ meaning.
Most Christians assume that “Antichrist is a word that has been Translated from
Greek which leads to all the Confusion and Wild Speculation. Using these facts
and Feigning with a Definition of it’s, the Church that is, own. This Strategy
has helped the Church and Satan keep the True Translated Meaning of “Antichrist”
a Secret for 2,000 years!
The Church has Lied to you again! They have Lied to Cover-Up another False Doct
rine and to add Insult to Injury they have with Forethought, Intent and Malice D
eceitfully led people down a path that takes them to the Book of Revelations and
have managed to make most people think that Revelations is the only place in th
e Bible that deals with the Antichrist!
Do you still have Faith in your Church? Do you still believe that your Church i
s above all this Negativity, Wickedness and Evil? Do you think all this Lambast
ing is directed at the Catholic Church alone? No, my son it is directed at my C
hurch, your Church and every Church on the face of the Earth that calls itself C
hristian save for a small Remnant.
Do you think the people under the Old Covent who broke their Promise and went wh
oring after idols, Pagan gods and Polytheistic Religions are any different from
those people under the New Covent? That they are somehow different and somehow
Incapable of making the same Exact mistakes?
Do you believe Joshua to be a Liar? No? OK. Do you believe that the Holy Ghos
t is a Liar? No? OK. Do you believe that the Holy Ghost to be weak or slow? N
o? OK. Do you believe that KNOWN History to be a Lie, and by KNOWN History I m
ean Manuscripts, Church Records, Christian Historians, Secular Historians to be
a Lie? No? OK.
So why did it take 400 – 500 years for those 318 Bishops at The Council of Nicae
a just happened to come up with the idea that God is a Dualistic Entity? Becaus
e it took that long to figure it out. And why do I keep Calling Him a Dualistic
God?
Dualistic because the Council of Nicaea said that The Father and Yeshua were mad
e of the same substance, and that the both of Them together make 1 Godhead. The
y said that the Messiah was Begotten not Created. They went on to say that both
were co-equal, co-eternal, all-Seeing and all-knowing. Dualistic because the H
oly Ghost won’t be added until the 7th or 8th Century at which time the Trinity
was recognized. So it took them 781 years to realize God was a Triune God. All
the Bishops Agreed that you MUST acknowledge your Belief in the Holy Trinity to
be Saved. I wonder, what happened to those Saved before 681 especially the one
s Saved by Yeshua?
Answers are Required for these questions and the answer must not be nonsense, mu
st not Appeal to it’s being a Mystery (because I’ll not allow you to call our Lo
rd a Liar and the Holy Ghost impotent [see John 16:13]), must not Appeal to, the
human mind isn’t capable of Understanding, must be Biblically Supported by not
less than 2 Passages from the New Testament and retain their Context, must be Bi
blically Supported by not less than 2 Passages from the Tanakn (OT) and retain t
heir Context. With that being said let’s begin.
I always get confused every time we get to this point. If they are co-eternal H
ow can Yeshua be Begotten because Begotten infers a Beginning, and if Yeshua was
Begotten and has a beginning then it follows that Yeshua cannot be co-eternal!
Furthermore where was the Godhead before Yeshua was Begotten? Was He Yahweh un
til the others arrived? Was He in Existence before the others arrived or was He
created when the others arrived? Did God Create a Godhead Greater than Himself
?
Just a couple more simple questions and we’ll get back to the Antichrist. What
does Begotten mean? What is the difference between Begotten and Created? If “B
egotten” refers to Mary, where was Yeshua before Mary? Why was Yahweh the only
God in the Tanakn (OT)? In the Tanakn (OT) it says only God (Yahweh?) can forgi
ve Sins, How could Yeshua forgive Sins? How did the Holy Ghost come into Being?
How do you resolve John 15:26 “When the Counsellor comes, whom I will send to
you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father, he will t
estify about me”? If you are Successful in explaining the Origins of the Holy G
host why doesn’t It have a name? How do you resolve Genesis 1:1 with John 1:1 (
Hint: New Age – vs – New World)? How do you resolve the FACT that everything wa
s Created by Elohim (a non-direct way of addressing Yahweh, EL or I AM) Yahweh,
I AM or EL without even hinting that a Godhead or anyone else was involved? Re
garding the Trinity, how do you resolve the many issues associated with John 15:
12 which says “I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know hi
s master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I l
earned from my Father I have made known to you”: if Joshua told them everything
that was important for them to know, why is there no mention of the Trinity whic
h is important to know so that they could Worship correctly? Why didn’t Yeshua
give the Holy Ghost a name instead of a title? In Isaiah 9:6 it says “And he wi
ll be called Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Pe
ace”, how do you resolve Joshua carrying all these titles (Hint: He is the Jewis
h Agent or Shaliach)? How do you resolve the acrostic YAHWEH written on the plaq
ue hanging over Yeshua’s head, written by Pilate who refused to change the wordi
ng when asked by the Jews (The High Priest among them)? How do you resolve Yesh
ua’s statements about returning to His Father in John 14 and John 20:17 where He
says “,,, returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” (Fath
er means God and God means Father as indicated by the joining of the two infinit
ives by a comma instead of a conjunction used to join two different ideas)?
Just a few more questions and my Understanding of your Trinity will or should be
complete. I have quoted John 7:1 – 3 below. How is it that YHWH not the Godhe
ad who grants Authority over all people? How is it that Eternal life is to know
YHWH and not the Godhead? How is it that the Godhead has absolutely No Part or
Responsibly or Role to Play in this incredibly important event? Moreover how i
s it that I cannot find even one verse in the entire Bible where YHWH doesn’t ha
ve complete Command and Control?
“After Jesus said this, he looked towards heaven and prayed: “Father, the time h
as come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you. For you granted him a
uthority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have g
iven him. Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God,
and Yeshua Christ, whom you have sent.”
If we are serious about our salvation, which depends on us knowing the only true
God and Yeshua Christ (John 17:3), then we must be serious about studying God’s
Word and understanding the Truth, and in all Truth I have thoroughly, and you k
now how thorough I am, searched the Entire Bible and cannot find one Chapter, on
e Section, one Passage or even one Word which Explicitly or Implicitly points to
a Godhead or a God other than YHWH!
It occurs to me that I am chasing nonsense. It occurs to me that The Trinity is
a Trap or Snare set by Satan using his favorite Instrument, the Church and it’s
still intact Latter Day Creeds, to Capture the Souls of the Unwary but otherwis
e Good Christian people. These otherwise Good Christian people Worship a Pagan
Roman god, Pray in the name of this Roman god, Sing to this Roman god, Worship m
any False gods (The godhead, the father, the son, the holy ghost and jesus), Tit
he to False gods, get Baptized in the names of False gods and perform all sorts
of Religious Ceremonies, Rituals and Events to and for these False gods.
The ‘Church’ with all of it’s Tradition Based Creeds penned by Satan himself, an
d The Capturing of Unwary Souls through False Creeds, Doctrine, Dogma and Teachi
ngs being lead to Hell instead of Eternal Life have forgotten the Apostle Paul’s
Warning and Instructions to Search the Scriptures (the Tanakn [OT] for Paul) da
ily to see whether the things they, and you, Heard or were Taught, are True or N
ot. All these Lost Souls Victims of Satan’s Traps and Snares put me in Remembra
nce of two of our Lord and Master’s Teachings:
"Enter in by the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that l
eads to destruction, and there are many who go in there: Because narrow is the g
ate, and narrow is the way, which leads to life, and there are few who find it."
(Matthew 7:13-14)
"For many are called, but few are chosen." (Matthew 22:14)
Many are those who follow those False Creeds, gods, Doctrines and Churches and f
ew are those who Teach:
There is One God and one mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Yeshua.
I have no idea where all that came from. But back on page 27 near the top every
time I’d press the Shift key and start to press the “S” key to type Satan my sc
reen would go wacko and start printing all kinds of random characters and lock m
y machine up in that state! All I could do was hit the Reset Button. It was ve
ry … odd.
Below, I have extracted a portion of the 1 John commentary that will assist in r
evealing to you the Scriptural identity of the antichrist!
1 John 4:2,3 (KJV)
Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Yeshua Messi
ah is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Ye
shua Messiah is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of anti
christ, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in
the world.
I have known Trinitarians to intentionally twist these verses into the following
:
"...every spirit that confesseth that God is come in the flesh as Yeshua Messiah
is of God; and every spirit that confesseth not that God is come in the flesh a
s Yeshua Messiah is not of God..." THAT IS NOT WHAT IT SAYS, despite the wishes
of those who believe and teach that the Trinity is True and that Yeshua is God.
In point of fact, it doesn t even Imply that such an idea is True; yet many Chur
ch leaders teach that it does!
The wine of the Trinity intoxication is so strong, that many seem to sincerely s
ee this verse as Supporting the Trinity! An error that finds it s way into the
minds of most Trinitarians is the idea that "Son of God" means "God the Son".
NOWHERE in Scripture is "God the Son" found! "God the Son" is the invention of
the Beast using later church Creeds.
Although Trinitarians expend a lot of Energy and Effort to confuse the issue by
creating various "antichrist" scenarios, in Truth, these passages come very clos
e to condemning Trinitarians that teach a "God in the flesh" Messiah! If they a
re read with the fog of the Trinity deception removed, they DO destroy the Notio
n that Yeshua was anything more than a 100 percent human being! Additionally, w
e see in these verses reference to a "spirit". I will comment later on this "sp
irit" of antichrist.
The Greek term rendered "flesh" is sarx {sarx}, and the corresponding Hebrew wor
d is basar { baw-sawr }. Both words mean pure flesh and blood, that is to say f
ully human, verses the Man-God the church creeds attempt to define. There is no
thing in the Greek or the Hebrew that implies anything more than 100 percent hum
an flesh and blood!
Furthermore, as stated earlier in this document, there is a Greek word that is l
eft untranslated. There is a word that the translators intentionally with fore
thought and malice decided NOT to translate. And I believe it is because they
Fear that the literal meaning will expose their Lies!
Traditional Christian doctrine has built an entire mini theology and sensational
, end-time teaching around this Greek word that they transferred into the Englis
h vocabulary. The Greek word is antichristos, rendered in its untranslated form
in English as, antichrist.
Note: "spirit of antichrist" = erroneous doctrine. The antichrist is primarily
the representative of a set of false teachings, not simply some future possible
world religious/political figure! Those accepting the error promoted by the "sp
irit of error" or "spirit of antichrist" are unintentional victims of the spirit
of antichrist.
In the case of 1 John 4:2,3, antichrist is actually a combination of 2 Greek wor
ds, anti and christos. The literal meaning(s) of antichrist is:
1. adversary of Messiah
2. usurper of Messiah
3. instead of Messiah
4. opposite to Messiah (or in opposition to Messiah)
5. in place of Messiah (a replacement or counterfeit Messiah)
It is useful at this time to note a couple of verses from earlier in John s epis
tle. Also note how, to further the end-time deception, antichrist is often capi
talized as Antichrist; moreover, it is a blatantly false assumption which forces
you into believing the False Teaching that traditional Christianity wants you t
o believe.
1 John 2:18,19 (NKJV)
Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist
is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the
last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been
of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be
made manifest, that none of them were of us.
Traditional Christianity seems to have erased these passages from the New Testam
ent. Why do Traditional Christian leaders focus almost exclusively on the conce
pt of some future, superman "antichrist" when these passages make it abundantly
clear that the "antichrist" was present even during the time John wrote his epis
tle? In point of fact, it clearly states that many antichrists were present! H
ow could the Author have been any clearer?
It is important to grasp the meaning of the word translators conveniently chose
to not translate. The term "antichrist", as proven above, literally means "adve
rsary of" the Messiah, "in place of" the Messiah, "instead of" the Messiah, or "
usurper of" the Messiah. It can also mean a "replacement" Messiah. Furthermore
, John makes perfectly clear that MANY antichrists had gone out FROM THEM (early
believers) teaching False Doctrine regarding the Messiah, Yeshua. These "antic
hrists," or usurpers of the true Messiah, were promoting Doctrines that presente
d a Messiah that was in place of or instead of the TRUE Messiah. They were teac
hing a "replacement" Messiah. John was a Hebrew; therefore, it is probable that
the "us" John refers to in 1 John 2:19 is probably his Christian brothers who fo
llowed Yeshua as defined from their Hebraic context.
The true Hebraic context of Messiah with which John and his brethren were famili
ar had the following two central characteristics:
1. He was the ‘anointed one’, the ‘sent one’, the fully empowered human Ag
ent of the Almighty Creator. He was not God in the flesh. I discuss the crucia
l issue of what it means to be the Agent or Shaliach of God in a minute and how
this factors into proving Messiah is not God. When one understands the Hebraic
meaning of Shaliach (shah lee OCK) all the mystery regarding Messiah s relations
hip with God is removed and the Truth is easy see. It is for this reason that
you will never hear this issue discussed my your Pastor.
2. He was indisputably and firmly PRO-torah (pro-law). The true Messiah wa
s a devoted keeper and promoter of God s eternal instructions.
Therefore, any Messiah (Christ) which possessed characteristics different than t
hose listed above was usurping the Messiah and replacing the true Messiah.
Because Christianity started out as a Sect of Judaism you MUST view the Bible, t
he Messiah (Yeshua) and YHWH from a Hebraic Perspective. Yeshua, the Apostles a
nd the Early Church Leaders were all Jews. They Talked, Walked, Thought (from a
Uniquely Jewish perspective), Saw and Interpreted Events as only a Jew could.
After the death of the Apostles, Christianity began taking in Pagans and Adoptin
g Pagan Beliefs which were not compatible with their Jewish Roots. By the year
300 AD Christianity had thoroughly divested itself from all traces of its Jewish
Roots and become thoroughly Paganized. They had lost the ability to View, Inte
rpret and Understand things, including the Scriptures, from the Hebraic Perspect
ive.
Among the things they lost was the Extremely Critical Concept of the Jewish Shal
iach or Agency. One of the Shaliach’s applications regards the misunderstanding
of how Yeshua, who is NOT God, was able to do things that only God should be ab
le to do, like forgiving sins. Many people jump to the wrong conclusion that su
ch powerful acts prove Yeshua is God in the Flesh. The question occurs that stat
es:
"Well, if Messiah is not God how come he was able to forgive sins? Only God can
forgive sins."
That question symbolizes a vast ignorance that persists in the minds of those af
fected by traditional Christian bias, an ignorance born in the standard Christia
n failure to grasp Hebraic principles.
Since the entire Bible is written from a Hebraic perspective failure to interpre
t it from its Hebraic Context means there will be misunderstandings of Scripture
and Events. There is simply no way to correctly interpret Scripture and Events
unless Hebraic concepts are applied. The same faulty thinking by those who ass
ume Yeshua is God because he could forgive sins applies to issues such as how he
was able to heal, resurrect, or in general perform Miracles.
It is my Belief that Yeshua was a Shaliach, an EMISSARY of God, but he was NOT G
od. Obviously if you use common sense, you must admit that the Emissary of anot
her is NOT the one who commissioned him as an Agent. The Emissary, and the one
who commissioned him as an agent, are separate and distinct Entities. The defin
ition of Emissary requires this to be the case. When Yeshua says he was sent, i
t proves he is NOT God.
Shaliach (sha-LEE-ock) means Agent or Emissary. It is a Torah-legal term for a
person empowered by someone else to act in his stead. Yeshua was empowered by Y
ahweh to act in His stead. The shaliach first appears in the Torah in the person
of Eliezer, whom Abraham commissioned to find a wife for his son, Isaac. Rebecc
a was selected and betrothed as a wife for Isaac by Eliezer, and she was legally
Isaac s wife without her actual husband having ever set eyes on her or having e
xchanged a single word with her. In the words of the Talmud, "A person s shaliac
h is as he himself."
Consider this in light of Yeshua saying, "I and the Father are one." As God s s
haliach, Yeshua was acting in behalf of God; thus, God s emissary or representat
ive was as God, since he was fully empowered to legally act as God s chosen agen
t. However, just as Eliezer was NOT Abraham, Yeshua is NOT God. This is what Ye
shua meant when he said such things as:
John 8:28, 42, 50 (NASB)
Yeshua therefore said, "When you lift up the Son of Man, then you will know that
I am He, and I do nothing on My own initiative, but I speak these things as the
Father taught Me."
Yeshua said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love Me; for I proceede
d forth and have come from God, for I have not even come on My own initiative, b
ut He sent Me."
"But I do not seek My glory; there is One who seeks and judges”
There exists a model (the "slave") for one who has abnegated his will, personali
ty and very identity to that of his "master."
Yeshua was also God s slave in the sense that he submitted his will to God; howe
ver, he did not submit his identity or personality. Recall prior to Yeshua s de
ath him praying to his God and Father, "not my will, but thine, be done." (Matt.
26:39, Mark 14:36, Luke 22:42). We should submit our will to the same God Yesh
ua did, which is NOT the God promoted by Trinitarians and all others that promot
e a Messiah man-God.
There also exists the model of the employee, who assumes the obligation to perfo
rm a certain task for someone else, but whose personality and identity remain se
parate and distinct from the personality and identity of his employer. The shal
iach is unique in that they retain a great degree of autonomy in carrying out th
eir mission, yet at the same time becomes a virtual extension of the person who
commissioned him.
Likewise, as God s unique emissary (shaliach), Yeshua became a virtual extension
of God. Again, this is what he meant when he said that he was one with God. I
t is also what he prayed for when he prayed that his followers would likewise be
one with the Father just as he is:
John 17:11; 21; 22 (KJV)
And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to the
e. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that
they may be one, as we are. ... That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art i
n me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe
that thou hast sent me. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them;
that they may be one, even as we are one.
The shaliach does not abnegate his intellect, will, desires, feelings, talents o
r personal style to that of the one whom he represents; rather, he enlists them
in the fulfillment of his mission. Yeshua DID submit his will to God, and Hebra
ic thought clearly teaches we ARE to submit our will to God; however, Yeshua mai
ntained his desires, feelings, talents, and personal style. The result of this
in not a lesser bond between the two, but the contrary: God, the meshaleiach, i
s acting through the whole of the shaliach not only through the Shaliach’s physi
cal actions, but also through the Shaliach’s personality, which has become an ex
tension of the meshaleiach s personality.
God, as the Meshaleiach, was acting through the whole of Yeshua. He was utilizi
ng the gifts and personality Yeshua the Messiah possessed.
Additional information useful for understanding a shaliach is found in The Jewis
h Encyclopedia, page 232. It describes the "Jewish Law of Agency."
The Law of Agency deals with the status of a person (known as the agent) acting
by direction of another (the principal), and thereby legally binding the princip
al in his connection with a third person. The person who binds a principal in th
is manner is his agent, known in Jewish law as sheluach or sheliach (one that is
sent): the relation of the former to the latter is known as agency (shelichut).
The general principle is enunciated thus: A man s agent is like himself .
Yeshua, as the agent of YHVH, is FULLY empowered to LEGALLY and FULLY represent
YHVH. As the agent (shaliach) of God, Yeshua is "like," or the "likeness" and "
image" of God; however, just as the agent (the one sent) is not the principal (w
ho sent him), Yeshua is NOT God!
Appointment.
1. Under the Jewish law an agent may be appointed without the formality of writi
ng, that is, by spoken words; and witnesses are not needed to give effect to the
se words, except to prove, in case of dispute, that authority had been given, an
d the extent of such authority. The standard authorities draw this conclusion fr
om the remark in Kiddushin, 65b, that witnesses are needed only to meet denials.
...
An agent may appoint a subagent
The apostles, and WE who continue to spread the "good news" of Yeshua s rule and
the Kingdom of God, are subagents sent by Yeshua!
It should also be noted that a shaliach has his emissary status revoked either b
y failure (such as Israel) or death. Yeshua did NOT fail and HE LIVES!! Theref
ore, he is STILL the shaliach of YHVH.
So, there you have it. Yeshua is the shaliach (emissary) of God, but he is NOT G
od. Since he is the FULLY empowered agent of God, he has the power to forgive s
ins, heal, resurrect, etc. But his power does NOT prove him to be God. All it
proves is that he is FULLY empowered by YHWH God!
Each true follower of Messiah is to go forth as a shaliach of THE shaliach. For
further evidence proving Yeshua to the shaliach (one sent) of God. After readi
ng Yeshua s words it should be obvious that Yeshua is the shaliach, sent one, ag
ent of the Almighty God. A revelation came to me as I presented the quotes from
the gospel of John. Christianity and counterfeit Messianism present John s gos
pel as their primary alleged "proof" of Messiah s deity. However, they misrepre
sent the truth (as usual), because what John actually presents is the evidence p
roving Yeshua to be the shaliach of God, but NOT as God! I am now convinced tha
t the primary purpose of John s gospel was to prove Yeshua to be the "sent one,"
the shaliach (agent) of God. Indeed! John implicitly states that as being his
primary purpose for writing his gospel when he quotes Yeshua summarizing his pu
rpose and the way to eternal life:
John 17:3 KJV
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jes
us Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Please ponder intently Yeshua as the shaliach of YHVH. THE key to understanding
Yeshua s mission and position lies in an understanding of shaliach.
I have tried to set you Free from the Traps and Snares set by Satan and the Beas
t through the sheer weight of Evidence. But you Chose to remain in the Bonds th
at Bind you. You were Blind to the Truth and Chose to follow the Beast, the ant
ichrist. I have shown and told you of at least 3,000 passages in support of Mon
otheism and Weighted that Evidence against the 1 or 2 passages in the New Testam
ent which could maybe, might, could possibly, if Ripped out of Context and Alleg
orized to the upmost levels of imagination, support the Idea of a Trinity.
I have shown you how the Church has Lied and is still is Lying about many things
, events, Doctrine and Dogma, and how both Yeshua and the Apostles said these Fa
lse Teachings are the antichrist. Again you Chose to follow the Beast. I even
Challenged you to show me where it says Christ Emptied Himself of His Godhood …
in point of fact you were Told that particular Lie and Told what Book, Chapter a
nd Verse where it could be found. But you failed to Heed the Apostle Paul’s Adm
onition to Study the Scriptures (and the Scriptures were the Tanakn (OT)) to see
if the things told to you were True or not.
I have shown you where Yeshua speaks about the many, the few and Eternal Life in
the Kingdom in Matthew 22:14 "For many are called, but few are chosen”, and Mat
thew 7:13, 14 "Enter in by the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is t
he way, that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in there: Because n
arrow is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leads to life, and there are few
who find it". About how the many are the individual Church Members who Worship
many gods and follow the antichrist or False Doctrine which replaces the True M
essiah with an Usurper. But you remained entangled in Satan’s Snares and Chose
to follow him instead of the One Living God.
I have tried using Irrefutable Logic to Enlighten you, to show you the way to th
e Narrow Gate. The Logic was Pure and Simple Unblemished by Fallacies; unlike y
our False Doctrines which are riddled with Fallacies. And again you Chose the
antichrist over the Messiah.
I have utilized the Socratic Method of Reductio Ad Absurdum which showed the Ten
ets of your False Doctrine to be Absurd. But for the Nth time you have Chosen t
o Reject the Master’s Call.
Now I am appealing to your Common Sense. In addition to appealing to your Commo
n Sense I have taken you back through time. I have turned back the Pages of tim
e to an Era before Constantine reeked Havoc on our Beloved Church for Political
Expediency and Power. Back to a time before the Philosopher Wannabe Church Lead
ers took the Pagans in and Adopted their Idolatry and Evil Practices making our
Beloved Church an Adulterous Whore in the Eyes of God and our Lord Yeshua Christ
. Back even further to a time before their Anti-Semitism caused them to Divorce
themselves from their Judaic Roots.
Back on Page 24 I asked: “How do you resolve Genesis 1:1 with John 1:1 (Hint: Ne
w Age – vs – New World)?” You must realize through your Study and Research that
John 1:1 – 18 is a poem, and that Poems are given to Allusion. The Phrase “in
the beginning” is Alluding to two Entirely different Events and Things, and yet
they have a Significant Relationship.
The first part of the Allusion refers to Genesis 1:1 and John 1:1 as being two E
ntirely different Divine Acts which are two Entirely different Acts of Creation.
The Allusion to Genesis 1:1 is about the Creation of, and the ‘beginning’ of,
a New Universe and World. The ‘beginning’ in John 1:1 is the Ending of one Age
and the Creation of a New Age.
The term ‘Word’ also has a Duplicity of Meaning. The term ‘Word’ is translated
from the Greek term Logos which is generally translated as Thought or Idea; more
over, the term ‘Word’ also Alludes to Yeshua. So we have In the beginning of th
e New Age was the Thought or idea of Yeshua, and the Thought or Idea of Yeshua w
as with God, and the Thought or Idea of Yeshua was the ‘Shaliach’ of God.
NOTE. I believe the original Document used a Lower Case ‘W’ in the Word because
both life and light are as important as the term Word yet both are Lower Case,
and both life and light have Duplicity of meaning in that they are defining both
Who and What Yeshua is.
For the sake of argument I am going to assume that Saint John was the Author of
said Gospel. John was a Jew and his seeing Yeshua as the ‘Shaliach’ of God came
to him as easily as the assumption that water is wet; however, the Redactor did
not read nor Understand the Gospel from a Hebraic perspective, and saw the perf
ect opportunity to make John 1:1 support the notion that Yeshua was God by makin
g the ‘W’ in word Upper Case as are all the names of God.
The Redactor’s failing was leaving the second clause intact because if Yeshua wa
s with God then Common Sense tells us that if you are with somebody then you can
not be the somebody nor can you be a part of the somebody and the term with Expl
icitly Implies a separateness. Furthermore, the Redactor seems to be woefully u
naware that 1st John 1:1 Explicitly Defines ‘beginning’ as the Start of the Gosp
els, as the Dawning of a New Age. There is some Evidence that 1st John was circ
ulated with the Gospel of John. The first six Verses of 1st John, that is 1st J
ohn 1:1 – 6, are a Recapitulation of the Preface (or Opening Poem) of John 1:1 -
18.
What follows below is an excerpt from another Point of View in which I find many
Points that I can accept; however, the Author lacks a Hebraic Perspective which
leads him into much Misunderstandings. Having said all that, here is another a
nalysis:
1. The preface to the Gospel of John is poetry (John 1:1-18). This may be s
tating the obvious, but it is important to remember this when interpreting the v
erse.
2. The "In the beginning..." of John is obviously related in some way to th
e "in the beginning" of Genesis 1:1, but comparison with the same "beginning" in
1 John 1:1 (a letter which may have accompanied John’s Gospel) shows that the "
beginning" which John is talking about, concerns not the beginning of the earth,
but the beginning of the Gospel witnessed by the apostles (compare the use of t
he same Greek word ‘beginning’ in Mark 1:1, Luke 1:2, John 6:64, 8:25, 15:27, 16
:4, 1st John 1:1, 2:7,13,24, 3:11, 2nd John 5,6). Rather than being the "in the
beginning" of Genesis 1:1, John is making a comparison between the Genesis "begi
nning", and the more important new "beginning" found in his own Gospel. It also
is worth noting here that the word "Beginning" is a title of Christ (Colossians
1:18, Revelation 3:14, 21:6, 22:13).
3. "...was the Word": John’s "word" is obviously closely related in some wa
y to Christ, but the "word" is not simply another name for Jesus. If John had me
ant to write ‘in the beginning was Jesus Christ’ then he would have done so. Als
o it is often overlooked that the "word" is only one key word here; the ‘Life’ (
vs.4), and the ‘Light’ (vs.7-9), are also parts of what John is saying. None of
these words, ‘Word’, ‘Life’, ‘Light’ are simple substitutions for the name of Je
sus of Nazareth.
4. "...and the Word was with God": Even without any knowledge of the origin
al Bible languages it is clear that what follows cannot be the simple statement
"Jesus = God" that people want to read, because if the Word is simply Jesus he c
annot physically be "with God" (on the right hand of God perhaps?) and yet "be G
od" at the same time.
5. "...and the Word was God": This is not the only possible translation of
this phrase. Alternative renderings have included "and what God was, the Word wa
s", "the Word was divine" and so on. But if we remember what Christ himself said
about the meaning of the word "gods" in John 10:34-35 (mentioned earlier) then
this does not have to be the Trinitarian statement that many think.
6. "He..": The choice of "he" rather than "it" is the work of the English B
ible translators, not John. The pronoun here is no different from the usual word
for ‘it’ used for ‘word’ when it occurs in other contexts. The same is true of
the capital ‘W’ of "the Word" - this is not in the original text. It is odd that
the translators give "he" and a capital letter to "Word", but do not always do
so for "life" and "light" - again this is not a distinction made by John.
7. ".. was in the beginning with God": This is a repeat of John’s earlier "
with God" statement, but in different words. John’s repeated emphasis here that
the Word is something that is present with God, but distinct from God, is often
overlooked. John is choosing words carefully here to make clear that the word is
not identical to God. Most importantly John repeats in 1:2 the important time f
actor; When was the word with God? - "in the beginning" - the Mark 1:1 beginning
not Genesis 1:1.
8. "All things were made by him...": This is a major key to the context. By
comparing this with the rest of John’s writings we can see that by "all things"
John is not primarily concerned with the plants and animals of Genesis. What Jo
hn is concerned with here, and throughout his writings, is the "new creation" fo
und in the New Testament - which is very different from the old creation of Gene
sis. Similar language is used by Paul in Colossians 1:16 and Ephesians 3:9, but
in both cases comparison with Paul’s context (compare Colossians 1:15-18, 3:9-10
and Ephesians 2:10, 3:10, 4:24) shows that the creation which Paul is referring
to was made by means of Christ. This new creation is the creation of new men an
d women who are born again, and has nothing to do with the old creation of Adam
and Eve who were born of the dust (compare 2 Corinthians 5:17, Galatians 6:15, J
ames 1:18, Revelation 3:14).
According to the Trinitarian Doctrine, Point of View, Ideology John 1:1–3 offers
a Direct Statement of Yeshua’s Eternal Godhood (and his Unique position as a Ma
n-God), and offers Biblical Support for the Trinitarian Creed. I, in turn, have
offered an Analysis in Context, from a Hebraic World View, as a Poetic Preface
to the Gospel with all the intended Allusions and Duplicity of Meanings of certa
in Terms, and have offered up a second Analysis not from a Hebraic Perspective t
hat puts things back into their Proper Context and an alternative Analysis of th
e Poem.
It is my firm Belief that my and the alternative analysis have successfully Expl
ained Away, Countered, Debunked, Destroyed by using Common Sense the Lie being i
mposed upon Church Members by Trinitarians and the Beast.
I am going to be Brutally Honest, Blunt and Frank with you. By now you should h
ave already realized that the Tanakn (OT) was the only Holy Scripture for nearly
700 years after the Death of the Messiah. The Messiah Used, Read and Taught fr
om the Tanakn (OT) daily and said the Heavens and Earth will pass away before on
e jot or tittle of the Torah (Law) is aberated. The Apostles, Disciples and Ear
ly Church Missionaries Preached Salvation from the Tanakn and things they had se
en or heard of from someone who had seen them. The Tanakn (OT), contrary to wha
t a great many Churches and Pastors Preach and Teach, was and still is the Defin
itive Word of God.
The Early Church and Apostles exhorted Christians to Study the Scriptures (Tanak
n) to see if the things they had Heard or were Taught were True or False. To sa
y if something is True or False you should have at least 2 witnesses or 2 differ
ent Passages (in Context) or Sections of Scripture (at least one of which should
be from the Tanakn) that support your position, what you have Heard or what you
have been Taught.
To begin you must forget all the things you Believe to be True or False, forget
all the things you’ve been Taught is True or False, all the things you’ve been T
old is True or False. You MUST do these things to remove any Preconceived Notio
ns or Bias. And in as much as it is possible try to ‘see’ what you read through
Jewish Eyes because what you are reading was written by a Jew for a Jew from a
Jewish perspective. If you feel that you are unable to do that, I have an Extre
mely good Reference Book written about the Tanakn, from a Jewish perspective, by
an unbiased Jewish person who is recognized worldwide as an outstanding Biblica
l (both OT and NT) Scholar which may suffice on its own or at least give you a v
ery good starting point.
We will begin with the Idea of The Trinity because you can no longer Plead Innoc
ence or Deceit since you have Seen and Heard the Truth and accepted it by confes
sing that Yeshua is a Man and thereby destroying the Doctrine of a Trinity. I’d
hate to be you on Judgment Day when the LORD asks you “Why after Seeing, Hearin
g and Confessing the Truth did you retain the Mark of the Beast and Follow after
one of her harlots”? “Why did you continue to go Whoring after Idols and False
gods”?
Once you have a few of these Studies under your belt, you will find that it beco
mes easier and easier. I chose the Trinity because I fear for your Salvation du
e to the afore mentioned Conditions and because the Idea or Teachings of a Trini
ty is easy to Study and renders a definitive True or False decision without a lo
t of work. And the Lord (Yeshua) made the Study of God of Supreme Importance wh
en He said: And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God,
and Yeshua Chirst whom You have sent.
Are you ready? Let’s begin. First of all Forget whatever it is that you’ve bee
n told about the Tanakn (OT). It was not “Fulfilled” with the Death and Resurre
ction of the Messiah. It did not Pass Away with the Ending of the Old Age and B
eginning of the New Age. The Tanakn (OT) did not become Obsolete with the Endin
g of the Old Covenant or Superseded by the New Testament and start of the New Co
venant. Forget whatever it was that you were told or taught that has kept you f
rom Studying the Tanakn (OT) because it’s just another Lie propagated by the Bea
st through the Church to cover up their False Doctrine and Lies.
Do remember that the Messiah Himself Read, Studied and Taught from the Tanakn ev
eryday. And that Yeshua the Only Begotten Son of YHWH said the Heavens and Eart
h shall pass away before any part of the Tanakn was invalidated. Also keep in m
ind that the Tanakn was the Only Holy Scripture anyone had for the first 700 yea
rs. Do remember that within the Tanakn lies Truth, Wisdom and Understanding all
of which the Beast and the Church wants to hide from people who could expose th
eir False Doctrine and Lies.
Let’s begin our Search for the Truth about the Doctrine of a Trinity. We won’t
need to consult a Concordance to find out where the instructions are for determi
ning if a god is True or False, and if the god(s) are False what to do about it’
s follower(s). The Test to see if a god(s) is True or False can be found in the
13th Chapter of Deuteronomy, but we’ll have to perform the Test and determine t
he Outcome before a Second Witness can be named.
You realize that we are doing precisely what the Beast and the Church were tryin
g to stop don’t you? We are going to use the same Scriptures that our Beloved M
essiah used and the Only Scriptures that the Church Recognized as being Valid an
d Used for the first 700 years of it’s Existence. Doesn’t it make you wonder ho
w the Church could call the Tanakn the Only Valid Scriptures and the Letters and
Manuscripts being circulated, which later became the New Testament, as Invalid
for use as Holy Scriptures or the Inspired Word of God? How could the Tanakn be
Valid enough to have the Trinitarian Creed and many other Creeds, Doctrines, Do
gma and Edicts from the Pope developed from it and then some 700 years later be
Declared Invalid since the Death of and Resurrection of Yeshua? If True it foll
ows that the Trinitarian Creed and all the other Creeds, Doctrine, Dogma and Chu
rch Edicts are also Invalid, doesn’t it? I find it all to be more than a little
disconcerting!
I hope I don’t have to Justify the Tanakn (OT) as the Inspired Word of God. Why
do I keep calling it the Tanakn instead of it’s name, The Old Testament? I do
it for 2 reasons. One out of respect to the Jewish people who find the term Old
Testament insulting. And two because the term Old carries the connotation of s
omething no longer used and replaced by something New. Yes the Tanakn is Ancien
t of Days, but God’s Word never grows Old nor can they ever be replaced. God’s
word is Eternal, and the idea that it is no longer good for Study because all th
ings in it have been Fulfilled and that since the Old Covenant has been Replaced
by the New Covenant, the New Testament has become the New Authority on God’s Wo
rd, is a Lie propagated by the Beast and her Master, Satan.
Having said that, let’s Study Chapter 13 of Deuteronomy. First of all it is sho
rt and gets right to the point without allowing any Grey Areas to cloud the issu
e. The issue being how to recognize a False god from The True God when a Dreame
r, Prophet or anyone else says “Come let us go and Worship God”.
The Test is very simple and entirely Black and White. Is his god the same God y
ou and all your forefathers have always Worshipped? If the answer is No then yo
u are Commanded to kill him. If it’s a whole city you are Commanded to kill all
the people including women and babies; furthermore, you are to gather all the p
lunder and bring it to the town square and burn it. So the test we have to perf
orm is to see if the “New” Christian God is the same God that God that brought I
srael out of Bondage in Egypt.
Let’s think this through because the answer to that question will have Profound
Consequences, not so much for me, but with dire consequences for you if the answ
er is False. Let us begin with the easiest and simplest of questions, is his Na
me Yahweh, I AM or EL? DO NOT WALK AWAY OR CLOSE THIS DOCUMENT!
The Trinitarian Doctrine holds that Yahweh is God the Father who is 1 of 3 Perso
nages that make up an Unnamed Godhead! The Trinity FAILS the Test! The answer
to the question is a resounding No!
I chose God’s name because God’s name is Eternal. You told me that the reason t
he Trinity took so long to develop was that it took that long for the Church Lea
ders to realize that God was a Triune God. They could change the name of Yeshua
because they had possession of all the Manuscripts which called him Yeshua and
had all the Manuscripts not in their possession BURNED, but the Tanakn was held
and maintained by the Jews. They could not change God’s name!
Maybe I’m jumping the gun. Let’s apply the same Test to both Yeshua and jesus.
Both names Fail! Yeshua is NOT a god! I’m not even go through the motions for
the Holy Spirit because if has no Name!
I am absolutely certain that the Church Leaders right down to the Pastor Level h
ave both Read and Contemplated Chapter 13 of Deuteronomy. But in my 56 years of
life I have never heard Chapter 13 of Deuteronomy Preached about, used as a Ref
erence, Taught or Used in any manner at a Church Service, Sunday School, Bible S
tudy or Church Sponsored Event and I wonder why that is.
It occurs to me that Chapter 13 of the Book of Deuteronomy is Highly Relevant in
today’s time of New Religions, New Churches, New Splinter Groups, New Denominat
ions, New Sects and New Cults. It is of Supreme Importance for Potential New Me
mbers of said groups to be able to determine if they will be Worshipping the Onl
y True God, and to Existing Churches to show members that they are Worshipping t
he Only True God.
Your Salvation REQUIRES that you aren’t Worshipping a False god(s). The Worship
of False gods is considered Idolatry and is the Number One Sin on God’s list of
‘Thou shall not’s. When you stand before the Judgment Seat and say “Lord I hav
e Known you and Worshipped you since the Age of Knowledge” that the Lord will re
ply “Man I do not know you”. It is that Important. So Why is the Church Hiding
this simple Test? Why is the Church trying doing all it can to Stop the Study
of the Tanakn? Why is the Church doing all it can to Invalidate the Tanakn?
Contemplate the Findings of the Test and Pray for answers to these questions. P
ray Diligently with much Fasting. Seek the answers as if they were Buried Treas
ure. Seek the answers with all your Heart, all your Mind, all your Strength and
all your Soul. Your Salvation depends on your Decision about the Test and
your Salvation depends upon your answers to those Questions!
Do you still Love your church and her Doctrine more than the Eternal Wor
d of Yahweh? You Destroyed the Trinity when you agreed that Yeshua was a man, a
nd now the Eternal Words of Yahweh Destroy the Trinity. Yahweh’s Mercy may be I
nfinite, but His Patience is not. Idolatry or the Worship of False gods is His
number one No-No.
Earlier in this paper I said there were two Greek words which were left
untranslated: baptize and antichrist. The church and Clergy have endorsed the b
rief mention of antichrist in the Book of Revelations as the primary Reference a
nd that it is speaking of some super-human who will rise to power in the Last Da
ys and will give out a Mark to those who follow him.
This whole notion is a willful, intentional LIE told with malicious inte
nt to hide the true meaning of antichrist. The Greek word antichristos is easil
y translated into English:
1. adversary of Messiah
2. usurper of Messiah
3. instead of Messiah
4. opposite to Messiah (or in opposition to Messiah)
5. in place of Messiah (a replacement or counterfeit Messiah)
That isn’t quite what you were expecting is it? The word antichrist has nothing
to do with a man. Antichrist is an idea. An ideology. A Doctrine. More to t
he point it speaks to a False Doctrine. What False Doctrine? 1st John 4:2 – 3
clearly defines how to tell the Truth from the False Doctrine.
1 John 4:2 - 3 (KJV)
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Yeshua Mes
siah is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that
Yeshua Messiah is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of a
ntichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it
in the world.
In other words: Every Doctrine that says Yeshua was a man is of God, and
every Doctrine that saus Yeshua is a man-god is of the Spirit of antichrist. W
hy? How can I say that? Turn back a page to the definitions of antichrist. Th
e False Doctrine says Yeshua was a man-god and is therefore an Usurper of, a Rep
lacement of the True Messiah who was and is a man.
The Greek term rendered "flesh" is sarx {sarx}, and the corresponding Hebrew wor
d is basar { baw-sawr }. Both words mean pure flesh and blood - fully human, ve
rses the human-God the church creeds attempt to define. There is nothing in the
Greek or the Hebrew that implies anything more than 100 percent human flesh and
blood! Which means the Trinity Doctrine is a False Doctrine and is of the Spir
it of antichrist! Now are you beginning to see why the church and Translators n
ever translated antichrist? Why the church and Clergy are trying to redirect yo
ur attention to Revelations and a Man called Antichrist (which is another willfu
l and intentional LIE).
So you think that’s only my opinion of an isolated verse, try 1st John 2:18 – 19
.
1 John 2:18 - 19 (NKJV)
18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichri
st is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is t
he last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had
been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they migh
t be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
I told you before that I speak the Truth and can support what I say with
Scripture. So another witness: 1st John 4:6.
1 John 4:6 (NKJV)
6 We are of God. He who knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear u
s. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.
Thus, the "spirit of antichrist" is equated to a "spirit of error". Clearly, an
tichrist represents an error. a False Teaching, a False Doctrine that was and I
S being spread.
NOTE: "spirit of antichrist" = erroneous doctrine. The antichrist is primarily
the representative of a set of False Teachings or Doctrine, not simply some futu
re possible world religious/political figure!
So, the "antichrist" was and IS representative of a Doctrine or set of Doctrines
that oppose the truth concerning Messiah (Christ). This set of Doctrines were
already being spread in the latter part of the first century as false teachers b
etrayed the truth and went out promoting teachings that were and ARE in oppositi
on to the TRUE Messiah.
Again even more Biblical Support can be found in 2nd John 7.
2 John 7 (NKJV)
7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess (acknowledg
e) Yeshua Messiah as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
This is almost the same warning given in 1st John 4:2 - 3. Once again we may be
getting warned to beware of those who do not confess or acknowledge that Yeshua
Messiah (Jesus Christ) is 100 percent, pure flesh and blood. Note how this was
AN antichrist; thereby, implying there is more than one. It could not have bee
n made much clearer in warning us of the Trinity Doctrine!
There very well may be a Religious/Political Figure who will rise to a Position
of great Power in the Last Days. Personally I believe it to be so, but this doe
s not take away from my analysis of antichrist, it’s meaning and it’s misuse by
the church and the Clergy.
You may be wondering if I feel that the church is the Great Harlot riding on the
back of the Dragon, with what group do I associate myself with? I have yet to
contact them, but my Ideology, Theology and Christology match up perfectly (yes,
perfectly believe it or not) with the Monotheistic Messianic’s. I don’t know w
here the nearest local Chapter is for I’ve been far to busy with research to fin
d out.
To be exact and precise the Beast refers to a Nation, Nations, Kingdom or Politi
cal Entity, while the Harlot is a Religious Entity. If you do a little Biblical
Research you’ll find References all the way back to the times of the Tanakn.
The Relationship between the Beast and Harlot is a Satanic Marriage between the
Government (Beast) and the Spiritual Power of that Government (Harlot). And the
re is a large amount of Historic and Biblical Support that defines the Beast as
the Physical Manifestation of the Spiritual Harlot.
The Harlot is the ancient Babylonian sun-god mystery religion which continues to
this day as the primary opponent to God’s Word. The idea of the Harlot did NOT
begin with the writing of Revelation as the church would have you believe. The
Harlot is first mentioned in the Book of Nahum which was written long before th
e Babylonian Captivity!
Nahum 3:4 – 6 (KJV)
3:4 Because of the multitude of the whoredoms of the wellfavoured harlot, the mi
stress of witchcrafts, that selleth nations through her whoredoms, and families
through her witchcrafts. 3:5 Behold, I am against thee, saith the LORD of hosts
; and I will discover thy skirts upon thy face, and I will shew the nations thy
nakedness, and the kingdoms thy shame. 3:6 And I will cast abominable filth upo
n thee, and make thee vile, and will set thee as a gazingstock.
Because she is mentioned by the Prophet Nahum and because she is describ
ed as (Revelation 17:5) "upon her forehead a name was written, a mystery, BABYLO
N THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." proves
her to have originated in Babylon at least as far back as the times of Nimrod!
The point I’m trying to make (without much success) is that the Beast is
the Physical Manifestation, as the Kingdom of Nineveh, of the Spiritual Great H
arlot. They are so inexorably tied together that it is impossible to tell where
one ends and the other begins. Therefore one may use the terms Beast and Harlo
t interchangeably without affecting the Truth of what is being said.
 Having established a Historical Context of the Beast/Harlot, let’s move
on to what is probably the most talked about and lest understood topic by Christ
ians, The Mark of the Beast.
There are many varying opinions as to what this "mark" is. Most limit t
he definition to the last days and promote it as being some sort of literal or v
isible mark, logo, stamp, implant, identity chip, or sign. Most also seem to fe
el it is necessary to understand the mysterious meaning behind the number 666, w
hich is mentioned in a single passage within the context of the discussion regar
ding the Mark. Of course, since some manuscripts have the number as 616, it is
unwise to focus on the number as one seeks to understand the Mark since there is
no absolute agreement as to whether 666 is the correct number. Regardless, It
is NOT necessary to understand the nebulous and widely varying concepts of the n
umber 666 in order to determine what is the Mark of the Beast.
Let me say that again. It is NOT necessary to understand the nebulous a
nd widely varying concepts of the number 666 in order to determine what is the M
ark of the Beast.
Everyone I have known, seen or heard (save the Monotheistic Messianic’s)
use the Scriptures to define what The Mark of the Beast is nor (surprise, surpr
ise) what The Mark of God is. They all want to define The Mark of the Beast usi
ng wild and crazy scenarios endorsed by the church and Hollywood, and totally mi
ss the equally important Mark of God!
Insofar as The Mark of the Beast goes they have forgotten 1st Corinthian
s 14:33 “for God is not the author of Confusion”. Common Sense dictates that Go
d would not leave a concept as important as the Mark unsupported. There is Bibl
ical Support for the Mark of God from which The Mark of the Beast can easily be
deduced. The Support is plain to read and not given to wild and fanciful Alleg
ory or Hidden Meanings.
And again I have to ask, if I, a mere Layperson can find and figure thes
e things out, then most assuredly the church Clergy and church Leaders have know
n of this for Ages. Why would they hide it and promote this wild speculation?
Instead of using my own meager studies I am going to add this Source Doc
ument. I do not intend to Plagiarize another work, but since this Document is m
eant for my children and not for Public consumption, I am going to reprint a por
tion of one of my Source Documents. © Copyright 2001, TorahofMessiah.com.
What is meant by the term "mark?"
Most traditional Christians and Messianics are familiar with the following passa
ge found in Revelation, which discusses the Beast s mark.
Revelation 13:16 (KJV)
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to re
ceive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
The importance of understanding the true definition of this mark is obvious from
other passages in Revelation. If we do not grasp the actual SCRIPTURAL meaning
we may unknowingly accept the mark of the Beast and find ourselves in oppositio
n to God when He pours out His wrath upon mankind at that time when His limit of
mercy is reached and necessary justice is finally administered. Therefore, it
is fair to say there are few issues for which a clear, Scriptural understanding
is more crucial. The following passages illustrate the seriousness of this issu
e as we read of the fate of those that choose to accept the "mark of the Beast."
Revelation 14:9-11 (KJV)
9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worshi
p the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out wi
thout mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fi
re and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the
Lamb: 11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they
have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever
receiveth the mark of his name.
Revelation 16:2 (KJV)
2 And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a n
oisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon
them which worshipped his image.
Revelation 19:20 (KJV)
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles
before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast
, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of
fire burning with brimstone.
The context of Revelation from which these passages are found discusses the "Bea
st," and how that Beast will cause many to receive a mark in their right hand or
in their foreheads (Rev. 13:16). Before continuing, let s first grasp the mean
ing of the Greek word charagma (khar-ag-mah), which is here translated as "mark.
"
The Enhanced Strong s Lexicon (Strong s # 5480) shows that in the Authorized Ver
sion (KJV) the Greek word charagma is translated as "mark" eight times and "grav
en" once. Strong s further defines charagma as:
1. a stamp, an imprinted mark.
o of the mark stamped on the forehead or the right hand as the badge of th
e followers of the Antichrist [there is a traditional error here that I will sho
rtly describe]
o the mark branded upon horses
2. thing carved, sculpture, graven work.
o of idolatrous images.
Interestingly, with one exception, the ONLY place in the New Testament where the
Greek word charagma is used is with reference to the "mark" of the Beast!
The New Strong s Dictionary of Hebrew and Greek Words defines charagma as:
charagma, a scratch or etching, i.e. stamp (as a badge of servitude), or sculptu
red figure (statue):- graven, mark.
The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament states the following with regard
to this Greek word:
charagma [mark, stamp]
Marking is common in antiquity (cf. slaves, and the branding of devotees with th
e marks of deities).
The Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains gives u
s crucial insight into the meaning of charagma when it states:
A strictly literal translation of the mark of the beast might imply a picture
of the beast or a mark made by the beast. A more satisfactory indication of
the relationship between mark and beast would be a mark showing one s relat
ionship to the beast or a mark of loyalty to the beast or a mark of the part
y of the beast.
A further insightful note can be grasped from another comment in the Theological
Dictionary of the New Testament with regard to this mysterious mark.
In Rev. 17:5 the harlot, who personifies all worldly abominations, whether concr
etely as Rome or abstractly as a demonic power, bears on her forehead the mark o
f her true nature in a mysterious allusion to Babylon. The basis is the modish
custom of Roman harlots, who had their names on bands round their foreheads.
What religious organization is most closely associated with Rome? What religion
originated from this Roman empire? Also, note in Revelation this great harlot
is called the mother of harlots; thus, clearly implying many other harlots spran
g from her and still promote the foundational false teachings which she establis
hed. Who is the great Harlot? Who are her daughters and thus harlots themselv
es? Think on these things. They may very well set you free from the harlot s e
mbrace if you allow sincerity and truth to guide you instead of your own wishes.
The earlier definition in Strong s presents a slight error. Sadly, this error a
ppears in other sources and is commonly promoted from pulpits worldwide. It is
with regard to the mention of the "Antichrist." Why does Strong s imply the "ma
rk of the Beast" is given by the "Antichrist?" The term "antichrist" is complet
ely absent from the Biblical context in which we find the "mark of the Beast" me
ntioned. In fact, the term antichrist is found ONLY in the epistles of John; th
erefore, obviously the term "Antichrist" is nowhere found in the book of Revelat
ion! So, I ask again, why mention the "Antichrist" as being the one that allege
dly gives out the mark?
The reason Strong s and other sources imply the "mark of the Beast" is the mark
of the "antichrist" is because of the traditional decoys of deception Christian
leaders hope to plant in the minds of sincere seekers of truth. They hope that
by planting an antichrist decoy (one of many such tricks), you will be drawn off
the path that leads to discovering the TRUE meaning of the mark - a discovery C
hristianity and her counterfeit Messianic offspring struggle to prevent. Their
intent is to misdirect the sincere student of Scripture into accepting false con
cepts of both the antichrist and the Beast. I discuss the TRUE meaning of antic
hrist in a separate article. Oddly, Strong s is actually unintentionally reveal
ing partial truth by bringing antichrist into the discussion, since it is the an
tichrist/anti-messiah promoters (those promoting the spirit of delusion) that ar
e lead by - and represent - the Beast. Therefore, even though the "antichrist"
is not the one giving out the mark, the Beast that promotes the antichrist decep
tion is. (NOTE: antichrist means anti-Messiah, which is a teaching that promotes
a replacement Messiah deception.) So, Strong s accidentally provides us valuab
le insight, or perhaps he was more aware of truth than Christian leaders realize
. The result of this insight will become apparent as we continue in our discuss
ion of the "mark of the Beast."
An important consideration most miss is the rendering of the Greek word epi (ep-
ee ), which the King James Version translates as "in" in Revelation 13:16 - "...
in their right hand, or in their forehead ...". The Enhanced Strong s Lexicon
(Strong s # 1909) shows epi can be rendered as "on," "in," "upon," as well as ot
her possible renderings. Other versions render the word as "on;" however, the p
oint to remember is that it can be "in" or "on." So, don t allow yourself to st
ubbornly cling to an understanding that the mark is applied ONTO something. It
can just as well be applied INSIDE something.
So, summarizing the information gathered from these sources we can state the fol
lowing with regard to the deeper meaning of the Greek word that is translates as
"mark" in Revelation:
1. This mark is almost certainly a symbolic stamp or sign and is not to be
taken literally as many zealously and blindly claim.
2. This mark will be SYMBOLICALLY placed on - OR INSIDE - the forehead and/
or right hand.
3. The mark historically symbolizes servitude or allegiance to the one from
whom the mark is received.
4. The mark symbolizes the relationship existing between those that decide
to receive it and the Beast (or his agents) from whom it is received. It shows
the recipients of the mark to be loyal to the Beast and among his willful follow
ers.
5. The harlot of Revelation 17:5, historically and almost universally accep
ted as representing Rome and the evil Babylonian mystery religion that has conti
nuously opposed the true faith, "bears on her forehead the mark of her true natu
re in a mysterious allusion to Babylon."
6. Though I did not specifically discuss it, the verb translated as "receiv
e" in Rev. 13:16 is in the subjunctive mood, which implies uncertainty. One can
not "receive" something unless they "accept" it, which implies willingness. Thu
s, the mark is not forced, though there may be various levels of persuasion used
. Ultimately, those that receive the mark do so of their own free will.
The overwhelming implication from all sources referenced clearly shows "mark of
the Beast" is NOT a physical mark. Instead, by compiling the available informat
ion the clearest meaning of the mark is as a FIGURATIVELY SYMBOLIC sign that dis
tinguishes those having it as being followers of the Satanic Beast. In short, i
t is a spiritual mark, which exposes the hearts and minds of those receiving it.
It shows to whom they willingly give their allegiance.
Is there a mark of God? If so, what is it?
Now, let s look at other passages of Scripture that traditional Christian and co
unterfeit Messianic leaders seem to purposely overlook and hope you never discov
er. As you will see, these passages remove the shroud of mystery they hope rema
ins in place.
Within the Torah, which is Genesis through Deuteronomy (Hebrew word Torah means
"instruction" or "teaching") we read the following:
Exodus 13:9 (NASB)
9 And it shall serve as a sign to you on your hand, and as a reminder on your fo
rehead, that the law of the Lord may be in your mouth; for with a powerful hand
the Lord brought you out of Egypt.
Exodus 13:16 (NRSV)
16 It shall serve as a sign on your hand and as an emblem on your forehead that
by strength of hand the Lord brought us out of Egypt.
Deuteronomy 6:8 (NRSV)
8 Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead,
Deuteronomy 11:18 (NRSV)
18 You shall put these words of mine in your heart and soul, and you shall bind
them as a sign on your hand, and fix them as an emblem on your forehead.
Most Christians are not even aware of these verses since they rarely or never re
ad the Torah or the Tanakh (Older Testament), which Messiah Yeshua and ALL his f
ollowers considered to be THE Holy Scriptures! (Of course, they rarely read it
because they have been deceived by the servants of Satan into believing that stu
dy of the Tanakh is unnecessary or "legalistic".)
What is the obvious fact one should immediately notice from these passages? Wha
t figuratively leaps from the pages as we discuss the issue of the mark of the B
east? Allow me to again present the passage from Revelation.
Revelation 13:16 (KJV)
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to re
ceive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Almost the exact same phrase is used with respect to a mark - or sign! However,
the passages from Torah show the mark to be the mark of God, whereas the passage
from Revelation refers to the mark of the Satanic Beast.
The Hebrew word rendered "sign" is presented by the Enhanced Strong s Lexicon to
be a sign, a distinguishing mark, an omen, a token, etc. The root word from wh
ich it derives implies "to consent" or "to agree." This is almost certainly the
word John was considering when he penned Revelation, since John was a Hebrew man
that spoke Hebrew as his native tongue and lived, thought, and wrote entirely f
rom his Hebraic world view. So, what we have here is the equivalent word used i
n Revelation. They both mean exactly the same thing! The word translated as "ma
rk" in Revelation and "sign" in Torah are the same word that has simply been wri
tten in the separate languages of Hebrew and Greek and translated into English.
Now let s look more closely at the verses quoted from Torah. Unlike the mark of
the Beast, the mark (sign) of God is easily grasped from the direct reading of
the passages in which it is mentioned. I will show later that although Torah pr
esents more than one "sign" or "mark" they can actually be considered as one; th
us, I will refer to these signs of God in a singular form as representing an all
encompassing sign (mark).
There is no need for speculative theories to determine the unambiguous definitio
n of the sign or mark of God. I will let the ONE and ONLY YHWH Elohim - the Alm
ighty Creator - tell us from His ETERNAL Torah what the mark (sign) is that thos
e devoted to Him will choose to accept of their own free will. God s mark - or
sign - is obvious. All that is required for one to determine the meaning is a s
imple reading of Scripture.
I will first examine Exodus 13:9,16 then Deuteronomy 11:18, and lastly (and most
importantly) Deuteronomy 6:8.
The sign of Exodus chapter 13
To limit the size of the article, I will not quote the context of Torah from whi
ch these verses were taken. You can easily verify what I will say by simply rea
ding Exodus yourself. When you do so you will see there is no argument that the
sign to which God is referring is Passover.
Exodus 13:9, 16 (KJV)
9 And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial betwe
en thine eyes, (alternate rendering of "on your forehead") that YHWH s law may b
e in thy mouth: for with a strong hand hath YHWH brought thee out of Egypt. ...
16 And it shall be for a token upon thine hand, and for frontlets between thine
eyes (alternate rendering of "on your forehead"): for by strength of hand YHWH b
rought us forth out of Egypt.
So, here in Exodus 13 God presents us with a sign (mark) that we may choose to a
ccept or reject. However, as you will see with your continued study of this topi
c, Passover is actually a sign WITHIN a much broader and central sign or mark of
God.
The sign of Deuteronomy chapter 11
Next we will look at Deuteronomy 11:18. To further impress upon you the full mea
ning of the sign of God I will include the crucial context in which Dt. 11:18 re
sides. To make it appear slightly more readable I will quote from the New King J
ames Version; however, every version I checked says the same thing in slightly d
ifferent words. I will enclose explanatory comments in parenthesis ( ).
Deuteronomy 11:18-28 (NKJV)
18 Therefore you shall lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul
, and bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between y
our eyes. (alternate rendering of "on your forehead")
19 You shall teach them to your children, speaking of them when you sit in your
house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up.
20 And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates, (G
od s Torah - teachings - shall be the focus of your life)
21 that your days and the days of your children may be multiplied in the land of
which the Lord swore to your fathers to give them, like the days of the heavens
above the earth.
22 For if you carefully keep all these commandments which I command you to do -
to love the Lord your God, to walk in all His ways (obedience is the test of tru
e love for God), and to hold fast to Him -
23 then the Lord will drive out all these nations from before you, and you will
dispossess greater and mightier nations than yourselves.
24 Every place on which the sole of your foot treads shall be yours: from the wi
lderness and Lebanon, from the river, the River Euphrates, even to the Western S
ea, shall be your territory.
25 No man shall be able to stand against you; the Lord your God will put the dre
ad of you and the fear of you upon all the land where you tread, just as He has
said to you.
26 Behold, I set before you today (God gives you a choice) a blessing and a curs
e:
27 the blessing, if you obey the commandments of the Lord your God which I comma
nd you today;
28 and the curse, if you do not obey the commandments of the Lord your God, but
turn aside from the way which I command you today, to go after other gods which
you have not known. (note I have a separate article that discusses if you are be
ing lead to worship "other gods.")
The true context of these passages is Deuteronomy chapter 5 through chapter 11.
I very much advise you to read the book of Deuteronomy and plead with you to do
so. At the very least read chapters 5 through 11.
Friend, the sign of God, which He tells us to bind as "a sign on your hand, and
they shall be as frontlets between your eyes" (or "emblem on your forehead" in o
ther versions) is TORAH - the very Torah traditional Christianity and even count
erfeit Messianism teaches is abolished, unnecessary, or optional! So, here we s
ee a verse which shows Torah (Hebrew for instructions or teachings) is THE SIGN
OR MARK ACCEPTED BY THOSE THAT ARE TRUE CHILDREN OF GOD! But I m not through yet
. There is more proof that Torah is the mark of God!
The sign of Deuteronomy chapter 6
Let us now continue to the verse from Deuteronomy chapter 6. As with the verse
just studied, I will quote a portion of the local context and comment where nece
ssary within it. I will again quote from the New King James Version; however, a
s before, all versions agree. Read them yourself if you doubt me.
Deuteronomy 6:1-17 (NKJV)
1 Now this is the commandment, and these are the statutes and judgments which th
e Lord your God has commanded to teach you, that you may observe them in the lan
d which you are crossing over to possess,
2 that you may fear the Lord your God, to keep all His statutes and His commandm
ents which I command you, you and your son and your grandson, all the days of yo
ur life, and that your days may be prolonged.
3 Therefore hear, O Israel, and be careful to observe it, that it may be well wi
th you, and that you may multiply greatly as the Lord God of your fathers has pr
omised you - a land flowing with milk and honey.
4 Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! (alternate renderings: "The
Lord is our God, the Lord alone,", or "The Lord our God is one Lord," or "The L
ord is our God, the Lord is one.")
5 You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and
with all your strength. (THE TEST OF LOVE FOR GOD IS OBEDIENCE TO HIS ETERNAL TO
RAH!)
6 And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart.
7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when
you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you
rise up.
8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets bet
ween your eyes. (alternate rendering of "on your forehead")
9 You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates. (God s
Torah - teachings - shall be the focus of your life)
10 So it shall be, when the Lord your God brings you into the land of which He s
wore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to give you large and beauti
ful cities which you did not build,
11 houses full of all good things, which you did not fill, hewn-out wells which
you did not dig, vineyards and olive trees which you did not plant - when you ha
ve eaten and are full -
12 then beware, lest you forget the Lord who brought you out of the land of Egyp
t, from the house of bondage.
13 You shall fear the Lord your God and serve Him, and shall take oaths in His n
ame.
14 You shall not go after other gods, the gods of the peoples who are all around
you
15 for the Lord your God is a jealous God among you, lest the anger of the Lord
your God be aroused against you and destroy you from the face of the earth.
16 You shall not tempt the Lord your God as you tempted Him in Massah.
17 You shall diligently keep the commandments of the Lord your God, His testimon
ies, and His statutes which He has commanded you.
How can anyone with the ability to read (or hear) not see the obvious message pr
esented in these verses. The mark of God is unmistakably and repeatedly stated t
o be HIS Eternal torah (Law)! Furthermore, this mark or sign is clearly shown t
o be ALL of Torah, not just scattered portions some wish to obey. There is also
no hint that Torah observance is "optional", as most counterfeit Messianic and
Nazarene leaders teach, for those wishing to accept God s mark!
In both contexts of Deuteronomy, which define the sign (mark) of God, we find:
1. GOD GIVES US A CHOICE!
2. we are to obey the Torah
3. we are to teach the Torah
4. we are to talk of the Torah
5. we are to show that we love God through obedience to Torah
6. we are to LIVE the Torah by sincerely striving to obey the God we claim
to love.
7. we are given the chance to accept the Mark of God, which is undeniably t
he Eternal Teachings given through Moses - THE TORAH!!!
8. Despite this, there is literally a hatred of Torah - or at the very leas
t apathy - within Christianity!
NOTE: With both the mark of God AND the mark of the Beast we are given a choice
. Ultimately - indeed ever since the dawn of time - the exact same choice has e
xisted. The "mark of the Beast" is actually nothing new! The choice was, is, a
nd will be whether to choose and accept the mark of God or the mark of the enemy
(Beast).
We have within the just quoted verses a passage that Yeshua the Messiah stated a
s being THE MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL COMMANDMENTS! Note the very words of Yeshua
in the following passage as he quotes Deuteronomy 6:4,5.
Mark 12:28-30 (NASB)
28 And one of the scribes came and heard them arguing, and recognizing that He h
ad answered them well, asked Him, "What commandment is the foremost of all?" 29
Yeshua answered, "The foremost is, HEAR, O ISRAEL! THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD
; 30 AND YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR
SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH.
A parallel passage from Matthew 22:36-40 presents the second most important comm
andment.
Mt 22:36-40 (KJV)
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Yeshua said unto him, T
hou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and w
ith all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second
is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two comma
ndments hang all the law and the prophets.
Most Christians do not have the slightest notion of the importance of the "Shema
" Yeshua is quoting in Matthew chapter 22 and Mark chapter 12 or that this very
same Shema is inseparable from and included within the mark of God! The Shema t
hat Yeshua quoted here is from the verses previously quoted from Deuteronomy, wh
ich is itself part of Torah (Torah is Genesis through Deuteronomy).
Deuteronomy 6:4,5 (NASB)
4 "Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one! 5 "And you shall love t
he Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mi
ght.
The LORD is 1 - not 3 or 2 comprising 1, but ONE!
Many a Jew and True Monotheistic Messianic (vs. today s counterfeit Messianics)
have died with this verse on their lips or have resisted the murderous tortures
and condemnations of the church as "Christians" tried to force acceptance of Yes
hua as God. Instead of violating the Shema and faith in the ONE and ONLY YHWH,
these courageous believers chose death or persecutions (and we still are). The
Shema - in the Hebrew - actually emphasized that YHWH A-L-O-N-E is the Eternal E
lohim (God)!
The Shema is THE foundational element of the "mark of God". Since traditional C
hristianity and counterfeit Messianism have forsaken the truth of the One YHWH,
most reject, through their promotion of another god, this "foremost commandment"
.
Here Yeshua is elevating the Shema - the recognition of the One and ONLY YHWH -
to the status of the most important commandment of all. Most Christians miss th
is entirely because of their failure to understand the exalted importance Yeshua
(as shown here) places upon the recognition of ONE (not 3 in 1) God. Sadly, Ch
ristians often violate this "foremost" commandment.
There are those that twist and stretch the Hebrew word for one - echad - {ay-kod
} - into being a "compound unity". However, this desperate attempt at word gam
es to "prove" the Trinity has been abandoned by many. I have a separate article
that discusses the word games many play with the Hebrew words Elohim and Echad,
which exposes the deceit behind their wicked attempt to distort truth.
More support for the ONE God is found in this small sampling of the MANY other S
criptural passages:
Deuteronomy 4:35; 39 (NKJV)
35 To you it was shown, that you might know that the Lord Himself is God; there
is none other besides Him. ... 39 Therefore know this day, and consider it in yo
ur heart, that the Lord Himself is God in heaven above and on the earth beneath;
there is no other.
1 Corinthians 8:4 (NKJV)
4 Therefore concerning the eating of things offered to idols, we know that an id
ol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God but one.
Ephesians 4:4-6 (NKJV)
4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your
calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is
above all, and through all, and in you all.
It is proven elsewhere on this site that this ONE God is NOT a Trinity God and i
s NOT the Messiah! This God is, instead, the very God Yeshua the Messiah worshi
pped, promoted, obeyed, and died serving so that we can have the hope of a resur
rection to eternal life by the very same ONE God that resurrected him.
The "second" most important commandment according to Yeshua is from Leviticus 19
:18, which is also within Torah; therefore, it is also a component of the mark o
f God.
Leviticus 19:18 (NASB)
18 You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the sons of your pe
ople, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the LORD.
It is always amazing to me to find so many Christians that do not even realize Y
eshua was quoting and honoring Torah (Lev. 19:18) when he said, "thou shalt love
thy neighbor as thyself". They seem to feel this was a "new" Christian teachin
g Yeshua was promoting. Instead, as with virtually everything Yeshua taught, it
came straight from Torah, since Yeshua - more than anyone in human history - gl
adly chose to accept the mark of God by devoted obedience to TORAH!
Summarizing what we now know regarding the mark of God, we can state the followi
ng:
1. The "mark of God" is very clearly defined - in no uncertain terms - to b
e Torah! To say otherwise is to ignore some of the clearest passages in all of
Scripture. Despite this, traditional Christianity DOES say otherwise!
2. Yeshua fully endorsed and obeyed Torah; thus accepting the mark of his G
od and ours. Anyone claiming to follow Messiah that fails to endorse and/or obey
Torah, is NOT a follower of the TRUE Messiah!
3. THE foundational aspect of the "mark of God" and THE most important pass
age in all of Scripture according to Yeshua is the Shema, which declares God to
be ONE and ONLY One - NOT a Trinity God - not a Binity God - and not a man-God M
essiah!
So, what now begins to become obvious regarding WHO is the Beast and WHAT is his
mark?
Why common concepts of the "mark of the Beast" are incorrect
At this point I will point out why some of the common definitions for the mark c
annot possibly be correct - or at the very least find very little support from S
cripture. Some of the common sensationalized concepts of the mark present it as
being:
1. an implanted ID chip
2. an ID card
3. a common currency or some other "global" object of trade or identificati
on. Some consider the "cashless" society to be the means by which mankind will
receive the mark through the exclusive use of credit cards or debit cards.
4. There are numerous variations of these common themes.
There is a common problem shared by all such concepts, which proves them to be i
ncorrect. That problem is that NONE of these imply rebellion against God! How
does the use of a debit card show one to be sinful? How does accepting an ID ca
rd indicate spiritual rebellion? How can it be shown that an implanted chip pro
ves one to be practicing willful disobedience to God? Frankly, these common con
cepts are outrageous and do NOT, in any way, show one to be disobedient! There
is NOTHING about these concepts that implies one is willfully casting off the in
structions of God! Those promoting concepts such as these show themselves to be
grossly ignorant of the true meaning of the mark. ALL of these concepts are de
coys to misdirect others away from the TRUE "mark." I invite anyone to demonstr
ate to me how any of these concepts shows one to be sinful and rebellious.
As you continue in this study, you will see that the ACTUAL mark of the Beast ve
ry much does show those receiving it to be making a freewill choice to rebel aga
inst God!
The primary contributing factor leading to most traditional and erroneous defini
tions of the mark is the ONE verse of Revelation 13:17, which I will here quote
from the King James and the Updated New American Standard Versions of Scripture
along with verse 16.
Revelation 13:16, 17 (KJV)
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to re
ceive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man migh
t buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the numbe
r of his name.
From the NASB we read:
Revelation 13:16, 17 (NASB95)
16 And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and th
e free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their fo
rehead, 17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except th
e one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
It should be noted that one MUST interpret verse 17 in ONLY a strictly literal s
ense to find support for most of the common definitions of the "mark" that tradi
tional Christian and counterfeit Messianic leaders hope you will accept. From v
erse 17 those deceived will conclude that the mark will be something that will a
llow ONLY those that possess it to "buy and sell." They feel this refers to a L
ITERAL "buying and selling" of goods or services; thus, the common "mark of the
Beast" concepts share the common idea that it applies to the "merchandising" of
goods. But, are the mark, the "buying and selling", or even the merchandise tha
t is bought and sold to be taken literally? Can those that promote such concept
s PROVE them to be literal? Are most other marks within Scripture literal? Wha
t is the most consistent understanding - literal or figurative (non-literal) - o
f most marks we see in Scripture? What else could be meant by the phrase "no on
e will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the na
me of the beast or the number of his name?"
I will address this issue as follows.
1. I will present additional information that suggests the mark is NOT lite
ral.
2. I will later present another meaning - A MEANING THAT HAS APPLIED FOR CE
NTURIES AND STILL APPLIES TODAY - for the phrase "no one will be able to buy or
to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the nu
mber of his name."
3. I will show that the meaning of the phrase "buy and sell" is best define
d to be BOTH figurative (non-literal) and literal! However, this partially lite
ral aspect of the phrase "buy and sell" does NOT apply to the clearly non-litera
l nature of the "mark".
Further evidence of the non-literal nature of the "mark"
Although I have already shown the mark is NOT to be taken literally, let s look
at a few other examples in Scripture where we find types of marks, signs, or nam
es mentioned.
Revelation 3:12 (NRSV)
12 If you conquer, I will make you a pillar in the temple of my God; you will ne
ver go out of it. I will write on you the name of my God, and the name of the ci
ty of my God, the new Jerusalem that comes down from my God out of heaven, and m
y own new name.
In the verses just quoted we see:
1. The name of God will be written on the forehead of those that are saved.
2. The name of Jerusalem will be written on the forehead of the saved.
3. The name of Messiah will be written on the forehead of the saved.
Since Revelation 13:17 indicates the name of the Beast is synonymous with the ma
rk, the literal or non-literal meanings of Revelation 13:17 and Revelation 3:12
can be assumed to imply a similar understanding of the how the marking of the na
me(s) mentioned in each of them should be interpreted. Revelation 3:12, just li
ke the verses that address the mark of the Beast, describes something that will
be written on (or in) the forehead of those that are the true children of God.
I will not waste time here. CLEARLY we are not to take LITERALLY Revelation 3:1
2. Likewise, if we are sincere and consistent in our interpretation of Scriptur
e, we are not to take literally Rev. 13:16,17. Both discussions of a mark (or n
ame written on/in the forehead) imply the mark to be a spiritual indicator that
shows to whom the one receiving the mark (or name) gives their devotion.
Next, we will look at another set of passages from Revelation.
Revelation 17:1-6 (NASB)
1 And one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me, sa
ying, "Come here, I shall show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on
many waters, 2 with whom the kings of the earth committed acts of immorality, an
d those who dwell on the earth were made drunk with the wine of her immorality."
3 And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sit
ting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten h
orns. 4 And the woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold a
nd precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abomination
s and of the unclean things of her immorality, 5 and upon her forehead a name wa
s written, a mystery, "BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMI
NATIONS OF THE EARTH." 6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints,
and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. And when I saw her, I wondered gr
eatly.
These passages refer to a name that is written on the forehead of the Great Harl
ot, the MOTHER of Harlots, which of course means there are other harlot daughter
s. Just as before, all with common sense and basic understanding recognize that
neither the harlot nor the name written on her forehead are to be taken literal
ly. We also see another example of figurative (non-literal) meaning with the de
scription of the woman "sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, h
aving seven heads and ten horns." Are the literalists wanting us to believe a l
iteral beast with seven heads and ten horns will be ridden by woman? The Harlot
is clearly a figurative representation of the age-old opponent of the true fait
h - the mystery Babylonian religion, and the name written on her forehead repres
ents a set of doctrines, which have a name, title, or description. This descrip
tion will be revealed as we continue our study of the "mark of the Beast." Of c
ourse, as many of you know, this woman (the great Harlot) has long been equated
to the church of Rome, which promotes the same age-old Babylonian faith and sorc
eries that Satan has always promoted as part of his "attempt to change the sacre
d seasons and the law" (Dan. 7:25 NRSV). Some of the Harlot s earlier work is s
poken of in the following verses.
Nahum 3:1-7 (NASB)
1 Woe to the bloody city, completely full of lies and pillage; Her prey never de
parts. 2 The noise of the whip, The noise of the rattling of the wheel, Gallopin
g horses, And bounding chariots! 3 Horsemen charging, Swords flashing, spears gl
eaming, Many slain, a mass of corpses, And countless dead bodies - They stumble
over the dead bodies! 4 All because of the many harlotries of the harlot, The c
harming one, the mistress of sorceries, Who sells nations by her harlotries And
families by her sorceries. 5 "Behold, I am against you," declares the Lord of ho
sts; "And I will lift up your skirts over your face, And show to the nations you
r nakedness And to the kingdoms your disgrace. 6 "I will throw filth on you And
make you vile, And set you up as a spectacle. 7 "And it will come about that all
who see you Will shrink from you and say, Nineveh is devastated! Who will grie
ve for her? Where will I seek comforters for you?"
Strangely, most that accurately promote this understanding of the Harlot seem to
cleverly ignore the fact this woman (Roman Babylonian false religion) has other
harlot daughters. ?? Could this be because ALL Christian denominations were u
ltimately birthed from the church of Rome, promote the Harlot s primary foundati
onal doctrines (the antichrist deception and that Torah is abolished or unnecess
ary), and are ,therefore, CLEARLY her harlot daughters? Hmmm??
Finally, let s look at one more passage from Revelation.
Revelation 22:3,4 (KJV)
3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall
be in it; and his servants shall serve him: 4 And they shall see his face; and h
is name shall be in their foreheads.
As with the others, we are obviously not to assume a name will be literally writ
ten on the foreheads of the saved. Instead, by their freewill choice to accept
God s mark instead of the Beast s, they will have God s name (or authority in th
eir lives) written in their foreheads as a sign of their demonstrated devotion t
o Him.
So, we can again summarize the more probable, NON-LITERAL meaning of the term "m
ark."
1. First, as shown, the mark is clearly symbolic and shows the recipient ch
oosing to promote the cause of the Beast. It is a spiritual mark, which exposes
the hearts and minds of those receiving it. It shows to whom (or to what teach
ings) they willingly give their allegiance.
2. The sin for which those receiving the mark will be punished is NOT simpl
y possessing the mark. Instead, the sin leading to the eternal wrath of God is
the FREE WILL CHOICE of those receiving the mark - the choice made by those poss
essing the mark. They are punished because they knowingly and intentionally CHO
SE to accept the mark, knowing full well what it stands for. The mark is not th
e sin. It is simply a sign of the sinful rebellion against God of the recipient
.
3. If the recipient of the mark unwittingly received it, they would be inno
cent of the obvious sin the mark represents. God will most likely not inflict e
ternal death to those that sincerely seek Him through devotion to study and obed
ience yet fall short due to being unwittingly deceived. This further suggests t
he mark to be something that is easily seen to be against God; therefore, those
receiving it cannot use ignorance as an excuse. In short, the TRULY sincere see
ker of Truth will NOT accept the mark because he/she will see it to be in direct
opposition to God s teachings.
4. The underlying theme of the mark is clearly something that represents ou
tright rebellion against God. It must be something that clearly shows the recip
ient to have made the freewill choice to disobey God.
The more likely dual meaning of "buy and sell" within Rev. 13:17
So, what of the odd reference to buying and selling that we find in Revelation 1
3:17? What does it really mean? Well, there are ONLY 3 possible options availa
ble to us for interpretation.
1. It is a literal reference to the buying and selling of something.
2. It is non-literal, and thus has a figurative meaning.
3. It is BOTH literal and figurative.
The possible literal meaning requires no detailed discussion. It would simply i
nfer that those NOT possessing the mark of the Beast will have restrictions impo
sed upon their ability to purchase or sell physical items or services. Note the
inclusion of SERVICES within these restrictions. As we will see, restrictions
on services are imposed by the Beast even today! Since the literal interpretati
on is so easily grasped, we will quickly proceed to the second option, which is
that the phrase "buy and sell" may be interpreted figuratively.
Let s look at other examples of buying and/or selling within Scripture that are
clearly NOT literal.
Proverbs 23:23 (NRSV)
23 Buy truth, and do not sell it; buy wisdom, instruction, and understanding.
Obviously, this verse from Proverbs does not LITERALLY mean we are to buy truth,
wisdom, instruction, or understanding. Truth CANNOT be literally bought or sol
d! So, in Proverbs we see one of many examples of how buying and selling is not
always to be taken literally.
Paul contributes to our discussion as he refers to those I just mentioned that "
peddle" the word of God.
2 Corinthians 2:17 (NRSV)
17 For we are not peddlers of God s word like so many; but in Christ we speak as
persons of sincerity, as persons sent from God and standing in his presence.
Though it is not considered by me to be a good translation, the New Living Trans
lation expresses this verse from 2 Corinthians well.
2 Corinthians 2:17 (NLT)
17 You see, we are not like those hucksters - and there are many of them - who p
reach just to make money. We preach God s message with sincerity and with Christ
s authority. And we know that the God who sent us is watching us.
So, Paul is alluding here to the selling of the Word of God; thus, there is a li
teral AND spiritual meaning expressed. The literal meaning refers to the mercha
ndising of religion (commonplace today), and the spiritual meaning is that it is
allegedly "truth" that is being sold - though in fact falsehood is what the ped
dlers actually market. It always amazes me how blind many are to the fact many
of today s Christian leaders have been made rich from the peddling of God s Word
. Some of the most popular preachers today are also among the wealthiest of Ame
ricans. The naive nature of those that contribute to the bulging bank accounts
of today s "men of God," is both sad and disgusting.
Next we read in Isaiah of God pleading for us to buy from Him and/or His true re
presentatives.
Isaiah 55:1-3 (NASB95)
1 "Ho! Every one who thirsts, come to the waters; And you who have no money come
, buy and eat. Come, buy wine and milk Without money and without cost. 2 "Why do
you spend money for what is not bread, And your wages for what does not satisfy
? Listen carefully to Me, and eat what is good, And delight yourself in abundanc
e. 3 "Incline your ear and come to Me. Listen, that you may live; And I will mak
e an everlasting covenant with you, According to the faithful mercies shown to D
avid.
God figuratively refers to the buying of wine and milk and claims it to be witho
ut cost. How can one buy something for no cost unless the buying is not literal
. And thus it is with these verses. God implores us to sincerely seek His trut
h and uses the figurative illustration of buying as part of His plea.
From Revelation 3:18 we read of another example of buying.
Revelation 3:18 (KJV)
18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich;
and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy naked
ness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
Again, this verse uses buying as a figure of speech to illustrate how we are to
seek the truth. As with so many other verses that refer to buying or selling, w
e are not always to take it literally.
Finally, as a last of many possible examples, we read of Yeshua using the terms
"buy" and "sell" to illustrate how we are to fervently seek the Kingdom of God.
The non-literal nature of this verse from the Gospel of Matthew is obvious.
Matthew 13:44 (NASB)
44 The kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, which a man fou
nd and hid; and from joy over it he goes and sells all that he has, and buys tha
t field.
Now, how can the phrase buy and sell be shown to be BOTH literal and figurative?
We recently read Paul applying it as such in his second letter to the Corinthi
ans.
2 Corinthians 2:17 (NLT)
17 You see, we are not like those hucksters - and there are many of them - who p
reach just to make money. We preach God s message with sincerity and with Christ
s authority. And we know that the God who sent us is watching us.
Admittedly, this is more literal than figurative; however, from the example of t
he buying and selling of religion we can begin to gain insight into the deeper m
eaning of Revelation 13:17.
At this point I will refrain from revealing the final meaning of the "buy and se
ll" reference in that verse until after I have proven what the TRUE meaning of t
he "mark of the Beast" is. Then, I will show how those that do not possess that
mark are indeed severely restricted from buying and selling and how the Beast h
as enforced this prohibition throughout history (approximately 1700 years). So,
let us now discover the undeniable meaning of the "mark of Beast," after which
we will easily see how the Beast prevents those that do not accept his mark from
 buying and selling in both a literal and non-literal sense.
The "mark of God," reveals the "mark of the Beast!"
First, let us revisit the summary from our look at the meaning of mark in Revela
tion.
1. This mark is almost certainly a symbolic stamp or sign and is not to be
taken literally.
2. This mark will be SYMBOLICALLY placed on - OR INSIDE - the forehead and/
or right hand.
3. The mark historically symbolizes servitude or allegiance to the one from
whom the mark is received.
4. The mark clearly symbolizes the relationship existing between those that
decide to receive it and the Beast (or his agents) from whom it is received. I
t shows the recipients of the mark to be loyal to the Beast and among his willfu
l followers.
5. The harlot of Revelation 17:5, historically and almost universally accep
ted as representing Rome and the evil Babylonian mystery religion that has conti
nuously opposed the true faith, "bears on her forehead the mark of her true natu
re in a mysterious allusion to Babylon." Thus, we can surmise that this spiritu
al harlot from Rome plays a major role in promoting the "mark of the Beast."
6. Those that receive the mark do so of their own free will. They CHOOSE t
o accept the mark offered by the Beast.
Now let s restate the summary of findings regarding the mark of God.
1. The "mark of God" is the Eternal instructions of God - the Torah! To sa
y otherwise is to ignore some of the clearest passages in all of Scripture. Des
pite this, traditional Christianity rejects and openly opposes Torah and/or the
need for obedience to God s Eternal Teachings!
2. Yeshua fully endorsed and obeyed Torah; thus accepting the mark of his G
od and ours. Anyone claiming to follow Messiah that fails to endorse and/or obey
Torah, is NOT a follower of the TRUE Messiah!
3. THE foundational aspect of the "mark of God" and THE most important pass
age in all of Scripture according to Yeshua is the Shema, which declares God to
be ONE and ONLY One - NOT a Trinity God - not a Binity God - and not a man-God M
essiah!
The "mark" is a spiritual mark, which exposes the hearts and minds of those rece
iving it. It shows to whom or what ideology they are devoted.
My friend, do you see something strange when you compare "the mark of God" with
what traditional Christianity teaches? I expect, after determining what constit
utes the mark of God, some of you have already realized what the "mark of the Be
ast" most likely is. However, let s list a few common sense issues that lead us
to the TRUE definition of the "mark of the Beast." I will follow them with a ta
bulated synopsis which presents a side-by-side comparison of the "mark of God" a
nd the "mark of the Beast."
1. The Beast, which is empowered by Satan, is the number one enemy of God a
nd promotes teachings that are contrary to God s.
2. The mark of God is clearly shown to be Torah, and it is from the respons
e one gives to the mark of God (Torah) - acceptance or rejection - that their al
legiance or rebellion toward God is determined.
3. The Beast is opposed to God; therefore, common sense dictates the mark o
f the Beast would be something that is in direct opposition to the mark of God.
4. So, the most obvious definition of the Mark of the Beast is that it is d
efined as that which erases or teaches against the Mark of God; thus, the Mark o
f the Beast teaches against torah!
THE MARK OF GOD THE MARK OF THE BEAST
The Eternal Instructions of God, Torah Teaches against God s Eternal Instructio
ns, anti-Torah
The Shema (Dt. 6:4) is a crucial aspect of the mark of God and is what Yeshua ca
lled THE foremost commandment Defines a different "God" than that presented in
the Shema - a God that is "another god" than that presented in Torah
It is also true that teaching Torah is optional is functionally no different tha
n teaching it is abolished. In other words, teaching that sincere attempts at T
orah observance is not a critical factor in determining one s eternal fate is no
different than teaching Torah is abolished, since the end effect of the teachin
g, which is to negate the Torah s importance, is the same. Though Yeshua is the
ultimate means through which we have the hope for eternal life, since he took u
pon himself the "curse of the Law" (the legal death penalty resulting from disob
edience) he does NOT abolish the necessity to obey as did he. In fact, he often
states his direct endorsement of Torah (Matt. 5:17-19, Matt. 7:23, etc.) as do
other New Testament writings.
So now the clear truth regarding the true nature of the mark of the Beast should
be obvious as I show in the following table.
THE MARK OF THE BEAST TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN AND COUNTERFEIT MESSIANIC
TEACHING
Teaches against God s Eternal Instructions, anti-Torah Teaches Torah (Law) is a
bolished, unnecessary, or optional; thus, is anti-Torah ("usurps" or "replaces"
Torah)
Defines a different "God" than that presented in the Shema - a God that is "anot
her god" than that presented in Torah Promotes an unscriptural Trinity God and
that the Messiah is God; thus, presents a different God - "another god"
Friend, it is as obvious as the nose on your face. The Mark of the Beast - the
Sign of the Beast - The Mark that so many willingly accept, thus showing allegia
nce to the Beast ===> Is Traditional anti-torah Christian and counterfeit Mess
ianic doctrine!
Finally, remember Yeshua s words?
Matthew 7:22-23 (NASB95)
22 "Many will say to Me on that day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your na
me, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?
23 And then I will declare to them, I never knew you; depart from Me, you who p
ractice lawlessness ."
The greek term rendered "lawlessness" is the same one used in 1 John 3:4 to defi
ne sin. It literally means "violation of the Law." There are numerous similar
verses in the Messianic writings (New Testament) that clearly show lawlessness (
torah violation) is not a good thing.
Consider Yeshua s words in light of the passages in Revelation that describe the
fate of those who accept the mark and worship the "beast" and his image. (I fe
el the "image" is a reference to the counterfeit religion, possibly even the "re
placement Messiah" (antichrist) teachings as erroneously promoted by the "great
whore.")
Revelation 14:9-10 (NASB95)
9 Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If
anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or
on his hand,
10 he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full st
rength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone
in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
So, we can see that the same fate that awaits the "lawless" also awaits those wh
o willfully accept the mark of the beast. There are numerous similar warnings t
o avoid lawlessness (torah violation).
So, since the fate of the lawless and "marked" is the same, an association can b
e clearly established between lawlessness and the mark. This provides strong ev
idence that the "mark of the beast" is something that furthers lawlessness. And
of course, the TEACHING of Lawlessness (anti-torah), which I firmly believe IS
the "mark of the beast," certainly does!
The common sense, logical approach I took in my presentation should be contraste
d with the sensationalized, theoretical approach taken by those wishing to confu
se others as they endeavor to conceal the simplicity of the truth!
So, how has the Beast prevented others from buying and selling?
If an organization does not accept the mark (anti-torah and the anti-Messiah tea
ching that Yeshua is God), that organization is censored and forced from the pub
lic marketplace of religion! When was the last time you saw anything other than
Christianity being promoted as a religion on TV? Those not showing allegiance
to the Beast are ostracized. But it goes even further. A dear friend of mine a
nd fellow soldier of truth (www.hebraic-renewal.com) was forced off the radio 3
SEPARATE TIMES in Colorado by Christians and Messianics because of his teachings
against the Trinity and his promoting of Torah. The Beast would not allow him
to sell his message! He also had his counseling business shut down as a result
of these same Beast followers boycotting and actively speaking against his busin
ess. So, there we have a direct example of how the Beast prevented my friend fr
om competing in the marketplace of both religion and the secular world. He was
prevented from buying and selling his services through the efforts of those that
have willfully accepted the mark of the Beast. And, as usual, they NEVER sough
t to engage him in debate. Instead, as is the norm with the Beast, they simply
drove him out of town. The Beast always works that way. He drives his opponents
out of business, or out of town, or out of this life!
You may recall how the prevention of buying and selling applies to SERVICES just
as directly as it applies to goods. Therefore, we see how those that do not ac
cept the mark of the Beast and/or the name of the Beast are targeted by Christia
ns and counterfeit Messianics in such a way as to prevent those not accepting th
e mark from enjoying the same access to the "market" that the Beast enjoys. Ind
eed, the Beast DOMINATES the market and exerts all manner of strong arm tactics
to prevent others from interfering in his gross monopoly.
Finally, history is filled with examples of how those that did not accept the ma
rk (such as devoted Jews) were LITERALLY restricted from buying and selling at t
imes, had their goods confiscated, were driven into exile, or were killed. The
Beast has enacted a lengthy list of decrees to prevent his wicked dominance from
coming under threat, or simply to satisfy his endless lust for blood and power.
There is NO organization in the history of mankind that has such a long and bloo
dy history as Christianity. Christianity is, without doubt, history s most hypo
critical and unmerciful terrorist organization! Christians are usually willingl
y ignorant of the grotesquely demonic, murderous history of the faith system to
which they belong. The truth is, almost ALL Christians do not want to consider
the vile history of Christianity. They prefer to live in denial regarding the f
acts of history and the CONTINUING disdain Christianity shows to those that dare
oppose it. I thank the almighty God we live in a constitutional Republic that
guarantees freedoms of speech and religion; otherwise, I have NO DOUBT that the
preferred means of control proven throughout history to be the choice of Christi
an leaders would be utilized to the fullest to kill-off all opponents of the Bea
st.
Here is a sampling of the various measures Christianity has imposed over time ag
ainst those that would not "worship the Beast" or take his "mark." Though these
measures were aimed primarily at Jews, they would also apply to ANYONE that wish
es to promote or obey the ETERNAL Torah (the mark of God!). The fact that Chris
tianity has been so desperate to kill and persecute Jews is particularly ironic,
since Christians claim to worship a "Christ" that is, himself, a Jew! Of cours
e, the reason for the zeal Christianity has shown to massacre Jews is due to the
fact religious Jews hold to the pro-Torah mark of God and the Beast cannot let
that go unpunished. Any Christian that harbors anti-semitic feelings (and most
DO) is automatically an enemy of the Semite Messiah they hypocritically claim to
follow! The sampling shown in the table below was taken from the Baruch HaShem
Messianic Synagogue website that unfortunately promotes the teaching that Yeshu
a is God, which is a primary component of the mark of the Beast. May HaShem ope
n their eyes to truth and empower them to rid themselves of the Beast s characte
ristic teachings.
Prohibition of intermarriage and of sexual intercourse between Christians and Je
ws, Synod of Elvira, 306. Jews and Christians not permitted to eat togethe
r, Synod of Elvira, 306.
Jews not allowed to hold public office, Synod of Clement, 535. Jews not allowed
to employ Christian servants or possess Christian slaves, Third Synod of Orlean
s, 538.
Jews not permitted to show themselves in the streets during Passion Week, Third
Synod of Orleans, 538. Burning of the Talmud (writings of Jewish Sages) and oth
er books, 12th Synod of Toledo, 681.
Christians not permitted to patronize Jewish doctors, Trulanic Synod, 692.
Christians not permitted to live in Jewish homes, Synod of Narbonne, 1050.
Forced Jews to make "contributions" to the church equal to that of Christians, S
ynod of Gerona, 1078. Prohibition of Sunday work, thus ENFORCING Sunday as the
sabbath, despite the fact the Scriptures CLEARLY define the seventh day (Saturd
ay) as the Sabbath, Synod of Szabolcs, 1092.
Jews not permitted to be plaintiffs, or witnesses against Christians in the cour
ts, Third Lateran Council, 1179, Canon 26. Jews not permitted to withhold i
nheritance from descendants who accepted Christianity, Third Lateran Council, 11
79, Canon 26.
The marking of Jewish clothes with a badge, 4th Lateran Council, 1215, Canon 68.
(Copied from the legislation by Caliph Omar II [634-44], who had decreed that C
hristians wear blue belts and Jews, yellow belts.) Construction of new syna
gogues prohibited, Council of Oxford, 1222.
Christians not permitted to attend Jewish ceremonies, Synod of Vienna, 1267.
Jews not permitted to dispute with simple Christian people about the tenets of t
he Catholic religion, Synod of Vienna, 1267.
Compulsory Jewish ghettoes established, forcing Jews to live where told, Synod o
f Breslau, 1267. This same Synod ordered the Jews of Silesia to wear special id
entifying caps. Christians not permitted to sell or rent real estate to Jews, Sy
nod of Ofen, 1279.
Adoption by a Christian of the Jewish religion or return by a baptized Jew to th
e Jewish religion defined as a heresy, Synod of Mainz, 1310. Sale or transfer
of church articles to Jews prohibited, Synod of Lavour, 1368
Jews not permitted to act as agents in the conclusion of contracts between Chris
tians, especially marriage contracts, Council of Basel, 1434, Sessio XIX.
Jews not permitted to obtain academic degrees, Council of Basel, 1434, Session X
IX.
The measures just quoted are only a sampling, and they are only those copied in
various ways by the Nazis. Many other horrible, BEASTLY persecutions were under
taken. Christian history is packed from its beginnings in Rome (Christianity is
NOT a product of Jerusalem!) with persecution of those that do not worship the
Beast, his image, or his name. Some of us have felt, firsthand, the bitterness
of typical Christians because we dare suggest they are wrong and are bold enough
to openly expose the deceptions of the Beast. If not for laws prohibiting it,
I am absolutely certain the typical "loving" Christian would heartily endorse al
l manner of infringements upon the liberties of those that oppose them. Christi
anity is NOT as pure a religion of love as many intoxicated Christians think. T
o those that wish to worship the TRUE God, honor His Torah, and His TRUE Messiah
, Christianity is a religion of HATE, and history proves such! To those of us t
hat dare to reject the wine of the Harlot the true nature of Christianity has be
en proven over and over to be Beastly. The only reason the same hate isn t show
n today is because the laws of the land currently prevent the Beast from using h
is preferred means of "conversion." Thank God we have separation of church and
state. Anyone that thinks the church and state should not be separate is a FOOL
or desires to bring back the tyranny that Christianity has shown itself to pref
er! Sadly, there is growing evidence the Beast may be once again working to sol
idify his state control as the lines between church and state become alarmingly
blurred.
There are countless examples of how the Beast "provides that no one will be able
to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beas
t or the number of his name" (Rev. 13:17).
THE BEAST IS LARGELY REPRESENTED BY TRADITIONAL CHRISTIANITY, AND THE MARK OF TH
E BEAST IS CHRISTIAN ANTI-TORAH DOCTRINE!
I plead with you to consider this issue. Please do not react in a knee-jerk, an
gry fashion. Look at how simple it is to define the mark of God. It is directly
 defined from Scripture without the slightest ambiguity. Consider how common se
nse and logic demands that the mark of the Beast is obviously the opposite of th
e mark of God. When this common sense approach is used the conclusion is unavoi
dable!
Have you irrevocably taken the mark of the Beast? Do you accept the lie that Go
d s Eternal Torah has been abolished, superceded, is unnecessary, or optional?
Do you worship a different God other than the one Yeshua the Messiah implied was
the ONLY God by his (Yeshua s) stating that the Shema (Dt. 6:4) is the most imp
ortant verse in all of Scripture?
I plead with you and pray you will consider which mark you have taken - the mark
of God or the mark of the Beast, and that after considering, you will insure yo
u are among those that will not suffer the wrath of God when the Beast and those
that are devoted to him are eternally destroyed.
Well, have you accepted the Mark? Belief in and the following of church Doctrin
e is the Mark. Do you still love Doctrine more than Scripture? Do your loyalti
es still reside with church Doctrine after reading this? Will you begin to stud
y the Torah, that is the Teachings and Instructions found in the Tanakn (OT)?
Whether you believe it or not is purely your decision, but everything in this do
cument IS SUPPORTED BY SCRIPTURE. The Trinity IS NOT supported by Scripture. T
he Anti-Torah Doctrine IS NOT supported by Scripture. The Anti-Semitic Bigotry
IS NOT Scriptural; the Messiah was, is, and forever will be a Jew. Scripture or
church Doctrine? Eternal Life or …
Something very odd and glorious at the same time just happened to me. Remember
when I said I was amazed at how the Holy Ghost would reveal Biblical Support for
some of my Theological Precepts? I was reviewing some of my Source Documents w
hen the thought Galatians 3:20 began running through my mind. That thought bega
n interfering with my concentration … it was incessant. Galatians 3:20 meant no
thing to me, and I didn’t have the time to read and begin analyzing the whole Bo
ok to understand it’s Context.
The Source Document I was reading was about some author’s commentaries. The tho
ught was incessant. As I scrolled down the document I ran across a Link that sa
id Choose a Book. I thought “Oh cool. I’ll see what he has to say about John”.
I clicked the Link. There were only 5 or 6 Books listed. John wasn’t among t
hem. But Galatians was. I thought OK I’ll see what he has to say about Galatia
ns so I clicked it. That brought me to another Link that said Choose a Chapter.
There were only 2 choices available to me. You got it, I selected 3 which bro
ught me to another Link that said Choose a Verse. Again I clicked the Link whic
h brought up a list of Verses to choose from. There were only 3 Verses to choos
e from, and yes, I selected 20.
Chris is already aware, but Jim and Kristy aren’t aware of my fondness of 1st Ti
mothy 2:5 which says something like For there is One God, and one mediator betwe
en God and men, the man Christ Jesus. The verb ‘is’ is in the present tense mea
ning Right Now At This Moment Christ is a man; and thereby, destroying the Trini
ty because that only leaves 2 entities which can be called gods.
Keeping that in mind here is the Commentary on Galatians 3:20.
________________________________________
Galatians 3:20
20 Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one.
The New King James Version, (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers) 1998, c198
2.
An indication of the lack of knowledge regarding Judaic things and the Hebrew mi
nd is illustrated by the trouble so many have with this verse. Paul is not usin
g some sort of mysterious code phrase here. He is making 2 simple points.
1. The very definition of "mediator" demands at least 3 entities.
1. Two individuals to mediate between, and
2. the mediator
In our case Yahshua is the mediator (1 entity) and we and YHWH are the individua
ls to mediate between (2 mediating individuals). Therefore a clear distinction
is shown between Yahshua and YHWH by the very meaning of a mediator.
2. Paul uses the phrase "God is ONE"! This is simply the Hebraic foundatio
n of Paul s faith shining through. He NO DOUBT was calling to mind the Shema, w
hich is THE foundation of the TRUE Biblical Faith and which, even today, is the
ultimate statement of belief in the ONE Elohim (God) among Jews the world over.
It is also a statement of faith the false Trinity erases, despite the outrageou
s word games some play with the Hebrew word for "one" (echad), attempting to def
ine it as a "compound unity" - a definition that is easily refuted. I will not
even waste time defending against the ridiculous and deceitful farce of Trinitar
ians as they try to prove one means three: using echad. Get the book, THE DOCTR
INE OF THE TRINITY, CHRISTIANITY S SELF INFLICTED WOUND, by Sir Anthony Buzzard,
which I list on my recommended reading page, if you want to see the false conce
pt of the echadians destroyed, as well as all the other false concepts of the Tr
inity.
Deuteronomy 6:4-8
4 Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! (not 2 or 3 in 1) 5 You sha
ll love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all
your strength. 6 And these words which I command you today shall be in your hear
t. 7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them wh
en you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when
you rise up. 8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as
frontlets between your eyes.
The New King James Version, (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers) 1998, c198
2.
________________________________________
How Odd. How Coincidental. NOT!!! How Glorious! Why me? I am the le
ast of all of us. I did with intent and forethought walk away from my Salvation
. Yet He chose to Heal me. He healed me of a Genetic Disease. Science cannot
even begin to treat a Genetic Disease. He healed me. Me. And True to Yeshua’s
Promise the Holy Ghost keeps on Reveling the Truth to me He reveals His Truth t
o me through my Dreams, through my Thoughts and Through my Research and Studies.
If He’ll do that for the least of us, just think of what He will do for you on
ce you begin to Worship Him in Truth and in Spirit!
Just a few more observations and I’ll bring this to a close. Go to 1st
Corinthians 11:3
1st Corinthians 11:3 (NIV)
Now I want you to realise that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of
the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
Another way of saying this is:
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of
every woman is a man, and the head of Yeshua is YHWH.
If YHWH and Yeshua are co-equal gods then 1st Corinthians 11:3 is a Lie.
But, if 1st Corinthians 11:3 is True, then the Trinity Doctrine is a Lie. The
passage is easy to understand, and not given to any Allegory, Metaphor or Parab
le. It is straight forward and very plain. God, Yahweh, is the head of Messiah
.
Again in 1st Corinthians 15:27 - 28
1st Corinthians 15:27 - 28 (NIV)
For he “has put everything under his feet”. [Psalm 8:6] Now when it says that “e
verything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God hi
mself, who put everything under Christ. When he has done this, then the Son him
self will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may b
e all in all.
Here again we have Messiah being subservient to YHWH. If Yeshua is ‘und
er’ YHWH then they cannot be co-equals and therefore the Trinity Doctrine is a L
ie or 1st Corinthians 15:28 is a Lie. Only one of the two Premises can be True.
Is your Love and Loyalty to the Scriptures or to yourch and her Doctrines?
Another Witness to the notions that I have been trying yo convey is Hevr
ews 2:17
Hebrews 2:17 (NIV)
For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that
he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that
he might make atonement for [Or and that he might turn aside God’s wrath, taking
away] the sins of the people.
The first thing we should notice is “he had to be made like his brothers
in every way”. This means no Virgin Birth but exactly the contrary, he was mad
e by the union between a man and woman, and from a man from the line of David.
Joseph was from the line of David. The Miracle occurred when he was Baptized ma
rking the Beginning of the New Age, the Age of the New Covenant, the Beginning o
f the Gospel.
“Made like his brothers [the True followers] in every way”. The word eve
ry means completely the same, all conditions exactly the same without exception.
Need I go on?
The second thing we need to notice is “,,, service to God …”. He, Yesh
ua, was the fully empowered Emissary or Shaliach of Yahweh! He is a servant of
YHWH. He is not a god nor is he a co-equal with YHWH. He is the Shaliach of Go
d!
Epilog
I afraid I didn’t get to fully address Paganism and Greco-Roman Philosop
hy in the Early Church. I touched upon Paganism and Greco-Roman Philosophy in a
n ‘Oh, by the way’ manner and that doesn’t do Justice to the way in which Pagani
sm and Greco-Roman Philosophy played a very significant role in the development
of the Christian Religion.
Neither did I get around to explaining the role of Christianity’s Nemesi
s and Arch-Enemy the ancient Babylonian Mystery Sun god Religion. The most obvi
ous adaptation is the moving of the Sabbath from Sundown Friday until Sundown Sa
turday to Sun-Day. Sun Day, get it?
Another adaption of Paganism is Christmas. If you truly read the Script
ures with an unbiased mind, it is very apparent that the Messiah was born in a S
eptember-October timeframe. December 25th is just 4 days after the Winter Solst
ice and you can tell the days are getting longer. A very great number of Pagan
Religions celebrated December 25th for an equally wide number of reasons.
The vast majority of this document is dedicated to showing how the Scrip
tures DO NOT SUPPORT THE TRINITY! If you continue to Love and be Loyal to churc
h Doctrine more than the Scriptures themselves then you will not receive Eternal
Life but be Judged with the others who carry the Mark of the Beast. Your Fate
is sealed and you will be thrown into the Lake of Fire with all the other Idolat
er’s and those who carry the Mark of the Beast.
Torah. Opinions vary widely. I will NOT tell you that you don’t have t
o follow all of the Law, but I will tell you that if you Love and Worship Yahweh
with all your Heart, with all your Mind and with all your Soul and Him alone, a
nd if you love your neighbor as you love yourself (another way to say that is Do
onto others as you would have others do onto you), then all the rest of the Law
hangs on these two Commandments. If you follow these two Commandments is that
enough? Probably not, but it is a beginning.
I will wait and see how you all react to this document, and what questio
ns you have, and what you would like to hear more about, before undertaking the
next document.
Without boasting and with all humility, I do posses a formidable amount
of knowledge and understanding. I have a very close and personal relationship w
ith Yahweh, and He reveals many Truths to me. I believe Yeshua when he said “an
d this is Eternal Life, that they would come to know You, the only True God, and
Yeshua Christ whom You have sent.” (John 17:3). And I’d truly love to help you
increase your knowledge and understanding of YHWH, the Only True God.
Email me with Questions or comments at nuddycrk@fuse.net