Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tafila Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, P.O. Box 179, 66110 Tafila, Jordan
Tel. +962 (3) 2250326; Fax +962 (3) 2250431; email: aimanr@yahoo.com
b
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, The University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan
Abstract
This paper discusses the concept of water quality and stability, describes various indices available to assess the
scale formation (protective layer) and corrosivity of water and the methods of their calculation for different tap
water resources in Tafila City, south Jordan. The saturation levels are calculated by Langelier saturation index
(LSI), Ryznar stability index (RSI) and the calcium carbonate precipitation potential (CCPP). LSI values are negative
and range from 0.39 to 1.5 while RSI values range from 8.7 to 9.8. CCPP values are negative and range from
1.77 to 16.76. Although these results indicate corrosion conditions, this image changes upon heating and evaporation
of water with the release of CO2. Water samples exhibit high concentrations of Cl, SO2
and HCO3 as the major
4
2+
2+
anions and Ca and Mg as the major cations. Magnesium has a threshold limit of maximum CaCO3 solubility at
about 0.00424 M. Microbiological tests indicate that three of the water samples (the three springs) are polluted with
total and faecal coliform bacteria. Moreover, high concentration of nitrate has been detected in one of the springs.
Most of the water samples have SO2
/ HCO3 ratio of less than 1. At least 94% of the scale composition is CaCO3
4
(aragonite).
Keywords: Tafila City; Water quality; Coliform; CaCO3; Scale formation; LSI; RSI; CCPP; Corrosion
*Corresponding author.
Presented at EuroMed 2006 conference on Desalination Strategies in South Mediterranean Countries: Cooperation
between Mediterranean Countries of Europe and the Southern Rim of the Mediterranean. Sponsored by the
European Desalination Society and the University of Montpellier II, Montpellier, France, 2125 May 2006.
0011-9164/07/$ See front matter 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.01.039
1. Introduction
Safe drinking water is a human birthright. It
must fall among the highest priorities for every
nation on earth. It is vitally important that water
is free of disease-causing germs and toxic chemicals and pollutants [1]. Coliform, nitrate and boron
indicate pollution in water. The main sources of
nitrate in drinking water are in rainfall, sewage or
animal excreta, biological fixation in the soil and
various agricultural practices. Tarawneh et al [2]
conducted a hydrochemical and bacteriological
study on the springs in Tafila region. Their study
indicates that some springs are highly polluted
due to surface pollution. Shatanawi and Fayyad
[3] reported that faecal coliform bacteria, in Zarka
River, was higher than World Health Organization
(WHO) [4] drinking water guidelines because the
river receives part of its water from a wastewater
treatment plant.
Tap water sources range over a broad spectrum
of chemical quality which reflects the history of
water and the region from which it originates. The
effect of this water on the piping system appears
in three forms: fouling, aggression and corrosion.
Fouling, a complex phenomenon, is the accumulation of undesirable deposits on industrial equipment surfaces. Aggression is the dissolution of
cement material comprising the conduits and retaining structure which destructs the integrity of
the material. Corrosion is the end result of the
electro-chemical reactions between water and the
metal components [5]. The occurrence of scale
deposition and corrosion in natural and processed
waters can cause serious operational and cost
problems. Scale is the crystallization of sparingly
soluble calcium carbonate, magnesium hydroxide,
and calcium sulphate. The formation of the alkaline scales CaCO3 and Mg(OH)2 strongly depends on temperature, pH, desorption rate of CO2
as well as on the concentrations of HCO3, CO2
,
3
Ca2+, and Mg2+ ions [6]. Factors causing corrosion
in water distribution systems include acidity (very
low), hardness, bimetallic contact, high chloride
323
(1)
(2)
Silica, in such solutions, forms thermodynamically stable silicate compounds. The general
equation for kaolinite [Al2Si2O5(OH)4] formation
is:
2Al(OH) 4 + 2H 4SiO 4 + 2H +
Al 2Si 2 O5 (OH) 4 + 7H 2 O
(3)
324
325
Fig. 1. Water sources location map of the study area (modified from Europa Technologies 2005).
The samples were analyzed for major components, cations: K+ and Na+ (flame photometry,
ATS 200 MKI, Advanced Technical Service), Ca2+
and Mg2+ (titration with 0.1 N EDTA), and anions:
, NO3, F and PO3
(ion chromatography,
Cl, SO2
4
4
Dionex-100). The samples were collected in polyethylene bottles and for microbiological analysis
in sterilized glass bottles.
A multiple tube test method was used to determine the presence of total and faecal coliform
bacteria. 10 ml of water sample were added to ten
test tubes containing Lauryl Tryptose Broth (LTB)
media (Himedia Laboratories Limited, Mumbai,
India). The tubes were then incubated at 35C for
24 h. Gas bubbles were noticed inside the tubes
indicated the presence of coliform bacteria (positive test). The tubes that showed negative results
were incubated for an extra 24 h. Total and faecal
coliform were tested by inoculation the positive
samples into two tubes containing Brilliant Green
Lactose Bille Broth medium (BGLB) at 35C and
45C, the first to ascertain the positive results and
the second to check for faecal coliform [4].
326
Table 1
Temperature, pH, total hardness (TH), turbidity, electrical conductance (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and free
chlorine for the water samples
Site No.
Temperature
(C)
pH
TH
(mg/L)
Turbidity
(NTU)
EC
(S/cm)
TDS
(mg/L)
Free Cl2
(mg/L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JDWS(*)
21.9
21.6
22.1
21.8
21.2
21.4
21.7
21.8
21.7
7.89
7.73
7.44
7.54
7.58
6.67
7.57
7.63
7.80
6.508.5
35
90
55
20
40
40
75
25
40
300
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.7
1
564
499
607
418
491
807
360.96
319.36
388.48
267.52
314.24
516.48
500
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.8
0.0
1.0
(*) Allowable limits according to the Jordanian Drinking Water Standards (286/2001).
Table 2
Anions and cations in the water samples
Site No.
Cl
(ppm)
F
(ppm)
NO3
(ppm)
SO2
4
(ppm)
Na+
(ppm)
K+
(ppm)
Ca2+
(ppm)
Mg2+
(ppm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JDWS(*)
45.575
38.721
48.526
48.431
48.402
32.182
39.283
91.074
200
0.801
0.446
0.526
0.431
0.432
1.021
0.251
0.771
1.5
19.598
12.880
71.750
17.720
17.720
17.599
14.670
105.270
50
36.712
17.974
60.496
34.978
34.978
31.009
16.321
63.414
200
122.2
11.11
13.33
6.66
44.44
15.55
66.66
18.88
200
2.397
1.370
1.095
1.164
1.301
24.52
1.027
3.014
105
123
107
103
102
119
103
115
75
93
107
97
91
93
105
91
107
30
(*) Allowable limits according to the Jordanian Drinking Water Standards (286/2001).
327
Table 3
CO2 species: HCO3, CO2
, CO2 and TC the water samples
3
Site No.
TA
(mol/kg) 104
TC
(mol/kg) 104
HCO3
(mol/kg) 104
CO2
3
(mol/kg) 106
CO2
(mol/kg) 105
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
5.869
6.874
5.980
5.757
5.701
6.651
5.757
6.428
5.813
5.733
6.819
6.127
5.837
5.758
8.142
5.819
6.446
5.734
5.463
6.522
5.826
5.576
5.507
6.623
5.564
6.168
5.483
19.470
16.980
7.482
8.779
9.251
1.468
9.350
12.490
15.700
0.7562
0.1277
2.2560
1.7370
1.5880
15.0400
1.6210
1.5330
0.9393
[H + ] = 10 pH
[HCO3 ] =
[CO 2 ] =
(4)
[H + ]2 + TA[H + ] KW
(1 + 2K
/[H + ])
[H + ]2 + TA[H + ] KW
K1 /[H + ] (1 + 2 K 2 /[H + ])
[CO32 ] =
[H + ]2 + TA[H + ] KW
2 (1 + [H + ]/ 2 K 2 )
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Site
No.
Positive tubes at
35C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
0
0
0
10
0
10
0
44C
Total coliform
MPN/100 mL
Faecal
coliform
10
0
0
0
0
10
0
10
0
>23
>23
>23
Positive
Positive
Positive
328
Ryznar stability index (RSI) [10] is a practical extension of the LSI based on experience. It attempts
to quantify the relation between CaCO3 saturation
and alkaline scale formation. RSI is a correlation
of an empirical data base of scale thickness observed in water systems to the water chemistry. If
water has a negative LSI value, it is under-saturated with respect to calcium carbonate and is
potentially corrosive. Conversely, for waters with
a positive LSI, a protective layer of calcium carbonate can form as the water is supersaturated with
CaCO3 and the water is scaling. Saturated water
has a LSI of zero. If water has an RSI value between 6 and 7, the water has the potential of light
scale or corrosion. Less than 6, water is scale forming, and greater than 7, water is corrosive.
Unlike the other indexes such as LSI and RSI,
the calcium carbonate precipitation potential
(CCPP) quantifies the amount of CaCO3 that may
dissolve or precipitate. Table 5 presents the interpretation of the calcium carbonate precipitation
potential. The CCPP is the only calcium carbonate
saturation index that is proportional to the reaction
kinetics [23]:
d[Ca 2+ ]
= 105 kr A(CCPP) 2
dt
(9)
Table 5
Interpretation of the calcium carbonate precipitation potential
Description
Scaling (protective)
Passive
Mildly corrosive
Corrosive (aggressive)
>0
5 to 0
10 to 5
< 10
Table 6
LSI, RSI, CCPP and ion ratio values of the water samples
Site No.
Ca2+
(mol/kg) 103
LSI (*)
RSI (**)
CCPP (***)
(mg/kg)
SO4/HCO3
(mM)
Cl + SO4
(ppm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.625
3.075
2.675
2.575
2.550
2.975
2.575
2.875
2.600
0.39
0.46
0.82
0.75
0.73
1.55
0.72
0.60
0.49
8.7
8.7
9.1
9.0
9.0
9.8
9.0
8.8
8.8
1.77
3.18
4.38
3.81
3.64
16.76
3.64
3.12
2.34
0.7
0.3
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
1.1
82
57
109
83
83
63
56
154
(*)
LSI = pHpHS, where pHS = p[Ca2+] + pTA + pK2 pKSP,
(**) RSI = 2 pHS pH.
(***) CCPP = 50 000 (TAi TAeq), modeled using a C++ computer code.
sulphate/bicarbonate (SO2
/HCO3) values of the
4
water samples. LSI values were negative and
ranged from 0.39 (i.e. slightly corrosive but nonscale forming) in Hasda Spring to 1.55 (i.e. serious corrosive) in Shalha Spring. RSI values ranged
from 8.7 (i.e. heavy corrosion) to 9.8 (i.e. corrosion intolerable). Both LSI and RSI values indicate
corrosion conditions. CCPP values are negative
and ranged from 1.77 (i.e. passive) to 16.76 (i.e.
corrosive). This means that the water is undersaturated with calcium carbonate at ambient temperature but it is corrosive. This image changes
upon heating and evaporation of water and with
the release of CO2.
Fig. 2 shows the amount of CaCO3 precipitates
or dissolves from the different 9 samples expressed as mg CaCO3 per kg solution. The inset shows
the first 8 samples at their ambient conditions (i.e.
temperature, pH, and ionic strength or salinity).
The solid circles show the effect of raising temperature on the CCPP value of sample number 9.
The amount of CaCO3 precipitates increases with
increasing temperature.
329
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
pH = 7.80
[Ca2+] = 104 ppm
2
0
-2
-4
0
20
40
60
Temperature [oC]
Fig. 2. Effect of temperature on calcium carbonate precipitation potential (CCPP).
80
100
330
0
-2
R2 = 0.989
-4
CCPP [mg/kg]
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
90
92
94
96
98
100
[Mg2+] [ppm]
102
104
106
108
331
Table 7
The average composition of the scale formed from tap water distillation
Element as
Expected form
Average % wt
Calcium as CaO
Magnesium as mgO
Silicate as SiO2
Aluminum as Al2O3
Iron as Fe2O3
55.20
1.35
2.19
0.23
0.32
CaCO3, aragonite
CaCO3.MgCO3, dolomite
SiO2, silica
Al2Si2O5(OH)4, kaolinite
Fe2O3, hematite
94
1.8
2.2
0.7
1.3
332
29152920.
[4] World Health Organization; Drinking Water Quality
Guidelines, Vol. 1, Geneva, 1993.
[5] R.E. Loewenthal, I. Morrison and M.C. Wentzel,
Control of corrosion and aggression in drinking
water systems. The 1st IWA Conference on: Scaling
and Corrosion in Water and Wastewater Systems,
Cranfield University, UK, 2527 March 2003.
[6] A.E. Al-Rawajfeh, H. Glade and J. Ulrich, Scaling
in multiple-effect distillers: the role of CO2 release.
Desalination, 182 (2005) 209219.
[7] M.E.Q. Pilson, An Introduction to the Chemistry of
the Sea. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1998.
[8] E.G. Darton, Scale inhibition techniques used in
membrane systems. Desalination, 113 (1997) 227
229.
[9] W.F. Langelier, The analytical control of anticorrosion water treatment. J. AWWA, 28 (1936) 1500
1521.
[10] J.W. Ryznar, A new index for determining amount
of calcium carbonate scale formed by a water. J.
AWWA, 36 (1944) 472.
[11] M.M. Reddy and G.H. Nancollas, The crystallization
of calcium carbonate. J. Crystal Growth, 35 (1976)
3338.
[12] G. Falini, M. Gazzano and A. Ripamonti, Crystallization of calcium carbonate in presence of magnesium
and polyelectrolytes, J. Crystal Growth, 137 (1994)
577584.
[13] W.H. Taft, in: Developments in Sedimentology, Vol.
9B, G.V. Chillingar, H.J. Bissel and R.W. Fairnridge,
eds., Elsevier, New York, 1976.
[14] H. Roques and A. Girou, Water Res., 8 (1974) 907.
[15] D. Lisitsin, Q. Yang, D. Hasson and R. Semiat, Inhibition of CaCO3 scaling on RO membranes by
trace amounts of zinc ions. Desalination, 183 (2005)
289300.
[16] D. Hasson, R. Semiat, M. Ilevicky, D. Damiano and
R. Sher, Inhibition of CaCO3 scale deposition by
trace concentrations of some common ions. Proc.
AWWA Water Quality Conference, Texas 2004.
[17] J.R. Rossum and D.T. Merrill, An evaluation of the
calcium carbonate saturation indexes. J. AWWA, 75
(1983) 95100.
[18] R.E. Loewenthal, G.A. Ekama and G.vR. Marais,
STASOFT: A user-friendly interactive computer pro-
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]