Professional Documents
Culture Documents
August 1999
Accountability of Legislators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Which legislative system better enables voters to hold their elected representatives to account for
legislative actions?
Quality of Decision-Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Which legislative system makes for a better legislative process and better legislative decisions?
August 1999
Page 2
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 3
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
UNICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 4
BICAMERALIST
Accountability of Legislators
Which legislative system better enables voters to hold their elected representatives to
account for legislative actions? Unicameralists say that a unicameral legislature would be
more accountable to the electorate, because the simplicity and transparency of the unicameral
legislative process permits voters to better fix the responsibility of individual legislators for
legislative actions. Bicameralists say that the bicameral legislative process is actually more
open to public view and public accountability, and that a unicameral legislature would not
necessarily remedy, and might actually worsen, the real accountability problemallowing a
few legislators to impose legislative decisions on the general membership.
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
UNICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 5
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 6
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 7
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 8
BICAMERALIST
The following western democracies have national unicameral legislatures: Finland, Israel, Luxembourg,
Denmark, Sweden, and New Zealand. The latter three have converted from bicameral to unicameral structures
since World War II. Other jurisdictions, like Iceland and Norway, have legislatures that are elected on a
unicameral basis but divide into two houses after election for purposes of processing legislation. Others, like
Canada and Britain, have bicameral national legislatures, but practical legislative power is heavily concentrated in
one house. Canadas provinces all have unicameral legislatures.
August 1999
Page 9
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
Quality of Decision-Making
Which legislative system makes for a better legislative process and better legislative
decisions? Bicameralists say that the bicameral legislative process promotes quality results
by slowing decision-making, by creating more opportunities for second thought before final
action, and by requiring that all actions have the approval of two independent groups of
lawmakers. Unicameralists say that the bicameral structure actually shortcuts deliberation and
engenders carelessness and error in lawmaking, whereas the simplicity of the unicameral
legislative process fosters slower, more deliberate, careful decision-making. Both sides assert
that their favored structure makes for greater citizen participation and therefore provides
lawmakers with better information on which to base decisions.
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 10
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 11
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 12
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
August 1999
Page 13
UNICAMERALIST
BICAMERALIST
For more information about the nations only unicameral legislature, see the House Research information
brief, Nebraskas Unicameral Legislature. Also, the information brief, The Minnesota Legislature:
Proposals to Change its Size and Structure, summarizes bills introduced in the 1999 Minnesota legislative
session that bear on this issue.
This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please call 651-296-6753 (voice);
or the Minnesota State Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 (TTY) for assistance. Many House Research
Department publications may also be accessed via the Internet at: www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/hrd.htm.
The following western democracies have national unicameral legislatures: Finland, Israel, Luxembourg,
Denmark, Sweden, and New Zealand. The latter three have converted from bicameral to unicameral structures
since World War II. Other jurisdictions, like Iceland and Norway, have legislatures that are elected on a
unicameral basis but divide into two houses after election for purposes of processing legislation. Others, like
Canada and Britain, have bicameral national legislatures, but practical legislative power is heavily concentrated in
one house. Canadas provinces all have unicameral legislatures.