Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L I G H T
B E A R E R S
HISTORY
OF THE
SEVENTH-DAY
ADVENTIST
CHURCH
R I C H A R D
F L O Y D
W .
S C H W A R Z
G R E E N L E A F
LIGH T B E A RERS
Copyright 1979 by General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Department of Education, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Revised edition copyright 2000 by General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Department of Education, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Printed in the United States of America by Pacific Press Publishing Association. All rights
reserved.
www.pacificpress.com
ISBN 13: 978-0-8163-1795-0
ISBN 10: 0-8163-1795-X
09 10 11 5 4 3
C O N T E N T S
P a r t O n e
Origins and Formative Years, 1839-1888
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
P a r t T w o
Years of growth and Reorganization, 1888-1945
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
LIGH T B E A RERS
P a r t T h r e e
The Globalization of the Church, 1945-2000
Chronological Data
Bibliography
Index
P r e f a c e
t o
t h e
F i r s t
E d i t i o n
When Edward Gibbon began his candid but rational inquiry into the progress and
establishment of Christianity, he posed the question as to how its remarkable victory over the prevailing religious systems of the day could be explained. With tongue
in cheek, Gibbon made ironic obeisance to the obvious but satisfactory answer that
this was due to the convincing evidence of the doctrine itself, and to the ruling providence of its great Author (Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol. 1, pp. 507,
508). Then followed over fifty pages devoted to explaining the rise of the Christian
church solely in the light of social, intellectual, and political currents of the first centuries after Christ.
In spite of his skeptics orientation Gibbon had a point. It seems easier for historians to explain the past on the basis of tangible events: the interaction of men, institutions, economic forces, social groups, even the intellectual climate, than to discover
behind, above, and through all the play and counterplay of human interests and power
and passions, the agencies of the all-merciful One, silently, patiently working out the
counsels of His own will (E. G. White, Education, p. 173).
Trained to be critical, to prefer several eyewitnesses and documents produced by
impartial, competent observers close to an event, the historian reaches for certainty
about the past in terms of things he knows, things that can be seen, heard, and read. He
may be confident, as was the ancient prophet Daniel, that the God of heaven changeth
the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings (Dan. 2:21). He
may, with Nebuchadnezzar, be certain that the Most High doeth according to his will
LIGH T B E A RERS
in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth (Dan. 4:35). Yet to inject
this all-powerful God into his interpretation of past events requires an act of faith in
the Unseen and seemingly Intangible which runs counter to his training as a historian.
It is frequently more comfortable to follow Gibbonian reason and package an explanation of the past in terms of the will and prowess of man. . . . his power, ambition, or
caprice (White, ibid.).
Faced with this dilemma, the Seventh-day Adventist historian must frankly recognize that he is not only a historian, he is also a Seventh-day Adventist Christian. As he
approaches the past, and particularly the past of his own church, he does so in this dual
roleand finds that it is not always easy to keep the two roles separate. Many things he
will find easy to explain in terms of human passions, social forces, and psychological
insight. Yet he must also be conscious that his theological beliefs color his selection
and interpretation of facts. These beliefs provide, in essence, the glasses through
which he views the past.
In the following interpretation of the origins, development, and spread of the
Seventh-day Adventist Church, a conscious effort has been made to heed Leopold von
Rankes famous injunction to tell it as it actually happened. Yet there has been the
constant realization that to do so would require much more information and insight than
is available. At the same time the writer has tried to heed the warning of an outstanding
European church historian. Men are so much in love with their own opinions, wrote
Fra Paolo Sarpi, that they persuade themselves that God favors them as much as they
do themselves (quoted in P. Burke, ed., Sarpi, p. xxxii).
While attempting to portray the rise and development of the Seventh-day Adventists
as accurately as possible, this account also seeks to avoid a dogmatic interpretation of
events as occurring because God ordained them so. This should not be taken to mean
that there are not many aspects of Seventh-day Adventist history which can be fully
understood only in the light of the great controversy which continues to rage between
Christ and Satan. To the Seventh-day Adventist historian the existence of that controversy
provides the real key to a true understanding of all history, including that of his own
church. The student is challenged to keep this continuing conflict constantly in mind
and thus to develop his own insights into the divine leadings in our past history.
Richard W. Schwarz
P r e f a c e
t o
t h e
R e v i s e d
E d i t i o n
Between the appearance of Light Bearers to the Remnant in 1979 and this revised
edition, the Seventh-day Adventist denomination has grown from approximately
3,000,000 to more than 10,000,000 members. This growth has taken place primarily
in what we have variously called the third world, the developing world, or its more
recent term, the two-thirds world, descriptions that are not precisely equivalents, but
approximations of each other. During the years of this growth, four General Conference
sessions have occurred and three different men have been elected to the General Conference presidency. Adventists have revolutionized their conceptualization of mission
processes and reorganized the representational system of their governance; General
Conference leaders have moved into a new world headquarters office building. The
church has also passed through some of its most serious challenges to doctrine and
authority. At the same time it has coped with social issues that seemed so remote in
1960 as to be unlikely.
This revised edition seeks to depict the denomination as a truly global organization
by narrating its growth and commenting on the changes that growth has fomented.
Because the church has become a world entity it can no longer deal with questions
as though they are primarily North American issues. They have become world issues.
More than ever before Adventists have become aware that while their church emerged
within North America, its growth has produced an international bodya process that has
required changes in governance and an appreciation for the impact of its cosmopolitan
character on faith and practice.
LIGH T B E A RERS
These changes give rise to a second underlying theme, that of the nature of the
challenges Adventism experienced regarding its doctrine and authority. As the church
became larger, much of its activity and many of its programs became more sophisticated. In part this reflected global trends unrelated to religion, but church growth
paralleled by increased professionalism was not a mere coincidence in Adventism.
The struggles over faith, practice, and authority that affected much of the Adventist
world during the last quarter of the twentieth century stemmed not only from questions that remained from an earlier era but also from a well-educated, philosophicallyinquisitive generation that wanted to understand the churchs identity in the context of
a milieu far removed from the nineteenth century and its aftermath.
A third theme also appears in this revision. Changes notwithstanding, the Seventhday Adventist Church has preserved a remarkable continuity since its origins in the
Millerite movement. Adventists still hold as strongly as ever the conviction that their
message is firmly established on biblical foundations and that they are fulfilling a
divine commission to carry this gospel to a perishing world. Adventism at the end of
the twentieth century retains the apocalyptic urgency of 1844 blended with the pastoral
sensitivity that a tortured world needs.
Many similarities to the first edition remain in this revision, but readers of this book
will quickly detect differences. The most obvious change is its format. This revised
edition consists of four parts. The first three are both chronological and topical, but the
fourth is genuinely topicala sweeping view of the denomination. This changed format
represents several aspects of revisionupdating some chapters, adding new chapters,
and rearranging some of the material so that it better reflects the denomination at the
end of the twentieth century as compared to the mid-1970s.
I have made only scant change in chapters 1 through 15 of the first edition. In this
revised edition these chapters constitute Part I and the first three chapters of Part II.
Beginning with chapter 16 of the first edition, I revised by condensing chapters in order
to make room for new material. Chapters 16 through 26 of the first edition have become
chapters 16 through 23 in the revised book, with material from chapter 24 reassigned
to Part IV.
The most serious revisions began with chapter 24 of the first edition and continued
in chapters 27 through 36. Chapters 29 and onward in the first edition received my
close attention because they discussed questions that are still pertinent to the church.
In their updated form these chapters make up the bulk of Part III. This section also
includes four new chapters: 28, 31, 32, and 34. Approximately half of the material in
the revised chapters in Part III is new; the other half is condensed from its original
form.
Chapters 37 and 38 of the first edition are a final statement which Part IV of the
revised book replaces. I formed this last section by combining material from chapters
24, 27, and 28 of the first edition and adding extensively to produce two new chapters,
36 and 37 of the revised edition.
8
One of the more serious difficulties I encountered was that of handling the fastmoving events in the church, especially when describing growth in membership and
institutions, and satellite telecasting. Some of the data were outdated even before publication. Also, regarding theological discussions in the church, new books appeared too
late for me to comment upon. My revisions taper off with events after 1995, but some
references to events, publications, and personalities appear as late as 1999.
Many of the sources I consulted for my revisions do not fit the conventional definition
of history, but they become historiographically significant because they contributed to
the Adventist mindset that, in a sense, was on public trial from the 1970s onward. The
literary spectrum of pertinent material to which I referred ranged from issues discussing the perennial arguments between science and Scripture, to theological hair-splitting
and the debate about the nature of inspiration, and on to light reading such as stories by
missionaries. The Adventist mind fed on all these topics, as well as others, and thus all
of Adventist literature became the forum in which the twentieth-century discussions
about the centrality of Adventism took place. It is my belief that no one can understand
Adventism on the threshold of the twenty-first century without first understanding the
Adventist mentality, hence this literature looms in importance. It is worth repeating
that the globalization of Adventism on the one hand and its internal conflicts and successes on the other are somehow inextricably mixed, perhaps in ways that we are just
beginning to fathom.
Many persons merit my thanks because of their assistance in technical and supportive
ways. My first word of gratitude is to Humberto Rasi, General Conference Director of
Education, who approached me about this project and guided me through it with wise
counsel, especially at crucial points. His secretary, Silvia Sicalo, was always willing to
add my ever-growing list of requests to her already full schedule. John Fowler, also from
the Department of Education of the General Conference, and Russell Holt of Pacific
Press, provided valuable comments and suggestions.
During a long evening session of the Association of Seventh-day Adventist Historians
in Portland, Oregon, in April 1998, my fellow historians expressed both confidence and
encouragement and made numerous helpful suggestions. From among them I should
specifically note Ben McArthur, Eric Anderson, Brian Strayer, and Arthur Patrick who
were especially generous with ideas. Gary Land, chair of the History Department at
Andrews University and Richard Osborn, Vice President for Education of the North
American Division, deserve special thanks for their careful attention to my manuscript
and their incisive critiques.
Many conversations were the source of impressions and ideas that eventually found
themselves in the revision. Cherie Smith, at the time a member of the pastoral staff of
the Collegedale Church, rendered valuable counsel regarding womens ministries. David
Mansfield, a friend and neighbor, acquired a packet of papers for me from the TransEuropean Division that provided information about Adventist relationships to labor
unions in Britain; and Sarah Holmes, a student in denominational history at Andrews
9
LIGH T B E A RERS
University offered me ideas about Adventist lifestyle. Bruce Norman, former faculty
member at the Adventist Institute of Advanced Studies in the Philippines, shared relevant
information with me about Adventism in Asia. From Norman Gulley, whose roots are
in England and who directed the first graduate program in theology in the Philippines, I
gleaned insights about the British Unions biracial reorganization as well as information
about Adventist education in the Far East.
Carl Currie, career missionary to China and a one-time member of the East Asia
Association, provided candid descriptions about Adventist work in China. A. C. McClure, president of the North American Division, gave me a first-hand account of the
evolution of that division from its special relationship with the General Conference
to its contemporary status. Joel Tompkins, a former union president, discussed with me
issues of church administration.
I had virtually free access to the resources of the McKee Library in Collegedale,
Tennessee, where Peggy Bennett, the head librarian, and Shirley Bennett of the periodical section, went out of their way to make information acquisition easy for me. In the
Heritage Room at the James White Library, Andrews University, James Ford and Carlota
Brown provided all the assistance that I needed for successful searches.
Richard Coffen and Gail Hanson of the Review and Herald Publishing Association
generously accommodated my requests for illustrative material, as did Tim Poirier in
the White Estate. Bert Haloviak and John Wycliffe in the General Conference Archives
were tireless in their support of my search for pictures and other materials. Tanya Holland of the Adventist Review provided invaluable service by preparing the illustrative
materials for publication.
My own experience has also contributed to this revision. Some of my conversations
about denominational matters occurred during trips before I undertook this project. I
talked to several members of the Kulakov family and other church workers during visits
to Russia, and to Robert Wong, Eugene Hsu, Robert Folkenberg, Jr., and Daniel Peek,
an ESL teacher at the Unviersity of Beijing, during a trip to China. Conversations with
fellow Adventists and visits to Adventist centers during earlier journeys to Europe and
Latin America gave me a context of understanding for denominational affairs in those
regions, and notes that I made as a participant in the General Conference sessions of
1990 and 1995 were useful to me.
Although the help I received enabled me to produce extensive revisions, I cannot
overlook the towering influence that the original author, Richard Schwarz, still exerts in
this new edition. When rewriting and condensing chapters in the first edition I developed
a new appreciation of his capacity to synthesize and to sequence his material effectively.
It was with more than a little trepidation that I broke into his chapters. Throughout
my revisions I attempted to retain his pertinent thoughts and, as space would permit,
his phraseology. Although the title of the book has changed, and despite my work, he
remains the principal author of this book.
10
Floyd Greenleaf
P A R T
O N E
ORIGINS AND
FORMATIVE YEARS,
1839-1888
These were the years of origin and formation, 1839 to 1888. They began with a sense of
buoyancy and excitement and hope, followed quickly with bitter disappointment after the pent-up
emotions of Adventists dissipated following October 22, 1844. Their belief that Jesus would come
on a specific date that they mistakenly identified from their biblical studies forced them back to
the Bible to find their error. Forty-four years later they struggled over their understandingand
misunderstandingof the relation of law and obedience on the one hand and forgiveness and
grace on the other, wrapped up in the phrase, righteousness by faith. It was the first major doctrinal
battle for Adventists after they had developed their body of teachings.
During the years immediately following the Great Disappointment, Adventists studied their
way to a set of doctrines that included, among others, conditional immortality, the seventh-day
Sabbath, the presence of the Spirit of Prophecy in the church, a broader understanding of the
three angels messages of Revelation 14, and a belief in the priestly ministry of Christ in the
heavenly sanctuary.
In 1860 Adventists chose a name that incorporated their two defining beliefs, and over the
next three years formally organized congregations, conferences, and the General Conference.
In the years that followed they established institutions to support their mission. Schools, healthcare establishments, and publishing enterprises became institutional benchmarks of Adventism.
They also began to sense their responsibility to the world and formed a mission board to oversee
sending workers to other countries.
Until after the American Civil War, the Seventh-day Adventist Church was primarily a church
of the northern part of the United States. Adventists began in the northeastern states and spread
westward, settling in Battle Creek, Michigan, as their headquarters. They survived the Civil War by
setting precedents for the relationship of their church with the state. After that conflict Adventists
ventured southward, somewhat cautiously. For them it was almost a mission to a foreign land.
During these formative years both Joseph Bates and James White, two of the founders of the
church, died. The remaining voice from among the founders was Ellen White, who continued
to guide the fledgling denomination. In the 1880s she spent time in Europe, helping to establish
Adventism abroad. Ministers, eager to perpetuate the churchs beliefs, preached boldly, if not
virulently at times, on prophecy, Sabbath observance, and the soon return of Jesus. Two younger
men, just as vehemently, preached new ideas about the relation of the law to obedience and
forgiveness and grace. For some it was a shock to think that in their emphasis on biblically
based doctrines they had neglected the most basic of all, faith in the atoning blood of Jesus. A
confrontation developed, and at Minneapolis in 1888 the church thrashed it out, leaving wounds
that festered a long time.
The church was not the same afterwards. It was no longer an innocent body. Doctrinally, it
passed through acute soul-searching. For Adventists, it was a time of new beginnings for selfunderstanding.
11
LIGH T B E A RERS
12
C H A P T E R
LIGH T B E A RERS
LIGH T B E A RERS
LIGH T B E A RERS
Economic Conditions
Reform Movements
18
Educational Reform
Health Habits
Feminist Reformers
Many of the most active reformers
were women. A number crusaded for improvement in their own lot. Although along
the frontier it was common for women to
be accepted as near equals, in the older
areas of settlement they were expected to
be good housekeepers, strong in support
LIGH T B E A RERS
Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison (18051879), a New England editor, spoke out against
slavery as a moral wrong.
20
LIGH T B E A RERS