Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music &
Letters.
http://www.jstor.org
I/S/Cand
Letters
JANUARY 1976
VOLUME
No.
LVII
THE
1 'Analysis Today', Probklmsof ModernMusic, ed. Paul H. Lang, New York, I960,
2 'The Significance of Aleatoricism in twentieth-century Music', 77ie Music Review,
xxix (I968), 322.
I
surface to be nothing more than linguistic hairsplitting, the significance of the differentiation becomes apparent in the analysis of a
work such as 'Constellation-miroir', the third and central movement
of Boulez's Third Piano Sonata.3 Close examination of some ideas
Boulez wrote about at the time he was composing the sonata and an
analysis of 'Constellation-miroir' make clear the necessity and
validity of the distinction. In addition, an analysis of this movement
illustrates one meaning of the term 'open form'.
An earlier work by Boulez, Structuresfor two pianos (I 95I-6),
illustrates the composer's attempt to serialize rhythm, dynamics and
attack in addition to pitch. During the completion of Structures,
however, Boulez was already re-examining the validity of the strict
serial procedures he was employing at that time; his writings show a
concern with this problem until the composition of the Third Piano
Sonata (c. I 960). First, Boulez challenged the conclusions serial
composers drew from Webern's works and the manner in which
they 'extended' his procedures:
The model universally chosen is Webern: and in his music the
principal matter for study is the organization of the musical material.
Certain conclusions are arrived at, and these are then deliberately
developed by a process of extension. With real frenzy we set about
[serial] organization as if we were on the threshold of undiscovered
worlds ... Webern organized only intervallic relationships; we now
subject rhythm, tone-colour and dynamics to [serial] organization.
All this serves as fodder for the monstrous multiple organization
which must be renounced forthwith if we are not to condemn ourselves to deafness.4
Second, he questioned the relationship between
elements and the perception of the total form:
the serialized
Each system, carefully worked out in its own terms, could only
cohabit with the others through a miraculous coincidence. The works
of this period also show an extreme inflexibility in all their aspects;
elements in the 'magic squares' which the composer, with his magic
wand, forgot at the birth of the work, react violently against the
foreign and hostile order forced upon them; they get their own
revenge: the work does not achieve any conclusively coherent
organization; it sounds bad and its aggressiveness is not always
intentional.5
These are bitter thoughts from one of the technical masters of
'total serialism'. What Boulez specifically attacked was the applica3 Only two of the proposed five movements have been published: 'Trope' and
'Constellation-miroir'. The latter is designed to be played either forward or in retrograde,
but only the retrograde has been published. Both were completed by I96o.
' In German in 'Einsichten und Aussichten', tr. Hilde Strobel, Melos, xxii (I955),
i62.
? Boukz on Music Today,tr. Susan Bradshaw and Richard R. Bennett, London, 197I,
p. 25.
2
FUNCTIONAL
generativeprocess
p. 63.
directobject
the bread
verb
took
to my house
prepositional
phrase
uickly
adverb
inf6rant
de cette conflagration
que se
comme on menace
l'unique Nombre qui ne peut pas
hesite
cadavre par le bras"
9 'Sonate, que me veux-tu ?', tr. D. Noakes and P. Jacobs, Perspectivesof New Music,
i(1963),
32.
10Hans R. Zeller, 'Mallarme and Serialist Thought', tr. Margaret Shenfield, Die
Reihe,vi (I964), 7.
11 Mallarme, ed. Anthony Hartley, Harmondsworth, I965, p. 2I8.
Ex. 1.
Vif
J126
126
t;=
J126
J5
~~~~ Il~~~~~~
sffz
sffz
___!
uJ
a-----!
iPed.
U{.C.
13
Second are the 'if. . . then' tempo markings, those which are indicated by the same sign that indicates the choice of segment. They state,
in effect, that if the composition is to proceed from segment x to
segment y, the latter segment must be played at z tempo; on the
other hand, if the composition is to proceed from segment q to
segmenty, the latter must be played at w tempo, as in pointS 2:
Ex. 2.
(mobile)
J 80
= 5
4=76 -(stable)
J= 96
(mobile)
=86 -
tressec et rapide
*
.|
--
absolument
Pedale
sants
SECTION
SEGMENTS
UNITS
Mllange
points3
IO
blocs2
points2
24
8
3
3
blocsI
pointsI
II
Tempo does not really affect the number of units. Of the two
types of tempo modification discussed earlier the first occurs within a
segment. The frequent changes in tempo measure the time relationship between chords or pitches (see Ex. i). In music with a basic
pulse this measurement is accomplished by the rhythmic values
assigned to pitches. In his earlier compositions Boulez's notation was
characterized by highly complex rhythms in music that sometimes
lacks a basic pulse. He found that the realization of these rhythms in
performance was an approximation of the notation and that simpler
notation, combined with fluctuating tempo, would serve him
better. 1 As a result, the rhythmic notation in this movement has
actually been simplified. Fluctuations in tempo replace many of the
earlier, complex rhythmic patterns; in their place one finds simple
quavers or semiquavers.
The connective, 'if . . . then' tempo indications between two
segments (see Ex. 2) might appear to be a further usage of chance
techniques, but their primary purpose is to assure a smooth transition
from one segment to the next. Since the order of segments within a
unit is not predetermined, tempo must be considered within the
multiple possibilities of contexts for each segment. This planning can
be seen in the two choices offered by Boulez for the main unit of
points 2 (in the diagram each crotchet or quaver represents a segment):
Ex. 3
---j
138
A J---~~~41-26-121
endu
72
------------s2
8 1---------
26
The pianist, then, actually has far fewer choices than one would
expect from the notation of 'Constellation-miroir'. While there is
choice among individual segments, the organization of these
segments into units prevents random chance and provides a subformal structure. In addition, the tempo markings, which at first
14
glance appear to promote the use of chance, perform two longestablished functions: the control of the rate of musical events; and
the control of smooth transitions between segments.
To this point we have eliminated some misunderstandings about
the use of chance in 'Constellation-miroir' and have determined how
many genuine notational choices are given. In short, it has been
shown that Boulez has loaded the dice. To determine the extent of
the loading an examination of the pitch structure is necessary.
Boulez has stated that his prime concern with serial organization in
this piece was to create horizontal and vertical sonorities related to
each other in a manner that could be perceived by the listener. If
this movement is to be considered serial, it must be considered so in
light of Boulez's definition of the series, with its emphasis on
hierarchy as opposed to pitch-order.
The pitch organization of 'Constellation-miroir' is similar to that
of 'Trope', the other published movement of the Third Piano Sonata.
The same series can be considered the foundation from which Boulez
develops his pitch material:
15
IEFF#BI
G# I
GAACA
I CDD#I
EL 4.
Vif 4=126
-w
accel
C ?ts0u:F--t;
xxf
~v gf
fff
Mf ff
Ih
ff
sYffr
J152.
-127
ft
-j
ff
I0