Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kathllyn Matos
figure. At 0:36, Ciara astonishes the viewers with a long shot of her
dressed in a suit and cornrows whilst performing masculine dance
moves. In the same shot she is also dressed as a woman with a
short dress, long tidy hair and very high heels. The stereotype of
gender in the music industry is highlighted by her exposure of skin
when dressed as a woman. It acts in accordance to Barthes theory
that Striptease is based on contradiction. Women are desexualised
at the very moment when she is stripped naked. He suggests that
it is clothes that intently sexualise women.
This is then challenged at 1:01 as Ciara brilliantly mocks the typical
male superiority through the use of a mid shot of her heels placed
firmly on the shoulder of her male alter ego - the lyrics
accompanying this by stating would it still apply if I played you like
a toy. This identifies that dominance does not only apply for males,
but that Ciara can also exhibit power and control while still being
feminine. Ciara giftedly infers that the male dominance propelled in
our faces is forced due to the shots of the male in the video being
uncomfortable in the throne-like chair. Inversely, Ciara reigns while
in the same position as the male, this is done to reinforce the idea
that males are exposed to too much power and do not always use it
effectively, whereas women sustain a lot more yet are constantly
underestimated.
At 1:14 minutes, we experience the shot known as the best stand
against sexualising women. Ciara appears once again dressed in
baggy and lose clothing, but this time she comprises female dancers
both dressed and performing like male hip-hop artists. This
amazingly contradicts how a group of women are generally
portrayed, as Ciara does not allow her or her female dancers to be
sexualised or objectified in any way.
We reach an intriguing shot at 2:04 where Ciara and all her dancers
raise their arms and flex their muscles while presenting an
unimpressed facial expression. Ciara creates this representation of
male hip-hop artist to emphasise how outrageous she finds it. The
effect of this representation is that women all over the world who
view this video will experience an inner confidence which has
continuously been undermined and discredited by male producers in
the past couple years. These music videos have consistently
depicted women as disposable and interchangeable, which
eventually had been imposed on young girls from the early ages of
adolescence. Her lyrics state if I act like you, walk a mile in your
shoes, would you like that followed by examples such as having
separate bank accounts, lying and manipulating, etc. This is
effectively used to create the imagery of a society where men are
bombarded by liberty and told from a young age that they pursue
the power to treat women as they please whilst women are
expected to be passive and faithful. Ciara confronts these beliefs by
Kathllyn Matos
proving the dissatisfaction that would consume men, had this been
the other way around.
Ciara bravely disregards the male gender through her lyrics at 2:14
as a close up of her face is shown along with the following questions
what? You mad? Cant handle it? This is continuously reinforced as
the video proceeds to a long shot of Ciara and her dancers stood in
an organised military manner while depicting a similar movement to
marches done in an army. It is followed by the position of the
dancers forming an X, which clarifies their refusal to be presented
as nothing but sex symbols. This representation has been created to
demonstrate strength, dedication and persistency in achieving a
world where females do not need to be sexualised in hopes of
acknowledgement. The music video persists of establishing shots of
Ciara and her army implying how prepared they are to put up a
fight against this common stereotype. Ciara asserts that gender
superiority is not constrained by the genre of music. She
undermines the masculine gender views and avows that a female
can also be powerful and positively influential.