Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TITLE
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Experimental Capabilities
To study the temperature distribution along the length of a
3.2
Unit Construction
Figure
1: The
Heat
5. interchangeable Heater
section
6. Axial fan
7. Ducting-intake section
8. Air intake control valve
SUMMARY OF THEORY
Introduction to Convection Heat transfer
The term convection refers to heat transfer that will occur between a
surface and a moving or stationary fluid when they are at different
temperatures as shown in Figure 2. This mode of heat transfer comprises of
two mechanisms. In addition to energy transfer due to random molecular
motion (conduction), energy is also transferred by the bulk, or macroscopic
motion of the fluid. This fluid motion is associated with the fact that, at any
instant,
large
numbers
of
molecules
are
moving
collectively
or
as
to the surface
Ts
of
boundary
layer
phenomena
is
essential
to
and
T s , respectively and
>
<
>
T s ).
and
fluid motion,
transport
properties.
Any
study
of
convection
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Experimental procedures
1. The convection heat transfer rig was connected to a 240 V AC
single phase power source and the main switch was switched on
from the control panel. The digital meter display was allowed to
start up for a few seconds before performing the experiment.
2. The anemometer prop was made sure to properly fitted into the
ducting.
3. The fan was switched on and the air was let to run in the ducting
for a few minutes.
4. The ducting was inserted with flat plate heater and the
temperature was observed without any heat.
5. The temperature values were recorded observed in i3 DAQ
software as well as the reading from anemometer.
6. The power used by the heater was observed using the power
meter provided.
7. The heater switched on using the heater switch in control panel
and we waited until the steady state condition is established. The
temperature and the velocity was recorded in the tables
provided.
8. When the experiment was completed the heater was switched off
first and the apparatus was allowed to cool for 2 to 3 minutes
before the fan was switched off.
9. The steps 4-8 was repeated with other heaters.
5.2
Shut-down procedure
1. The system was switched off using the button in control panel.
2. The heater plug was taken off from the panel and it was arranged
in the space provided at the bottom of the rig
6.0
6.1
Flow case
Heater
surface area
Free stream
velocity
T1
T2
Tm
Density,
(kg/m3) at Tm
Specific heat
capacity, Cp
(j/kg.C) at Tm
Kinematic
viscosity, v at
Tm
Rod Heater
Low
High
0.09048
Fin Heater
Low
High
0.09
1.016
2.032
1.016
2.032
1.016
2.052
26.52
30.06
28.29
28.83
30.19
29.51
26.38
29.60
27.99
32.21
33.66
32.94
29.12
38.87
34.00
25.85
35.85
30.85
1.1708
1.1660
1.1720
1.1528
1.148
1.1608
1007
1007
1007
1007
1007
1007
1.5923*
10-5
1.6035*
10-5
1.5895*
10-5
1.6356*
10-5
1.6456*
10-5
1.6160*
10-5
Thermal
conductivity,
k (W/m. K) at
Tm
Mass flow
rate,
Heat
absorbed, Q
(watts)
Heat transfer
coefficient, h
Hydraulic
diameter, DH
Nusselt
number from
experiment,
(Nuexp)
Prandtl
Number from
experiment,
Prexp
Nusselt
Number from
correlation,
Nucor
Nu/Pr (1/3)
6.2
0.02575
0.02587
0.02573
0.02610
0.02618
0.02594
0.01713
0.03412
0.01715
0.03373
0.01680
0.03397
136.0
136.5
136.8
136.5
136.5
135.5
424.6
1109.3
472.05
1045.98
777.78
725.78
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
1978.72
5151.55
2201.55
4809.10
3565.07
3357.50
0.7287
0.7283
0.7288
0.7274
0.7271
0.7280
43.18
66.65
52.33
72.91
51.40
73.37
7656.85
15206.7
7670.34
47.93
74.08
58.15
14908.2
9
81.07
7411.55
57.16
15089.1
1
81.56
Discussion
When each particle of the fluid follows the flow of a fluid in a smooth
path which never interfere with one another it is called as laminar flow. In
laminar flow, the velocity of the fluid remains constant throughout the path,
at any point in the fluid. On the other hand, irregular flows that creates tiny
whirlpool regions are called the turbulent flow where the velocity of the fluid
in this type of flow are not constant at any point of the fluid. The increase in
viscosity of the fluid that is caused by the intense mixing of air in turbulent
flow caused increase in friction force which in turn increases the heat
transfer coefficient. Hence, turbulent flow has higher convection heat
transfer coefficient compared to laminar flow.
The
difference
between
the
Nusselt
number
obtained
through
experiment and the one that we got through the correlation is considered to
be too high. This is the result of the constant that were assumed in the
correlation which is not possible to be kept constant in the experiment. One
of it is the velocity of air flow. In correlation we assumed that the air flows
are constant but in experiment it changes as it travels through the funnel as
there is presence of surface friction between the air and the funnel surface
and the fin surfaces. Another factor would have been the supply of the air
through forced convection, we could see the fluctuation in the power supply
to the blower which means the mass of air entering the funnel is not the
constant.
The Reynolds number in considered to be the most significant in the
determination of the properly of convection heat transfer as it resembles the
characteristics of the fluid that causes convection heat transfer. Higher
Reynolds number indicates turbulent flows (Re < 2000) where the heat
transfer coefficient in high while lower Reynolds number indicates laminar
flow (Re > 2000) where the heat transfer coefficient is much lower.
Empirical correlation based on geometries exist between Nusselt
number, Reynolds number, Prandtl number and Rayleigh number. It depends
on the way the fluid is initiated. An average Nusselt number is the function of
Rayleigh number and Prandtl number for a natural convection, while for
forced convection, Nusselt number is the function of Reynold and Prandtl
number. The average Nusselt number is significant as it represents the heat
transfer coefficient across the boundary.
7.0
CONCLUSION
The temperature distribution along the length of the vertical pipe was
studied in natural and forced convection by varying the velocity of the air
and the geometry of the funnel; where the Nusselt number and Prandtl
number was calculated using the data obtained. Even though the Nusselt
number obtained through experimental values and correlation differs, with
the increase in the Nusselt number in both the value when the convection is
switched from natural convection (laminar flows) to forced convection
(turbulent flow) it can be proved that the surface heat transfer coefficient of
a vertical tube is higher in forced convection.