Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 Introduction
This design is just an excerpt from my final year project Structural Analysis and Design of 35,000
Capacity Reinforced Concrete Stadium. After analysis and design of the superstructure (see figure
1.1), I realized I had a very large magnitude of axial loads and moments at the foundation.
Foundations must be designed to resist geotechnical and structural failure, and at the same time
should be economical. The ultimate bearing capacity of the supporting soil at 2.00m depth was very
good at 380 KN/m2, (gravely sand at Naze, Owerri) so shallow foundation was adopted.
However, adopting a pad footing proved very uneconomical given the large area of excavation
required (columns are spaced at 6.0m), and the depth of concrete needed to handle shear forces was
much. Raft foundation proved to be too expensive for a soil with such good bearing capacity. After
much consideration, I realized that chaining the columns continuously will do the trick, but at the
same time, I could combine the slab with upstand beams running continuously along the axis of the
column. My whole aim was to reduce the great quantity of concrete that would have been required to
control diagonal shear by using shear reinforcements (stirrups) in the beams which proved to be much
cheaper (see Figure 1.1).
Page 1
For this paper, I selected an axis from the structure in which the intermediate columns had
approximately an ultimate axial load of 3081.075 KN each while the end columns had an axial load of
1680.3 KN (see Figure 1.3).
From the symmetrical arrangement of the loads, it is quite obvious that the centroid will pass through
the middle column, hence, soil pressure can be assumed to be uniform under the whole length of the
footing.
NSLS =
= 12942.05 KN
12942.05 = 1553.04 KN
= 38.14 m2
= 1.051 m
Provide a 1.1 m x 36.3m x 1.1m (trial depth) base (Aprov = 39.93 m2)
Earth Pressure intensity (q) =
= 469.97 KN/m2
. .
= 0.30 m
Assume depth of slab h = 300mm; concrete cover = 50mm and assuming that Y12mm bars will be
used at the slab;
Hence, the effective depth (d) = 300 50 (12/2) = 244mm
The design moment Mx-x =
k=
= 21.14 KN.m
Page 2
. .
.
.
Provide Y12 @ 200 mm c/c (Asprov = 566 mm2/m) in longitudinal direction as distribution bars
Check for shear
The concrete resistance shear stress (Vc) = 0.632
Vc = 0.632
30 3
=
25
0.4665 N/mm2
Page 3
k=
.
.
ASmin =
. .
= 5252 mm
k=
. .
.
ASmin =
= 4124 mm
Provide 4Y32mm + 3Y25mm BOT (Asprov = 4689mm2) mainly around the mid span supports. (See
detailed drawings)
Top reinforcement design
Width of flange (bf) = 1100mm
Span A-B and F-G
M = 1440.08 KN.m
k=
. .
.
.
= 3387.5 mm
Page 4
k=
.
.
. .
.
.
= 1888.224 mm
Shear stress v =
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632
.
.
= 0.5978 N/mm2
Page 5
( .
= 2.474 N/mm2
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632 1.032 1 = 0.652 N/mm2
For Fcu = 30N/mm2, Vc = 0.652
= 0.692 N/mm2
Vc + 0.4 < v Hence shear reinforcement is required
Trying 4 legs of Y10mm, we have
Spacing Sv =
( .
0.95 Fyv + bw Vc d
Vc = 0.692 N/mm2
Vn =
Vn = 706.326 KN
Extent of shear links Sn =
Extent of shear links Sn =
+d
.
+ 1.024 = 2.112 m
Stop shear links at 2.2 m from face of column and provide nominal reinforcement
At column support B (Span B-C)
Shear force = 1633.4 KN
At d from the face of column, Vd =
v =
. .
.
Page 6
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632 1.032 1 = 0.652 N/mm2
For Fcu = 30N/mm2, Vc = 0.652
= 0.692 N/mm2
Vc + 0.4 < v Hence shear reinforcement is required
Trying 4 legs of Y10mm, we have
Spacing Sv =
( .
Vc = 0.632
Vc = 0.632
( .
0.95 Fy + bw Vc d
Vc = 0.6517 N/mm2
Vn =
Vn = 685.69 KN
Extent of shear links Sn =
Extent of shear links Sn =
+d
.
+ 1.024 = 1.049 m
Page 7
Stop shear links at 1.1 m from face of column and provide nominal reinforcement = 3Y10 @ 300mm
Detailing
Typical sections cut through points Band C is shown in Figure 1.5. Kindly download full detailed
drawing from www.structville.blogspot.com
Page 8