LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA

KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA

FORMAT PELAPORAN ULBS
BAHASA INGGERIS SPM
2012

LAPORAN KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

NAMA SEKOLAH: SMK SERI GUNONG

KOD SEKOLAH: KEE 2160
NOMBOR PUSAT: KC 201
NO TELEFON SEKOLAH : 04-7209922
BILANGAN CALON : 115

NAMA KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH:

FAUZIAH BT SAAD

1.

STUDENTS PERFORMANCE REPORT BASED ON CONSTRUCT

(STRENGTH, WEEKNESSESS AND ERRORS)
1.1.

1.2

1.3

Give appropriate responses/Converse on a topic effectively:

a)

Strengths.
Adequate understanding of topic but with limited ability to
sustain a conversation.
Ability to catch and maintain audience-interest throughout
presentation.

b)

Weaknesses.
Inability to interact/hold a discussion/hold a conversation
Inability to arouse interest of the audience.

c)

Errors.
Wrong topic
Wrong discussion

Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation:

d)

Strength.
Fairly fluent and clear speech with frequent and long pause.

e)

Weaknesses.
Fluency is interrupted by consistent halting and long pauses.
Minimal or no utterance

f)

Errors.
Wrong pronunciation

Speak coherently:
g)

Strength.
Flow of ideas is interrupted by use of inappropriate discourse
markers and linkers.
Some relevant and appropriate responses.

h)

Weaknesses
Minimal or no flow of ideas
Very few relevant and appropriate responses.

i)

Errors
Wrong information and ideas on the topic.

1.4

1.5

Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within

context:
j)

Strength.
Good range of vocabulary with some interesting expressions.
Accurate and clear language used most of the time with some
slips that do not disrupt meaning.

k)

Weaknesses.
Limited range of vocabulary
Frequent use of inappropriate vocabulary which distort
meaning
Minimal use of language
Able to perform only limited language functions in context.

l)

Errors.
Wrong vocabulary
A few words mistake

Speak using correct grammar:

m) Strengths:
Proficient candidates had no problem with these two aspects. Most of
them we able to speak and converse using grammatically correct
sentences.
n) Weaknesses
Weak candidates mainly resorted simple or compound sentences to
play safe as they have no confidence in using more complex structures.
They made a lot of grammar errors which affect the flow of the ideas.
o)

Errors.
Pronoun errors
Subject verb agreement errors
Tense errors

2.

OVERALL STUDENTS PERFORMANCE BASED ON SCORE

LEVEL
EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
WEAK
VERY WEAK
TOTAL MARKS
3.

SCORE
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
5-10

NO OF CANDIDATES
0
0
7
18
90
115

COMMENT ON INSTRUMENT/MODEL
3.1

Model been used for students:

The students used Narrating and Giving description for Model 1 & 2 in
their form 4 assessment while Role-Playing as their activity for Model
3 in their form 5 assessment.

3.2

Suitability of model to students.

Most of the models suited with the level of students proficiency in this
school. Most of the students were able to complete the task.

ADVISE TO CANDIDATES
Candidates should be more creative in carrying out their task.
English teachers always stress on the importance of English, especially
in this global era and for science subjects. Students were also
encouraged to interact among themselves in the language.

ADVISE TO TEACHER
Comprehensive evaluation, which consists of teacher evaluation
especially in speaking. Teacher role as advisor, reader and resource
person for the students. As for the students, when they evaluate the
others work, it provide every speaker with real speaker, enable
students to learn different speaking and listening strategies from one
another and focus more on speaking and listening aspects.

Reported by :
..

(FAUZIAH BT SAAD)
DATE: 15 MAY 2012