Professional Documents
Culture Documents
time:
Mendelssohn, Schumann, Chopin, Wagner,
Verdi, and Liszt.
All of them are born, amazingly, between 1809 and 1813.
Which means that each of them was coming
of age just exactly at the time of the death of
Beethoven.
It also means that they were coming of age
just
as diatonicism was being seriously
threatened for the first time,
as the Classical style's rubber band was
being perilously stretched
all of this, naturally, is
thanks to Beethoven,
if "thanks" is the word. [LAUGH]
Some of those composers,
certainly Verdi, come out of
different traditions.
But others, in particular Mendelssohn and
Schumann, are in
very clear-cut ways heirs to Mozart,
Beethoven, and Schubert.
Mendelssohn, Schumann and Chopin are, I
would argue,
the greatest composers of piano music after Beethoven
and
Schubert and before at least Brahms.
Each, amazingly though, mostly abandoned
the piano sonata,
the form in which Beethoven was most prolific.
Mendelssohn wrote hundreds of works for
the piano, many of which
have entered the repertoire, and yet only three piano
sonatas which absolutely have not entered
it.
One of these, the E major, Opus 6, is
clearly modeled on,
or at the very least inspired by,
Beethoven's Opus 101,
of which it is such a pallid echo,
one can hardly hear Mendelssohn's voice in it at
all, much less Beethoven's.
Schumann wrote three sonatas, all with
truly wonderful things in them,
but even a lover of his music as fervent as I am
would have to admit that
each of these works is either flawed
or at least limited, and reveals a certain formal awkwardness.
There's just this slightest sense of a
child wearing his parent's clothing.
It's not just that they are too big for
him, they're too old for him.
In Schumann's hands, and in Mendelssohn's,
the piano sonata begins to feel like a
past number,
a sense one never gets listening to
Schumann's greatest piano works.
It is interesting and perhaps revealing that
Schumann's fantasy, which was
initially called
a sonata in the planning stages, is
by contrast so formally unrestrained,
individual, expressive,
it's as if even the word "sonata" itself was
a problematic one for Schumann
and he felt liberated as
soon as he could let go of it.
Chopin did write two truly great piano
sonatas,
but not only do they represent a tiny
fraction of his output,
one of them is the piece that Schumann referred to as "the four
unruly children."
Even Beethoven, in his late period, would have
questioned whether it was
appropriately titled.
And the other Chopin sonata, while
outwardly more traditional,
does not really rely on traditional sources
of drama.
After hundreds of listenings to the piece,
I still can't even really locate its first
movement's recapitulation.
Nominally, it's a sonata form, but the
form itself means little to it.
The work thrives because of the beauty and
the interest in the material,
phrase by phrase, rather than because of
its structure,
whereas even the last works of Beethoven
are always
deeply concerned with structure, no matter
how unconventional
those structures might in fact be.
In short, it is interesting that...
you know, the "Beethoven influence" is
incessantly
talked about, yet in honesty, while it would be wrong to call it a
negative influence given that it's spawned
such creativity,
it was, in a sense, a destructive
influence.
Put another way, Beethoven advanced the
forms he worked in
to a point where their total destruction
was probably inevitable
if music was going to remain vibrant.
As we come to the end of this class, what
strikes me is
not just how much more ground there is to
cover with the Beethoven sonatas,
but how different ground could have moved
us in different directions.
Every time I made the decision to focus on
one sonata,
one movement rather than another, it moved
the discussion in one direction.
Focusing on another sonata might
equally