Professional Documents
Culture Documents
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Photographs of AAQM station installations
Page 1 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Project Site
Page 2 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Geo Engineering Survey photographs
Page 3 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
GIDC Reservoir
Page 4 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Vav Village
Page 5 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Page 6 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Janiyadra Village - Noise
Koliad Village
Padariya Noise
Project Site
Vadadla Village
Page 7 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Vav Village
Photographs of water sampling for aquatic studies
GIDC Reservoir
Koliad Village
Vadadla Village
Page 8 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Padariya Village
Vav Village
Photographs of Flora observed
Galenda Village
Janiyadra Village
Page 9 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Project Site
Koliad Village
Page 10 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Padariya Village
Skittering Frog
Dragonfly
Guppy Fish
Page 11 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Stone Chat
Page 12 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Photographs of Plankton species
Page 13 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Page 14 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Page 15 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Photographs of Benthos
Gomphonema sp.
Scripsella sp.
Thallasiosira sp.
Euglena
Page 16 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Chaetoceros sp.
Tetrastrum sp.
Ambheta Village
Vadadla Village
Vadadla Village
Jolva Villaje
Page 17 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Project Site
Galenda Village
Page 18 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Janiyadra Village
Koliad Village
Vav Village
Dahej Villaje
Page 19 of 20
Photographs of Baseline Monitoring Sampling carried out in 10 km radius of study area around
project site of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India for EIA for proposed synthetic resin manufacturing unit.
(Duration Oct 2014 to Dec 2014)
Padariya Village
Dahej Village
Page 20 of 20
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Affected Area
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Affected Area
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Affected Area
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
SN 10. Leak from hydrogen cylinders through instrument tubing- Stability Class F (2.2)
Damage distances for Overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
Plot Plan:
M/s. POLYOLS AND POLYMERS
at Plot No. D2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej - II, Tal Vagra,
Dist - Bharuch, State Gujarat, India
Predominant Wind
Direction - SW to NE
SN 15. Leakage from 200 meters length Natural Gas pipeline -Stability Class F (2.2)
Damage distances for Thermal radiation from jet fire
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
TOLUENE ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (MIBK) ..................................................................................................................................... 3
CYCLOHEXANONE.................................................................................................................................................................. 4
METHYL ETHYL KETONE........................................................................................................................................................ 5
ETHYL ACETATE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6
ACRYLO NITRILE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
ETHYL ACRYLATE................................................................................................................................................................... 9
ETHYLENE DIAMINE................................................................................................................................................................ 10
HYDROGEN-HYDROGENATION REACTOR .......................................................................................................................... 11
HYDROGEN-HYDROGEN CYLINDER BANK.......................................................................................................................... 12
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL (IPA) .................................................................................................................................................. 13
METHYL METHACRYLATE...................................................................................................................................................... 14
BUTYL ACETATE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15
BUTANOL ................................................................................................................................................................................. 16
STYRENE ................................................................................................................................................................................. 17
ACETIC ACID............................................................................................................................................................................ 18
BUTYL METHACRYLATE......................................................................................................................................................... 19
FORMALDEHYDE..................................................................................................................................................................... 20
XYLENE .................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
PHENOL.................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
SULFURIC ACID ....................................................................................................................................................................... 24
Page 1 of 24
TOLUENE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Toluene,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
Amount of Toluene,KL
pool Area,m2
D
atm
4
8.33
45
20
58.7
F
atm
4
2.2
10
20
57.3
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
<10
<10
Pool Fire
4.4
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
4.983
Distance to radiation level 37.5kw/m2,..m
16
<10
30
Distance to radiation level 4kw/m2,..m
34
48
Distance to radiation level 1.6 kw/m2,..m
46
Assumptions
Stability class is D and F.
For MCS 10mm hole diameter is considered. (For 3 pipe this is ~10% of pipe diameter ) (Ref 3.A.2.4,Purple Book).
The line feeding Toluene to the reactor will be isolated after detection & identification of leak. The release time is taken
as 15mins.
The leak will form an evaporating puddle. Puddle height is 25mm.
No fire water spray system in process area.
No gas detection is available in process area.
Flammable effects will be analysed.
Area is classified area.
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.28kg/s.The total material released is 1267kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Toluene vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 5mins.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 16/less than 10m respectively. But
the total spilled material will be burnt within 5 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 34 & 46m for atmosphere condition D and 30 & 48 m for F.
Page 2 of 24
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of MIBK,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of MIBK,KL
20
20
60.9
60.9
<10
<10
4.21
3.71
14
29
<10
27
39
42
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
For all 10mm leak MCS scenarios assumptions are covered in general assumptions and similar to Toluene scenario.
Hence these are not repeated for each such scenarios.
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.23kg/s.The total material released is 1221kgs.
The evaporating pool will release MIBK vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 6mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F, the temp (10degC) is below flash point of MIBK (14degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 14/less than 10m respectively. But
the total spilled material will be burnt within 6 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 29 & 39m for atmosphere condition D and 27 & 42m for F.
Page 3 of 24
CYCLOHEXANONE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Cyclohexanone,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of Cyclohexanone,KL
20
20
pool Area,m2
56
56
<10
<10
3.1
2.88
12
24
<10
25
33
38
Wind Speed,m/s
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammable Effects:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.34kg/s.The total material released is 1328kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Cyclohexanone vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 8mins.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 12/<10m respectively.But the total
spilled material will be burnt within 8 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 24 & 33m for atmosphere condition D and 25 & 38m for F.
Page 4 of 24
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Atm
Atm
Pressure,barg
Atm
Atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Leak Size,mm
10
pool Area,m2
60.7
10
61.5
<10
<10
3.7
3.28
12
26
<10
25
35
39
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammability Effect:
Discussion:
The pool fire due to this spill will last for 5mins and all 1223kgs of spilled MEK will burn within this time.
The radiation of 37.5kw/m2 will experienced at 12m for atmospheric class D.
The total spilled material will be burnt within 5 mins.The radiation will experience for this time only.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 26 & 35m for atmosphere condition D and 25 & 39m for F.
Page 5 of 24
ETHYL ACETATE
Scenario
Most Credible Scienario of Ethyl Acetate,Spillage from 200Lit Drum
Input Data
Stability Class
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
200
200
pool Area,m2
20
20
<10
<10
1.09
0.95
<10
<10
14
13
Temperature,degC
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Discussion:
The pool fire due to this spill will last for 3mins and all 175kgs of spilled ETHYL ACETATE will burn within this time.
The burn rate is 1.09kg/s.
The radiation of 37.5kw/m2 will not experienced due to this fire.
Due to these reasons there is unlikely that other drums will get damaged and additional ETHYL ACETATE will be
spilled.
If the explosive mixture is not ignited immediately then the spilled material will be evaporated at rate of 0.29kg/s and it
will take 16 mins to evaporate all the spilled material.
Page 6 of 24
ACRYLO NITRILE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of ACN,Leakage from 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of ACN,KL
10
10
IDLH,ppm
85
85
LD50,ppm
333
333
0.62
0.0455
<10
<10
Output
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
2.95
2.667
11
<10
23
24
31
36
Distance to LC50,m
49
26
Distance to IDLH,m
108
91
Assumptions
The line feeding ACN to the reactor will be isolated after detection & identification of leak. The release time is taken as
15mins.
The leak will form an evaporating puddle.
Puddle height is 25mm.
ACN Pump should having double mechanical seals.
No fire water spray system in process area.
Toxic and flammable both effects will be analysed.
Area is classified area.
Toxic Effect:
Page 7 of 24
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.23kg/s.The total material released is 1225kgs.
The evaporating pool will release ACN vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
LC50 distances are 49 & 26m for atmospheric condition D & F respectively.
The cloud will reach these distance within 3 mins of release. The concentration at this point will be 333ppm for 1-2
mins and subsequently it decreases below IDLH value.(As seen in below fig)
A part of the emergency plan considers the evacuation of (parts of) the plant, the neighboring plants and people in
further surroundings to minimize exposure in case of an Acrylonitrile vapour cloud
ACN detectors can be installed at the strategic locations in the plant and battery limit which helps in alarming that ACN
is escaping to offsite.
To minimize the effects it is suggested that the area where ACN is handled may have bund wall of 300mm.This will
limit the spread of ACN spill and reduce the pool area. Eventually evaporation rate and ACN evaporated & released to
air can be minimized.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 8mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 23 & 31m for atmosphere condition D and 24 & 36 m for F.
ACN is Highly reactive and reacts violently with strong oxidising agents.ACN emits toxic fumes of hydrogen cyanide
and nitrogen oxide when heated to decomposition.
In the event of a fire involving acrylonitrile, use alcohol resistant foam, or normal foam if not available, and
liquid tight protective clothing with breathing apparatus
Page 8 of 24
ETHYL ACRYLATE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Ethyl Acrylate,Leakage from 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
10
10
0.405
0.0271
<10
<10
3.28
2.91
<10
<10
23
22
31
33
Output
Pool Fire
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.32kg/s.The total material released is 1310kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Ethyl Acrylate vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 8mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 23 & 31m for atmosphere condition D and 22 & 33m for F.
Page 9 of 24
ETHYLENE DIAMINE
Scenario
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
10
10
Output
Evaporation Rate ,gm/s
0.038
<10
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
0.65
<10
11
Material Solidify
Page 10 of 24
If the explosive mixture is not ignited immediately then the spilled material will be evaporated at rate of 0.038kg/s
The storage area shall be well ventilated
HYDROGEN-HYDROGENATION REACTOR
Scenario
Hydrogenation Reactor Catastrophic Failure
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
300
300
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Volume of reactor,m3
10.7
10.7
<10
<10
24
75
Output
Released Quantity,Kg
Explosion
Assumptions:
The catastrophic failure will release all the contents to atmosphere almost instantaneously. The 50% of reactor volume
contains hydrogen which is available for explosion.
The release will catch fire immediately as MIE of hydrogen is very less (0.017mJ) and result in explosion.
Total released material is 10.7 kg.
Flammable Effect (Explosion):
Discussion:
The failure of hydrogenation reactor will result in release of reactants and the content will splash with force exerted
due to 100barg pressure.
Almost instantaneously the released hydrogen will explode as hydrogen do not need any separate ignition source as
its required minimum ignition energy is very low (0.017mJ).
The explosion will result in overpressure. The analysis results shows that overpressure wave more than 8psi will not
be experienced.
At distance of 24/75 m, the overpressure experienced is 0.5psi for stability class D/F respectively.It can cause injuries
due to glass shattering of windows. It can be protected by applying safety laminates on the windows which come
under this area
Page 11 of 24
F
300
100
2.2
10
0.047
1.22
25
1
<10
<10
<10
Assumptions:
Atmospheric stability class F & D.
Leak is from instrument tubing which is disconnected and of size .
The leak will cat fire immediately as MIE of hydrogen is very less(0.017mJ).A jet fire will sustain at the leak.
The leak is assumed to be for 15mins before detection and isolation.
Flammable Effect Explosion
No Explosion
Discussion:
At the release rate of 0.018 & 0.0203 kg/s for stability class D & F .The burning will occur and it will end within 20 secs
(completely burning 1.08 / 1.22 kgs in one cylinder).
At this rate the radiation effect of Jet Fire are maximum. All radiation effects are within less than 10m from jet source.
The flame length is 1m at start. This is due to high pressure inside of the cylinder.
Practically it will take more time but with less release rate. As pressure will reduce inside cylinder the release rate will
also reduced.
In case of stability class F, the explosion effects are also experienced.0.5 psi overpressure is experienced upto
25m.This overpressure can shatter glasses.
Page 12 of 24
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of IPA,KL
20
20
61.5
61.5
<10
<10
2.4
2.21
<10
20
<10
21
27
32
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.23kg/s.The total material released is 1208kgs.
The evaporating pool will release IPA vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 9mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F,the temp (10degC) is below flash point of IPA (11.67degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 20 & 27m for atmosphere condition D and 21 & 32m for F.
Page 13 of 24
12 METHYL METHACRYLATE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Methyl Methacrylate,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
10
10
56.4
56.4
<10
<10
3.21
2.87
<10
23
<10
22
30
33
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammable Effects:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.33kg/s.The total material released is 1319kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Methyl Methacrylate vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind
direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 8mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 23 & 30m for atmosphere condition D and 22 & 33m for F.
Page 14 of 24
13 BUTYL ACETATE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Butyl Acetate,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
10
10
57.5
57.5
<10
<10
3.4
11
24
<10
23
32
35
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammable Effects:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.307kg/s.The total material released is 1294kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Butyl Acetate vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 7mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F,the temp (10degC) is below flash point of butyl acetate (23.9degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
In case of stability class D,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 11m.But the total spilled material will
be burnt within 6 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 24 & 32m for atmosphere condition D and 23 & 35m for F.
Page 15 of 24
14 BUTANOL
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Butanol,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of Butanol,KL
10
10
60.6
60.6
<10
<10
2.6
2.41
11
22
<10
23
29
34
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Flammable Effects:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.24 kg/s. The total material released is 1227 kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Butanol vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 8 mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F, the temp (10degC) is below flash point of Butanol (28.9degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 11/less than 10m.But the total
spilled material will be burnt within 9 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 22 & 29m for atmosphere condition D and 23 & 34m for F.
Page 16 of 24
15 STYRENE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of styrene,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of styrene,KL
20
20
57.3
57.3
<10
<10
4.35
3.98
15
31
<10
29
42
46
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.31kg/s. The total material released is 1298kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Styrene vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 5 mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F, the temp (10degC) is below flash point of Styrene (31.1degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 15/less than 10 m.But the total
spilled material will be burnt within 5 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 31 & 42m for atmosphere condition D and 29 & 46m for F.
Page 17 of 24
16 ACETIC ACID
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Acetic Acid,leakage through 10mm hole
Input Data
D
atm
atm
4
8.33
4
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
10
10
53.27
Solid
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,barg
Wind Speed,m/s
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
<10
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
1.28
<10
12
15
Solid at 10degC
Flammable Effect:
Acetic acid will solidify below
16degC at atmospheric pressure.
Hence no hazardous scenario is
analysed
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.41kg/s. The total material released is 1397kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Acetic Acid vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 18 mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F, at temp (10degC) acetic acid will solidify(below 16degC)
In case of stability class D,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is not experienced
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 12 & 15m for atmosphere condition D
Page 18 of 24
17 BUTYL METHACRYLATE
Scenario
Most Credible Scienario of Butyl Acrylate,Spillage from 200Lit Drum
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
200
200
pool Area,m2
20
20
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
<10
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
1.19
<10
16
21
Assumptions:
The damage of drum is happened during handling.
There can be 10 events of handling.
Due to damage total material of the drum is spilled on the ground.
Due to the adjacent drums the pool height is considered as 10mm.Hence the pool area is considered as 20m2.
Although the flash point 52.2degC is higher than atmospheric temperature,the consequence is evaluated assuming
that the spill will get an ignition immediately.
The consequence is evaluated for class D only.
Flammable Effect:
Page 19 of 24
18 FORMALDEHYDE
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Formaldehyde,Spillage from 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
45
10
Pressure,barg
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of Formaldehyde,KL
50
50
IDLH,ppm
20
Wind Speed,m/s
Output
Solution Release rate,kg/hr
1.44
1.44
0.0133
0.0133
<10
<10
Distance to IDLH,m
45
162
Discharge Calculations
The discharge is modeled as liquid flow through sharp edged orifice
The Discharge Rate of Formaldehyde Soln.
: 1.44 kg/s
The release rate of formaldehyde from solution can be done in following two basis,
1. There is certain volume over the pool whose composition can be found out by vapor pressure (0.34psi) of
formaldehyde solution at ambient conditions. This formaldehyde is available for dispersion. It can be modeled as direct
source in ALOHA as instantaneous release.
2. The emission rates of formaldehyde from 37% solution are available in literature. (Ref: Estimating Formaldehyde
Emission in Air by EPA;1991) For different process and storages rates are reported. Maximum of these rates
(0.35kg/Mg) can be used in ALOHA and modeled in ALOHA as direct source with continuous rate.
Based on vapor pressure,on conservative side it is assumed that from the released solution 2.5% of the amount of
formaldehyde gas is released to atmosphere.
The release rate of formaldehyde gas
: 1.44*0.37*2.5% = 0.0133kg/s
This much formaldehyde is available to disperse in downwind direction.It is modeled as direct source - continuous in ALOHA.
Flash Fire Envelope:
The envelope diameter is <10m for both atmospheric stability classes.
Page 20 of 24
Toxic Effect:
The Area is patchy hence not
shown.
Discussion:
It is assumed that after isolation and control of the formaldehyde solution leak(ie 15mins) still there will be release of
formaldehyde gas from spilled solution but it is assumed that it will be negligible as all 37% formaldehyde is released
during the leak.
The IDLH distance for stability class D & F is 45 and 162m. For atmospheric class D the area of dispersion is not
wide and it is patchy ,hence ALOHA has not given the map. For class F also the spread of area along the line of
concentration is not more than 5m.
At these distances the horizontal spread of vapour cloud is not more than 10m maximum.
The toxic effect is more severe than flammable effects.
Page 21 of 24
19 XYLENE
Scenario
Most Credible Scienario of xylene,Spillage from 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
atm
atm
Pressure,barg
atm
atm
Wind Speed,m/s
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of xylene,KL
20
20
58.7
58.7
<10
<10
5.167
4.65
17
<10
35
32
48
51
pool Area,m2
Output
Flash Fire Envelope,m
Pool Fire
Burn Rate of Pool fire ,kg/s
Flammable Effect:
Discussion:
The discharge rate through leak is 1.28kg/s.The total material released is 1268kgs.
The evaporating pool will release Xylene vapors to atmosphere which will disperse in downwind direction.
If the dispersed vapors got ignition then a fire will flash back to source and pool fire will sustained. The total material
will burnt out in 4mins.
Although for atmospheric stability class F,the temp (10degC) is below flash point of xylene (24degC), the
consequence is calculated considering the fire initiated due to other source.
In case of stability class D/F,radiation of 37.5kw/m2 is experienced up to distance 17/less than 10m.But the total
spilled material will be burnt within 4 mins.
4.0 & 1.6 kw/m2 distances are 35 & 48m for atmosphere condition D and 32 & 51m for F
Page 22 of 24
20 PHENOL
Scenario
Most Credible Scenario of Phenol,Spillage from 10mm hole
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
45
10
Pressure,barg
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Amount of Phenol,KL
40
40
IDLH,ppm
250
250
LD50,ppm
2500
2500
Wind Speed,m/s
Output
Evaporation rate,kg/hr
0.01026
Distance toLD50,m
<10
Distance to IDLH,m
<10
2.48
11
21
28
Material Solidify
Flammable Effect:
Toxic Effect:
All the toxic endpoint distances are less than 10m.
Discussion:
LD50 and IDLHconcentration will not reach more than 10m.
The flash point (79degC) is more than atmospheric temp. Then also the radiation effects are analyzed considering it
will burning due to fire.
The 37.5 kw/m2 radiation will experienced upto 11m. 4 & 1.6 kw/m2 will experienced up to distance of 21&28m.
Page 23 of 24
21 SULFURIC ACID
Scienaro 1
Catastrophic Failure of Sulfuric acid Tank
Input Data
Stability Class
Temperature,degC
Pressure,kg/cm2g
atm
atm
8.33
2.2
Atmospheric Temperature,degC
45
10
Volume of vessel,m3
10
10
Diameter,m
Height,m
ERPG2,mg/m3
10
10
Evaporation Rate,kg/min
1.5
0.105
LC50 Distance,m
<10
<10
ERPG2 Distance,m
13
<10
Wind Speed,m/s
Output
Assumptions
For this worst-case analysis, it was conservatively assumed that the sulfuric acid stored in the tank contains 4% sulfur
trioxide (oleum). However, the actual amount of oleum in 96% sulfuric acid is negligible. Nevertheless, to be
conservative, a 4% oleum concentration was used as input into the ALOHA model to simulate a release of sulfuric
acid
The release is instantaneous.
The release will be modeled as burning / evaporating puddle.
Atmospheric stability class is D (Wind velocity 8.33m/s).This is worst case for pool formation, evaporation. With the
heat available from ground and atmosphere is at these conditions, the pool evaporation rate is maximum.
The dyke around sulfuric acid tank is not designed to contain total volume of tank.
The pool height is 10mm(1cm)
Toxic Effect:
All toxic endpoints distances are less than 10m.
Discussion:
ERPG 2 concentration will not reach more than 13m.
The release rate of SO3 from sulfuric acid is 1.5gm/s and amount released in air is 5.39kgs.(for stability class D)
The release rate of SO3 from sulfuric acid is 0.12gm/s and amount released in air is 368gms.(for stability class F)
It is suggested to have 300mm bund wall around sulfuric acid tank and pumping area. This will help to restrict sulfuric acid spill
to minimum area.The area inside bund can be of acid resistant material.
Page 24 of 24
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
50
41
45
10
11
46
51
10
11
12
13
43 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
47
10
11
12
13
14
15
52 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
44 19 20
21
22 23 24 25
48 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
53 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
42
45 26 27 28 29 30
31
49 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
54 28 29 30
31
50 30
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
50
41
45
10
11
46
51
10
11
12
13
43 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
47
10
11
12
13
14
15
52 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
44 19 20
21
22 23 24 25
48 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
53 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
42
45 26 27 28 29 30
31
49 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
50 30
54 28 29 30
31
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
List of Partners:
Sr.No. List of partners
Contact No.
Address
9377001193
(02632) 273708
2
3
4
(0260) 2462985
9824141616
9427870258
Page 1 of 1
Population-Total
Population-Rural
Population-Urban
Population(0-6Years)
SC Population
5.0
0
913
962
940
932
ST Population
5.0
Literates
26.0
Illiterates
73.0
Total Workers
43.0
Main Worker
34.0
Marginal Worker
Non Worker
9.0
57.0
CL (Main+Marginal)
25.0
Al (Main+Marginal)
39.0
HHI (Main+Marginal)
1.0
OW (Main+Marginal)
35.0
tw*$$clRT
r:
j.-1.'
, ..*<ci.-t
!i r A 4f uf , '. ]. .r ;
'q,
;, Lt t
.,-
-1"
I L- +-.L E c-.
-') .
t\ ;', ti,
:jrr
1,.,, i l,
r,j:..-.i
!tir tr iii
r,:
!, ...
,,.-
!. iii 1r..rr(i.,irLi r
r,r rlr.,.
L.r,ii) -i ,,r,:i,1!
!)u!t0:. \t:\\I lj.la-t t Ri 1\l) s!IpLy {rr \'.1t O{. S Sy\ I IIL t 1{t ltrstls
t\)ll \:,1'i tr'1'I1.i. i\ \l);[a:!] r. ]{]JIlUIt 1\} ,it Rl...i I I ..r.1.1i: a-,
;\Dt_st nrEs"
;:,'
Jt\,ts!
.i.tir:0ii
l\j);_.1
P2
(FOR
CAR)
26.5
Lab on FF
48.00
Tank
farm
area
8
Utility
30.0
COMMON
OPEN PLOT
10.00
38.33
20.00
1
2
4
3
20.00
5
6
7
Petroleum
Class A U/g
tankfarm
20.00
18.00
1. HYDROGEN TROLLY
2. HYDROGEN REACTOR
3. RM STORAGE BAGS
4. RM STORAGE DRUMS
5. FG STORAGE DRUMS
6. FG STORAGE BAGS
7. EXPLOSIVE RM STORAGE AREA
8. BOILER, THF, CP, DG, ALL UTILITIES
GREEN BELT AREA
Product Name
1 (a)
Acrylic resin
Proposed
production
capacity
MT/Month
60
1 (b)
Acrylic Polyols
150
1 (c)
Acrylic emulsion
150
Hydrogenated ketonic
resin
150
Raw materials
Consumption
Kg/kg of
MT/Month
product
Methyl methacrylate
Butyl methacrylate
Acrylic Acid
Poly Vinyl Alcohol
Benzoyl peroxide (Initiator)
0.330
0.460
0.240
0.0003
0.021
19.80
27.60
14.40
0.02
1.26
Toluene
Acrylic monomers
Benzoyl peroxide (Initiator)
0.50
0.49
0.01
75.0
73.5
1.5
Methyl methacrylate
0.396
59.40
Sodium lauryl sulphate
0.008
1.20
Ammonium persulphate
0.001
0.15
Other acrylic monomers which shall be used in product no. 1 (a), (b), (c) as per product spec. are :
Acrylonitrile, Methyl Acrylate, Ethyl Acrylate, Butyl Acrylate, 2 ethyl Hexyl Acrylate, Methoxyethyl
Acrylate, Dimethyl amino Acrylate, Methacrylic Acid, Ethyl methacrylate, Isobutyl methacrylate, 2
ethyl hexyl methacrylate, Lauryl methacrylate, Stearic methacrylate, Di methyl amino methacrylate,
Allyl methacrylate, 2 Hydroxy ethyl Acrylate, 2 Hydroxy Propyl Acrylate, 2 Hydroxy ethyl
methacrylate, 2 Hydroxy Propyl methacrylate, Acryl amide, Methacrylamide, Glycidyl Acrylate,
Styrene
Ketonic Resin
300
Ketonic resin
Butyl acetate /Ethyl
acetate/MEK/IPA/butanol
Hydrogen gas
Raney nickel (catalyst)
0.882
0.021
132.4
3.15
0.098
0.002
14.7
0.30
Cyclohexanone
Optional components :
Methyl Cyclohexanone
Acetophenone
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
MIBK
Formaldehyde (37%) /
Paraformaldehyde
Caustic soda flakes
0.800
240.0
1.200
360.0
0.056
16.8
Page 1 of 3
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Product Name
Proposed
production
capacity
MT/Month
1500
Raw materials
Consumption
Kg/kg of
MT/Month
product
Castor oil
0.800
1200.0
Ketonic Resin
0.199
298.5
Di butyl tinoxide
0.001
1.5
Optional raw materials which shall be used in product no. 4 as per product spec. are :Acrylic Polyols, Glycerol,
Trimethylolpropane Propoxylate
5 (a)
5 (b)
6 (a)
Phenol formaldehyde
resin
(a) Phenol
formaldehyde / alkyl
phenol formaldehyde
resin NOVOLACS
750
Phenol formaldehyde
resin (b) alkyl Phenol
formaldehyde resin
resole
300
Polyamide resin
(a) Co solvent grade
polyamide resin
600
Phenol /
Para tertiary butyl phenol/
Nonyl phenol
Formaldehyde (37%) /
paraformaldehyde
Oxalic acid / hydrochloric
acid - catalyst
0.970
727.5
0.672
504.0
0.020
15.0
1.000
0.730
300.0
219.0
0.018
0.030
0.005
5.4
9.0
1.5
Dimer acid /
Fatty acid (Soya fatty acid/
Tall oil fatty acid)
Ethylene Diamine / TETA
0.850
0.134
510.0
80.4
0.107
64.2
6 (b)
Polyamide resin
(b) Alcohol soluble
polyamide resin
600
Dimer acid
Acetic acid
Ethylene Diamine / TETA
0.816
0.146
0.155
489.6
87.6
93.0
6 (c)
Polyamide resin
(c) Reactive poly
amide resin
600
Dimer acid
Soya Fatty Acid
Ethylene Diamine / TETA
0.79
0.154
0.074
474.0
92.4
44.4
300
*Hexanediol
#Adipic Acid
Tri methylolpropane(TMP)/
Glycerol/ Tri
methylolethane(TME)
#Iso Pthalic Acid
0.690
0.425
0.007
207.0
127.5
2.10
0.009
2.70
Page 2 of 3
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Product Name
Proposed
production
capacity
MT/Month
Raw materials
Consumption
Kg/kg of
MT/Month
product
600
Gum Rosin
Para Tertiary butyl Phenol/
Nonyl phenol
Para Formaldehyde
Pentaerythritol
0.7
0.325
420.0
195.0
0.173
0.135
103.8
81.0
8 (b),9
600
Gum Rosin
Pentaerythritol
Fumaric Acid
0.8
0.125
0.295
480.0
75.0
177.0
10
Styrene Maleic
Anhydride Resin
300
Styrene
Maleic Anhydride
Toluene
0.45
0.55
0.05
135
165
15
11
Xylene
Formaldehyde Resin
90
Xylene ( L )
Formaldehyde 37% / Para
formaldehyde
Sulphuric Acid
Sodium Carbonate solution
0.800
0.970
72.0
87.3
0.290
0.100
26.1
9.0
Page 3 of 3
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
C5H8O2
C8H14O2
C3H4O2
INITIATOR
C5H8O2
C8H13O2
CH2=CH-COOH
Page 1 of 29
acrylic resin
Mol. Wt. 314
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Poly vinyl alcohol 0.300kg
DM water 1000kg
Dissolution
1000.3kg
Heating
2051.3 kg
Cooling
2051.3 kg
Filtration
1030.3 kg
Water 500 kg
Washing
1030.3kg
Drying
60 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
90 KL/month
3.0 KL/day
Wastewater generation
91.26 KL/month
3.042 KL/day
Page 2 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
Methyl Methacrylate
Mol. Wt 100
2- OH Ethyl Acrylate
Mol. Wt 116
CH3
H2 C
H
CH2
COOCH3
C
COOCH2CH2OH
Page 3 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Polymerization
10100
1000kg
Reflux
1000kg
Cooling
1000 kg
Packing in barrels
150 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
NIL
Page 4 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
MW: 100-200
Page 5 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
DM Water 595kg
Polymerization
10100
1000 kg
Reflux
1000 kg
Cooling
1000 kg
Packing in barrels
150 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
89.25 KL/month
Wastewater generation
NIL
Page 6 of 29
2.975 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
O
CH2 OH
KETONIC RESIN
H2
H2
O
H2
O
CH2 OH
n
HYDROGENATED KETONIC RESIN
Page 7 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Ketonic resin 900 kg
Butyl acetate 400 kg
Dissolution
1300 kg
Cooling
1402 kg
Filtration
Spent catalyst 3 kg
(Recovered & reuse in next batch)
1399 kg
Distillation
1020 kg
Cooling
150 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
NIL
Page 8 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
H2
O
H2
O
7 CH2O
CH2OH
CYCLOHEXANONE
(M.Wt. 98)
37 % FORMALDEHYDE
(M.Wt. 30)
Page 9 of 29
4H2O
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Cyclohexanone 800 kg
37%Formaldehyde 1200 kg
Caustic soda 56 kg
Water 1400 kg
Reaction
3456kg
Cooling
3456kg
Filtration
ML
Filtration
Effluent 2406 kg
sent to ETP
1030kg
Washing
Water 5000 kg
Resin waste 20 kg
Sent to co processing or incineration
Effluent 5000 kg sent to ETP
1030 kg
300 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
1920 KL/month
64KL/day
Wastewater generation
2221.8KL/month
74.06KL/day
Page 10 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
CH3 (CH2)5 CH (OH) CH2 CH = CH (CH2)7 COOH + HO-R1---(-----OOC-R-COOR1 ---)----OH
CASTOR OIL
POLYESTER RESIN
Mol. Wt 934
Mol. Wt 650
+ H2O
POLYESTER POLYOLS
Mol. Wt 18
1570
Mol. Wt 1584
Flow sheet:
Castor oil 800 kg
Ketonic resin 199 kg
Di butyl tin oxide 1 kg
Mixing
1500 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
NIL
Page 11 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
Page 12 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
37%Formaldehyde 672 kg
Phenol 970 kg
Oxalic acid 20 kg
Reaction
1662 kg
Reflux
1662 kg
Cooling
1662 kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Breaking in lumps
& Packing in bags
INPUT = OUTPUT
1662
1662
750 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
496.5KL/month
Page 13 of 29
16.55KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
H2
OH
NaOH
2 C6H4OHC(CH3)3
PARATERTIARY
BUTYL PHENOL
(M.Wt.150)
CH2O
(CH3)3C
OH
C(CH3)3
FORMALDEHYDE
H2 O
(M.Wt.30)
R
PHENOLIC RESIN
[M.Wt. 312)
Page 14 of 29
M. Wt. 18
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Formaldehyde 730 kg
p- tertiary butyl phenol 1000 kg
NaOH 18 kg
Reaction
1748 kg
Cooling
1748 kg
Sulphuric acid 30 kg
Toluene 100 kg
Neutralization
1878 kg
Layer separation
1095 kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Cooling
1000 kg
Breaking of lumps
&Packing in bags
300 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
234.9 KL/month
Page 15 of 29
INPUT = OUTPUT
1878
1878
7.83 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
HOOC-R-COOH + CH3-COOH + C2H4(NH2)2
Dimer acid
acetic acid
M.Wt.: 560
M.Wt: 60
HOOC-R-CONHR1-NH2 +H2O
ethylene diamine
M.Wt: 60
Page 16 of 29
M. Wt : 18
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Reaction
1091 kg
Heating
1091 kg
Cooling
1091 kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Cooling
1000 kg
Breaking of lumps
& Packing in bags
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
54.6 KL/month
Page 17 of 29
1.82 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Reaction
1117 kg
Heating
1117kg
Cooling
1117kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Cooling
1000 kg
Breaking of lumps
& Packing in bags
INPUT = OUTPUT
1117
1117
Proposed production capacity
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
70.2 KL/month
Page 18 of 29
2.34 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Reaction
1000 kg
Heating
1000 kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Packing in barrels
INPUT = OUTPUT
1018
1018
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
10.8 KL/month
Page 19 of 29
0.36 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
Page 20 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Adipic acid 425 kg
Hexane diol 690 kg
Tri methylol propane 7 kg
Isophthalic acid 9 kg
Esterification
1131 kg
Heating
1131 kg
Distillation
1000 kg
Packing in barrels
INPUT = OUTPUT
1131
1131
300 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
39.3 KL/month
Page 21 of 29
1.31 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
CH2OH CH2OH
ADDITION
REACTION
R-COOH
M.wt: 323
R-OH
M. Wt: 150
HCHO
M.Wt: 30
R-COOH
C
R1OOC
CH2 - Ph - CH2OH
[ O - Ph - CH2 -
Ph
+ 2H2O
CH2OH
MODIFIED PHENOLIC RESIN
M.Wt: 467
Water
M.Wt : 18
Page 22 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Pentaerythritol 135 kg
Gam rosin 700 kg
para tertiary butyl phenol 325 kg
p- Formaldehyde 173 kg
Reaction
1333 kg
Condensation
Heating
Layer
separation
1000 kg
Cooling
Turpentine 67 kg
1000 kg
Packing
INPUT = OUTPUT
1333
1333
600 MT/month
40.2MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
159.6KL/month
Page 23 of 29
5.32 KL/day
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
CH - C -
OH
CH - C -
OH
REACTION AT
ELEVATED
TEMPERATURE
O
R-
CH - C
M.Wt : 323
CH - C
M.Wt : 125
FUMERIC ACID
M.Wt : 136
CH3
COOH
O
R1OOC - R-
CH - C
CH3
CH3
CH - C
R = ABIETIC ACID
CH3
Page 24 of 29
H2 O
M.Wt : 430
Maleic resin
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Pentaerythritol 125 kg
Gum rosin 800 kg
Fumaric acid 295 kg
Reaction
1220 kg
Condensation
Heating
Layer
separation
1000 kg
Turpentine 44 kg
Cooling
Effluent 176kg sent to ETP
1000 kg
Packing
INPUT = OUTPUT
1220
1220
600 MT/month
26.4 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
Page 25 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
ADDITION
POLYMERISATION
STYRENE
Mol. Wt 104
MALEIC ANHYDRIDE
Mol. Wt 98
SMA RESIN
Mol. Wt 200-400
Page 26 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Styrene 500 kg
Maleic anhydride 550 kg
Toluene 1000 kg
Reaction
2050 kg
Reflux
2050 kg
Heating
2050 kg
Cooling
2050kg
Filtration
1050 kg
Drying
300 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
NIL
Page 27 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Chemical reaction:
H2SO4
Xylene + formaldehyde
Reflux 7hrs
Xylene formaldehyde
CH3-C6H4-CH3 + HCHO
C9H12O
Mol. Wt 106
mol. Wt 136
mol. Wt 30
Page 28 of 29
Project:
Proponent:
Project site:
Documents:
Flow sheet:
Reaction
2060 kg
Layer separation
1020kg
Neutralization
1120kg
Layer separation
Packing
1000kg
Xylene- Formaldehyde resin 1000 kg
INPUT = OUTPUT
2260
2260
Proposed production capacity
90 MT/month
Freshwater Consumption
NIL
Wastewater generation
Page 29 of 29
Sr.No
Chemical Name
CAS No.
Type of
Hazard
Hazards
Health Fire
Toxicological
information
Reacti ERPG,ppm
vity
LD50
(LC50)
ppm
Flash Point
degC
BP
Sp
LEL
Gravity
degC
UEL
NFPA
Hazardous
Combustion Products
R
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Butyl Methacrylate
97-88-1
Flammable /
Toxic
Butyl Acetate
123-86-4
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
10768
23.9
126.5
0.9
1.7
7.6
Partially soluble
in cold water
Not Available
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Ethyl Acetate
140-78-6
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
5620
(LC50
45000)
77
0.902
2.2
Soluble in cold
and hot water
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Formaldehyde 37%
50-00-0
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
100
98
1.08
36.5
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Phenol
108-95-2
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
270
182
1.057
1.7
8.6
Soluble in cold
water
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Not Available
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Yes
yes
yes
16000
52.2
160
0.894
Sulphuric Acid
7664-93-9
Non
Flammable
Yes
No
yes
2140
Not Applicable
270
1.84
NA
NA
Styrene
100-42-5
Flammable
Yes
yes
yes
2650
145.2
0.906
1.1
6.1
Very slightly
Soluble in cold
water
Xylene
1330-20-7
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
4300
138.5
0.864
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Acetic Acid
64-19-7
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
3310
118.1
1.049
19.9
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Easily Soluble in
cold water
10
Ethylne Diamine
107-15-3
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
500
34
117.2
0.9
4.2
11
Cyclohexanone
108-94-1
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
1516
155.6
0.948
1.1
9.4
12
Toluene
108-88-3
Flammable
Yes
yes
No
636
110.6
0.864
1.1
7.1
Not Available
Not Available
Partially Soluble
Reactive with oxidicing
in Hot and cold
agent, acids ,alkali.
water
Practically
insoluble in
water
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Sr.No
Chemical Name
CAS No.
Type of
Hazard
Hazards
Health Fire
13
Hydrogen Gas
Toxicological
information
Reacti ERPG,ppm
vity
LD50
(LC50)
ppm
degC
BP
Sp
LEL
Gravity
degC
Yes
Yes
No
STEL 10
333
77
0.806
3.1
No
-252.8
UEL
Extreamly
Flammable
yes
No Information
Available
1333-74-0
No
Not
Available
Flash Point
14
Acrylonitrile
1017-13-1
Flammable /
Toxic
15
Methyl Ethyl
Ketone(MEK)
78-93-3
Flammable/To
xic
Yes
Yes
No
STEL:300ppm
6480
-9
79.6
0.805
1.8
16
IPA (Isopropyl
Alcohol)
67-63-0
Flammable
Yes
Yes
No
NA
NA
11.67
82.5
0.785
NFPA
Hazardous
Combustion Products
R
Not Available
17
Very slightly
incompatible with
soluble in cold
oxidizing agents, such
water, hot
as metals, acids, alkalis
water
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
10
Soluble in cold
water
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
Easily soluble in
Reactive with oxidizing
12.7 cold water, hot
agents, acids, alkalis.
water,
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
75
soluble in water
17
Ethyl Acrylate
140-88-5
Flammable/To
xic
Yes
yes
yes
TWA 25ppm
(1414)
99.4
0.923
1.4
13
18
Methyl
Methacrylate
80-62-6
Flammable/To
xic
Yes
yes
yes
7872mg/
kg
19
100
0.936
2.1
12.5
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
Carbon Oxides
( CO2,CO)
19
Butanol
71-36-3
Flammable
Yes
yes
no
NA
NA
36.1
117.7
0.81
1.4
Easily soluble in
Highly reactive with
methanol,
oxidizing agents,
diethyl ether.
reducing agents.
11.2 Partially soluble
Slightly reactive to
in cold water,
reactive with organic
hot water, nmaterials, acids, alkalis
octanol
20
MIBK
108-10-1
Flammble
No
yes
No
NA
NA
14
115.9
0.8
1.4
7.5
Imiscible
State i.e,
solid /
Liquid /
Gas
Inventory
No.
MT
Storage Parameters
B.P.C, M.P.C
Fl. P.C
LD50 mg/Kg or
LC50 mg/l
Vapour
pressure
1.5 kPa@
20C
0.5 kPa@
20C
NA
11.1 kPa@
20C
NA
NA
Source
Acetic acid
Consumption
MT/Month
87.6
Al or SS Tank - AGT
10
Pressure
kg/cm2
Atm.
30-40C
BP 118.1C MP 16.6C
39
Acrylic Acid
14.4
Drum
0.2
Atm.
30-40C
BP 141 C MP 14C
50
3
4
Acryl amide
acrylonitrile
S
L
73.5
73.5
5
8
1 MT Jumbo bag
CS Tank - AGT
15
1
15
20
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP 125 C MP 84.5C
BP 77.3C MP -82C
138
-1.11
5
6
Benzoyl peroxide
Bisphenol-A
S
S
2.76
207
5
3
50 kg bag
1 MT Jumbo bag
10
20
0.5
20
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP 103C MP-104.5C
BP 220C MP 158-159C
NA
227
Butanol
3.15
95
10
Atm.
30-40C
BP 117.7C MP -89.5
28.9
Butyl acetate
3.15
95
CS or SS Tank AGT
CS or SS Tank AGT
10
Atm.
30-40C
BP 126.5, MP -77.9
23.9
9
10
butyl acrylate
Butyl methacrylate
L
L
73.5
27.6
8
22
Drum
Drum
100
100
20
20
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP 145C MP -64.6C
BP 160C MP -75C
29
52.2
10
11
S
L
22
240
68
5
50
2
50
40
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP 1388C MP 323C
BP 155.6C MP -31C
NA
43.89
12
13
Di butyl tinoxide
Ethyl acetate
S
L
1.5
3.15
4
19
Jambo Bag
CS or SS Tank AGT
Drum
Drum
1
10
0.2
2
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
MP >300C
BP 77C, MP -83C
NA
-4.4
14
ethyl acrylate
73.5
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 99.4C MP -72C
-2
15
Ethyl methacrylate
73.5
CS or SS Tank AGT
Drum
100
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 118-119C MP -60C
19
16
Ethylene Diamine
93
Drum
50
10
Atm.
30-40C
BP 117.2C MP 8.5C
34
17
ethylene glycol
207
Drum
100
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 197.6C MP -13C
111
18
Formaldehyde (37%)
1083
100
Atm.
30-40C
BP 98C MP -15C
50
19
20
Hydrogen gas
Iso Propyl Alcohol
G
L
14.7
3.15
10
190
30
1
5
20
150-200
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP -252.8C MP -259C
BP 82.5C MP -88.5C
NA
11.7
21
methacrylic acid
73.5
CS or SS Tank AGT
Cylinder
CS or SS Tank AGT
Drum
100
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 163C MP 16C
77
22
23
methyl acrylate
methyl cyclohexanone
L
L
73.5
240
8
3
Drum
Drum
100
100
20
20
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
BP 80.5C MP -76.5C
BP 162-163C MP -13.9C
-3.89
48
24
240
CS Tank - AGT
10
Atm.
30-40C
BP 79.6C, MP -86C
-9
25
240
CS Tank - AGT
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 115.9C MP -84C
14
26
Methyl methacrylate
79.2
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 100C MP -48C
13
27
Paraformaldehyde
1083
CS or SS Tank AGT
Jambo Bag
50
50
Atm.
30-40C
MP 120-170 C
70
28
Phenol
727.5
CS Tank - AGT
40
Atm.
30-40C
BP 182C, MP 42C
79
29
30
S
L
0.02
207
750
3
50 kg bag
Drum
10
100
0.5
20
Atm.
Atm.
30-40C
30-40C
MP 200C
BP 188C MP -59C
79
99
LD50->20000 mg/kg
LD50- 20000mg/kg
31
Styrene
336
CS Tank - AGT
40
cool
15-21C
BP 145.2C MP -30.6C
31.1
32
Sulphuric acid
35.1
CS Tank - AGT
10
Atm.
30-40C
BP 270-340C, MP -35C
NA
33
Toluene
91.5
13
CS Tank -UGT
40
Atm.
30-40C
BP 110.6C, MP -95C
4.44
34
Xylene
199.5
CS Tank -UGT
20
Atm.
30-40C
BP 138.5C MP -47.4C
24
35
Terpentine-Product
AGT - Aboveground Tank
67
CS Tank -AGT
1
UGT - Underground tank
20
20
Temp C
Polyols Polymers
Atm.
30-40C
HF - Highly flammable
BP 165C
LD50-2650 mg/kg,
LC50-12000 mg/l-4h
LD50- 2140 mg/kg,
LC50-510mg/m -2h
LD50-636 mg/kg, LC5049000 mg/m-4h
LD50- 4300 mg/kg
35
LD50- 5760 mg/kg
VHF - Very Highly flammable
indigenous
indigenous
indigenous
indigenous
indigenous
indigenous
Sc-I, part-II
Sc-I, part-II
NA
0 kPa@
20C
4.5 mm Hg
@ 20C
NA
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sc-I, part-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sch-1,part-I(a)-highly Toxic
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF, Sc-I, part-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF
Sc-I,part-I(b)-VHFpart-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF, Sc-I, part-II
Sc-I, part-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF, Sc-I, part-II
Sc-I, part-II
Sc-I, part-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-F
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-HF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF
Sch-1,part-I(b)-VHF, Sc-I, part-II
Sch-1,part-I(b)-F
indigenous
indigenous
imported/ indigenous
indigenous
Corrosive,Sc-I, part-II
Page 2 of 7
HPLC/UV-Fluorescence Detector
Page 3 of 7
Test Method
APHA 21st ed. 2550B
APHA 21st ed. 2120B Visual Comparison
APHA 21st ed. 2150B Thresold odour
IS 3025 (Part 10) 1984 reaffirmed 2002 Nephlometric
A PHA 21st ed. 2540 B TS dried at 103-105c
APHA 21st ed. 2540C TDS dried at 180 c
APHA 21st ed. 2540D TSS dried at 103-105 c
IS 3025 (part 38) : 1989 reaffirmed Azide Modification
3-days BOD test(IS 10-1000mg/l
3025(part44)1993 Reaffirmed 1999)
IS method Open Reflux
IS:3025 (Part-11)-1983
IS -3025-Part 26-1986)
IS -3025-Part 22-1986)
APHA 21st ed. 4500 NH3 C Titration
APHA 21st ed. 4500-N org B Macro-kjedhal method
IS 3025 (Part 34) : 1988 Devadas alloy reduction
APHA 21st ed. 4500C vanadomolybdophosphoric acid
APHA 21st ed. 4500E Turbidimetric
APHA 21st ed. 4500B Argentometric
APHA 21st ed. 4500B Iodometric
APHA 21st ed. 4500C Molybdo silicate
APHA 21st ed. 3500-Ca B EDTA Titrametric
APHA 21st ed. 3500-Mg B calculation method
APHA 21st ed. 2340C EDTA Titrimetric
APHA 21st ed. 3500-Na B Flame Emission Photometric
APHA 21st ed. 3500-K BFlame Emission Photometric
IS 3025 (part 53) 2003 Phenanthroline method
APHA 21st ed. 4500S2- F Iodometric method
APHA 21st ed. 4500F-D SPADNS method
APHA 21st ed. 3500-Mn AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 pb AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Zn- AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Cr- AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Cr-B - colorimetric
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Cu-B-Neocuproine Method
APHA 21st ed. 3500 As-AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Hg-cold vapour AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Cd-AAS
APHA 21st ed. 3500 Ni-AAS
IS 3025 (Part 39) : 1991 liq-liq Partition Gravimetric
APHA 21st ed. 5530 D Direct photometric
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Page 4 of 7
Page 6 of 7
Page 7 of 7
Guidelines issued by GPCB for coal handling units and proposed compliance actions by proponent
Polyols & Polymers for coal handling at proposed new unit at D-II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India.
Proposed action
Complied, plot land is acquired by GIDC
Complied, plot land is acquired by GIDC
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Transport permission shall be obtained from local
administration after grant of EC
Page 1 of 3
Guidelines issued by GPCB for coal handling units and proposed compliance actions by proponent
Polyols & Polymers for coal handling at proposed new unit at D-II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India.
Guideline
13. Coal handling unit/Agency shall provide paved
approach with adequate traffic carrying capacity.
14. Coal handling unit/Agency shall construct compound
wall all along periphery of the premises with minimum 9
meters height.
15. Continuous water sprinkling shall be carried out on
the top of the heap at regular intervals to prevent dusting,
fire & smoke. To prevent fugitive emission during
loading/unloading, fixed pipe network with sufficient
water storage and pump shall be installed. Water
sprinkling shall be carried out at each and every stage of
handling to avoid generation of coal, dust or other dust
within premises.
16. Coal handling unit/Agency shall ensure regular
sweeping of coal, dust from internal and main road and
also ensure that there is adequate space for free
movement of vehicles.
17. The following adequate Air Pollution Control
Measures shall be
installed and to be operated
efficiently.
(a) Dust containment cum suppression system for the coal
stack, loading and unloading.
(b) Construction of effective wind breaking wall suitable
to local condition to prevent the suspension of particles
from the heaps.
(c) Construction of metal road & RCC Pucca flooring in the
plot area/ godown etc.
(d) System for regular cleaning and wetting of the floor
area within the premises.
(e) Entire coal storage area/ godown should be covered
with permanent weather shed roofing and side walls i.e.,
in closed shed, in case of crushing/sieving/grading activity
is carried out (i.e. G. I. Sheet) along with adequate
additional APCM should be installed.
18. Coal handling unit/Agency shall carryout three rows
plantation with tall growing tress all along the periphery
of the coal handling premises, inside & outside of the
premises along with road.
19. Proper drainage system shall be provided in all coal
storage area so that water drained from sprinkling &
runoff is collected at a common tank and can be reused
after screening through the coal slit or any other effective
treatment system.
20. All the engineering control measures and state of art
technology including covered conveyer belts, mechanized
loading and unloading, provision of silo etc. shall be
provided in addition to the measures recommended in
the environmental guidelines for curbing the pollution.
(E) Safety requirement:
21. Coal handling unit/Agency shall provide adequate fire
fighting measure to avoid any fire or related hazards
including adequate water storage facility, and the
premises shall be exclusively used for storage of the coal.
22. An onsite emergency plan shall be prepared and
implemented by coal handling unit.
Proposed action
10 m wide internal paved road shall be provided for
access to coal storage yard
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Page 2 of 3
Guidelines issued by GPCB for coal handling units and proposed compliance actions by proponent
Polyols & Polymers for coal handling at proposed new unit at D-II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat,
India.
Guideline
(F) Legal criteria:
23. Necessary permission from all the applicable
regulatory authorities and adequate steps under the
provisions of applicable environmental acts/ rules shall be
taken.
24. Coal handling unit/Agency shall prepare EMP
(Environment Management Plan) and implement the
same in true spirit and thus maintain overall environment
of that area.
25. Coal handling unit/Agency shall not carry out the
operation of loading/unloading of coal/coal dust at any
place, till adequate air pollution control equipment for
dust control/suppression are installed and efficiently
operated and the consent under the provisions of Air
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 is obtained
by the coal yard owners/ Coal handling unit/Agency / coal
importers.
26. Coal handling unit/Agency shall operate continuous
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations as per CPCB
guideline. The results of parameters like SPM, RSPM, and
SO2 and NOx shall be submitted to the SPCB every month.
27. In case of port which provides the facility to individual
developers an agreement /MoU shall be made between
port authority and developer for curtailment of pollution.
Port authority shall be responsible for supervising and
controlling the pollution control related activities and
implementation of the environmental guidelines.
28. The concentration of the following parameters in the
ambient air within the premises and a distance of 10
meters from the source (other than the stack/vent) shall
not exceed the following levels.
PARAMETERS
Particulate
Matter- 10 (PM10)
Particulate
Matter- 2.5
(PM2.5)
SO2
NOx
Proposed action
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Shall be complied
Not applicable
Shall be complied
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT
24 Hrs
Annual
Average
60
100
3
3
Microgram/M
Microgram/M
40
3
Microgram/M
60
3
Microgram/M
50
3
Microgram/M
40
3
Microgram/M
80
3
Microgram/M
80
3
Microgram/M
Page 3 of 3
EIA activities carried out by Associate FAEs and team members involved in the EIA for Proposed project of Synthetic
Organic Chemicals Unit of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej Pjase II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch,
Gujarat State, India
Functional Area AP
Associate FAE :1. Ms. Bhumika Bhuva
Designation : Environment Engineer
Individual activities carried out : Preparation of study area maps
Prepare monitoring calendar for AAQM
Co-ordination with team members
Record keeping
Compilation of baseline AAQM monitoring results in tabular and graphical formats
Procurement of meteorological data of nearest station of IMD and compiling the statistics.
Compilation of hourly meteorological data of weather monitoring station (primary baseline monitoring of site specific meteorology)
Generating windrose plots
Collecting all technical details related to stack emissions :-sources, pollutants, stack details, details of APCD
Project Data Collection
Secondary data procurement
Verify completeness and correctness of information obtained from proponent
Data collection for Alternative Analysis
Filling up of salient features table and comparing with siting guidelines of MoEF
Under guidance of FAE : Identification of impacting activities of project w.r.t air pollution.
Identifying other sources of air pollution by studying each project activity at each phase
Prediction of impacts and scoring in impact-activity matrices
fugitive emission estimation on TANKS software
Post project monitoring plan for AP management
Assistance in report preparation
Team members :1. Mr. Vikram Gohil
Designation :- Field Supervisor & Lab Chemist
Baseline monitoring : Survey work for baseline sampling and monitoring. GPS measurements and photography of sampling sites.
Selecting Air quality monitoring stations, networking, scheduling, supervising equipment installation and sampling, recording
analysis results and evaluating baseline status.
Co-ordinating with client for monitoring schedules and visits
Supervising equipment installations and arranging for necessary field support and supplies
guiding monitoring teams
troubleshooting while monitoring and sampling
Supervising sample storage and transport procedures
Inhouse lab analysis and compilation of analytical data
Verification of sampling results and assessment of baseline status
Collecting all technical details related to stack emissions :-sources, pollutants, stack details, details of scrubber systems already
installed and operational.
2. Mrs. Femida Kundawala Designation : Environment Engineer
Preparation of study area maps
Prepare monitoring calender.
Compilation of baseline AAQM monitoring results in tabular and graphical formats
Estimating the emission loads from material balance and reactions
Calculation flue gas emission factors
Page 1 of 5
EIA activities carried out by Associate FAEs and team members involved in the EIA for Proposed project of Synthetic
Organic Chemicals Unit of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej Pjase II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch,
Gujarat State, India
Functional Area WP
Associate FAE :1. Mrs. Khushbu Patel
Designation : Environment Engineer
Individual activities carried out : Preparation of study area maps
Co-ordination with team members
Record keeping
Collection of analytical data for SW and GW analysis and compilation in tabular format for data review, authentication and
verification
Conducting ion balancing for SW and GW samples
Collecting secondary baseline data from Govt. publications and websites and compilation of the same for comparison
Final drafting of GW and SW baseline results
Carrying out Water balance calculations for process and utilities and assessment of effluent generation sources, quantification of
effluent streams
Identifying and segregating the effluent streams
Identification of impacting activities of project w.r.t water pollution.
Prediction of impacts and scoring in impact-activity matrices
Estimating the rainwater harvesting potential
Assist in report preparation
Under guidance of FAE
Estimation of boiler blowdown
Hydraulic calculations for capacity rating of proposed ETP unit
Suggestions for water conservation measures
2. Mrs. Femida Kundawala Designation : Environment Engineer
Under guidance of FAE : Preparation of study area maps
Collecting secondary baseline data from Govt. publications & comparison of primary data with secondary data.
Carrying out Water balance calculations for process and utilities and assessment of effluent generation sources, quantification of
effluent streams
Identifying and segregating the effluent streams
Hydraulic calculations for capacity rating of proposed ETP units
Team Members
1. Mr. Vikram Gohil
Designation : Field Supervisor and Lab Chemist
- Survey work & field visit for baseline sampling for SW & GW. GPS measurements and photography of sampling sites.
- Sampling preparation work
- guiding monitoring teams
- troubleshooting while sampling
- Inhouse lab analysis
- Verification of analytical data for authenticity, completeness, relevance and accuracy
- Identify impacting activities and their significance through impact matrices
- Review proposed treatment scheme for adequacy based on treatability results and make suggestions
- Review adequacy of contingency storage proposed
- Prediction of impacts and assessment of required mitigation measures and finalization
- Propose Post-project environment monitoring plan w.r.t WP
- Identification and prediction of construction phase impacts on water and proposed mitigation measures
- Suggest additional mitigative measures if required
2. Dr. Vinod B. Gaur
Designation : Laboratory Manager
- Guide for Laboratory preparations for surfacewater and ground water sampling, collection, preservation and transport etc.
- Conduct QC/QA procedures for checking errors and flaws
- Execute instrument calibration procedures and intermediate checks
- Supervise analytical work and record-keeping
- Participate in review of results and interpretation
- Participate in preparation of Post project monitoring plan
3. Ms. Neha H. Solanki
Designation :
Lab Chemist
Individual activities
Selection of parameters for Environmental Analysis of baseline survey samples of GW, SW, marine samples, soil etc.
Page 2 of 5
EIA activities carried out by Associate FAEs and team members involved in the EIA for Proposed project of Synthetic
Organic Chemicals Unit of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej Pjase II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch,
Gujarat State, India
Analysis of samples of GW, SW, marine samples, soil etc.
Calibration and intermediate check of instruments
Under guidance of FAE :- QA/QC activities as per QMS and SOPs
- Participate in data interpretation for SW and GW baseline results and conclusion
FA - Hazardous Wastes Management
Associated FAE :1. Ms. Bhumika Bhuva
Designation : Environment Engineer
Individual activities
Site Visit and study area visit
Identification of project activities
Identification of impacts from project activities
Evaluating the types of solid wastes to be generated from each project activity during each phase of the project.
Quantifying the industrial wastes generated from material balance.
Categorization of industrial wastes as per HW rules
Determining the segregation of the wastes, method of collection and disposal of each waste in compliance with the applicable HW
rules.
Collecting status of common TSDF and incineration facilities proposed for disposal.
Details of management of the hazardous wastes to be generated from the project stating detail of storage area for each type of
waste, its handling, its utilization and disposal etc.
Collecting information on proposed methodology of de-contamination and disposal of discarded containers and its record keeping
and assessing its suitability and feasibility as well as effectiveness
Impact assessment of waste generation during construction phase.
Assess measures proposed for hazardous waste management, quantity generated, storage facilities, treatment facilities
Assess disposal methods proposed are in compliance with applicable rules and whether the receiving bodies have the capacity to
accept the wastes
Impact assessment of waste generation during commissioning & operation phase.
Under guidance of FAE : EMP for construction phase under FAE guidance.
Measures for waste minimization
Possibilities of co-processing of incinerable wastes
Management of non-hazardous wastes
Assigning scores in impact activity matrices under guidance of FAE.
Assist in Report preparation.
EMP for commissioning & operation phase.
2. Mrs. Femida Kundawala Designation : Environment Engineer
Under guidance of FAE : Identification of project activities
Identification of impacts from project activities
Evaluating the types of solid wastes to be generated from each project activity during each phase of the project.
Quantifying the industrial wastes generated from material balance.
Categorization of industrial wastes as per HW rules
Determining the segregation of the wastes, method of collection and disposal of each waste in compliance with the applicable HW
rules.
Details of management of the hazardous wastes to be generated from the project stating detail of storage area for each type of
waste, its handling, its utilization and disposal etc.
Assigning scores in impact activity matrices under guidance of FAE.
Assist in Report preparation.
FA SE
Associated FAE :1. Mr. MahendraSinh K. Rathod
Designation : Executive Socio economic studies(Proposed FAE for SE)
Primary data collection for socio economic survey within study area.
Photography of survey.
Compilation of survey information gathered in questionnaires
Secondary data collection of Govt. publications, census & comparison of primary data with secondary data.
Verification of legal aspects of the project related socio-economics with prevailing policies and regulations in India
Participate in CSR planning and need assessment review
Page 3 of 5
EIA activities carried out by Associate FAEs and team members involved in the EIA for Proposed project of Synthetic
Organic Chemicals Unit of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej Pjase II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch,
Gujarat State, India
FA EB
Associate FAE
1. Priti D. Raval
Designation : Environment Engineer
Study area visit for ecological survey
Collecting secondary ecological data and verifying it through surveys
determining status of endangered species of animals and plants
Identification of nearest ecologically sensitive areas around project site
Verification of applicability of prevailing policies and regulations in India
Assisting FAE for assessment of impact of the various project activities on the ecology and biodiversity of the project area during all
phases of the project.
Assistance in Report drafting for EIA
Assisting FAE in recommending species suitable for pollution abatement and ecological conservation as suggested in CPCB
guidelines and SEAC guidelines for the given agroclimatic zone of the region
Page 4 of 5
EIA activities carried out by Associate FAEs and team members involved in the EIA for Proposed project of Synthetic
Organic Chemicals Unit of Polyols & Polymers at D-2/CH-266,267,268, Dahej Pjase II, Ta. Vagra, Dist. Bharuch,
Gujarat State, India
Review of baseline noise levels, sources and their compliance with permissible limits
Identify sources of noise generation from the project and predict resultant increase in noise levels of sensitive receptors of the study
area
Collection and compilation of analytical data
Calculating equivalent noise levels from measured noise
Associate FAE
1. Ms. Priti D. Raval
Designation: Environment Engineer
Planning and scheduling of noise measurement at selected locations of study area
sampling and monitoring jobs and guiding monitoring teams
Collection and compilation of analytical data
Calculating equivalent noise levels from measured noise levels and compilation in tabular form
determine status of noise environment, existing sources of major noise generation
To predict noise levels of different project activities and anticipate the increase in the baseline noise levels in residential, industrial
and commercial zones as well as noise due to increase in road traffic
Compilation of the outcomes of the assessment in report form and submission to EIA Co-coordinator
Team Member
1. Mr. Ajit Parmar
Designation: Lab Assistant
Noise monitoring within study area, GPS & photography during monitoring.
Assist team during monitoring
2. Mr. Moshin Mansuri
Designation: Lab Assistant
Noise monitoring within study area, GPS & photography during monitoring.
Assist team during monitoring.
3. Mr. MahendraSinh K. Rathod
Designation: Executive Socio economic studies
Noise monitoring within study area, GPS & photography during monitoring.
Assist team during monitoring.
FA LU
Associate FAE
1.Ms. Bhumika Bhuva
Designation : Environment Engineer
Reference map preparation for classification and determine baseline LULC of the area.
Identification of impacts, Prediction of impacts on land use pattern and land cover.
Identification of talukas and villages as well as major landforms covered in the study area using google earth, wikimapia, census
datasheets
2. Mrs. Khushbu Patel
Designation: Environment Engineer
Reference map preparation for classification and determine baseline LULC of the area.
Identification of impacts, Prediction of impacts on land use pattern and land cover.
Identification of talukas and villages as well as major landforms covered in the study area using google earth, wikimapia, census
datasheets.
FA RH
Associate FAE
1. Ms. Bhumika Bhuva
Designation: Environment Engineer
Identification of hazardous chemical w.r.t haz. Chemical schedules & their antidotes.
Hazardous chemical Consequence analysis using ALOHA, mapping of threat zones and plot affected areas of study area and plant
sections.
Collecting data regarding fire-fighting arrangements and occupational safety measures
2. Mrs. Khushbu Patel
Designation: Environment Engineer
Identification of hazardous chemical w.r.t haz. Chemical schedules & their antidotes.
Hazardous chemical Consequence analysis using ALOHA, mapping of threat zones and plot affected areas of study area and plant
sections
Page 5 of 5
Page 1 of 1