Nama: Andreas Martin

NIM: 017848442
TUGAS 3 READING IV
Identify the collocations (ADJECTIVE + NOUN) in the following paragraphs.
Answer
1. new research
2. fewer fruit and vegetables
3. greatest threat
4. small changes
5. the worst-case impacts
6. worst-case analysis
7. economic development
8. positive trend
9. ambitious climate action
10. biggest cause of deaths
11. rich countries
12. red meat
13. large-scale
14. new work
15. valiant attempt
16. agricultural production
17. agricultural production
18. global food markets
19. extreme climatic
Climate change could kill more than 500,000 people a year globally by 2050 by making their
diets less healthy, according to new research published in the Lancet.
The research is the first to assess how the impacts of global warming could affect the quality of
the diets available to people and found fewer fruit and vegetables would be available as a result
of climatic changes. These are vital in curbing heart disease, strokes and diet-related cancers,
leading the study to conclude that the health risks of climate change are far greater than thought.
Climate change is already judged by doctors as the greatest threat to health in the 21st century,
due to floods, droughts and increased infectious diseases, with the potential toroll back 50 years
of progress.
Peter Scarborough, at the University of Oxford and part of the new research, said these direct
impacts would affect tens of thousands of people at particular times: But everyone in the world
eats, so small changes in diet can quickly add up to hundreds of thousands of deaths.

The health burden related to climate change is much bigger than we thought, Scarborough
said. But cutting carbon emissions and improving education and the availability of fruit and
vegetables would reduce the number of deaths, he said.
The Lancet [study] digs deeper, and reports the most advanced projections so far of the effects
of climate change on food and health, according to professors Alistair Woodward at the
University of Auckland and John Porter at the University of Copenhagen in a commentary on the
work.
They say that given the uncertainties involved in the complex analysis, it is understandable to
limit projections to the next 35 years. But they warn that the worst-case impacts beyond 2050
could be even greater.
As an example, they cite work indicating that failure of the rice crop in southern China due to
heatwaves could change from a one-in-a-100-year event to a one-in-four-year event in 2100. A
worst-case analysis is not unusual in risk assessments in other areas [such as national security]
when the stakes are high, they note.
The new research involved linking a series of computer models, which covered crop production,
economic development, trade and climate change, to consider a range of scenarios. The current
trend in global nutrition is for fewer people to die from inadequate diets each year, due to
increasing crop yields and poverty reduction.
But a continued rapid rise in carbon emissions would cut heavily into that positive trend. Severe
climate change would cause changes in food availability, leading to 529,000 more people dying
in 2050 than would have without warming, the research found. Even with very ambitious
climate action, including sucking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, there would be 154,000
extra deaths in 2050.
The research found that severe climate change would cut the fruit and vegetable available to
people in 2050 by 4%, the calories available by 3% and the red and processed meat by 0.7%. By
far the biggest cause of deaths was the reduction in fruit and vegetables, particularly in rich
countries.
The reduction in calories resulted in more people dying from lack of food, especially in India and
China. However, almost exactly the same number of deaths were prevented elsewhere by
reductions in obesity. The cut in red meat eating prevented 29,000 deaths.
Nearly all nations are projected to suffer an increase in deaths due to the diet changes caused by
climate change. But a few, in central America and southern Africa, could see a reduction in
deaths as the reductions in obesity outweigh other factors.
Scarborough accepted there are significant uncertainties in the projections and the study says the
projected deaths in 2050 ranges between 314,000 and 736,000. But he said it is the best estimate
so far and clearly shows that action to tackle climate change would have large-scale health
benefits.

Prof Andy Challinor, at the University of Leeds and not involved in the new work, said: This is
a valiant attempt to quantify the effects of climate change on the future of food production. Its
very difficult to estimate exactly what those impacts will be [but] what we can say for certain is
that the pressures on agricultural production will certainly be greater because of climate
change.
Year-to-year variability of food production will become greater, which will make global food
markets more unpredictable, Challinor said. And extreme climatic events will become more
common, such as the wheat harvest failure in Russia in 2010 which affected UK food prices. The
effects of such events on global food availability and prices will be felt in the UK and around the
world.