Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
An integrated process facility recently went through an
update of its existing load shedding scheme due to planned
process changes in the coming years. Transient simulations
indicated that by changing the load shedding philosophy, the
frequency profile during power shortages can be improved
significantly. This paper discusses the plant's electricalhteam
load balance issues, and the development of a high speed
load shedding scheme.
Introduction
Shortage of power in a network is invariably reflected in collapse
of frequency. Traditionally, frequency decay patterns have been
calculated using simplified methods. Simplifications included
the assumption of constant deceleration, constant voltages and
constant generators power. The results obtained using the
simplified methods were generally adequate for simple, slow
acting load shedding systems. In the case on hand, the loads
assigned for shedding and those to be "saved" by load shedding
are part of an integrated process plant sequence, where speed of
operation and selectivity of the load shedding is crucial to the
continuity of the oil-production process. In search for ways to
optimize the load shedding scheme, transient stability simulations
were used to calculate frequency profile, taking into account
generators' transient response and that of excitation and speed
governor systems. This paper describes the outcome of the
analysis in terms of possible improvements in load shedding
performance through the use of rate of change of frequency as
shedding indicator.
and three 800 KPPH boilers at 6550 kPa. The steam is required
for the electric power generation, various large steam drivers in
the Utility plant and Process areas and to supplement the steam
supply shortfall at the 4136 kPa, 1034 kPa and 345 kPa via
letdown stations. Steam is produced at the various utilization
pressures in the process areas as well. Steam is also used to heat
trace process piping systems. Major usage of the low pressure
thermal heat i.e., 345 kPa is in the Extraction plant to extract the
bitumen from the oilsands
ElectricaVSteam Priorities
Existing plant operating guidelines limit total steam production
to 3600 KPPH and power import to 80 MW to maintain steam
system stability. The general design of Syncrude's
electricalisteam system is one where steam loads have higher
priority than the electrical system loads. This is because of the
critical process drives being steam driven. To protect the steam
system, all the major upsets are transmitted to the electrical
system. This is supplemented by electrical load-shedding of nonessential
or less critical equipment. Within the steam system
itself, priorities are based on maintaining steam heat tracing,
critical steam-driven pumps and associated auxiliaries, and
critical refinery loads. The Electrical load shedding scheme is
designed to maintain the integrity of the 6550 kPa steam
pressure, which then allows the maintenance of other pressure
levels.
* 0.05 Hz.
systems.
Three types of load shedding are used for the frequency recovery:
proactive, reactive and manual. The first two are applied without
operator intervention because underfrequency relays distributed
throughout the Mining and Refinery areas trip various loads
according to established priorities. The lowest priority load, the
Mining draglines, are tripped proactively upon separation, since
during a system upset their fluctuating loads complicate system
recovery. The subsequent steps are coordinated on both
frequency and time basis so that the lower the frequency, the
larger the block of load is tripped. The electrical load shedding
sequence is staged in seven steps and is shown in Table 1
(attached at the back). Step 0 occurs when the frequency dips to
59.2 Hz. It separates the plant from the grid. This threshold
frequency is based on simulations of a trip of the largest
generator (380 MW) in the local utility system with a 0.2 Hz
safety margin.
Import I 40 80 120
Allowable I 34 I 38 I 22
seuaration P.U. on
IIII
97
Turbine's maxiyum transient outputs are limited to their
nameplate ratings.
Results
A few of the key simulation results for different import levels are
shown in figures 4 to 10.
Figure 4 shows comparative 40 MW import case with the
revised and df/dt based load shedding scheme. With the
revised scheme, step 1 load was shed whereas none was shed
with the new proposed scheme.
98
53s
om 2m 4m em (100 ?om (200 ( 4 0 0 (800 mm mm
SECWD
Figure 9
99
Conclusions Predicted frequency of steam production restriction
0
0
Future Work
Presently a project called Load Management is in the
process of being implemented on-site. Load will be
monitored at different locations of the plant and the
information will be sent to the DCS main control room via
radio link. It will provide an opportunity to confirm the load
consumption by different feeders and substation locations.
The data gathered will be used for informing the panel
operator with respect to MW load availability at different
steps. It can also be used for more informed decision making
for the manual load shedding, if required. Provision is in
place to link it with the underfrequency relays for remote
changes in the settings, based on changing production
priorities.
References
[I.] D. Novosel, K.T. Vir, D. Hort, E.Udern, Practical Protection and
Control Strategies during large Power system disturbances
PES Transaction.
[2] CYMSTABNDM Users Guide & Reference Manual, CYME
International Inc., Nov. 1991.
Table - 1
Revised Automatic Load shedding Frequency/Steps
Powerhouse 5/6 sec. 4.8 sec. 0.9 sec.
100
Externa
Supply
Cold
Refinery Area 3 x 800 KPPHr
2 x 750 KF'PHr
Plant
6550 kPa
I
BPSTGs CSTG
ported
Power
72 kV)
'4
.I(
2x23 hlW
101