STATISTICAL INFERENCE

Hypothesis Testing of Field Goal Data

April 18, 2009

Submitted To: Dr. Mussarat Ali Khan

Submitted By: Suleman Ahmed Ali (2008-1-41-8754)

Muhammad Khurram Zakaria (2008-1-41-8870)
Rehan Memon (2008-1-07-9333)
 Table of Contents
Table of Contents....................................................................................................... 2

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.............................................................................3

................................................................................................................................ 3

Null Hypothesis .......................................................................................................4

Alternative Hypothesis ...........................................................................................4

Test Statistic ...........................................................................................................5

Critical Value(s) ...................................................................................................... 5

Critical Region ........................................................................................................5

Significance Level ...................................................................................................5

One-sided Test .......................................................................................................5

Two-Sided Test .......................................................................................................7

Testing of Hypothesis (Real Example)........................................................................9

Data Description......................................................................................................9

Hypothesis of Data.............................................................................................10

Analysis .............................................................................................................10

Conclusion................................................................................................................ 12

Appendix – Sample Data...........................................................................................13

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
The basic idea of hypothesis testing is to examine the Probability that the result of a
study could have been obtained even if the actual situation was that the
experimental treatment or comparison made no difference. Setting up and testing
hypotheses is an essential part of statistical inference. In order to formulate such a
test, usually some theory has been put forward, either because it is believed to be
true or because it is to be used as a basis for argument, but has not been proved,
for example, claiming that a new drug is better than the current drug for treatment
of the same symptoms.

In each problem considered, the question of interest is simplified into two

competing claims / hypotheses between which we have a choice; the null
hypothesis, denoted H0, against the alternative hypothesis, denoted H1. These two
competing claims / hypotheses are not however treated on an equal basis: special
consideration is given to the null hypothesis.

We have two common situations:

1. The experiment has been carried out in an attempt to disprove or reject a

particular hypothesis, the null hypothesis, thus we give that one priority so it
cannot be rejected unless the evidence against it is sufficiently strong. For
example,

H0: there is no difference in taste between coke and diet coke

H1: there is a difference.

2. If one of the two hypotheses is 'simpler' we give it priority so that a more

'complicated' theory is not adopted unless there is sufficient evidence against
the simpler one. For example, it is 'simpler' to claim that there is no
difference in flavor between coke and diet coke than it is to say that there is
a difference.

The hypotheses are often statements about population parameters like expected
value and variance; for example H0 might be that the expected value of the height
of ten year old boys in the Scottish population is not different from that of ten year
old girls. A hypothesis might also be a statement about the distributional form of a
characteristic of interest, for example that the height of ten year old boys is
normally distributed within the Scottish population.

The outcome of a hypothesis test is "Reject H0 in favor of H1" or "Do not reject H0".
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, H0, represents a theory that has been put forward, either
because it is believed to be true or because it is to be used as a basis for argument,
but has not been proved. For example, in a clinical trial of a new drug, the null
hypothesis might be that the new drug is no better, on average, than the current
drug. We would write

H0: there is no difference between the two drugs on average.

We give special consideration to the null hypothesis. This is due to the fact that the
null hypothesis relates to the statement being tested, whereas the alternative
hypothesis relates to the statement to be accepted if / when the null is rejected.

The final conclusion once the test has been carried out is always given in terms of
the null hypothesis. We either "Reject H 0 in favour of H1" or "Do not reject H0"; we
never conclude "Reject H1", or even "Accept H1".

If we conclude "Do not reject H0", this does not necessarily mean that the null
hypothesis is true, it only suggests that there is not sufficient evidence against H 0 in
favour of H1. Rejecting the null hypothesis then, suggests that the alternative
hypothesis may be true.

Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, H1, is a statement of what a statistical hypothesis test is
set up to establish. For example, in a clinical trial of a new drug, the alternative
hypothesis might be that the new drug has a different effect, on average, compared
to that of the current drug. We would write

H1: the two drugs have different effects, on average.

The alternative hypothesis might also be that the new drug is better, on average,
than the current drug. In this case we would write

H1: the new drug is better than the current drug, on average.

The final conclusion once the test has been carried out is always given in terms of
the null hypothesis. We either "Reject H0 in favor of H1" or "Do not reject H0". We
never conclude "Reject H1", or even "Accept H1".

If we conclude "Do not reject H0", this does not necessarily mean that the null
hypothesis is true, it only suggests that there is not sufficient evidence against H 0 in
favor of H1. Rejecting the null hypothesis then, suggests that the alternative
hypothesis may be true.
Test Statistic
A test statistic is a quantity calculated from our sample of data. Its value is used to
decide whether or not the null hypothesis should be rejected in our hypothesis test.
The choice of a test statistic will depend on the assumed probability model and the
hypotheses under question.

Critical Value(s)
The critical value(s) for a hypothesis test is a threshold to which the value of the
test statistic in a sample is compared to determine whether or not the null
hypothesis is rejected.The critical value for any hypothesis test depends on the
significance level at which the test is carried out, and whether the test is one-sided
or two-sided.

Critical Region
The critical region CR, or rejection region RR, is a set of values of the test statistic
for which the null hypothesis is rejected in a hypothesis test. That is, the sample
space for the test statistic is partitioned into two regions; one region (the critical
region) will lead us to reject the null hypothesis H 0, the other will not. So, if the
observed value of the test statistic is a member of the critical region, we conclude
"Reject H0"; if it is not a member of the critical region then we conclude "Do not
reject H0".

Significance Level
The significance level of a statistical hypothesis test is a fixed probability of wrongly
rejecting the null hypothesis H0, if it is in fact true.

It is the probability of a Type I error and is set by the investigator in relation to the
consequences of such an error. That is, we want to make the significance level as
small as possible in order to protect the null hypothesis and to prevent, as far as
possible, the investigator from inadvertently making false claims.

The significance level is usually denoted by α

Significance Level = P(Type I error) = α

Usually, the significance level is chosen to be 0.05 (or equivalently, 5%).

One-sided Test
A one-sided test is a statistical hypothesis test in which the values for which we can
reject the null hypothesis, H0 are located entirely in one tail of the probability
distribution.

In other words, the critical region for a one-sided test is the set of values less than
the critical value of the test, or the set of values greater than the critical value of
the test.

A one-sided test is also referred to as a one-tailed test of significance.

The choice between a one-sided and a two-sided test is determined by the purpose
of the investigation or prior reasons for using a one-sided test.

Example Suppose we wanted to test a manufacturer’s claim that there are, on

average, 50 matches in a box. We could set up the following hypotheses

H0: µ = 50,
H1: µ < 50 or H1: µ > 50

Figure 1: Left Tailed Figure 1: Right Tailed

Either of these two alternative hypotheses would lead to a one-sided test.

Presumably, we would want to test the null hypothesis against the first alternative
hypothesis since it would be useful to know if there is likely to be less than 50
matches, on average, in a box (no one would complain if they get the correct
number of matches in a box or more).

Yet another alternative hypothesis could be tested against the same null, leading
this time to a two-sided test:

H0: µ = 50,
H1: µ ≠ 50
Here, nothing specific can be said about the average number of matches in a box;
only that, if we could reject the null hypothesis in our test, we would know that the
average number of matches in a box is likely to be less than or greater than 50.

Two-Sided Test
A two-sided test is a statistical hypothesis test in which the values for which we can
reject the null hypothesis, H0 are located in both tails of the probability distribution.
In other words, the critical region for a two-sided test is the set of values less than a
first critical value of the test and the set of values greater than a second critical
value of the test.

A two-sided test is also referred to as a two-tailed test of significance.

The choice between a one-sided test and a two-sided test is determined by the
purpose of the investigation or prior reasons for using a one-sided test.

Example: Suppose we wanted to test a manufacturers claim that there are, on

average, 50 matches in a box. We could set up the following hypotheses

H0: µ = 50,
H1: µ < 50 or H1: µ > 50

Figure 2: Two Tailed Test

Either of these two alternative hypotheses would lead to a one-sided test.

Presumably, we would want to test the null hypothesis against the first alternative
hypothesis since it would be useful to know if there is likely to be less than 50
matches, on average, in a box (no one would complain if they get the correct
number of matches in a box or more).
Yet another alternative hypothesis could be tested against the same null, leading
this time to a two-sided test:

H0: µ = 50,
 H1: µ ≠ 50
Here, nothing specific can be said about the average number of matches in a box;
only that, if we could reject the null hypothesis in our test, we would know that the
average number of matches in a box is likely to be less than or greater than 50.
Testing of Hypothesis (Real Example)

Data Description
We have taken the Field Goal Data for this purpose and the data set contains a
random sample of 399 field goals attempted during the 1995 NFL regular season.
Below is a description of the variables.

1. Date - Date of the field goal attempt (month, day, year)

2. Stadium - Type of stadium; O=Outside, D=Dome
3. Surface - Type of playing surface; T=Artificial Turf, G=Grass
4. Kicker - Name of field goal kicker
5. Success - Success of the field goal; Y=Yes, N=No
6. Distance - Distance in yards of the field goal
7. Population Mean (µ) - 35
8. Standard Deviation is Unknown (σ)

Using the sample data in Appendix we calculated the value of F(A) for each distance
(A) using the below Excel formula

“=NORMDIST(A,<mean>,<standard deviation>,FALSE)”

The following plot is drawn using above calculated data, also shown in Appendix

Figure 3: Normal Distribution of Field Goal Data

Hypothesis of Data
Null Hypothesis H0: µ = 35
Alternative Hypothesis H1: µ ≠ 35

Analysis
Let Distance in yards of the field goal be the variable A

No. of Field Goals in Sample, n = 399

Sample Mean
Ā =∑A/n

= 14490 / 399

= 36.3158

Sample Standard Deviation

Using Formula in Excel

“=STDEVP( <Data Range>)”

S = 10.1698

Confidence Interval
We are testing based on 5% significance level therefore the confidence interval will
be 95%

α = 0.05

1 – α = 1 – 0.05

1 – α = 0.95
Critical Values
As our alternative hypothesis is H1: µ ≠ 35 therefore our case consists of two-
tailed test. Following figure illustrates the idea

Figure 4: Critical Values

Z-Score (Tabulated)
Using the Normal Distribution Table

Ztab = + Z0.025

+ Z0.025 = + 1.96

Test Statistic
As σ is unknown and n > 30, we can use z-test with sample standard deviation s.
Using the below formula

ZCalc = (36.3158 – 35) / (10.1698/ √399)

ZCalc = 2.5844

Using the sample data in Appendix we calculated the value of Z for each distance
(A) using the below formula

“z= (x- µ)/s”

The following plot is drawn using above calculated data, also shown in Appendix
 Rejection Region

2.58
Test Statistic

Figure 5: Z- Distribution of Field goal Data

Since |ZCalc| > | Ztab | → Reject H0

Conclusion

At 5% significance level the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that

Distance in yards of the field goal of a random sample of 399 field goals attempted
during the 1995 NFL regular season is not equal to 35 yards.
Appendix – Sample Data

S Stadiu Distanc
# Date m Surface Kicker Success e F(A) Z
-
0.00774 1.67162
1 92595 D T HANSON Y 18 92 2
-
0.00774 1.67162
2 111295 O G BAHR N 18 92 2
-
0.00774 1.67162
3 111995 O G MURRAY Y 18 92 2
-
0.00920 1.57329
4 90395 O G DELGRECO Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
5 91095 O G STOYANOV Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
6 91795 D T ANDERSEN Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
7 92495 O T G_DAVIS Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
8 100895 O G N_JOHNSN Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
9 102995 O G BAHR Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
10 111995 D T REVEIZ Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
11 112695 O G HUSTED Y 19 59 13
-
0.00920 1.57329
12 121795 D T PETERSON Y 19 59 13
-
0.01083 1.47496
13 91095 O T COFER Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
14 91095 O G STOVER Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
15 91195 O G BUTLER Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
16 91795 D T BONIOL N 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
17 91795 O G ELAM Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
18 100195 D T PETERSON Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
19 101595 O G JACKE Y 20 13 06
20 101595 O G BAHR Y 20 0.01083 -
13 1.47496
 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
21 101595 O T DALUISO Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
22 102995 D T JACKE Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
23 102995 O T ANDERSON Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
24 111995 D T REVEIZ Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
25 121795 O T CHRISTIE Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
26 122495 O T REVEIZ Y 20 13 06
-
0.01083 1.47496
27 122495 O G ELLIOTT Y 20 13 06
-
0.01262 1.37662
28 90395 O T ANDERSON Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
29 90395 O G BAHR Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
30 91095 O G G_DAVIS Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
31 91095 O G MURRAY Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
32 91795 D T ANDERSEN Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
33 91795 D T HANSON Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
34 100195 O T STOYANOV Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
35 100895 O G KASAY Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
36 101595 O T DALUISO Y 21 1 99
-
0.01262 1.37662
37 121095 O T BONIOL Y 21 1 99
-
0.01456 1.27829
38 90395 O G MURRAY Y 22 49 92
-
0.01456 1.27829
39 91095 O G STOYANOV Y 22 49 92
-
0.01456 1.27829
40 91795 O G BUTLER Y 22 49 92
-
0.01456 1.27829
41 100895 O G N_JOHNSN Y 22 49 92
-
0.01456 1.27829
42 100895 D T STOVER Y 22 49 92
 -
0.01456 1.27829
43 102995 O G STOYANOV Y 22 49 92
-
0.01456 1.27829
44 111995 O G HOLLIS Y 22 49 92
-
0.01664 1.17996
45 91095 O G ELLIOTT Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
46 91095 O G DALUISO Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
47 91095 O G STOVER Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
48 92495 O G ELAM Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
49 100195 D T ELAM N 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
50 100195 O G BONIOL Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
51 100895 O T G_DAVIS Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
52 101595 O G REVEIZ Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
53 101595 O G KASAY Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
54 101995 O T PELFREY Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
55 102395 O G CHRISTIE Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
56 110595 D T CHRISTIE Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
57 110595 D T PETERSON Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
58 111295 D T DELGRECO Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
59 111295 O T CHRISTIE Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
60 112695 O G G_DAVIS Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
61 120395 O G CHRISTIE Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
62 121795 O G BUTLER Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
63 121795 O T BONIOL Y 23 65 85
-
0.01664 1.17996
64 122495 O T BRIEN Y 23 65 85
65 102395 O G BAHR Y 24 0.01884 -
25 1.08163
 78
-
0.01884 1.08163
66 110595 O G N_JOHNSN Y 24 25 78
-
0.01884 1.08163
67 121795 O T CHRISTIE Y 24 25 78
-
0.02112 0.98330
68 91795 D T G_DAVIS Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
69 92495 O G ELLIOTT Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
70 92495 O T MCLAUGLI Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
71 102995 O T STOVER Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
72 111295 O G PETERSON Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
73 111995 O G HANSON Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
74 121795 D T BIASUCCI Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
75 121795 O T CHRISTIE Y 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
76 122495 O T REVEIZ N 25 29 71
-
0.02112 0.98330
77 122495 O G N_JOHNSN Y 25 29 71
-
0.02345 0.88497
78 100195 O T FORD Y 26 15 63
-
0.02345 0.88497
79 101595 O T CHRISTIE Y 26 15 63
-
0.02345 0.88497
80 111295 O T WILKINS Y 26 15 63
-
0.02345 0.88497
81 121795 O G BUTLER N 26 15 63
-
0.02578 0.78664
82 90395 D T ANDERSEN Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
83 91095 D T REVEIZ Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
84 100895 O G STOYANOV N 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
85 100895 O G HUSTED Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
86 100895 O G BLANCHAR Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
87 102295 D T PETERSON Y 27 63 56
 -
0.02578 0.78664
88 102995 O G MURRAY Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
89 110595 O G BUTLER Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
90 111295 D T PELFREY Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
91 111995 O T PELFREY Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
92 112695 O G N_JOHNSN Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
93 121095 O T BUTLER Y 27 63 56
-
0.02578 0.78664
94 122395 O G HUSTED Y 27 63 56
-
0.02808 0.68831
95 100195 O G ELLIOTT Y 28 07 49
-
0.02808 0.68831
96 100195 O T CARNEY Y 28 07 49
-
0.02808 0.68831
97 100995 O G CARNEY Y 28 07 49
-
0.02808 0.68831
98 110595 O T PELFREY Y 28 07 49
-
0.02808 0.68831
99 111995 O G STOVER Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.02808 0.68831
0 112695 O G G_DAVIS Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.02808 0.68831
1 120395 O G PELFREY Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.02808 0.68831
2 120995 D T REVEIZ Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.02808 0.68831
3 121095 D T BIASUCCI Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.02808 0.68831
4 122495 O G BUTLER Y 28 07 49
-
10 0.03028 0.58998
5 91095 O G G_DAVIS Y 29 5 42
-
10 0.03028 0.58998
6 100195 O T FORD Y 29 5 42
-
10 0.03028 0.58998
7 100195 D T DELGRECO Y 29 5 42
-
10 0.03028 0.58998
8 100995 O G CARNEY Y 29 5 42
-
10 0.03028 0.58998
9 101595 D T LOHMILLE N 29 5 42
11 102995 O G KASAY Y 29 0.03028 -
0 5 0.58998
 42
-
11 0.03028 0.58998
1 110595 O T BAHR Y 29 5 42
-
11 0.03028 0.58998
2 110595 O G MURRAY Y 29 5 42
-
11 0.03028 0.58998
3 111295 O G STOYANOV N 29 5 42
-
11 0.03028 0.58998
4 111395 O T STOVER Y 29 5 42
-
11 0.03028 0.58998
5 121095 O G ELAM Y 29 5 42
-
11 0.03234 0.49165
6 100195 D T ELAM Y 30 81 35
-
11 0.03234 0.49165
7 101595 O G BONIOL Y 30 81 35
-
11 0.03234 0.49165
8 101695 O G ELAM Y 30 81 35
-
11 0.03234 0.49165
9 111995 O T LOWERY Y 30 81 35
-
12 0.03234 0.49165
0 112795 O G JAEGER Y 30 81 35
-
12 0.03234 0.49165
1 121095 O T MURRAY Y 30 81 35
-
12 0.03234 0.49165
2 121795 O T STOYANOV Y 30 81 35
-
12 0.03234 0.49165
3 122395 O T DALUISO Y 30 81 35
-
12 0.03421 0.39332
4 92495 O T G_DAVIS Y 31 92 28
-
12 0.03421 0.39332
5 100195 D T ANDERSEN Y 31 92 28
-
12 0.03421 0.39332
6 110595 O G G_DAVIS Y 31 92 28
-
12 0.03421 0.39332
7 121095 O G BAHR Y 31 92 28
-
12 0.03585 0.29499
8 90395 D T PELFREY Y 32 03 21
-
12 0.03585 0.29499
9 91095 O T KASAY N 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
0 91095 O T KASAY Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
1 91195 O G HENTRICH Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
2 91795 O G DALUISO Y 32 03 21
 -
13 0.03585 0.29499
3 100195 O G BONIOL Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
4 100195 O G DALUISO Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
5 100895 O T CHRISTIE Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
6 101695 O G ELAM Y 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
7 102995 O T MCLAUGLI N 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
8 110595 O G ZENDEJAS N 32 03 21
-
13 0.03585 0.29499
9 110595 D T ANDERSEN Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
0 111295 O G REVEIZ N 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
1 111295 O T DALUISO Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
2 111295 O T DALUISO Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
3 111995 O G ELAM Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
4 111995 O G CARNEY Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
5 120395 D T ANDERSON N 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
6 122495 D T WILKINS Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03585 0.29499
7 122495 O T BRIEN Y 32 03 21
-
14 0.03719 0.19666
8 91095 D T HANSON Y 33 76 14
-
14 0.03719 0.19666
9 92495 O T REVEIZ Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
0 100195 O T LOWERY Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
1 100295 O G CHRISTIE Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
2 100895 O T LOWERY N 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
3 101695 O G ELAM Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
4 102995 O G STOYANOV Y 33 76 14
15 110595 O G CARNEY Y 33 0.03719 -
5 76 0.19666
 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
6 111995 O G HUSTED Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
7 112695 O G N_JOHNSN Y 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
8 121095 O G LOWERY N 33 76 14
-
15 0.03719 0.19666
9 121195 O G STOYANOV Y 33 76 14
-
16 0.03719 0.19666
0 121795 D T CARNEY Y 33 76 14
-
16 0.03719 0.19666
1 122495 O T DELGRECO Y 33 76 14
-
16 0.03719 0.19666
2 122495 O G N_JOHNSN Y 33 76 14
-
16 0.03719 0.19666
3 122495 D T STOYANOV Y 33 76 14
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
4 91795 O G MCLAUGLI Y 34 43 07
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
5 91795 O T HOLLIS Y 34 43 07
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
6 100195 O G BONIOL Y 34 43 07
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
7 111295 D T DELGRECO Y 34 43 07
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
8 111295 O G ELLIOTT Y 34 43 07
-
16 0.03822 0.09833
9 111295 D T HUSTED Y 34 43 07
-
17 0.03822 0.09833
0 111295 D T DELGRECO Y 34 43 07
-
17 0.03822 0.09833
1 111395 O T N_JOHNSN Y 34 43 07
-
17 0.03822 0.09833
2 112695 O T BUTLER Y 34 43 07
-
17 0.03822 0.09833
3 120395 O T LOWERY Y 34 43 07
-
17 0.03822 0.09833
4 122495 O G PETERSON Y 34 43 07
17 0.03890
5 91795 O T CHRISTIE Y 35 13 0
17 0.03890
6 91795 O T CARNEY Y 35 13 0
17 0.03890
7 92495 O T N_JOHNSN Y 35 13 0
17 0.03890
8 100195 O T STOYANOV Y 35 13 0
17 102295 O G BUTLER Y 35 0.03890 0
 9 13
18 0.03890
0 110595 D T BRIEN Y 35 13 0
18 0.03890
1 111995 O G ELAM Y 35 13 0
18 0.03890
2 111995 O T LOWERY Y 35 13 0
18 0.03890
3 121095 O G BAHR N 35 13 0
18 0.03890
4 121795 O T G_DAVIS Y 35 13 0
18 0.03890
5 122395 D T BLANCHAR N 35 13 0
18 0.03920 0.09833
6 90395 O G HOLLIS N 36 94 07
18 0.03920 0.09833
7 90395 O G MURRAY Y 36 94 07
18 0.03920 0.09833
8 91095 O T COFER N 36 94 07
18 0.03920 0.09833
9 92495 D T ANDERSEN Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
0 100195 D T ANDERSON Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
1 100895 O T MURRAY Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
2 101595 O G HUSTED Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
3 102295 O G STOVER Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
4 111995 O G BLANCHAR Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
5 120995 O G G_DAVIS Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
6 121095 O G PETERSON Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
7 121095 D T HANSON Y 36 94 07
19 0.03920 0.09833
8 121795 D T BLANCHAR Y 36 94 07
19 0.03913 0.19666
9 110595 O T JAEGER Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
0 110695 O T ANDERSON Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
1 111295 O T BONIOL Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
2 111995 O G KASAY N 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
3 111995 D T REVEIZ Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
4 120995 O G G_DAVIS N 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
5 121095 D T BIASUCCI Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
6 121795 O G ELLIOTT N 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
7 121795 O T G_DAVIS Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
8 121795 O G STOVER Y 37 96 14
20 0.03913 0.19666
9 121795 O T G_DAVIS Y 37 96 14
21 0.03869 0.29499
0 90395 O G ELAM Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
1 91795 O G HENTRICH N 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
2 91795 D T PELFREY N 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
3 92595 D T HANSON Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
4 100895 O T CHRISTIE Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
5 101995 O T N_JOHNSN Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
6 102995 O G KASAY N 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
7 102995 D T HANSON Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
8 111295 O T CHRISTIE Y 38 4 21
21 0.03869 0.29499
9 111395 O T N_JOHNSN Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
0 112395 D T REVEIZ N 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
1 112695 D T LOWERY Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
2 121095 O G HUSTED Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
3 121095 O T ANDERSON Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
4 121795 D T HANSON Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
5 121795 D T PETERSON Y 38 4 21
22 0.03869 0.29499
6 122495 D T BIASUCCI Y 38 4 21
22 0.03788 0.39332
7 90395 O T N_JOHNSN Y 39 54 28
22 0.03788 0.39332
8 91095 O T CHRISTIE Y 39 54 28
22 0.03788 0.39332
9 91795 O T COFER N 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
0 91795 O G MCLAUGLI N 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
1 91795 D T BONIOL Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
2 102295 O G DELGRECO Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
3 102295 O G MURRAY Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
4 102295 O G HANSON Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
5 102395 O G BAHR Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
6 102995 O G KASAY N 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
7 102995 D T DELGRECO Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
8 110595 D T CHRISTIE Y 39 54 28
23 0.03788 0.39332
9 110595 O G CARNEY Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
0 111295 O T ANDERSON Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
1 111295 O G G_DAVIS Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
2 111995 O G PETERSON Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
3 112795 O G CARNEY Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
4 121095 O T PELFREY Y 39 54 28
24 0.03788 0.39332
5 121795 D T PETERSON Y 39 54 28
24 122395 O G HANSON Y 39 0.03788 0.39332
 6 54 28
24 0.03673 0.49165
7 90395 D T COFER Y 40 68 35
24 0.03673 0.49165
8 91095 D T HANSON N 40 68 35
24 0.03673 0.49165
9 92495 O T REVEIZ Y 40 68 35
25 0.03673 0.49165
0 101295 O T ZENDEJAS Y 40 68 35
25 0.03673 0.49165
1 101595 O T ANDERSON Y 40 68 35
25 0.03673 0.49165
2 102995 D T ANDERSEN Y 40 68 35
25 0.03673 0.49165
3 111295 D T DELGRECO Y 40 68 35
25 0.03673 0.49165
4 111995 D T ANDERSEN N 40 68 35
25 0.03528 0.58998
5 90395 D T KASAY Y 41 02 42
25 0.03528 0.58998
6 91795 D T DELGRECO N 41 02 42
25 0.03528 0.58998
7 91795 D T G_DAVIS Y 41 02 42
25 0.03528 0.58998
8 100895 O G N_JOHNSN Y 41 02 42
25 0.03528 0.58998
9 101595 D T BLANCHAR Y 41 02 42
26 0.03528 0.58998
0 112695 O G HOLLIS N 41 02 42
26 0.03528 0.58998
1 120395 O G JACKE Y 41 02 42
26 0.03355 0.68831
2 91095 O T PELFREY Y 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
3 91095 O G ELLIOTT Y 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
4 91095 D T N_JOHNSN Y 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
5 102295 O G HANSON Y 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
6 102995 D T LOWERY Y 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
7 111995 O T CHRISTIE N 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
8 112695 O G MURRAY N 42 53 49
26 0.03355 0.68831
9 112695 D T PETERSON Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
0 120395 D T REVEIZ Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
1 120395 O G STOYANOV Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
2 120495 D T HANSON Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
3 121095 O T ANDERSON Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
4 121095 O T DALUISO Y 42 53 49
27 0.03355 0.68831
5 122495 O G KASAY Y 42 53 49
27 0.03160 0.78664
6 91095 O G ANDERSON Y 43 77 56
27 0.03160 0.78664
7 91095 D T DELGRECO Y 43 77 56
27 0.03160 0.78664
8 91095 O G MURRAY Y 43 77 56
27 0.03160 0.78664
9 91795 O G HUSTED Y 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
0 92495 O T REVEIZ Y 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
1 100195 D T ANDERSON Y 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
2 100295 O G STOVER N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
3 102995 O G LOHMILLE N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
4 111295 D T HUSTED N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
5 111295 D T KASAY N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
6 111995 O G HANSON N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
7 120395 D T REVEIZ N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
8 120395 O G BAHR N 43 77 56
28 0.03160 0.78664
9 121095 O G KASAY Y 43 77 56
29 0.02948 0.88497
0 92495 O G MURRAY N 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
1 100895 D T DELGRECO Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
2 102295 O T STOYANOV Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
3 110595 O G BUTLER N 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
4 110595 O G DELGRECO Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
5 111295 O T ELAM Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
6 111295 O G G_DAVIS Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
7 113095 O G G_DAVIS Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
8 121095 O G BLANCHAR Y 44 66 63
29 0.02948 0.88497
9 121695 D T BRIEN N 44 66 63
30 0.02948 0.88497
0 122395 D T BLANCHAR N 44 66 63
30 0.02948 0.88497
1 122495 O T CHRISTIE Y 44 66 63
30 0.02724 0.98330
2 91095 O T BONIOL Y 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
3 91795 O G KASAY Y 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
4 100195 O G DALUISO N 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
5 100195 D T PETERSON Y 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
6 100895 O G HUSTED N 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
7 100895 O G PELFREY Y 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
8 101295 O T ZENDEJAS Y 45 32 71
30 0.02724 0.98330
9 101595 O T ANDERSON N 45 32 71
31 0.02724 0.98330
0 102995 D T DELGRECO Y 45 32 71
31 0.02724 0.98330
1 110595 O T PELFREY Y 45 32 71
31 0.02724 0.98330
2 111295 D T BLANCHAR N 45 32 71
31 111295 O G CARNEY N 45 0.02724 0.98330
 3 32 71
31 0.02492 1.08163
4 90395 D T ELLIOTT Y 46 83 78
31 0.02492 1.08163
5 100195 O T STOYANOV Y 46 83 78
31 0.02492 1.08163
6 100195 O G MURRAY Y 46 83 78
31 0.02492 1.08163
7 100195 O G BRIEN Y 46 83 78
31 0.02492 1.08163
8 101595 D T BLANCHAR Y 46 83 78
31 0.02492 1.08163
9 102295 O G DELGRECO N 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
0 110595 O G N_JOHNSN Y 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
1 110595 O T JAEGER Y 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
2 110595 D T JACKE Y 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
3 111995 O G ELAM N 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
4 111995 O G STOVER Y 46 83 78
32 0.02492 1.08163
5 113095 O G DALUISO N 46 83 78
32 0.02259 1.17996
6 92495 O G HENTRICH N 47 06 85
32 0.02259 1.17996
7 92495 O T N_JOHNSN N 47 06 85
32 0.02259 1.17996
8 100895 O T MURRAY N 47 06 85
32 0.02259 1.17996
9 101595 O G HOLLIS N 47 06 85
33 0.02259 1.17996
0 102995 O G MURRAY Y 47 06 85
33 0.02259 1.17996
1 113095 O G DALUISO N 47 06 85
33 0.02259 1.17996
2 120395 O T MURRAY Y 47 06 85
33 0.02259 1.17996
3 120395 O G BLANCHAR Y 47 06 85
33 0.02259 1.17996
4 121795 O T G_DAVIS N 47 06 85
33 0.02027 1.27829
5 91795 D T REVEIZ N 48 51 92
33 0.02027 1.27829
6 91795 O G MCLAUGLI N 48 51 92
33 0.02027 1.27829
7 100195 D T PETERSON N 48 51 92
33 0.02027 1.27829
8 102295 O T STOYANOV Y 48 51 92
33 0.02027 1.27829
9 110595 D T DALUISO N 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
0 110595 O T PELFREY Y 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
1 111295 O T ELAM Y 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
2 111395 O T N_JOHNSN N 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
3 111995 O G MURRAY Y 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
4 112695 O G HUSTED Y 48 51 92
34 0.02027 1.27829
5 120395 O G KASAY N 48 51 92
34 0.01802 1.37662
6 90395 D T ELLIOTT Y 49 18 99
34 0.01802 1.37662
7 90395 D T PETERSON Y 49 18 99
34 0.01802 1.37662
8 100195 O G HUSTED N 49 18 99
34 0.01802 1.37662
9 100895 O G STOYANOV N 49 18 99
35 0.01802 1.37662
0 102295 O T STOYANOV Y 49 18 99
35 0.01802 1.37662
1 111295 O T ANDERSEN N 49 18 99
35 0.01802 1.37662
2 111295 D T PELFREY Y 49 18 99
35 0.01802 1.37662
3 121095 D T HANSON N 49 18 99
35 0.01586 1.47496
4 92495 O T DALUISO Y 50 49 06
35 0.01586 1.47496
5 100895 O T G_DAVIS N 50 49 06
35 0.01586 1.47496
6 101595 O T CHRISTIE N 50 49 06
35 0.01586 1.47496
7 102995 D T JACKE Y 50 49 06
35 0.01586 1.47496
8 110595 D T CHRISTIE N 50 49 06
35 0.01586 1.47496
9 110595 D T JACKE Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
0 111295 O G HOLLIS Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
1 111995 O T N_JOHNSN Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
2 112695 D T LOWERY N 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
3 121795 O G HUSTED Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
4 121795 D T BLANCHAR Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
5 121795 O T STOYANOV Y 50 49 06
36 0.01586 1.47496
6 122395 D T BAHR N 50 49 06
36 0.01383 1.57329
7 90395 O G LOWERY N 51 17 13
36 0.01383 1.57329
8 90395 D T ANDERSEN Y 51 17 13
36 0.01383 1.57329
9 90395 D T LOHMILLE Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
0 91095 O G ANDERSON N 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
1 101595 D T BRIEN Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
2 101595 O G HUSTED Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
3 101595 O G REVEIZ Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
4 102295 O G JACKE N 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
5 112695 O T CHRISTIE Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
6 112795 O G CARNEY N 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
7 121095 D T BIASUCCI Y 51 17 13
37 0.01383 1.57329
8 121095 D T ANDERSEN Y 51 17 13
37 0.01194 1.67162
9 90395 O G ELAM Y 52 3 2
38 91095 O T KASAY Y 52 0.01194 1.67162
 0 3 2
38 0.01194 1.67162
1 100195 D T DELGRECO N 52 3 2
38 0.01194 1.67162
2 101595 D T LOHMILLE N 52 3 2
38 0.01194 1.67162
3 111995 O G PETERSON N 52 3 2
38 0.01194 1.67162
4 111995 O G BUTLER N 52 3 2
38 0.01021 1.76995
5 91795 D T PETERSON N 53 3 27
38 0.01021 1.76995
6 100195 D T DELGRECO Y 53 3 27
38 0.01021 1.76995
7 100895 O G HUSTED Y 53 3 27
38 0.01021 1.76995
8 101595 O G REVEIZ N 53 3 27
38 0.01021 1.76995
9 120495 D T BUTLER N 53 3 27
39 0.01021 1.76995
0 121795 D T DELGRECO Y 53 3 27
39 0.00864 1.86828
1 91095 O G STOYANOV N 54 96 34
39 0.00864 1.86828
2 122395 D T BAHR N 54 96 34
39 0.00725 1.96661
3 111295 O G BAHR Y 55 5 41
39 0.00725 1.96661
4 121095 D T ANDERSEN Y 55 5 41
39 0.00602 2.06494
5 100895 D T HANSON Y 56 67 48
39 0.00602 2.06494
6 112695 D T ELAM Y 56 67 48
39 0.00161 2.65492
7 102995 O T MCLAUGLI N 62 64 9
39 0.00125 2.75325
8 102995 O T PELFREY N 63 49 97
39 0.00055 3.04825
9 121095 O G ELAM N 66 4 19