Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mendez,
Victoria
Gomez,
Marta,
Alvarez,
ValenHn
J
Suarez-Rivas,
Rafael
Page 1 of 1
You
have
inquired
as
to
the
need
for
the
execution
of
a
covenant
in
lieu
of
unity
of
title
(the
Covenant).
Anticipating
this
issue
some
10
years
ago,
all
entities
holding
an
ownership
interest
in
the
subject
Midtown
parcel
executed
a
Construction,
Operation
and
Reciprocal
Easement
Agreement
(the
COREA)
The
COREA
was
executed
and
recorded
with
in
April,
2004.
A
copy
of
the
agreement
is
attached.
The
purpose
of
the
COREA
is
to
allow
for
multiple
tracts
to
be
treated
as
one
project
for
development
purposes.
The
COREA
serves
the
same
purpose
as
that
of
the
Covenant;
namely,
to
treat
the
property
as
one
single
project
and
a
single
parcel
of
land
for
development
and
operational
purposes.
Similar
to
the
Covenant,
the
COREA
creates
cross-easements
for
the
shared
development
and
use
of
the
land
including
allowing
cross
access,
utilities
and
encroachments.
In
reviewing
the
Citys
proposed
Covenant
form,
we
note
that
each
of
the
easements
referenced
therein
are
also
included
within
the
COREA
(see,
for
example,
section
3
of
the
COREA).
Finally,
the
COREA,
as
is
the
case
with
the
Covenant,
runs
with
the
land
and
is
binding
on
all
future
owners
(see
section
4.5
of
the
COREA).
Additionally,
our
application
for
a
Class
II
Special
Permit
has,
from
inception,
been
submitted
as
a
single
project.
All
relevant
entities
joined
in
the
application
and
executed
ownership
affidavits
and
sworn-to-
consents.
Notwithstanding
certain
objections
raised
by
individuals
opposing
the
Class
II
Permit,
the
City
treated
the
application
as
one
project,
considered
both
buildings
under
the
one
application
and
approved
the
application
under
a
single
Class
II
Permit.
Indeed,
notwithstanding
the
issues
raised
by
the
objectors,
this
issue
was
considered
and
rejected
by
the
City
Commission
and
Appellate
Courts
on
subsequent
review.
You
may
recall
that
we
held
a
meeting
with
the
City
approximately
two
months
ago
where
various
city
departments
were
present.
At
that
meeting,
we
provided
plans
which
reflected
the
foot
print
for
the
foundation
and
sought
to
address
any
concerns
the
City
might
have
regarding
the
fact
that
a
portion
of
the
foundation
would
extend
onto
the
adjoining
tract
and
whether
the
COREA
sufficiently
addressed
any
issues
regarding
unity
of
title.
The
group
consensus
was
that
the
COREA
was
sufficient.
While
we
do
not
believe
that
a
Covenant
is
required
at
this
time
to
secure
the
foundation
permit,
if
after
issuance
of
the
foundation
permit
and
before
we
commence
vertical
construction,
the
City
determines
it
wants
a
Covenant,
we
will
be
happy
to
provide
same.
Mendez,
Victoria
Richard.Perez@hklaw.com
Iglesias,
Peter,
Min,
Barnaby
As
long
as
the
enNNes
you
have
listed
below
are
the
proper
enNNes
that
would
be
parNes
to
signing
the
unity
or
covenant
in
lieu,
your
statements
are
accurate.
Thank
you.
Dear
Victoria:
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
review
the
correspondence
between
the
City
of
Miami
and
Wal-
Mart
with
respect
to
the
issuance
of
the
foundaNon
permit
for
the
construcNon
of
the
Wal-Mart
to
be
located
at
the
intersecNon
of
North
Miami
Avenue
and
N.E.
31st
Street
(the
Project).
I
write
to
obtain
conrmaNon
from
you
that
(i)
the
City
has
only
issued
to
Wal-Mart
a
Phased
Permit
FoundaNon
Only,
for
the
Project,
(ii)
the
Phased
Permit
for
the
Project
is
currently
in
a
locked
status,
and
(iii)
the
City
will
not
issue
any
addiNonal
permits
required
for
the
verNcal
construcNon
of
the
Project
unNl
such
Nme
as
a
unity
of
Ntle
or
a
covenant
in
lieu
of
unity
of
Ntle
is
executed
as
between
Wal-Mart,
the
Midtown
Community
Development
District,
and
Midtown
OpportuniNes
IXB,
LLC,
which
is
the
owner
of
the
liner
property
along
the
Projects
boundary
with
Midtown
Boulevard.
If
the
foregoing
accurately
reects
the
understanding
that
the
City
of
Miami
reached
with
Wal-
Mart,
we
respeckully
request
that
you
verify
the
same
to
us.
Best
regards,
Richard
Perez
|
Holland & Knight
Partner
Holland
&
Knight
LLP
701
Brickell
Avenue,
Suite
3300
|
Miami,
FL
33131
Phone
305.789.7630
|
Fax
305.789.7799
richard.perez@hklaw.com
|
www.hklaw.com
________________________________________________
Add
to
address
book
|
View
professional
biography
Page 1 of 2
NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP (H&K), and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail
from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe
anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to
H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained
expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege
that may be available to protect confidentiality.
Page 2 of 2
Mendez,
Victoria
Rick
Perez
Please
see
aQached
memorandum
re
COREA
.
A
copy
of
the
recorded
COREA
is
aQached.
Should
you
have
any
quesGons
please
feel
free
to
call
me
at
oce
or
on
my
cell
(
954-914-8809)
Mark A. Emanuele Partner
T 305 416 3180 F 305 416 3190 W www.lydeckerdiaz.com
Lydecker Diaz 1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor Miami, FL 33131
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Lydecker | Diaz for the use
of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or
otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named
addressee. It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this
electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it,
and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by calling Lydecker | Diaz at (305) 416-3180, so that
our address record can be corrected.
Page 2 of 2