Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Samantha Peters
(Photo credit: Sergei Yahchybekov)
We are Black and Indigenous women who are currently in law school at a Canadian university. Our
school says that it is already committed to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to
Action. One call to action encourages all law schools to require students to take a course in
Aboriginal People and the Law, where discussions and content will include the history and legacy of
residential schools, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples...and the list
goes on.
Buzzwords are used, much like how "reconciliation" is the new cool thing to do. Much like social
justice or anti-racism.
Still, in both of our experiences, while the school says one thing - like that they are committed to
indigenizing the curriculum - we see and experience another thing. We know we are not alone and
after reading the Criminal Lawyers' Association report, we see that the situation does not get any
better in the practice of law.
In fact, when we first read the report, we knew and more importantly, we know that women
experience systemic discrimination, like sexism. Yet, the report itself and the discussion surrounding
the report remained silent on systemic issues like racism: anti-Indigenous racism and anti-Black
racism.
Yes, women are treated in the courtroom differently than men, but what about the differences
among women? Specifically, how are Indigenous and Black women treated in the courtroom by
judges and court staff? And what issues do Indigenous women, Black women and other women of
colour in the criminal profession highlight as important issues we experience? The essentialism of
women is highly problematic and dangerous. The homogenization of women is even scarier. This
report and the discussions surrounding it should have included the diversity of experiences among
women in the analysis. When we talk about women, we must be specific on what kind of women we
are talking about.
This erasure or more appropriately, our erasure of our experiences from statistics, data, and
discussions as a whole is a sentiment that we often feel while sitting in our classrooms at law school.
We often sit in classes like criminal law and public law, experiencing the erasure of our experiences.
Our bodies are erased in the way class subjects are taught by who we read, who is allowed to speak,
and whose ideas and opinions are centered.
single strategy will likely remove the barriers that are keeping some women from staying." Women
cited concerns about "being forgotten by clients or colleagues while they were gone" while away on
maternity leave. The condescension runs deep.
Nevertheless, we write these words with hope of calling on these women to always remember their
Black and Indigenous colleagues...often not seen as lawyers or courtroom players but seen as the
help.
In the end, although this constant erasure is frustrating, we believe that our strength and resistance
will help us prevail. Our bodies carry the stories of our ancestors, surviving genocide, colonialism,
and slavery. We also see hope and light in the experiences of the Black and Indigenous women that
came before us. For example, we see Black women and Indigenous women, doing law differently. We
see them creating their own law firms, like this law firm created through one tweet, KMR Law
Group, after one of the Black women who formed this firm was referred to as a slave by a partner.
This story, and eventually our own, is a story of re-claiming, resisting and a refusal to remain silent
about our truths and our realities--realities and truths that Rider Law roanoke va are just as
important as the white cis-women complaining about maternity leave as if it is the only thing
feminism has left to tackle.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-sayers/remembering-black-and-indigenous-women_b_9517250
.html