Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This case details the history and social responsibility issues of Wal-Mart. It discusses
Sam Walton and his responses to criticisms as well as his determination to be a successful.
The central issue is this case is why is there such conflicting data? Some people see Wal-
Mart as an example of “social responsibility” and one of the most admired corporations in
America, while others see it as an unattractive homogenizing factor and a “Merchant of
Doom” that should not be allowed to set up shop in small towns.
The “stakeholders” in this case are: Consumers – everyone that shop at Wal-Mart and
enjoys their “low prices”. Specifically in this case it is the consumers that have selected
Wal-Mart over the local businesses they have shopped at for years and the 100 million
consumers that shop at Wal-Mart each week. Owners- Everyone that owns shares of Wal-
Mart and have a vested interest in profits. Sam Walton as founder was discussed in this
case in addition to employee shareholders. Community – the areas surrounding Wal-Mart
stores and the local environment. This case lists several; Iowa City, Pawhuska, Kinder and
Boulder Colorado. Some were very unhappy to have a Wal-Mart coming to town. Wal-Mart
instituted a program in “Environmental Awareness” and offered to “build green”.
Government – International, US, and local municipalities all interact with Wal-Mart. With
over $191 Billion in sales, and being the “world’s largest retailer”, Wal-Mart can and does
impact governmental planning. This case discusses Wal-Mart’s “buy America” plan and
international expansion. Employees – Everyone that works for Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart
employees over 1 million “associates” worldwide. They teach employees the “Wal-Mart”
way, offer them participation in stock programs, and encourage customer service.
In my opinion, I think Wal-Mart is doing great things, but they should be doing more.
They should seek to minimize the damage they do to the local business areas and be better
promoters (use the media) to let others know the good things they are doing (Buy America,
Environmental Awareness) as well as showcasing the positive employee opportunities. By
neglecting to be more proactive in these areas Wal-Mart is jeopardizing the success they
have built over Sam Walton’s lifetime.
I receive two or three emails per week from non-U.S. teachers asking about employment at
American private schools. My response is always the same: take care of the employment visa
and then, and only then, you can begin your job search.
Immigration Visas
Without permission to work in the United States, very few schools will go to the tremendous
trouble of petitioning the Immigration and Naturalization Service to obtain working papers for
you. The reason for this is simply that teachers generally fall into a category of workers seeking
employment-based visas, called "Employment Third Preference (E3)." This includes "Skilled
Workers, Professionals Holding Baccalaureate Degrees and Other Workers." This category is
below the First Preference (E1) generally reserved for "Persons of extraordinary ability in the
sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics." Put another way, the chances of a school going
through all that effort and expense for a teacher who may or may not stay with the school for a
long period of time are usually pretty slim. It is simply not a good investment.
Now one promising intiative is the NAIS's China Connection Program. NAIS recruits Chinese
nationals to teach Mandarin in member schools. This offers economies of scale and sets clear
expectations in the hiring process.
Another avenue to explore is the Amity Institute's Exchange Teacher Program. The program has
certain minimum requirements which must be met before you can be considered. The
appointments are temporary, typically lasting 1-3 years.
Twenty or thirty years ago it was fairly common to find faculty at private schools who were not
certified and licensed. Indeed many had never even taken an education course. Times have
changed. Increasingly state education departments require teachers in all schools to meet state
standards for teacher certification. Parents too are demanding maximum value for their tuition
dollar and expect their children's teachers not only to be knowledgeable in their subject, but also
skilled in education techniques. In other words, it is no longer simply enough to know your
subject; you must be able to teach it effectively. Furthermore, many aspects of K-12 education
have become incredibly specialized. Special education, the International Baccalaureate and the
Advanced Placement programs all demand highly qualified, highly trained professionals capable
of doing the job to the highest standards.
Each state has its own requirements for teacher licensing. In addition there is a national
certification which is gradually gaining acceptance. From the private school perspective it is
important to be able to maintain and improve standards. A school's reputation generally rises or
falls according to its students' academic success. For junior schools that success is most often
defined by the upper schools at which its graduates are accepted. Private high schools are in turn
judged by where their graduates go after grade 12.
A highly trained, certified and licensed teaching staff is a critical component in achieving the
kind of success which will keep an institution moving forward. Remember: if the customers do
not like the product, they will look elsewhere. Without guaranteed funding in the form of tax
dollars, a private school needs tuition income to survive. Its product must be the best value it can
possibly be. Satisfied parents and graduates do indeed ensure the future of a school.
By Bill Page
LATELY, we are hearing a lot of chatter about making changes to our public schools. Creating
charter schools and changing the way we hire teachers seem to dominate the news, and they are
effectively blinding us from our more pressing problems.
but change merely for the sake of change is rarely constructive. And in this case, it is a
distraction.
Focus should be on the one issue no one seems to want to discuss - the shortage of certified
teachers and qualified school service personnel.
Research tells us that the most important factor in a child's education is the presence of a highly
qualified and certified teacher. Unfortunately, odds are pretty good that a student who took
chemistry, math, foreign language or even language arts in a West Virginia public high school
last year did not have a teacher who was specifically trained to teach the class.
In other words, the teacher was not certified to teach the subject matter.
In fact, according to a recent report, 56 percent of chemistry positions in our schools went
unfilled just two years ago, meaning teachers with at best some science background filled in.
Over the last two school years, 10 percent of all classroom positions posted were not filled by
educators certified in the specific area. That's up from 7 percent three years ago, and the problem
is only getting worse.
Equally sobering is that the shortages are not restricted to one area of the state.
Contrary to the conclusions reached by members of the Governor's Twenty-First Century Job