Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S0308-8146(15)01192-9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.009
FOCH 17954
To appear in:
Food Chemistry
Received Date:
Revised Date:
Accepted Date:
26 January 2015
3 August 2015
3 August 2015
Please cite this article as: Torchio, F., Urcan, D.E., Lin, L., Gerbi, V., Giacosa, S., Segade, S.R., Pop, N., Lambri,
M., Rolle, L., Influence of different withering conditions on phenolic composition of Avan, Chatus and Nebbiolo
grapes for the production of Reinforced wines, Food Chemistry (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.
2015.08.009
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
1
3
4
Fabrizio Torchioa, Delia Elena Urcanbc, Lin Linb, Vincenzo Gerbib, Simone Giacosab,
6
7
Istituto di Enologia e Ingegneria Agro-Alimentare, Universit Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via
9
10
11
12
13
14
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, street Calea Mntur 3-5,
15
16
*Corresponding author: luca.rolle@unito.it, Tel.: +39 011 6708558; Fax: +39 011 6708549
17
18
19
20
Running title: Grape withering conditions for the production of Reinforced wines
2
21
Abstract
22
23
wines produced with partially dehydrated grapes was evaluated. The study was performed on
24
winegrape varieties with anthocyanin profiles differently constituted of di- and tri-substituted
25
forms. Dehydration induced limited changes in the anthocyanin profile of berry skins.
26
Nevertheless, the greatest abundance of total anthocyanins and their more stable forms
27
(malvidin-3-glucoside and acylated glucosides) corresponded to the wines made from slow
28
withered Chatus grapes, which were in turn the darkest. In contrast, the wines made from
29
withered Avan grapes did not meet good chromatic characteristics due to low contents of
30
total anthocyanins and high ratios between di- and tri-substituted forms. Nebbiolo wines
31
showed intermediate values of this ratio, and therefore of clarity and color intensity. The fast
32
33
slow withered Nebbiolo grapes may have a negative influence on wine astringency.
34
35
36
37
3
38
1. Introduction
39
40
importance in the diversification of wine products. In almost all viticultural areas in the world,
41
there are traditional wines locally produced using over-ripe and more or less withered grapes.
42
Among these enological products, some famous sweet and fortified wines are included, such
43
as ice wines, Passito wines, Sauternes, Tokaj, Porto, Pedro Ximnez, as well as many others
44
45
In Italy, in particular in the mountain area of Valtellina (Lombardy region), there are
46
special dry wines called Sfursat, which are produced from partially dehydrated Nebbiolo
47
grapes. These wines are classified as reinforced wines and defined as dry wines (generally,
48
but not exclusively, red) characterized by a higher alcohol and secondary metabolites content,
49
and produced with partially dehydrated berries (weight loss less than 25% of initial fresh
50
weight) (Mencarelli & Tonutti, 2013). After harvest, the bunches are dehydrated indoors in
51
naturally ventilated rooms called fruttai until they reach the desired sugar content (Nicoletti
52
et al., 2013). In the production of reinforced wines, when not regulated by specific rules
53
imposed by a product specification (as in the case of Sfursat), the natural and uncontrolled
54
55
56
In any case, during postharvest grape dehydration, important metabolic changes occur
57
due to water loss, leading to an active metabolism that affects the phenol composition and
58
extractability, volatile profile, and mechanical properties (Rolle et al., 2012b; Rolle, Giacosa,
59
Ro Segade, Ferrarini, Torchio, & Gerbi, 2013b; Toffali et al., 2011; Zoccatelli et al., 2013).
60
Different postharvest dehydration rates and conditions affect the quality characteristics of
61
grapes and related wines (Bellincontro, De Santis, Botondi, Villa, & Mencarelli, 2004;
62
Frangipane, Torresi, De Santis, & Massantini, 2012; Moreno, Cerpa-Caldern, Cohen, Fang,
4
63
Qian, & Kennedy, 2008; Rolle et al., 2013b), and also the grape cultivar could have a
64
65
On the basis of the above, the aim of this work was to study the influence of two
66
different withering conditions on the phenolic composition of three red grape varieties with
67
different phenolic profile (Nebbiolo, Chatus, and Avan), and to evaluate the possible
68
differences in the chemical composition and chromatic characteristics of the reinforced wines
69
70
Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo are authochtonous varieties growing in northwest Italy
71
Alps. They were used for the production of dry wines with fresh or partially dehydrated
72
grapes. In particular, these varieties were selected because of their different ratios between di-
73
and tri-substituted anthocyanins in order to investigate the impact of the anthocyanin profile
74
on the chromatic properties of this specific wine (Rolle & Guidoni, 2007). The present study
75
will determine whether the predominance of certain anthocyanin forms in fresh grapes is a
76
77
oxidation, during the withering process and subsequent winemaking, or whether the
78
postharvest dehydration conditions also play an important role in the stability of these
79
phenolic compounds.
80
81
82
83
84
In this study, whole bunches of red grape Vitis vinifera L. cv. Avan, Chatus, and
85
Nebbiolo were harvested from various vines in commercial vineyards located in the same
86
mountainous growing zone (Piedmont, Turin province, north-west Italy) in 2012. The clusters
87
were visually inspected, and those berries with damaged skins were discarded. For each
88
variety, one set of 150 berries with attached short pedicels was randomly selected from
5
89
different positions in the cluster for fresh grape analysis. Afterwards, the clusters were
90
randomly distributed in two batches, and each batch was subjected to different withering
91
92
chamber. The first batch was subjected to 18 C and 40% RH (slow withering, SW, 32 days).
93
The second batch was treated at 28 C and 40% RH (fast withering, FW, 24 days). The air
94
speed used was 0.9 m/s. For all trials, the final weight loss was <25%. For each variety and
95
withering process, one set of 150 berries with attached short pedicels was randomly selected
96
97
For each set of fresh and withered grapes, three subsamples of 10 berries were
98
accurately weighed and used for the determination of phenolic compounds (Rolle et al.,
99
2013b). The remaining berries, subdivided in three replicates, were used to determine the
100
standard physicochemical parameters in the grape must obtained by manual crushing and
101
centrifugation.
102
103
2.2. Winemaking
104
The wines were made in the experimental cellar of the University of Turin. For each
105
variety and withering process, partially dehydrated grape berries from about 200 kg of fresh
106
grapes, subdivided in two replicates, were destemmed and crushed. Total sulphur dioxide
107
(20 mg/L) was added to the grape must, which was then inoculated with Saccharomyces
108
cerevisiae (Lalvin EC-1118, Lallemand, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) commercial yeast (20
109
g/hL). The fermentation was conducted in 100 L stainless steel tanks, and the temperature was
110
kept at 28 C. Punching-down was done twice a day during the first four days of fermentation,
111
one punch-down and one pump-over were conducted during the fifth and sixth day, and two
112
pump overs were performed in the last day of maceration. After seven days of maceration-
113
fermentation, the grape pomace was pressed by a small pneumatic press (PMA 4, Velo SpA,
114
Italy) with a maximum pressure of 1.20 bar, and free-run juice and press juice were mixed.
6
115
Subsequently, the malolactic fermentation was induced by inoculation with Oenococcus oeni
116
lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacter SP1, Laffort, Bordeaux, France). After one month, the free
117
sulphur dioxide content was then adjusted to 40 mg/L. Finally, the wines obtained were stored
118
at 0 C for 2 weeks (cold stabilization), filtered (Seitz K300 grade filter sheet, Pall
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
were purchased from Sigma (Milan, Italy). The solutions were prepared in deionized water
126
produced by a Purelab Classic system (Elga Labwater, Marlow, United Kingdom). Among
127
phenolic standards, gallic acid (as GA), (+)-catechin (as C), (-)-epicatechin (as EC) and (-)-
128
epicatechin gallate (as ECG) were obtained from Sigma, and caffeic acid, cyanidin chloride,
129
130
131
132
(Steinheim, Germany).
133
134
135
In the must obtained and/or in the resulting wine, pH was determined by potentiometry
136
using an InoLab 730 pHmeter (WTW, Weilheim, Germany). Titratable acidity (g/L tartaric
137
acid, as TA), acetic acid (g/L), and ethanol (% v/v) were determined according to OIV
138
139
(citric acid, tartaric acid, and malic acid), glycerol, and reducing sugars (glucose and fructose)
140
(g/L) were quantified using a HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) system
7
141
equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and a refractive index detector (Giordano, Rolle,
142
143
144
145
The berry skins and seeds were manually removed from the pulp using a laboratory
146
spatula. The berry skins were quickly immersed into 25 mL of a hydroalcoholic buffer
147
solution of pH 3.2 containing 5 g/L tartaric acid, 2 g/L sodium metabisulphite, and 12% v/v
148
ethanol (Ro Segade et al., 2013). The skins were then homogenized at 8000 rpm for 1 min
149
150
and centrifuged in a PK 131 centrifuge (ALC International, MI, Italy) for 15 min at 3000g at
151
20 C. The supernatant was used for skin analysis. The berry pulp was introduced into a tube
152
containing 100 mg sodium metabisulphite, and subsequently diluted (9:1, w/w) with 5 mol/L
153
sulphuric acid (Ro Segade et al., 2013). Afterwards, the pulp was homogenized at 9500 rpm
154
155
centrifuged for 15 min at 3000g at 20 C. The resulting solution was used for pulp analysis.
156
The berry seeds, after immersion into 10 mL of the same buffer solution used for skins, were
157
maintained at 25 C for one week (Ro Segade et al., 2013). The solution was used for seed
158
analysis.
159
160
grape or L wine) and total flavonoids (mg (+)-catechin/kg grape or L wine, as TF) in the skin,
161
pulp, seeds, and wine, proanthocyanidins (mg cyanidin chloride/kg grape or L wine, as PRO)
162
and flavanols reactive to vanillin (mg (+)-catechin/kg grape or L wine, as FRV) in the skin,
163
seeds, and wine, total anthocyanins (mg malvidin-3-glucoside chloride/kg grape or L wine, as
164
TAI) in the skin and wine, and total hydroxycinnamic acids (mg caffeic acid/kg grape, as
165
HCTA) in the pulp (Ro Segade et al., 2013; Rolle, Torchio, Giacosa, Ro Segade, Cagnasso,
166
& Gerbi, 2012a). The wine color was assessed by the Glories chromatic parameters, such as
8
167
color intensity and tonality, and by the CIELab space, using a 2 mm path length cuvette,
168
following OIV (2008) methods. The parameters that define the CIELab space are clarity (as
169
L*), red/green color coordinate (as a*), and yellow/blue color coordinate (as b*), from which
170
the parameters correlated with the color perception are obtained, such as chroma (as C*,
171
referred also as C*ab) and hue angle (as H*). A UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimazdu
172
173
The determination of the anthocyanin profile was performed after the berry skin
174
extracts or the wines have been diluted with 0.05 M H2SO4 to less than 4 % ethanol content,
175
176
cartridge (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with methanol as the eluent (Rolle et al.,
177
2012a). The HPLC-DAD system and chromatographic conditions were previously reported in
178
the literature (Rolle et al., 2012a). A LiChroCART analytical column (250 mm 4 mm i.d.)
179
purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), which was packed with LiChrospher 100 RP-
180
18 (5 m) particles supplied by Alltech (Deerfield, IL, USA), was used. The mobile phases
181
182
183
184
185
186
Individual flavanols were determined by liquid chromatography before and after acid-
187
188
Phloroglucinolysis of the seed extracts was carried out according to the method proposed by
189
Kennedy and Jones (2001) and slightly modified by Torchio, Ro Segade, Giacosa, Gerbi, and
190
Rolle (2013). The extract was dealcoholized by evaporation to dryness under reduced
191
192
of 50 g/L phloroglucinol and 10 g/L ascorbic acid in methanol containing 0.1 mol/L
9
193
hydrochloric acid, and they were allowed to react for 20 min at 50 C. The determination of
194
gallic acid and individual flavanols was performed by the HPLC-DAD system, and
195
chromatographic conditions were previously reported in the literature (Kennedy & Jones,
196
197
column (250 mm 4 mm i.d.) purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), which was
198
packed with LiChrospher 100 RP-18 (5 m) particles supplied by Alltech (Deerfield, IL,
199
USA). The mobile phases consisted of A = 1% aqueous acetic acid; B = methanol, working at
200
a flow-rate of 0.8 mL/min. After the identification, the contents of individual gallic acid,
201
202
(procyanidin B1, procyanidin B2) were quantified in mg/kg grape. The mean degree of
203
polymerization (as mDP) was calculated as the molar ratio of the sum of all flavanol units
204
205
monomeric flavanols. The percentage of galloylation (as G) was calculated as the ratio of the
206
sum of galloylated flavanols to the sum of all flavanols. All analyses were performed in
207
duplicate.
208
209
210
Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics software package version
211
19.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The Tukey-b test at p < 0.05 was used to
212
213
214
215
216
217
Table 1 shows the parameters that define the technological ripeness of fresh and
218
withered Avan, Chatus and Nebbiolo winegrapes. Regarding fresh grapes, significant
10
219
differences were observed in all the parameters studied between Chatus and the other two
220
varieties, except for malic acid. The lower values of the parameters related to the
221
accumulation of sugars in the grape must (reducing sugars content, G/F ratio), and the higher
222
values of those associated with the acidity (titratable acidity, organic acids content) showed
223
that Chatus berries were less ripe than Avan and Nebbiolo.
224
Dehydrated grapes showed, with respect to each variety fresh ones, higher pH values
225
and citric acid (although not significantly different for Chatus, and for the latter also for
226
Nebbiolo), while lower titratable acidity and malic acid contents (except for Chatus faster
227
condition) were achieved. After postharvest dehydration, the technological parameters did not
228
differ significantly among berries of the same variety dehydrated under different
229
thermohygrometric conditions (slow and fast withering processes) for Avan and Nebbiolo
230
varieties, with some exceptions. In the case of the Chatus variety, a significantly higher
231
concentration of the must components occurred when the grape dehydration process was
232
233
On average, at the end of the withering process, the percentages of weight loss were
234
19.20.4, 24.50.5 and 142 % for Avan, Chatus and Nebbiolo, respectively. These
235
differences in the dehydration rate among varieties by applying the same withering conditions
236
can be imputable to different berry skin hardness (Giacosa, Torchio, Ro Segade, Caudana,
237
Gerbi, & Rolle, 2012). In particular, the varieties characterized by a high skin break force
238
239
240
241
The phenolic composition of berry skin, pulp and seeds for fresh Avan, Chatus and
242
243
higher values of the spectrophotometric indices A280, TF, PRO, and TAI in the skin, whereas
244
Avan had the lowest values of TF and FRV. The Nebbiolo variety showed intermediate
11
245
values of the spectrophotometric indices of the skin, which were not significantly different to
246
those of A280, PRO, and TAI for Avan, and those of FRV for Chatus. Significant differences
247
were found in the anthocyanin profile of the three varieties studied. Malvidin-3-glucoside was
248
the predominant anthocyanin compound in the Chatus variety with an anthocyanin profile
249
250
251
252
Chatus skins. Instead, for Avan and Nebbiolo varieties, peonidin-3-glucoside was
253
254
glucoside and peonidin-3-glucoside) anthocyanins (71.9 and 51.7%, respectively, for Avan
255
and Nebbiolo). The second more abundant anthocyanin compound was delphinidin-3-
256
257
The ratios between di- and tri-substituted anthocyanins were 2.940.23, 0.140.01, and
258
1.570.28 for Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo, respectively. A significant prevalence of acylated
259
forms of anthocyanins was observed in Chatus skins, followed by Nebbiolo, when compared
260
with Avan. The results obtained agreed with those previously reported in the literature for
261
TAI, TF, PRO, and FRV of Nebbiolo skins (Rolle et al., 2012a), and for the anthocyanin
262
profile of Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo skins (Ferrandino, Carra, Rolle, Schneider, &
263
Schubert, 2012; Rolle & Guidoni, 2007; Zeppa, Rolle, Gerbi, & Guidoni, 2001). Regarding
264
the pulp, the Nebbiolo variety had significantly higher values of A280 and TF when compared
265
with Avan and Chatus, whereas no significant difference was observed among varieties in
266
the values of HCTA. Ferrandino et al. (2012), using a HPLC method, found lower contents of
267
HCTA in the pulp of Avan and Nebbiolo varieties (two-year average of 32.3 and
268
269
In the seeds, the Avan variety showed significantly lower values of the
270
spectrophotometric indices A280, TF, PRO, and FRV, as well as of the extractable content of
12
271
C, EC, and procyanidins B1 and B2, whereas the extractable content of ECG and the
272
percentage of galloylation (total) were significantly higher when compared with Chatus and
273
Nebbiolo seeds. The G value is related to the proportion of ECG subunits in polymeric
274
flavanols, and Avan seeds are characterized by a higher percentage of galloylated subunits in
275
both terminal and extension units (Table 2), different with respect to Chatus. Nebbiolo seeds
276
were significantly richer in TF, GA, and C, whereas procyanidin B1 was significantly more
277
abundant in Chatus seeds. The values found of A280, TF, and FRV were in the range reported
278
in the scientific literature for Nebbiolo seeds (Rolle et al., 2012a, 2013a), but they were lower
279
for Avan seeds than others published (Torchio, Giacosa, Ro Segade, Gerbi, & Rolle, 2014).
280
The values observed of PRO were higher than those previously published for Avan and
281
282
The contents obtained of the different flavanol compounds agreed with those
283
previously reported for the same varieties (Rolle et al., 2013a; Torchio et al., 2014), with the
284
exception of GA for Nebbiolo, and ECG for Avan and Nebbiolo. A possible reason is the
285
edaphoclimatic vineyard and vintage effect on the flavanolic composition of the seeds
286
(Lorrain, Chira, & Teissedre, 2011). The compounds C and EC were by far the main
287
constituents of seed monomeric flavanols. The most abundant monomeric flavanol in the
288
seeds of the Nebbiolo variety was C, in agreement with a previous work (Rolle et al., 2013a),
289
whereas similar percentages of C and EC on the total monomers were found in Avan and
290
Chatus seeds, ranging from 44.7% to 49.6%. Procyanidins B1 and B2 were equally present in
291
Nebbiolo seeds (Rolle et al., 2013a). mDP and Gt values for the three varieties studied were
292
consistent with the previously reported for the seeds of Nebbiolo and other winegrape
293
varieties. In fact, other works showed mDP values ranging from 2.0 to 16.1, and Gt values
294
ranging from 4.1% to 51.3% (Bordiga, Travaglia, Locatelli, Cosson, & Arlorio, 2011; Chira,
295
Schmauch, Saucier, Fabre, & Teissedre, 2009; Lorrain et al., 2011; Rolle et al., 2013a). No
296
significant difference was found among the three varieties studied in the value of mDP,
13
297
although other researchers found that the variety is a factor influencing the seed flavanol
298
composition including mDP values (Chira et al., 2009; Lorrain et al., 2011).
299
It was confirmed that the three varieties tested showed different characteristics
300
regarding the phenolic profile. As discussed, anthocyanin content and profile were among the
301
302
303
304
305
controlled thermohygrometric conditions (slow and fast withering processes), on the phenolic
306
composition of berry skin, pulp and seeds is shown in Table 2. The phenolic composition was
307
308
309
3.3.1 Skins
310
311
composition. The A280 index, recognizable as a fast generic index and presented as
312
normalized by the weight of the berries used for the extraction, achieved significant
313
differences before and after the dehydration process only for slow withered Avan grapes,
314
marking a decrease. Instead, in Chatus the A280 value increased with the dehydration, but the
315
differences were not significant due to the high variability in the fast withering samples.
316
Nebbiolo extracts showed non-significantly different slightly higher values after withering
317
when the values were expressed per kg grapes. The aforementioned tendencies before and
318
after the dehydration were found also for TF, FRV, and TAI indices, with non-significant
319
320
PRO values and the sum of acetyl-glucoside anthocyanins percentage seemed to be the
321
skin parameters which changed more with the dehydration. In particular, the latter parameter
322
achieved significant differences in Chatus and Nebbiolo, only before and after the fast
14
323
324
the results we can see that the significant differences were present only between the withered
325
326
In detail, regarding the differences between dehydration conditions, the values of the
327
spectrophotometric indices determined in the skin were higher in fast withered grapes for the
328
three varieties studied when compared with slow withered grapes, but the differences were
329
330
The important decrease caused by the dehydration process in the values of PRO and
331
FRV for Avan skins, agreed with the reported for these indices in Mondeuse winegrapes
332
throughout the on-vine drying process (Rolle, Torchio, Giacosa, & Gerbi, 2009), and with the
333
contents of monomeric and oligomeric flavanols in Raboso Piave berries during postharvest
334
dehydration (Bonghi, Rizzini, Gambuti, Moio, Chkaiban, & Tonutti, 2012). The FRV index is
335
sensitive to the presence of monomeric flavanols and it is partially related with the
336
337
to be generally effective in delaying the reduction in the skin flavanol concentration (Bonghi
338
339
Anthocyanin content (as TAI) in the skin decreased only during slow withering of
340
Avan grapes in relation to fresh grapes, whereas this was not significantly affected during
341
dehydration of Chatus and Nebbiolo. The fast withering process, although notably for having
342
a TAI content (as mg/kg berries) not significantly higher than the slow process, may have
343
reduced the degradation of anthocyanin compounds in Avan berries in relation to the slow
344
345
substituted anthocyanins. It is well known that di-substituted forms of anthocyanins are more
346
unstable than those that are tri-substituted. In fact, the ratio between di- and tri-substituted
347
anthocyanins was 1.6 times greater in fast withered Avan grapes than in slow withered
348
grapes. Nevertheless, the ratio observed was independent on the withering process for Chatus
15
349
and very little dependent for Nebbiolo. The ratio differences between the two withering trials,
350
351
352
Nebbiolo grapes in relation to fresh berries, although it was not significantly different among
353
berries dehydrated at 20 and 30 C. No significant variation in the value of TAI was found for
354
Mondeuse winegrapes throughout the on-vine drying process (Rolle et al., 2009), or for
355
Corvina during controlled postharvest dehydration at different rates (Rolle et al., 2013b).
356
Bonghi et al. (2012) reported that key genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis were
357
unaffected or down-regulated when Raboso Piave berries were dehydrated at different rates.
358
In contrast, Mencarelli, Bellincontro, Nicoletti, Cirilli, Muleo and Corradini (2010) showed
359
that the anthocyanin content increased significantly in Aleatico grapes after postharvest
360
361
due to the different withering conditions, as well as to variety effects on the grape
362
363
With regard to the anthocyanin profile, few significant differences were observed
364
among berries dehydrated at different rates for the three varieties studied, and dehydration
365
itself induced limited changes in the anthocyanin profile of grapes. Significant differences
366
were found in Avan skins: fast withering provided a higher relative abundance of peonidin-
367
3-glucoside and acetylated glucosides. In withered Chatus grapes, the proportion of acetylated
368
glucosides was significantly higher when the fast process was used, mainly at the expense of
369
370
371
372
the results reported from other researchers for Nebbiolo berries (Nicoletti et al., 2013), for
373
each winegrape variety studied, the differences in the percentage of total acylated
374
anthocyanins (acetyl plus cinnamoyl derivatives) among berries dehydrated by fast and slow
16
375
processes were not significant. Thermal stress has not induced the acylation of anthocyanins
376
and, therefore, it has not increased the vacuolar content of stable pigments.
377
378
The limited variations in the anthocyanin profile among fresh and withered berries
found here were consistent with those observed in the Mondeuse variety (Rolle et al., 2009).
379
380
3.3.2 Pulps
381
In the absence of reactions, the withering process should increase the content of the
382
phenolic compounds present in the pulp, mainly due to the concentration effect associated
383
with water evaporation. However, the changes induced by postharvest dehydration of grape
384
berries are a balance between concentration, hydrolysis and oxidation processes (Serratosa,
385
Lopez-Toledano, Merida, & Medina, 2008; Bonghi et al., 2012). In the present work, the
386
concentration effect prevailed in the degradation reactions for these compounds, particularly
387
for Chatus grapes, since all the reported values for dehydrated berries were higher than the
388
fresh berries content (Table 2), and with the exception of Avan slow withering sample which
389
almost matched the HCTA content with the unwithered one, and slow-withered Nebbiolo TF
390
value. However, only Chatus and Nebbiolo HCTA contents showed significant changes
391
392
Few works are available in the scientific literature on the evolution of pulp phenolic
393
compounds during off-vine dehydration of grapes. Frangipane et al. (2012) showed a slight
394
decrease in the content of hydroxycinnamic acids in the juice during the dehydration process
395
396
When the phenolic composition of the pulp in slow and fast withered berries was
397
compared for each variety, the value of TF was found significantly higher in slow withered
398
Avan grapes, whereas the fast process gave withered Nebbiolo grapes a significantly higher
399
value of A280. No significant difference was found between slow and fast withered grapes in
17
400
the content of HCTA in the pulp, as well as in the values of A280 and TF for the Chatus
401
variety.
402
403
degradation closely related to enzymatic and nonenzymatic changes in the cell wall pectin
404
(Chong, Law, Cloke, Abdullah, & Daud, 2008). This degradation depends on the dehydration
405
rate of grape berries and is variety dependent (Rolle et al., 2013b). In addition, the skin cell
406
wall degradation during the postharvest dehydration process facilitates the diffusion of
407
phenolic compounds to the pulp (Mrquez, Dueas, Serratosa, & Mrida, 2012b).
408
Furthermore, another hypothesis is related to the higher water evaporation occurring when the
409
410
Varo & Merida, 2014). In the cited study Tempranillo musts presented higher antioxidant
411
412
condition, but the phenolic classes here described (total flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic
413
414
415
3.3.3 Seeds
416
417
of the seeds was small: Avan and Chatus marked some differences with the dehydration in
418
spectrophotometric parameters like A280, TF and PRO, while the extraction from Nebbiolo
419
seeds before and after dehydration did not appear to be different when analyzed by these
420
parameters. Among them, the differences between fresh and withered grapes from both
421
dehydration rates (slow and fast) were significant only for TF parameter in Chatus samples.
422
Furthermore, the dehydration process influenced ECG content, which decreased significantly
423
in Avan. Procyanidin B2 values were significantly different only in fast dehydrations for
424
Chatus (as also B1) and Nebbiolo (together with EC), marking an increase.
18
425
426
427
spectrophotometric indices A280 and TF, and non-significantly higher contents of monomeric
428
(except ECG) and dimeric flavanols in the seeds were obtained with the slow withering
429
process. By contrast, Chatus and Nebbiolo seeds showed higher indices and contents when
430
the fast withering process was applied, but significant differences only for Nebbiolo EC and
431
B2 contents. Rolle et al. (2013b) also reported higher values of TF, PRO, and FRV in the
432
433
conditions.
434
435
proanthocyanidins (PRO index) and low molecular weight flavanols (FRV index) from the
436
seeds to total content (seeds and skins) in withered Avan grapes, particularly for the slow
437
withering process, when compared with that in the fresh ones. This may have a notable
438
influence on the future sensorial properties of red wines made with maceration, particularly
439
astringency and bitterness (McRae, Schulkin, Kassara, Holt, & Smith, 2013).
440
mDP value was not significantly affected by the postharvest dehydration, nor by the
441
variety or the dehydration rate. On the other hand, the values of Gt in the seeds from
442
dehydrated grapes were higher in Avan samples with respect to the other varieties, as a
443
consequence of the higher value in the fresh grapes. However, the Gt value decreased with the
444
dehydration for all the varieties and conditions, except for the only significant variation for
445
446
galloylated flavanolic compounds (Gt) found in the seeds from slow withered Nebbiolo grapes
447
in relation to the fast withered and to the fresh grapes might directly be associated with higher
448
449
19
450
Regarding phenolic acids of the seeds, with respect of fresh samples, slow withered
451
Nebbiolo samples are the only ones that showed lower non-significantly different GA values,
452
as all the other dehydrated samples were richer in GA, with Avan seeds showing significant
453
increases. Indeed, only the Nebbiolo variety showed significant differences in the content of
454
GA among berries withered at different rates, with higher values in fast withered grapes.
455
456
457
458
the impact of the changes induced by the different dehydration rate on phenolic compounds
459
released into the wine was also studied for the three varieties (Table 3). For each variety,
460
461
observed among the wines made from grapes dehydrated under different controlled
462
thermohygrometric conditions.
463
The spectrophotometric indices A280, TF, PRO, and FRV were significantly higher in
464
the wines made from fast withered Chatus and Nebbiolo grapes when compared with those
465
from the respective slow withered samples, amplifying the effect of the dehydration rate
466
observed on the phenolic composition of the dehydrated berries (Table 2) and changing the
467
astringency and bitterness properties of the wines from fast withered grape samples (Vidal,
468
Francis, Noble, Kwiatkowski, Cheynier, & Waters, 2004). However, this effect was inverted
469
and significant only for PRO in Avan wines, but the values of these indices and TAI were
470
very low in each case. A possible justification is the different ability of skins and seeds of the
471
three winegrape varieties after dehydration to release phenolic compounds during maceration.
472
The qualitative and quantitative composition of anthocyanins in the resulting wines was not
473
directly related to that found in the respective withered grapes. This could be due to different
474
berry skin hardness values that condition the diffusion of anthocyanins from the skin into the
475
wine during maceration (Ro Segade et al., 2014), although this kind of data were not
20
476
acquired. Only for the Chatus variety, significant differences were observed in TAI among the
477
wines made from slow and fast withered grapes, showing higher values for the slow process.
478
479
480
481
482
loss of these anthocyanin compounds has been also noticed during winemaking by oxidation,
483
polymerization and insolubilization processes (Cagnasso, Rolle, Caudana, & Gerbi, 2008;
484
Cheynier, Souquet, Kontek, & Moutounet, 1994). Therefore, the prevalence of malvidin-3-
485
glucoside over peonidin-3-glucoside is possible in the resulting wines (Cagnasso et al., 2008;
486
Gonzlez-Neves, Gil, & Barreiro, 2008). When the anthocyanin profile was compared among
487
the wines obtained from grapes dehydrated by the slow and fast processes, the greatest
488
number of significant differences was found for the Chatus variety, corresponding the higher
489
490
slow withering process, as also occurred for malvidin-3-glucoside in the Nebbiolo variety.
491
The chromatic characteristics showed that the significantly darker wines (lower L*
492
values, higher color intensity) for each variety considered corresponded to those made from
493
slow withered Avan and Chatus grapes, and from fast withered Nebbiolo grapes. The fast
494
495
represented by coordinates a*, b*, and C* to the color of Chatus and Nebbiolo wines (thus
496
more red and yellow color contributions), but lower contribution for Avan wines, when
497
compared with the slow withering process. For the Nebbiolo variety, the wines made from
498
grapes dehydrated by the fast process had a significantly lower color tonality. It is important
499
to indicate that Avan wines made from dehydrated grapes did not meet good chromatic
500
21
501
possible pyranoanthocyanin formation, orange hue), and color tonality, and low values of a*
502
503
E* parameter (OIV, 2008) was calculated from the average L*, a*, and b*
504
coordinates values to show the overall colorimetric difference between slow and fast-withered
505
wines, separately for each cultivar. The calculated E* values were 5.54, 3.75, and 15.43,
506
respectively for Avan, Chatus and Nebbiolo. This confirms that Chatus wines showed the
507
less color differences between slow and fast trials, while Nebbiolo wine color was the more
508
509
Achieving a good color intensity and tonality could be interesting in Passito and
510
reinforced red wines, despite the presence of a postharvest process. In short cv. Tempranillo
511
grapes dehydration trials, higher temperatures (40 C with respect to 30 C) increased the
512
must color absorbance measurements at 420 and 520 nm wavelengths, thus lowering the color
513
tonality (or hue, as Abs420nm/Abs520nm) due to the predominance of the latter contribution
514
(Marquez et al., 2014). As previously mentioned, these authors indicated that faster
515
dehydration rates could have prevented the oxygen entry in the grapes under dehydration.
516
However, the cited study analyzed only the color of the must obtained by pressing of
517
dehydrated grapes, and not the color of wines from a maceration and complete fermentation
518
of the grapes.
519
Table 4 shows the standard parameters of the wines made from grapes dehydrated by
520
slow and fast processes for each variety. Chatus wines were characterized by the highest
521
values of TA, as well as the highest contents of malic acid (sign of the inability to complete
522
the malolactic fermentation) and ethanol, but the lowest values of pH. Furthermore, Chatus
523
wines made from slow withered grapes were more alcoholic, and less acid and glyceric than
524
those made from fast withered grapes. No significant difference was found in these described
525
parameters among wines made from differently dehydrated grapes for Avan and Nebbiolo
526
varieties, although about 9 g/L of residual sugars were present in Avan wines produced with
22
527
slow withered grapes, resulting in significant differences when compared with the fast trials.
528
Also Chatus fast trials showed more than 5 g/L of unfermented residual sugars.
529
530
531
4. Conclusions
532
533
534
quality traits during the production of premium wines. This study improved our understanding
535
of the changes occurring in phenolic compounds of the grapes during slow and fast withering
536
537
implications for the wines obtained. The three winegrape varieties used for the production of
538
reinforced wines were selected on the basis of different anthocyanin profiles for di- and tri-
539
540
541
Avan grapes were not suitable for the production of reinforced wines. The withering
542
process caused an important decrease in the content of total anthocyanins in Avan grapes,
543
and the resulting wines showed similar percentages of di- and tri-substituted anthocyanins,
544
which affected negatively the chromatic characteristics. In addition, high acetic acid contents
545
and some differences in residual sugars depending by the withering trial could affect the
546
sensory perception. Chatus grapes were very suitable for the production of reinforced wines,
547
particularly slow withered grapes. In fact, the resulting wines showed higher amounts of
548
stable red pigments, lower contents of phenolic compounds related to astringency and
549
bitterness (proanthocyanidins and low molecular weight flavanols), lower pH, and the better
550
chromatic characteristics. Nebbiolo grapes, fit for the production of reinforced wines, are
551
better suited to the fast withering process when using longer maceration times, as this have
23
552
prevented a greater presence of seed galloylated flavanols, a factor that may affect negatively
553
wine astringency.
554
555
556
References
557
Bellincontro, A., De Santis, D., Botondi, R., Villa, I., & Mencarelli, F. (2004). Different
558
559
Malvasia, Trebbiano and Sangiovese grapes for wine production. Journal of the Science
560
561
Bonghi, C., Rizzini, F. M., Gambuti, A., Moio, L., Chkaiban, L., & Tonutti, P. (2012). Phenol
562
compound metabolism and gene expression in the skin of wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.)
563
564
565
Bordiga, M., Travaglia, F., Locatelli, M., Cosson, J. D., & Arlorio, M. (2011).
566
567
568
Cagnasso, E., Rolle, L., Caudana, A., & Gerbi, V. (2008). Relationship between grape
569
phenolic maturity and red wine phenolic composition. Italian Journal of Food Science,
570
20, 365380.
571
572
Cheynier, V., Souquet, J. M., Kontek, A., & Moutounet, M. (1994). Anthocyanin degradation
in oxidising grape musts. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 66, 283288.
573
Chira, K., Schmauch, G., Saucier, C., Fabre, S., & Teissedre, P.-L. (2009). Grape variety
574
effect on proanthocyanidin composition and sensory perception of skin and seed tannin
575
extracts from Bordeaux wine grapes (Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot) for two
576
consecutive vintages (2006 and 2007). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57,
577
545553.
24
578
Chong, C. H., Law, C. L., Cloke, M., Abdullah, L. C., & Daud, W. R. W. (2008). Drying
579
kinetics, texture, color, and determination of effective diffusivities during sun drying of
580
581
Ferrandino, A., Carra, A., Rolle, L., Schneider, A., & Schubert, A. (2012). Profiling of
582
583
584
585
586
colour and sensorial parameters in grape seed during ripening. Analytica Chimica Acta,
587
660, 2228.
588
Frangipane, M. T., Torresi, S., De Santis, D., & Massantini, R. (2012). Effect of drying
589
590
591
Giacosa, S., Torchio, F., Ro Segade, S., Caudana, A., Gerbi, V., & Rolle, L. (2012). Varietal
592
relationship between skin break force and off-vine withering process for winegrapes.
593
594
595
596
597
598
Giordano, M., Rolle, L., Zeppa, G., & Gerbi, V. (2009). Chemical and volatile composition of
599
three Italian sweet white Passito wines. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne
600
601
Gonzlez-Neves, G., Gil, G., & Barreiro, L. (2008). Influence of grape variety on the
602
603
25
604
605
606
607
Lorrain, B., Chira, K., & Teissedre, P.-L. (2011). Phenolic composition of Merlot and
608
609
610
Marquez, A., Serratosa, M.P., & Merida, J. (2012a). Anthocyanin evolution and color changes
611
in red grapes during their chamber drying. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
612
61, 9908-9914.
613
Mrquez, A., Dueas, M., Serratosa, M. P., & Mrida, J. (2012b). Formation of vitisins and
614
615
616
Mrquez, A., Perez-Serratosa, M., Varo, M. A., & Merida, J. (2014). Effect of temperature on
617
618
619
McRae, J. M., Schulkin, A., Kassara, S., Holt, H. E., & Smith, P. A. (2013). Sensory
620
621
622
Mencarelli, F., & Tonutti, P. (2013). Sweet, reinforced and fortified wines: Grape
623
624
Ltd., publication.
625
Mencarelli, F., Bellincontro, A., Nicoletti, I., Cirilli, M., Muleo, R., & Corradini, D. (2010).
626
627
628
7564.
26
629
Moreno, J. J., Cerpa-Caldern, F., Cohen, S. D., Fang, Y., Qian, M., & Kennedy, J. A. (2008).
630
Effect of postharvest dehydration on the composition of Pinot noir grapes (Vitis vinifera
631
632
Nicoletti, I., Bellincontro, A., De Rossi, A., De Sanctis, F., Tiberi, D., Pietromarchi, P.,
633
634
635
636
637
OIV (2008). Recueil international des mthodes d'analyse des vins et des mots. Paris:
Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin.
638
Ro Segade, S., Giacosa, S., de Palma, L., Novello, V., Torchio, F., Gerbi, V., & Rolle, L.
639
640
and chemical composition of Italia table grape berries (Vitis vinifera L.) sorted by
641
642
Ro Segade, S., Torchio, F., Giacosa, S., Ricauda Aimonino, D., Gay, P., Lambri, M.,
643
Dordoni, R., Gerbi, V., & Rolle, L. (2014). Impact of several pre-treatments on the
644
645
profiles and skin mechanical properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
646
62, 84378451.
647
Rolle, L., & Guidoni, S. (2007). Color and anthocyanin evaluation of red winegrapes by CIE
648
L*, a*, b* parameters. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 41,
649
193201.
650
Rolle, L., Giacosa, S., Ro Segade, S., Ferrarini, R., Torchio, F., & Gerbi, V. (2013b).
651
652
653
27
654
Rolle, L., Giacosa, S., Torchio, F., Perenzoni, D., Ro Segade, S., Gerbi, V., & Mattivi, F.
655
656
657
658
Rolle, L., Giordano, M., Giacosa, S., Vincenzi, S., Ro Segade, S., Torchio, F., Perrone, B., &
659
660
661
662
Rolle, L., Torchio, F., Giacosa, S., & Gerbi, V. (2009). Modifications of mechanical
663
664
winegrapes throughout the on-vine drying process. Journal of the Science of Food and
665
666
Rolle, L., Torchio, F., Giacosa, S., Ro Segade, S., Cagnasso, E., & Gerbi, V. (2012a).
667
668
production areas and sorted by flotation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,
669
63, 195204.
670
Serratosa, M. P., Lopez-Toledano, A., Merida, J., & Medina, M. (2008). Changes in color and
671
phenolic compounds during the raisining of grape cv. Pedro Ximenez. Journal of
672
673
Toffali, K., Zamboni, A., Anesi, A., Stocchero, M., Pezzotti, M., Levi, M., & Guzzo, F.
674
(2011). Novel aspects of grape berry ripening and post-harvest withering revealed by
675
676
Torchio, F., Giacosa, S., Ro Segade, S., Gerbi, V., & Rolle, L. (2014). Berry heterogeneity as
677
a possible factor affecting the potential of seed mechanical properties to classify wine
678
grape varieties and estimate flavanol release in wine-like solution. South African
679
28
680
Torchio, F., Ro Segade, S., Giacosa, S., Gerbi, V., & Rolle, L. (2013). Effect of growing
681
zone and vintage on the prediction of extractable flavanols in winegrape seeds by a FT-
682
683
Vidal, S., Francis, L., Noble, A., Kwiatkowski, M., Cheynier, V., & Waters, E. (2004) Taste
684
685
686
Zeppa, G., Rolle, L., Gerbi, V., & Guidoni, S. (2001). Anthocyanin composition of four
687
autochthonous Vitis vinifera grapevine varieties from the Piedmont. Italian Journal of
688
689
Zoccatelli, G., Zenoni, S., Savoi, S., Dal Santo, S., Tononi, P., Zandon, V., Dal Cin, A.,
690
Guantieri, V., Pezzotti, M., & Tornielli, G. B. (2013). Skin pectin metabolism during
691
the postharvest dehydration of berries from three distinct grapevine cultivars. Australian
692
693
694
695
29
696
697
698
Table 1
Technological ripeness parameters of fresh and withered Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo grape
berries.
Avan
Para
meter
pH
TA
(g/L
tartari
c
acid)
Citric
acid
(g/L)
Tartar
ic
acid
(g/L)
Malic
acid
(g/L)
Redu
cing
sugar
s
(g/L)
G/F
ratio
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
Fresh
SW
FW
Chatus
Sig Sig
na nb
Fresh
SW
FW
Si
gn
Nebbiolo
Sig Sig
na nb
SW
FW
3.370. 3.62
03aB 0.05b
3.71
0.06b
ns
3.130.
05A
6.610. 5.32
27bA 0.42a
5.28
0.11a
ns
ns
** **
0.250. 0.62
02aA 0.00b
0.78
0.16b
ns
0.290.
00aB
0.34 0.690
0.01a
.06b
**
ns
ns
6.210. 6.39
26bA 0.05b
5.41
**
0.06a
8.350.
22bB
6.91 6.260
ns
0.20a
.25a
**
ns
ns **
3.350. 2.62
10bA 0.14a
2.76
0.09a
ns
4.760.
27bB
2.73 6.360
**
**
0.12a
.13c
*
ns
**
*
** **
0.960. 0.92
00aB 0.01b
0.890.
01bA
**
**
0.94
0.01b
ns
3.26 3.180
ns
0.03
.01
Sig Sig
na nb fre
sh
3.290. 3.510 3.68
**
**
*
03aB
.00b 0.02c
*
Fresh
0.86 0.840
0.00a
.00a
ns
ns
**
*
**
**
*
All data are expressed as average value standard deviation (n = 3). Sign: *, **, *** and ns
indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and not significant differences, respectively,
between withered samples in the same cultivar (a), fresh and withered samples in the same
cultivar (b), and between fresh grapes cultivars (c). Different lowercase letters within the same
row indicate significant differences (b) among fresh and withered grapes according to the
Tukey-b test (p < 0.05). Different uppercase letters within the same row indicate significant
differences (c) among cultivars fresh grapes values according to the Tukey-b test (p < 0.05).
TA = titratable acidity, G/F = glucose/fructose, SW = slow withering, FW = fast withering.
30
708
709
710
711
Table 2
Phenolic composition of Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo grape berries prior to dehydration and
after slow and fast withering processes.
Phenoli
c
compo
und
Avan
Fresh
SW
Chatus
FW
Skin
A280
22.74. 10.0 18.33.
(1/kg)
6bA
1.0a
9b
TF (mg 16112 8833 12753
(+)44bA
7a
7ab
catechi
n/kg)
PRO
18892 1236 80526
( mg
89cA
9a
8b
Sig Sig
na nb
Fresh
SW
Nebbiolo
FW
Sig Sig
na nb
ns
**
*
**
ns
Fresh
SW
Si
gn
FW
Sig Sig
na nb
fre
sh
ns
ns
**
*
ns
ns
**
ns
ns
**
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
**
*
ns
ns
**
*
ns
ns
**
*
ns
ns
**
*
ns
ns
**
*
ns
**
**
*
ns
**
*
**
*
**
*
**
*
**
*
**
*
ns
ns
**
*
**
*
cyanidin
chloride
/kg)
FRV
45735 1172 30292
(mg
cA
7a
b
(+)catechi
n/kg)
TAI (mg 43112 1081 27782
malvidin3bA
1a
ab
3-glucoside
chloride/kg
)
Delphi
nidin3glucosi
de (%)
Cyanid
in-3glucosi
de (%)
Petunid
in-3glucosi
de (%)
Peonidi
n-3glucosi
de (%)
Malvid
in-3glucosi
de (%)
Acetyl
glucosi
des (%)
Cinna
moyl
glucosi
des (%)
Pulp
A280
(1/kg)
TF (mg
(+)catechi
n/kg)
HCTA
(mg
4.80.5 6.91.
A
8
4.00.9
ns
ns
4.40.5 4.90.
A
5
4.10.4
ns
1.70.2 1.20. 1.70.
A
3
2
ns
ns
4.60.5 5.11.
B
7
4.00.7
10.71. 9.70.
7B
9
8.40.5
ns
3.30.3 3.70.
A
5
3.30.2
ns
ns
ns
ns
25.22.
3B
ns
3.00.4 3.40.
A
2
3.40.6
17.51. 19.4
1C
1.5
ns
ns
27.1 28.60.
3.1
8
** **
* *
5.20.0 5.20. 6.40.
aC
1a
2b
ns
35.7 36.30.
3.5
5
ns
48.5
2.3
**
41.01.
1B
ns
49.70. 50.9
6C
1.9
9912 1124
ns
1001
ns
972a
ns
16.2
1.1
1561 1611 ns
4b
1b
11.60.
7aB
13.5 13.51.
0.3b
0b
ns
**
*
ns
31
caffeic
acid/kg
)
Seeds
A280
11.41. 19.7 17.42. ns
(1/kg)
1aA
4.4b
4ab
TF (mg 86557 1486 12571 ns
(+)aA
242b
71ab
catechi
n/kg)
PRO
21339 1430 20502 *
( mg
7bA
287a
22ab
ns
ns
ns
**
ns
ns
ns
**
*
0.550. 1.96
18A
1.00
1.64
1.19
ns
ns
9.871.
14B
**
*
ns
64.41
0.5B
65.7
13.5
85.7
10.7
ns
ns
ns
**
*
ns
62.59. 53.4
5B
11.8
77.4
14.0
ns
ns
3.050. 3.67
57A
1.51
3.77
1.13
ns
ns
2.910.
70bA
0.93 1.990. ns
0.32a 77ab
**
*
ns
33.43. 49.9
0aC
9.2ab
53.0
8.4b
ns
24.01.
5B
22.0 27.22. ns
1.8
9
ns
**
*
ns
30.82. 42.0
8aB
7.1ab
47.3
6.7b
ns
24.64.
3aB
25.4 36.62. ** **
1.9a
0b
**
*
6.661.
10
6.31.4
B
30.16.
7B
9.91.7
B
7.450. ns
08
7.00.8 ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
5.90
0.49
3.50.
3
16.1
0.4
5.60.
0
ns
26.41. ns
7
9.60.9 ns
5.941.
00
2.81.3
A
15.42.
3A
4.91.2
A
ns
**
*
**
*
cyanidin
chloride
/kg)
FRV
(mg
(+)catechi
n/kg)
GA
(mg/kg
)
C
(mg/kg
)
EC
(mg/kg
)
ECG
(mg/kg
)
B1
(mg/kg
)
B2
(mg/kg
)
mDP
Gext
(%)
Gter
(%)
Gt (%)
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
7.17
0.51
7.21.
0
23.4
3.5
9.51.
2
ns
ns
5.56
0.64
3.30.
9
15.1
3.1
5.41.
0
7.85 10.31
0.96
0.87
*
*
**
All data are expressed as average value standard deviation (n = 3). Sign: *, **, *** and ns
indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and not significant differences, respectively,
between withered samples in the same cultivar (a), fresh and withered samples in the same
cultivar (b), and between fresh grapes cultivars (c). Different lowercase letters within the same
row and cultivar indicate significant differences (b) among fresh and withered grapes
according to the Tukey-b test (p < 0.05). Different uppercase letters within the same row
indicate significant differences (c) among cultivars fresh grapes values according to the
Tukey-b test (p < 0.05). A280 = absorbance at 280 nm, TF = total flavonoids, PRO =
proanthocyanidins, FRV = flavanols reactive to vanillin, TAI = total anthocyanins, HCTA =
total hydroxycinnamic acids, GA = gallic acid, C = catechin, EC = epicatechin, ECG =
epicatechin gallate, B1, B2 = procyanidins B1, B2, mDP = mean degree of polimerization, Gext
= galloylation in extension units, Gter = galloylation in terminal units, Gt = galloylation total,
SW = slow withering, FW = fast withering.
32
727
728
729
730
Table 3
Wine phenolic composition of Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo varieties after slow and fast
withering process.
Parameter
SW
A280 (1/L)
TF (mg
(+)catechin/L
)
PRO (mg
cyanidin
chloride/L
)
FRV (mg
(+)catechin/L
)
TAI (mg
malvidin3glucoside
chloride/L
)
Delphinidi
n-3glucoside
(%)
Cyanidin3glucoside
(%)
Petunidin3glucoside
(%)
Peonidin3glucoside
(%)
Malvidin3glucoside
(%)
Acetyl
glucosides
(%)
Cinnamoy
l
glucosides
(%)
L*
17.90.1
a*
b*
C*
H* (rad)
Avan
FW
SW
17.30.2
Sig
n
ns
43.40.6
5107
49410
ns
53826
44417
1795
Chatus
FW
SW
Nebbiolo
FW
47.40.3
Sig
n
*
35.81.1
43.40.4
Sig
n
*
135140
153323
**
135150
164847
**
156663
180487
220197
258093
1884
ns
50111
70122
**
90733
111228
291
241
ns
2114
1993
1203
1183
ns
2.00.1
1.90.1
ns
3.60.3
6.90.3
***
3.40.3
3.20.3
ns
6.00.3
5.50.2
0.60.0
1.10.1
***
2.10.2
2.40.1
ns
5.50.5
5.80.4
ns
5.40.3
6.60.3
***
5.10.3
5.10.4
ns
29.80.5
28.20.3
**
4.80.2
5.90.2
***
16.70.4
20.00.4
**
50.00.6
51.60.5
**
67.10.9
63.50.9
**
56.30.4
52.60.3
**
2.30.1
2.40.3
ns
10.90.3
8.70.3
***
7.00.3
8.20.7
ns
4.40.4
4.60.1
ns
7.60.4
7.30.3
ns
9.40.4
8.50.3
83.61.0
10.600.
10
27.650.
27
29.650.
27
1.200.0
85.80.8
8.800.0
7
22.900.
20
24.500.
30
1.200.0
13.40.3
44.750.
37
31.250.
31
54.550.
51
0.610.0
15.10.1
46.850.
41
33.850.
21
57.850.
61
0.630.0
**
46.90.5
48.050.
41
36.300.
28
60.200.
58
0.650.0
32.90.4
53.450.
47
39.900.
34
66.750.
71
0.640.0
***
**
***
***
ns
**
**
**
ns
***
**
**
ns
33
Color
tonality
Color
intensity
(AU, OP
10 mm)
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
1
2.010.0
3
1
2.000.0
3
0.890.0
5
0.740.0
3
ns
***
2
0.690.0
2
2
0.680.0
2
11.380.
18
9.270.2
2
ns
***
2
1.040.0
3
2
0.940.0
2
3.020.1
2
4.530.1
1
***
***
All data are expressed as average value standard deviation (n = 2). Sign: *, **, *** and ns
indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and not significant differences, respectively.
A280 = absorbance at 280 nm, TF = total flavonoids, PRO = proanthocyanidins, FRV =
flavanols reactive to vanillin, TAI = total anthocyanins, L* = clarity, a* = red/green color
coordinate, b* = yellow/blue color coordinate, C* = chroma, H* = hue angle, SW = slow
withering, FW = fast withering.
34
738
739
740
741
Table 4
Wine standard parameters of Avan, Chatus, and Nebbiolo varieties after slow
and fast withering process.
Paramet
er
pH
TA (g/L
tartaric
acid)
Citric
acid (g/L)
Tartaric
acid (g/L)
Malic
acid (g/L)
Glycerol
(g/L)
Acetic
acid (g/L)
Ethanol
(% v/v)
Sugars
(g/L)
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
Avan
Chatus
SW
FW
4.080.02
4.120.01
4.760.11
4.650.08
0.100.03
0.130.01
1.040.07
1.150.06
nd
nd
13.910.0
8
14.150.1
0
1.030.03
0.970.04
15.70.1
15.80.1
8.860.07
1.550.04
Sig
n
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
***
Nebbiolo
SW
FW
3.530.0
1
3.680.02
7.130.1
0
8.780.16
0.140.0
1
1.100.0
3
2.000.0
9
9.900.1
1
0.500.0
5
Sig
n
*
SW
FW
4.050.02
4.130.04
5.290.09
5.030.13
nd
0.150.02
0.870.09
0.880.07
0.040.03
nd
10.600.1
7
10.340.1
2
0.680.07
0.560.05
15.00.2
15.10.1
1.120.06
1.200.01
**
nd
0.870.06
2.980.07
11.200.0
9
0.310.08
16.50.0
16.00.1
1.970.0
8
5.250.08
***
**
**
***
*
*
***
Sig
n
ns
ns
**
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
All data are expressed as average value standard deviation (n = 2). Sign: *, **, *** and ns
indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 and not significant differences, respectively. TA
= titratable acidity, SW = slow withering, FW = fast withering. nd = not detected.
35
750
Highlights
751
-Withering rate effect on phenol composition of reinforced wines was variety dependent
752
-Three red winegrape varieties with different anthocyanin profiles were selected
753
-Slow withered Chatus grapes produced the most colored reinforced wines
754
-Fast withering process is recommended for longer maceration times of Nebbiolo grapes
755
-Reinforced wines made from withered Avan grapes did not meet good color traits
756
757