Professional Documents
Culture Documents
nnnnnnnnnnnnnn
nnnnnnnnnnnnn
n 887
Part 1
The Erlanger Endo-Trainer
M. Neumann 1, J. Hochberger 2, T. Felzmann 3, C. Ell 4, W. Hohenberger 1
1
Introduction
Various issues in the field of endoscopy reinforce the need
for adequate training of sufficient quality. Pressure is exerted from various sides: trainees are faced with limited time
in which to gain experience in the various diagnostic and
therapeutic techniques; endoscopists are required to stay
in touch with the latest technological developments and
treatment modalities; there are increased demands and restrictions from health reform systems which further limit
time and investment possibilities. Furthermore, the risk of
complications needs to be kept to a minimum in the light
of the increasing legal pressure placed on endoscopists.
Last but not least, the growing awareness of patients about
the various treatment options and their associated risks is
leading towards specific questioning about the ability of
the individual endoscopist to carry out a particular procedure.
In existing training programs there are usually no qualitative criteria: requirements are commonly based on quantitative parameters, such as the number of procedures, and
the methods of assessing quality are generally less structured. In a recent article on the topic of quality assurance
in gastrointestinal endoscopy, OMahony et al. refer to the
threshold number of procedures specified by the American
Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) training
committee, the Union of European Medical Specialists
and the European Board of Gastroenterology [1]. In its
statement on credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy, ASGE also addresses the issue of
objective criteria of skill [2].
All these considerations, and the statements of gastrointestinal endoscopy societies, strongly emphasize the need for
suitable lifelike training models. We present here our Erlanger Endo-Trainer, a lifelike model constructed from
Neumann M et al
Figure 4 Endoscopic view of the
vocal chords as a
synthetic part of
the model
Figure 5
Figure 3
source
Table 1
Technique
Basic techniques and handling
Injection therapy
Variceal bleeding techniques: clipping, fibrin glue,
argon plasma coagulation
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
and cutting techniques for the papilla
Guide wire placement techniques
Stent placement
Stone (foreign body) extraction
Mucosectomy, polypectomy
Coloscopy polyp removal
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG),
percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ)
Bronchoscopy
Neumann M et al
Figure 7 Endoscopic view of
stone extraction
from the bile duct
after performance
of papillotomy
four complete workstations including the model and endoscopic equipment. This laboratory can be leased for varying lengths of time and use can be made of additional services. Students assist with the collection of data, media facilities are available for filming and recording and collaboration with other departments can be established if required.
In their recent article on quality assurance in gastrointestinal endoscopy, OMahoney et al. warn against the tendency
to overemphasize technical competence [1], stating that the
endoscopic procedure must be viewed in the context of the
overall management of the patient. There exists an apparent and urgent need to establish an all-inclusive training
concept for endoscopy. We believe that the acquisition of
technical skills will remain one important aspect of such a
program, and that the Erlanger Endo-Trainer provides an
efficient tool with which to achieve this.
References
1
OMahony S, Naylor G, Axon A. Quality assurance in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 483 488
2
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines
for credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. ASGE Publication No. 1012. Revised December 1997
3
Neumann M, Mayer G, Ell C, et al. The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2000; 32 (11):
906 910
4
Freys SM, Heimbucher J, Fuchs KH. Teaching upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The pig stomach. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 73
76
5
Soehendra N, Binmoeller KF. Overview of interactive endoscopy simulators. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 549 550
6
Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator. Endoscopy 2000; 32:
898 900
7
Neumann M, Friedl S, Egger K, et al. Prospektive Evaluierung
einer Score-Card fr die Beurteilung der diagnostischen GD:
Inter-Observer-Varianz (abstract). Z Gastroenterol 2001 (in
press)
8
Neumann M, Friedl S, Egger K, et al. Prospektive Evaluierung
einer Score-Card fr die Beurteilung der diagnostischen GD:
Welche Parameter unterscheiden zwischen Untersuchern unterschiedlicher Erfahrung (abstract)? Z Gastroenterol 2001 (in press)
Corresponding Author
M. Neumann, M.D.
Chirurgische Klinik mit Poliklinik
der Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg
Krankenhausstrasse 12
91054 Erlangen
Germany
Fax:
+ 49-9131-8536328
E-mail: Martin.Neumann@chir.imed.uni-erlangen.de
Summary